Atheist Civil War: Angry Feminists Get Richard Dawkins Disinvited from Skeptics' Conference


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

So, you're of the opinion that not believing in god means you're stupid? OK, just so I know what bias you're posting from...

 

 

I know little of Harris, but I challenge you to prove that Dawkins says stupid things. He's probably far far smarter than any of the folks posting on here.

 

 

 

Harris is no slouch for sure - the guy is brilliant in debate with a comedic timing, and an intellectual insight that is a pleasure to watch & listen too.

Its funny - the faithful dislike anything pointing to evolution - yet most have no idea what it is, many cant even spell it.

But this thread's topic is just another insight to a growing fungus.

  • Like 3
14 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

So, you're of the opinion that not believing in god means you're stupid? OK, just so I know what bias you're posting from...

Not even close to what he said though. 

  • Like 3
10 minutes ago, T3X4S said:

Harris is no slouch for sure - the guy is brilliant in debate with a comedic timing, and an intellectual insight that is a pleasure to watch & listen too.

Its funny - the faithful dislike anything pointing to evolution - yet most have no idea what it is, many cant even spell it.

But this thread's topic is just another insight to a growing fungus.

I like how Harris argues - straight to the point. Dawkins is more... restrained.

2 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

It's pretty much exactly what he said.  Try reading it again, paying attention to the punctuation.

IT's really not. I mean, sure if you absolutely want to twist the meaning for some weird reason to make him look bad, then you can decide to interpret it that way. but the meaning the way it as written is not. just that Atheists are just people who don't believe, and that includes all kinds of people including idiots, just like believers are all kinds of people, including idiots. 

 

He did not write "Atheists don't believe in god and are therefore idiots, so I'll believe that". 

2 minutes ago, HawkMan said:

just that Atheists are just people who don't believe, and that includes all kinds of people including idiots, just like believers are all kinds of people, including idiots.

 

Well, he's wrong. He forgot the idiots in between. The transidiots.

3 minutes ago, Ulyses said:

 

Well, he's wrong. He forgot the idiots in between. The transidiots.

are we inventing new words again ?

  • Like 3
4 minutes ago, HawkMan said:

are we inventing new words again ?

It would be wrong to assume the majority on any side is formed from individuals with positive mind sets. The majority on any side is formed from those that believe they believe or they believe they don't believe. Anything else is heresy or idiocy. Herediosy.

3 minutes ago, HawkMan said:

are we inventing new words again ?

Could be transsexual boneheads....
Could be people in between boneheadedness and non-boneheadedness
Could be people not sure of their views on religion, gods, etc (atheism/agnosticism)

Or.... it could be idiots who walk alot...  (sorry that was lame)

Heresiosy - thats a good one - I like that one.

what about.... transheresiostictheodemogaugory ? :D

 

2 minutes ago, Ulyses said:

It would be wrong to assume the majority on any side is formed from individuals with positive mind sets. The majority on any side is formed from those that believe they believe or they believe they don't believe. Anything else is heresy or idiocy. Herediosy.

what...  what are ... ... do you even... ... I ... ugh...

3 minutes ago, T3X4S said:


Could be people not sure of their views on religion, gods, etc (atheism/agnosticism)

Isn't that basically what agnostic is ? ;)

11 minutes ago, HawkMan said:

what...  what are ... ... do you even... ... I ... ugh...

Basically, any transidiot, no matter the side, will acuse you of herediosy. You are only allowed to be smart or pious, but not both at the same time. When smart, you must slander, when pious, you must stammer. If not, you're herediosiotical. That's bad, on either side.

Edited by Ulyses
  • Like 1
2 hours ago, theyarecomingforyou said:

Let me start by saying that as much as I respect Richard Dawkins the link he posted was extremely offensive and inappropriate, as equating feminism with Islamism is intellectually dishonest. At the same time the correct response is not to censor him but to challenge his opinions, which is why they were wrong to disinvite him. To claim they support free expression whilst censoring people for expressing themselves is hypocritical. Neither side comes off looking good in this matter.

I'd love to hear your thoughts on why its so offensive/dishonest.  I agree, for the most part you can't compare them so, but in the examples cited, I think there is reason to be critical.  Dawkins qualified in his tweet that it only applies to a some proclaimed feminists, of which he counts himself a member...

 

After reviewing his feed I would say that others have been 'worse', so maybe this was their last straw.  Still pretty pedantic.  I think the first speaks to the point he was reacting to in the video, the 2nd could cause problems for people who don't understand the concept of generalities.

 

 

 

CaIINJOW0AAz9cD.jpg

untitled.png

Edited by Dashel
3 minutes ago, Dashel said:

I'd love to hear your thoughts on why its so offensive/dishonest.

