Quick poll on the UK's decision to leave the EU


Remain 48% Leave 52%  

253 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you support the decision for the UK to leave the European Union?

    • Yes
      93
    • No
      134


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Eric said:

That's odd, then. I don't how they would have come up with the data other than aggregating opinion polls.

I suspect some newspaper has made it up to try and start an argument rather than accepting the result for what it is and getting on with things?

4 minutes ago, MikeChipshop said:

There were no exit polls for this vote.

 

I was fully Remain. And am pretty ticked off now, especially when you look at the votes compared to other data like educational background and age. I need to get a new haircut because i like to look pretty when i get ######ed.

 

Then again i live in Scotland, so eff knows what's going to happen here now!

Hadrian's Wall is going to get a spruce up ;)

  • Like 2

I am genuinely embarrassed to be called British today.
Both campaigns have been negatively run, however.


We as a nation have voted for a step back 60 years, it's people voting for 'the way it used to be' - when beer was cheap, measurements were in imperial and everyone was white and foreigners were things you tutted while looking for a shop that sells proper English food and on holiday.
When Britain was and empire, and won the world cup and World War II and people sang royal Britannia.

 

Here's a reality check, the world has moved on, and that should be embraced.

 

The issues we have in Britain are primarily of our own making, and we should be forcing our government to change things that needed - NHS, Tax avoidance, bank regulation.

But no, instead we'll blame the EU, because its much easier to blame something on someone else than fix it yourself right?

 

Leave stated that 54% of laws were passed in Brussels, simply not true in the last 4 years I believe the actual figure is 9% (and even they are not LAW in the UK unless the government votes on it)

Leave - £350 million can be poured back into the NHS, until apparently this was found to be not actually true (a 'mistake' I believe the words were from Nigel Farage)

Leave - we can trade with the EU tariff free because we're the 5th largest (*Edit - since the huge drop in sterling today, now the 6th) economy in the world - well maybe, but you don't KNOW that.

If we do want free trade we will very likely need to keep the freedom of movement, so all that stuff about controlling our boarders is likely totally incorrect too.

 

For the last 40 years we've had free trade, free movement of people and it's been a good thing, a progressive thing, a modern world thing.

 

The EU is not perfect, I'm not suggesting it is, but the best place to be to fix something as at the table, not out of the room.

 

So, to the leave voters, congratulations, you won you 'took your country back','little England' is now yours, and for the first time in 34 years its really not somewhere I wish to be.

 

1 minute ago, grunger106 said:

I am genuinely embarrassed to be called British today.
Both campaigns have been negatively run, however.


We as a nation have voted for a step back 60 years, it's people voting for 'the way it used to be' - when beer was cheap, measurements were in imperial and everyone was white and foreigners were things you tutted while looking for a shop that sells proper English food and on holiday.
When Britain was and empire, and won the world cup and World War II and people sang royal Britannia.

 

Here's a reality check, the world has moved on, and that should be embraced.

 

The issues we have in Britain are primarily of our own making, and we should be forcing our government to change things that needed - NHS, Tax avoidance, bank regulation.

But no, instead we'll blame the EU, because its much easier to blame something on someone else than fix it yourself right?

 

Leave stated that 54% of laws were passed in Brussels, simply not true in the last 4 years I believe the actual figure is 9% (and even they are not LAW in the UK unless the government votes on it)

Leave - £350 million can be poured back into the NHS, until apparently this was found to be not actually true (a 'mistake' I believe the words were from Nigel Farage)

Leave - we can trade with the EU tariff free because we're the 5th largest (*Edit - since the huge drop in sterling today, now the 6th) economy in the world - well maybe, but you don't KNOW that.

If we do want free trade we will very likely need to keep the freedom of movement, so all that stuff about controlling our boarders is likely totally incorrect too.

 

For the last 40 years we've had free trade, free movement of people and it's been a good thing, a progressive thing, a modern world thing.

 

The EU is not perfect, I'm not suggesting it is, but the best place to be to fix something as at the table, not out of the room.

 

So, to the leave voters, congratulations, you won you 'took your country back','little England' is now yours, and for the first time in 34 years its really not somewhere I wish to be.

 

What a brilliant post.

  • Like 3
16 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

Back on their downward spiral?  The USD has been on a tear in the recent years....and has been doing nothing rising since its low point in Apr '08  :laugh::laugh::laugh: (the financial crisis).  So...what "back on their downward spiral".  

This one:

 

Spoiler

 

dxy2016.jpg

 

 

 

10 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

What is it? 

The EuroBund is the EU equivalent to US ten-year Treasuries.

 

It runs the same length of term as well.  Due to that, it is as close to an official measure of relative strength between the two currencies - as determined by their respective issuing agencies.

