Quick poll on the UK's decision to leave the EU


Remain 48% Leave 52%  

253 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you support the decision for the UK to leave the European Union?

    • Yes
      93
    • No
      134


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Eric said:

That's odd, then. I don't how they would have come up with the data other than aggregating opinion polls.

I suspect some newspaper has made it up to try and start an argument rather than accepting the result for what it is and getting on with things?

4 minutes ago, MikeChipshop said:

There were no exit polls for this vote.

 

I was fully Remain. And am pretty ticked off now, especially when you look at the votes compared to other data like educational background and age. I need to get a new haircut because i like to look pretty when i get ######ed.

 

Then again i live in Scotland, so eff knows what's going to happen here now!

Hadrian's Wall is going to get a spruce up ;)

  • Like 2

I am genuinely embarrassed to be called British today.
Both campaigns have been negatively run, however.


We as a nation have voted for a step back 60 years, it's people voting for 'the way it used to be' - when beer was cheap, measurements were in imperial and everyone was white and foreigners were things you tutted while looking for a shop that sells proper English food and on holiday.
When Britain was and empire, and won the world cup and World War II and people sang royal Britannia.

 

Here's a reality check, the world has moved on, and that should be embraced.

 

The issues we have in Britain are primarily of our own making, and we should be forcing our government to change things that needed - NHS, Tax avoidance, bank regulation.

But no, instead we'll blame the EU, because its much easier to blame something on someone else than fix it yourself right?

 

Leave stated that 54% of laws were passed in Brussels, simply not true in the last 4 years I believe the actual figure is 9% (and even they are not LAW in the UK unless the government votes on it)

Leave - £350 million can be poured back into the NHS, until apparently this was found to be not actually true (a 'mistake' I believe the words were from Nigel Farage)

Leave - we can trade with the EU tariff free because we're the 5th largest (*Edit - since the huge drop in sterling today, now the 6th) economy in the world - well maybe, but you don't KNOW that.

If we do want free trade we will very likely need to keep the freedom of movement, so all that stuff about controlling our boarders is likely totally incorrect too.

 

For the last 40 years we've had free trade, free movement of people and it's been a good thing, a progressive thing, a modern world thing.

 

The EU is not perfect, I'm not suggesting it is, but the best place to be to fix something as at the table, not out of the room.

 

So, to the leave voters, congratulations, you won you 'took your country back','little England' is now yours, and for the first time in 34 years its really not somewhere I wish to be.

 

1 minute ago, grunger106 said:

I am genuinely embarrassed to be called British today.
Both campaigns have been negatively run, however.


We as a nation have voted for a step back 60 years, it's people voting for 'the way it used to be' - when beer was cheap, measurements were in imperial and everyone was white and foreigners were things you tutted while looking for a shop that sells proper English food and on holiday.
When Britain was and empire, and won the world cup and World War II and people sang royal Britannia.

 

Here's a reality check, the world has moved on, and that should be embraced.

 

The issues we have in Britain are primarily of our own making, and we should be forcing our government to change things that needed - NHS, Tax avoidance, bank regulation.

But no, instead we'll blame the EU, because its much easier to blame something on someone else than fix it yourself right?

 

Leave stated that 54% of laws were passed in Brussels, simply not true in the last 4 years I believe the actual figure is 9% (and even they are not LAW in the UK unless the government votes on it)

Leave - £350 million can be poured back into the NHS, until apparently this was found to be not actually true (a 'mistake' I believe the words were from Nigel Farage)

Leave - we can trade with the EU tariff free because we're the 5th largest (*Edit - since the huge drop in sterling today, now the 6th) economy in the world - well maybe, but you don't KNOW that.

If we do want free trade we will very likely need to keep the freedom of movement, so all that stuff about controlling our boarders is likely totally incorrect too.

 

For the last 40 years we've had free trade, free movement of people and it's been a good thing, a progressive thing, a modern world thing.

 

The EU is not perfect, I'm not suggesting it is, but the best place to be to fix something as at the table, not out of the room.

 

So, to the leave voters, congratulations, you won you 'took your country back','little England' is now yours, and for the first time in 34 years its really not somewhere I wish to be.

 

What a brilliant post.

  • Like 3
16 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

Back on their downward spiral?  The USD has been on a tear in the recent years....and has been doing nothing rising since its low point in Apr '08  :laugh::laugh::laugh: (the financial crisis).  So...what "back on their downward spiral".  

This one:

 

Spoiler

 

dxy2016.jpg

 

 

 

10 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

What is it? 

The EuroBund is the EU equivalent to US ten-year Treasuries.

 

It runs the same length of term as well.  Due to that, it is as close to an official measure of relative strength between the two currencies - as determined by their respective issuing agencies.

 

Like Treasuries, EuroBunds are term-defined sovereign debt (non-callable, in other words) and - like Treasuries - non-taxable to EU citizens.

 

Treasuries (even ten-year Treasuries) still have yield, as their coupon rates are above zero; however, that can't be said about the same-length EuroBund - it has a NEGATIVE yield.  In short, if you invest a thousand euros in EuroBunds of ten years, you won't even get back all you invested. (Hence my comment about the "knife in the back" - and why Janet Yellen has tried to avoid the Fed going sub-zero on Treasuries.)