No form of feminism—unlike Islamism—involves beheading homosexuals, denying women basic rights (education, the ability to drive, the ability to have their face uncovered), torture, barbarism, invading other countries, etc. As I said, the comparison was intellectually dishonest. As much as I respect Richard Dawkins he was completely out of line here, though that doesn't excuse the event revoking his invitation.

6 minutes ago, theyarecomingforyou said:

No form of feminism—unlike Islamism—involves beheading homosexuals, denying women basic rights (education, the ability to drive, the ability to have their face uncovered), torture, barbarism, invading other countries, etc. As I said, the comparison was intellectually dishonest. As much as I respect Richard Dawkins he was completely out of line here, though that doesn't excuse the event revoking his invitation.

You are not on the right track there.

Feminists are not hypercritical of Islam's lack of women's rights and genuine rape culture - not like the fake rape propaganda they are spreading around campuses. Islam gets a free pass. "Muslims can't rape" - this is the punch line at the end of the satirical music video.

 

Additionally, both groups use victim culture to spread themselves and rely on dumb liberals to support their every move.

13 minutes ago, theyarecomingforyou said:

No form of feminism—unlike Islamism—involves beheading homosexuals, denying women basic rights (education, the ability to drive, the ability to have their face uncovered), torture, barbarism, invading other countries, etc. As I said, the comparison was intellectually dishonest. As much as I respect Richard Dawkins he was completely out of line here, though that doesn't excuse the event revoking his invitation.

I quite agree with the first sentence.  However, I don't think we can ignore however that the video was a response to the surprising defense of Islam from some feminists who seem to be able to overlook such gruesome things.  I'm sure Dawkins would be the first to agree with your sentiment as well as a feminist.  No one is saying they actually do those things, that's really the point of the video - that feminists ignore behavior in defending the ideology.

1 hour ago, FloatingFatMan said:

So, you're of the opinion that not believing in god means you're stupid? OK, just so I know what bias you're posting from

 

 

 

 Err. I'm not entirely sure how you that idea from what AB posted.

  • Like 4
Just now, _Alexander said:

Feminists are not hypercritical of Islam's lack of women's rights and genuine rape culture - not like the fake rape propaganda they are spreading around campuses. Islam gets a free pass.

Please provide evidence. Islamism is fundamentally opposed to western feminism. In fact I regularly see articles like femen protesters staging topless protests against Islam or Sweden's feminist foreign minister criticising Saudi Arabia. Could it not simply be that Muslims make up such a small percentage of the US population that they're not the primary concern of feminists, whereas issues like jock and fraternity culture are much more relevant to them? To put it in perspective, when was the last time you discussed the human rights abuses in Myanmar? When was the last time you criticised the Catholic Church's sexual abuse of children in Poland? I don't see you mentioning those topics enough, therefore you must support those crimes.

 

Your comment is very similar to the Fox News tactic of attacking Muslims in the United States for not being critical enough of the Islamic State, even though the US Council Of Muslim Organisations and others regularly put out statements criticising the atrocities of the Islamic State. Unless feminists are condoning the Muslim subjugation of women, which they're not, you don't have a point.

5 hours ago, Javik said:

Curious, I'm a "leftist" and I don't want that. Did I miss something? Or are you doing the typically ignorant Fox News thing of making this about left v right again, when it's about authoritarian v libertarian.

1) don't watch Fox 

2) recovering Democrat

 

5 hours ago, Javik said:

 

Yeah, it's gotta be true if Salon says so, certainly not a site loaded with polemical BS or anything, right?

Atheists have reported this too, so go argue with them.

 

Ex: Adam Lee in The Guardian

 

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/18/richard-dawkins-sexist-atheists-bad-name

 

Rebecca Watson in Slate

 

http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2012/10/sexism_in_the_skeptic_community_i_spoke_out_then_came_the_rape_threats.html

2 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

 know little of Harris, but I challenge you to prove that Dawkins says stupid things. He's probably far far smarter than any of the folks posting on here.

He's recently tweeted blaming rape victims for being either drunk or dressing in a way that provoked it, so yeah - stupid.

2 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

I know little of Harris, but I challenge you to prove that Dawkins says stupid things. He's probably far far smarter than any of the folks posting on here.

 

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/18/richard-dawkins-sexist-atheists-bad-name

Quote

Instead, he clings to his insular and privileged viewpoint – and, worse, he’s creating the impression that “true” atheists all share his retrograde attitudes.
Like many scientists who accomplished great things earlier in their careers, Richard Dawkins has succumbed to the delusion that he’s infallible on any topic he chooses to address, and in so doing, has wandered off the edge and plummeted into belligerent crankery.

