RAF Jets Fly On Baltic Policing Mission


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Mirumir said:

How often do you hear about a NATO/US ships or planes coming close to Russia's borders?

Read a map. Those waters are international, not Russia's private pond. As it is the US has said our rules of engagement would have allowed our ships commander & aircraft to splash Russia's planes. Next time they, and their base,  may not be so lucky.

2 minutes ago, DocM said:

Read a map. Those waters are international, not Russia's private pond. As it is the US has said our rules of engagement would have allowed our ships commander & aircraft to splash Russia's planes. Next time they, and their base,  may not be so lucky.

What you are saying is that it's ok for U.S. ships to be there, while denying the same to Russian planes in international airspace. Double-standards?

 

 

6 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

What you are saying is that it's ok for U.S. ships to be there, while denying the same to Russian planes in international airspace. Double-standards?

The problem isn't that Russian planes are there, it's that Russian planes are using that area to continuously nudge at the airspace of other nations. 

  • Like 1
Just now, MikeChipshop said:

The problem isn't that Russian planes are there, it's that Russian planes are using that area to continuously nudge at the airspace of other nations. 

The same can be said about US/NATO ships "nudge" at the Russian airspace.

  • Like 1
2 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

The same can be said about US/NATO ships "nudge" at the Russian airspace.

We both nudge each other's borders, all the time.  It's nothing new and has been going on since the start of the cold war and beyond.  Denying it is useless so why do you even bother?  OP article is a complete waste of space and is just the media looking for something to print on a slow news day.

 

  • Like 3
6 hours ago, Mirumir said:

File under "NATO needs a boogeyman to justify its very existence".

4 Typhoons to cover all Baltic states?  That's laughable.  I wish them good luck.

 

Btw, for those that don't know, these "incursions" are there to test each other's radar capabilities and response times.  It's been happening for decades now but the ironic thing is that Western planes do it on a much, much more frequent interval.  It makes sense because Russia is very large.  So much for those crying about "Russian aggression."

1 hour ago, Mirumir said:

The same can be said about US/NATO ships "nudge" at the Russian airspace.

The Russians aren't nudging airspace, they're buzzinbg ships at <10 meters which is way closer than safety margins allow. One nervous twitch and that plane is in the ships bridge and people start shooting.

54 minutes ago, DocM said:

The Russians aren't nudging airspace, they're buzzinbg ships at <10 meters which is way closer than safety margins allow. One nervous twitch and that plane is in the ships bridge and people start shooting.

If the Russian planes were flying close to the American border, you could've had a point.

American ships in international waters. 

 

Maybe we should send a few F-22's or Warthogs to do a supersonic buzz of some Russian ships in the area? Or have a cruise missile do a flyby?

 

That's what this crap can lead to with one provocation too many. 

Edited by DocM
On 5/3/2016 at 9:26 AM, Gary7 said:

They buzz our warships all of the time, we ignore it. Putin is not stupid, he does not want a war that he cannot win.

They have been buzzing a lot lately.  But nothing really knew from what went on during the cold war.  Russia is just trying to intimidate others trying to make a name for themselves again.  And what was it, a couple years ago or so they came close to the coast of Alaska and said happy holidays...or something like that.   One of these times tho, something bad is going to happen.

 

On 5/3/2016 at 0:44 PM, DocM said:

American ships in international waters. 

 

Maybe we should send a few F-22's or Warthogs to do a supersonic buzz of some Russian ships in the area? Or have a cruise missile do a flyby?

 

That's what this crap can lead to with one provocation too many. 

Some of the recent flybys were as close as 30 - 50 feet.  Really hope nothing bad comes out of this.  Last thing we need is another war.

On 5/3/2016 at 2:59 AM, Riva said:

Typhoon vs. the PAK FA... good luck

Except the T-50 PAK-FA is only a tech demo jet and not in full production yet so, no. F-22's are already making rounds.

 

http://www.janes.com/article/58166/singapore-airshow-2016-analysis-pak-fa-s-asian-export-hopes-stymied-by-lack-of-fifth-generation-qualities

https://warisboring.com/the-indians-hate-their-new-russian-made-stealth-fighter-d89b9ce721de#.sys9d3ex9

Edited by Morisato

All in all if you look at a non-biased perspective and not from one side you'll see both sides are aggressive to some degree by prodding near each others air space limits. US is especially aggressive in the prodding near South China Sea and the Baltic Sea while Russia near the Pacific Coast and US allied countries. There is no real 'good' guy in the proxy wars both sides do. Pity we can't all work together for a better world but alas human nature is self-destruction.