 

Further, like Treasuries, ten-year EuroBunds are the investment of choice for the conservative (if not the chicken) EU-based investor (the non-rich, in other words) - however, why in the world would you invest in anything that doesn't pay out what you invest?  (Treasuries may be taxable, but they still have a yield; the EuroBund no longer does.)

I think the benefits of being in the EU outweighed the cons.

 

It seems to me it was more of "I want to vote for it, just because I can, even though I don't understand it".

  • Like 3
4 minutes ago, PGHammer said:

The EuroBund is the EU equivalent to US ten-year Treasuries.

 

It runs the same length of term as well.  Due to that, it is as close to an official measure of relative strength between the two currencies - as determined by their respective issuing agencies.

 

Like Treasuries, EuroBunds are term-defined sovereign debt (non-callable, in other words) and - like Treasuries - non-taxable to EU citizens.

 

Treasuries (even ten-year Treasuries) still have yield, as their coupon rates are above zero; however, that can't be said about the same-length EuroBund - it has a NEGATIVE yield.  In short, if you invest a thousand euros in EuroBunds of ten years, you won't even get back all you invested. (Hence my comment about the "knife in the back" - and why Janet Yellen has tried to avoid the Fed going sub-zero on Treasuries.)

 

Further, like Treasuries, ten-year EuroBunds are the investment of choice for the conservative (if not the chicken) EU-based investor (the non-rich, in other words) - however, why in the world would you invest in anything that doesn't pay out what you invest?  (Treasuries may be taxable, but they still have a yield; the EuroBund no longer does.)

Are you talking about a bond issued by the Bundesbank? What's the ISIN?

13 minutes ago, grunger106 said:

I am genuinely embarrassed to be called British today.
Both campaigns have been negatively run, however.


We as a nation have voted for a step back 60 years, it's people voting for 'the way it used to be' - when beer was cheap, measurements were in imperial and everyone was white and foreigners were things you tutted while looking for a shop that sells proper English food and on holiday.
When Britain was and empire, and won the world cup and World War II and people sang royal Britannia.

 

Here's a reality check, the world has moved on, and that should be embraced.

 

The issues we have in Britain are primarily of our own making, and we should be forcing our government to change things that needed - NHS, Tax avoidance, bank regulation.

But no, instead we'll blame the EU, because its much easier to blame something on someone else than fix it yourself right?

 

Leave stated that 54% of laws were passed in Brussels, simply not true in the last 4 years I believe the actual figure is 9% (and even they are not LAW in the UK unless the government votes on it)

Leave - £350 million can be poured back into the NHS, until apparently this was found to be not actually true (a 'mistake' I believe the words were from Nigel Farage)

Leave - we can trade with the EU tariff free because we're the 5th largest (*Edit - since the huge drop in sterling today, now the 6th) economy in the world - well maybe, but you don't KNOW that.

If we do want free trade we will very likely need to keep the freedom of movement, so all that stuff about controlling our boarders is likely totally incorrect too.

 

For the last 40 years we've had free trade, free movement of people and it's been a good thing, a progressive thing, a modern world thing.

 

The EU is not perfect, I'm not suggesting it is, but the best place to be to fix something as at the table, not out of the room.

 

So, to the leave voters, congratulations, you won you 'took your country back','little England' is now yours, and for the first time in 34 years its really not somewhere I wish to be.

 

x1000000

  • Like 1
15 minutes ago, grunger106 said:

I am genuinely embarrassed to be called British today.
Both campaigns have been negatively run, however.


We as a nation have voted for a step back 60 years, it's people voting for 'the way it used to be' - when beer was cheap, measurements were in imperial and everyone was white and foreigners were things you tutted while looking for a shop that sells proper English food and on holiday.
When Britain was and empire, and won the world cup and World War II and people sang royal Britannia.

 

Here's a reality check, the world has moved on, and that should be embraced.

 

The issues we have in Britain are primarily of our own making, and we should be forcing our government to change things that needed - NHS, Tax avoidance, bank regulation.

But no, instead we'll blame the EU, because its much easier to blame something on someone else than fix it yourself right?

 

Leave stated that 54% of laws were passed in Brussels, simply not true in the last 4 years I believe the actual figure is 9% (and even they are not LAW in the UK unless the government votes on it)

Leave - £350 million can be poured back into the NHS, until apparently this was found to be not actually true (a 'mistake' I believe the words were from Nigel Farage)

Leave - we can trade with the EU tariff free because we're the 5th largest (*Edit - since the huge drop in sterling today, now the 6th) economy in the world - well maybe, but you don't KNOW that.

If we do want free trade we will very likely need to keep the freedom of movement, so all that stuff about controlling our boarders is likely totally incorrect too.

 

For the last 40 years we've had free trade, free movement of people and it's been a good thing, a progressive thing, a modern world thing.

 

The EU is not perfect, I'm not suggesting it is, but the best place to be to fix something as at the table, not out of the room.