 

And he's probably far far dumber than many of the folks posting here. He's been "misunderstood" for a long long time now, it seems. He's developing a god complex and you're developing an apostles behaviour. He's only a man, and not very good at it, by the looks of it.

53 minutes ago, DocM said:

1) don't watch Fox 

2) recovering Democrat

 

1. For someone who doesn't watch Fox News, you've got their topics and agendas down to the letter.

2. DINO in name only. You and PGHammer are both Republicans/Conservatives to the fullest. 100% Right wing. You're just both too embarrassed to label yourselves as such, because of how much of a joke the GOP have made themselves out to be. We know. "You used to be a democrat". That means nothing now.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
    • Meta is reusing old DDR4 RAM in its servers instead of buying new hardware by Ivan Jenic Image: Meta The global hardware shortage isn’t exactly news, as the entire world has been struggling with rising component prices for quite some time now. And while big companies certainly aren’t as affected as the average consumer, even they aren’t opposed to the idea of saving a few (million) bucks. Meta appears to have found a way to spend less on new hardware while also putting its outdated infrastructure to use, essentially killing two birds with one stone. The company has built a custom chip that lets it reuse memory from retired servers rather than buying new hardware. The chip is called Vistara and allows for connecting old DDR4 RAM from obsolete servers into new servers that rely on DDR5. The problem Vistara solves goes back to a basic mismatch in how long hardware lasts. Meta replaces its servers every three to five years, but the memory modules inside them are good for seven to ten. When a server gets decommissioned, perfectly usable DDR4 RAM goes with it. Meta is presenting the new method at today’s ISCA symposium, but The Register has got hold of a paper that explains how Vistara works. It's a custom ASIC that bridges DDR4 memory to newer processors via aCXL 2.0/1.1 interface over PCIe Gen5 x16. Meta pulls DDR4 sticks from old machines and installs them in dedicated units it calls MemServers, each of which pairs 768GB of DDR5 with 256GB of recovered DDR4. The operating system sees the DDR4 as an additional memory node and draws from it when the primary DDR5 is running low. Off-the-shelf CXL hardware couldn't do this, so Meta built its own. Existing interfaces bundle their own memory with the controller, which makes reusing old RAM sticks impossible. But Vistara separates the controller from the memory entirely, so Meta can plug in whatever DDR4 sticks it has on hand. Meta plans to deploy the new architecture in hyperscale infrastructure with millions of servers, which should mean that Meta’s AI datacenters will now be more efficient. The company is investing heavily in AI infrastructure, especially with its new AI model, Muse Spark, now widely available. All of this doesn't mean that Meta will exclusively rely on "recycled" RAM, but the company is still looking at considerable savings at scale.
    • Save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI lifetime subscriptions by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time, you can save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI: lifetime subscriptions. ChatPlayground AI puts the world’s top AI models in one powerful interface, letting you enter a single prompt and instantly compare outputs from multiple models to choose the perfect response for your needs. Boost productivity and creativity with access to the latest AI giants like GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, and dozens more — all in one window. Whether you’re chatting, coding, generating images, or refining prompts, ChatPlayground AI equips you with advanced tools like prompt engineering, image/PDF chat, saved conversations, and AI image creation, plus priority support to keep your workflow seamless. Access the world’s best AI models Side-by-Side Comparisons: Enter one prompt & instantly view results from multiple AI models to find the best output for your needs 40+ AI Models: Includes GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, Llama, Perplexity, and many more Multi-Function Platform: Access AI for chat, image generation & coding all within a single interface Web Browser Extension: Offers a Chrome extension to seamlessly integrate the platform into your browsing workflow Boost productivity with powerful features ChatPlayground Interface: Designed for seamless AI model comparison in one window Prompt Engineering: Refine & optimize your prompts for better, more accurate responses Chat with Images & PDFs: Upload visuals and documents to get context-aware answers Saved Chat History: Keep track of past conversations for reference & ongoing projects AI Image Generation: Create high-quality visuals powered by top AI image models Priority Customer Support: Get faster assistance whenever you need it What you'll get with the Unlimited Plan Includes unlimited messages/month Built for prompt engineers, startups, and teams who run experiments nonstop Includes priority access to new features and future models Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Desktop Max number of device(s): Unlimited Available to both NEW & Existing users Updates included A lifetime subscription to ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited Plan) normally costs $619, but you can pick it up for just $79 for a limited time - that represents a saving of $530 (87% off). Click the link below for more details, always check terms and specifications before making a purchase. Get this ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited) for $79 (was $619) There are also two other discounted plans to choose from. Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!