 

http://www.ibtimes.com/russia-us-relations-update-navy-chief-says-moscows-actions-baltic-sea-raised-tensions-2363119

  • Like 1
13 minutes ago, Morisato said:

All in all if you look at a non-biased perspective and not from one side you'll see both sides are aggressive to some degree by prodding near each others air space limits. US is especially aggressive in the prodding near South China Sea and the Baltic Sea while Russia near the Pacific Coast and US allied countries. There is no real 'good' guy in the proxy wars both sides do. Pity we can't all work together for a better world but alas human nature is self-destruction.

 

http://www.ibtimes.com/russia-us-relations-update-navy-chief-says-moscows-actions-baltic-sea-raised-tensions-2363119

Yea, they all do this.  But 30-50 feet flybys is taking it to far.  No matter who is doing it.  All it takes is one stupid mistake from one country to start an international incident.

 

And human suck and agree, self destructive.  I often wish I could move out in the middle of no where and not think about all this crap.  If I could afford to do so, I probably would.  Of course, would still need a laptop and satellite internet from time to time....I know to many people here would miss me  :p

  • Like 1
3 minutes ago, techbeck said:

Yea, they all do this.  But 30-50 feet flybys is taking it to far.  No matter who is doing it.  All it takes is one stupid mistake from one country to start an international incident.

 

And human suck and agree, self destructive.  I often wish I could move out in the middle of no where and not think about all this crap.  If I could afford to do so, I probably would.  Of course, would still need a laptop and satellite internet from time to time....I know to many people here would miss me  :p

Don't leave us :cry: Take us with you!

  • Like 1
4 minutes ago, Jack W said:

Don't leave us :cry: Take us with you!

 

haha, kinda defeats the purpose!   Older I get, the more and more I dislike my fellow man.  Nothing against anyone here.  But more and more the world is getting worse when it should be getting better.

  • Like 1
On 5/3/2016 at 0:33 AM, Jack W said:

Four RAF Typhoon Jets have been put on 24/7 standby, allowing them to respond to Quick Reaction Alerts. This means that, in the event of any aggression from Russia, the jets can be launched immediately, and will cover the Baltic states, including:

 

  • Latvia
  • Estonia
  • Lithuania

 

The jets will be able to take off at a moments notice.

 

This isn't the first time the RAF has been involved in the Baltic policing:

 

http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/archive/raf-jets-fly-on-baltic-policing-mission-29042016

this is horse manure, reports were that another long line of fuel tankers from ISIS were bombed. but what your news isn't telling you is, ISIS, you know the terrorist group?, is sending trucks of fuel/oil to Turkey for money. so russia is doing what Weakling Obama won't or can't do.

 

old story but same storyline

 

http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/ISIS-Threat/Russia-releases-video-of-air-strikes-on-ISIS-oil-tankers-facilities-438548

On 5/3/2016 at 11:19 AM, DocM said:

The Russians aren't nudging airspace, they're buzzinbg ships at <10 meters which is way closer than safety margins allow. One nervous twitch and that plane is in the ships bridge and people start shooting.

Come on now, everyone knows that Russia is no in the wrong here, they have never done anything wrong, and currently are guilty of nothing.  This is all American propaganda designed to gain support for the US...

1 hour ago, techbeck said:

Come on now, everyone knows that Russia is no in the wrong here, they have never done anything wrong, and currently are guilty of nothing.  This is all American propaganda designed to gain support for the US...

It'll be real interesting come 2021-2022 when the US starts arming combat aircraft, ships and drones with tactical lasers. No radar or smoke traces etc.

 

"Hey, he was buzzing us, lost it and screwed himself into the deck."

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And Microsoft got walloped on here for what they were charging for the new Surface book. Not looking as bad now. This was inevitable as they have to maintain those Apple margins.
    • Now 8GB of ram looks even worse in the Neo. I'm so happy I purchased 128GB of DDR 4 when I did.... paid $174. Upgraded my parents laptop to 32GB around the same time for $48. Luckily I have a TON of spare laptops. So i'm good on laptops for a while. I also have a lot of desktops too that I could use if i had to. Lets just hope nothing happens to my main 4 monitor couch workstation.
    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      453
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Xenon
      77
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!