 

So, to the leave voters, congratulations, you won you 'took your country back','little England' is now yours, and for the first time in 34 years its really not somewhere I wish to be.

 

It's like you climbed inside me, took my thoughts and wrote them out far better than i ever could!

I'm hoping the Scottish now take the lead and remove themselves from this shambles.

Just now, Mirumir said:

Are you talking about a bond issued by the Bundesbank?

EuroBunds are issued by the European Central Bank (ECB) - the Bundesbank, if I'm not mistaken, is the GERMAN equivalent to the US Treasury (or the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer), and as such does not issue Euro-wide bonds officially.  You can trade EuroBunds in Germany (and they are, in fact traded there); however, the authority derives from Brussels - not Bonn (or Berlin, for that matter).

 

Sovereign debt (or ANY debt with a negative coupon rate) means that you don't get back all you invest - why would anyone do that?  The skewing in favor of the issuer is as obvious as a knife in the back, and sovereign debt is supposed to be the refuge of choice for conservative investors (the non-wealth class); however, the EuroBund just mucked that up.

18 minutes ago, grunger106 said:

For the last 40 years we've had free trade, free movement of people and it's been a good thing, a progressive thing, a modern world thing.

Free trade isn't inherently good or bad. What matters is your country's interests. It could have been an advantageous concept 40 years ago and deteriorated into a burden over the years.

 

Anyways, none of those things are going anywhere.

 

The flow of goods and people will continue. A British tourist won't ever need a visa to go to France or Germany and vice versa.

 

 

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

This one:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

dxy2016.jpg

 

 

 

aaah.  So you consider 1 year as downward "spiral" ... ok :)  If you go back even two years you'll see that the DXY has been around 92-100 range (after a huge jump from the 70 range)... normal adjustments/conditions and certainly by no means indicative of a downward "spiral".  

 

 

Spoiler

 

Capture.JPG


 

 

Yep...sure looks like a downward spiral to me.  Your anti-US statements get nauseating .. especially when they're put into a thread which really isn't about the US.

  • Like 2
1 minute ago, jjkusaf said:

aaah.  So you consider 1 year as downward "spiral" ... ok :)  If you go back even two years you'll see that the DXY has been around 92-100 range (after a huge jump from the 70 range)... normal adjustments/conditions and certainly by no means indicative of a downward "spiral".  

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Capture.JPG

 

 

 

 

 

Yep...sure looks like a downward spiral to me.  Your anti-US statements get nauseating .. especially when they're put into a thread which really isn't about the US.

Ok...

 

Spoiler


DXY01.jpg

 

 

4 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

Ok...

 

  Hide contents

 

DXY01.jpg

 

 

Which is why I said it has been on a tear the past couple of years (well since '08).  Now you're just trying to be difficult...certainly not a continuation of a downward "spiral". :)

 

9 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

aaah.  So you consider 1 year as downward "spiral" ... ok :)  If you go back even two years you'll see that the DXY has been around 92-100 range (after a huge jump from the 70 range)... normal adjustments/conditions and certainly by no means indicative of a downward "spiral".  

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Capture.JPG

 

 

 

 

Yep...sure looks like a downward spiral to me.  Your anti-US statements get nauseating .. especially when they're put into a thread which really isn't about the US.

jjk - the inspiration for the EU itself was to counterweight the United States; and especially in terms of trade.  The same has, in fact, held true for ALL these multinational alliances - including, if not especially, Airbus Industrie.

 

JP Morgan - an American (US-based, in fact) financial institution (named after the US-based founder - James Pierpont Morgan; Morgan and FDR butted heads during the Great Depression).

While Morgan has a not-insignificant present in Europe, Citi has a bigger presence than JP Morgan; heck, Bank of America does as well (via Merrill Lynch).

I have nothing against wanting to counterweight the United States - to each their own; however, flubbing it up is Europe's own fault.

So... since the Brexit was announced...

 



The pound has plummeted to a 30 year low
Japanese stock market has crashed 8% and suspended trading
Already a push for another Scottish independence
Calls for an Irish reunification referendum
Far-right nationalists across Europe now calling for referendums and the demise of the EU
Hundreds of UK pension funds underwater
FTSE is expected to open 10% down (the bankers knocked 8% off in the 2007 financial crash, so this is big)
German DAX market expected to open 10% down
HSBC is worth £10bn less since yesterday
S&P has announced that UK now likely to lose its AAA credit rating
In two hours (as of 7am) the UK economy has lost over £255bn, the equivalent of 40 years' worth of EU contributions
The British Prime Minister has resigned

JP Morgan announced UK exit for all business

22 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

Which is why I said it has been on a tear the past couple of years (well since '08).  Now you're just trying to be difficult...certainly not a continuation of a downward "spiral". :)

I'll PM you when DXY hits a new low.

 

15 minutes ago, John. said:

Nasdaq sees worst drop since 2011!

There's an opinion that the upward ride from 2011 was fueled by the depreciating dollar. So when the dollar surged today, the U.S. stock market experienced a currency evaluation correction. In other words, since the currency has strengthened, the assets which are priced in it, depreciated. Which is the reason why the price of commodities fell too today.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!