 

Like Treasuries, EuroBunds are term-defined sovereign debt (non-callable, in other words) and - like Treasuries - non-taxable to EU citizens.

 

Treasuries (even ten-year Treasuries) still have yield, as their coupon rates are above zero; however, that can't be said about the same-length EuroBund - it has a NEGATIVE yield.  In short, if you invest a thousand euros in EuroBunds of ten years, you won't even get back all you invested. (Hence my comment about the "knife in the back" - and why Janet Yellen has tried to avoid the Fed going sub-zero on Treasuries.)

 

Further, like Treasuries, ten-year EuroBunds are the investment of choice for the conservative (if not the chicken) EU-based investor (the non-rich, in other words) - however, why in the world would you invest in anything that doesn't pay out what you invest?  (Treasuries may be taxable, but they still have a yield; the EuroBund no longer does.)

I think the benefits of being in the EU outweighed the cons.

 

It seems to me it was more of "I want to vote for it, just because I can, even though I don't understand it".

  • Like 3
4 minutes ago, PGHammer said:

The EuroBund is the EU equivalent to US ten-year Treasuries.

 

It runs the same length of term as well.  Due to that, it is as close to an official measure of relative strength between the two currencies - as determined by their respective issuing agencies.

 

Like Treasuries, EuroBunds are term-defined sovereign debt (non-callable, in other words) and - like Treasuries - non-taxable to EU citizens.

 

Treasuries (even ten-year Treasuries) still have yield, as their coupon rates are above zero; however, that can't be said about the same-length EuroBund - it has a NEGATIVE yield.  In short, if you invest a thousand euros in EuroBunds of ten years, you won't even get back all you invested. (Hence my comment about the "knife in the back" - and why Janet Yellen has tried to avoid the Fed going sub-zero on Treasuries.)

 

Further, like Treasuries, ten-year EuroBunds are the investment of choice for the conservative (if not the chicken) EU-based investor (the non-rich, in other words) - however, why in the world would you invest in anything that doesn't pay out what you invest?  (Treasuries may be taxable, but they still have a yield; the EuroBund no longer does.)

Are you talking about a bond issued by the Bundesbank? What's the ISIN?

13 minutes ago, grunger106 said:

I am genuinely embarrassed to be called British today.
Both campaigns have been negatively run, however.


We as a nation have voted for a step back 60 years, it's people voting for 'the way it used to be' - when beer was cheap, measurements were in imperial and everyone was white and foreigners were things you tutted while looking for a shop that sells proper English food and on holiday.
When Britain was and empire, and won the world cup and World War II and people sang royal Britannia.

 

Here's a reality check, the world has moved on, and that should be embraced.

 

The issues we have in Britain are primarily of our own making, and we should be forcing our government to change things that needed - NHS, Tax avoidance, bank regulation.

But no, instead we'll blame the EU, because its much easier to blame something on someone else than fix it yourself right?

 

Leave stated that 54% of laws were passed in Brussels, simply not true in the last 4 years I believe the actual figure is 9% (and even they are not LAW in the UK unless the government votes on it)

Leave - £350 million can be poured back into the NHS, until apparently this was found to be not actually true (a 'mistake' I believe the words were from Nigel Farage)

Leave - we can trade with the EU tariff free because we're the 5th largest (*Edit - since the huge drop in sterling today, now the 6th) economy in the world - well maybe, but you don't KNOW that.

If we do want free trade we will very likely need to keep the freedom of movement, so all that stuff about controlling our boarders is likely totally incorrect too.

 

For the last 40 years we've had free trade, free movement of people and it's been a good thing, a progressive thing, a modern world thing.

 

The EU is not perfect, I'm not suggesting it is, but the best place to be to fix something as at the table, not out of the room.

 

So, to the leave voters, congratulations, you won you 'took your country back','little England' is now yours, and for the first time in 34 years its really not somewhere I wish to be.

 

x1000000

  • Like 1
15 minutes ago, grunger106 said:

I am genuinely embarrassed to be called British today.
Both campaigns have been negatively run, however.


We as a nation have voted for a step back 60 years, it's people voting for 'the way it used to be' - when beer was cheap, measurements were in imperial and everyone was white and foreigners were things you tutted while looking for a shop that sells proper English food and on holiday.
When Britain was and empire, and won the world cup and World War II and people sang royal Britannia.

 

Here's a reality check, the world has moved on, and that should be embraced.

 

The issues we have in Britain are primarily of our own making, and we should be forcing our government to change things that needed - NHS, Tax avoidance, bank regulation.

But no, instead we'll blame the EU, because its much easier to blame something on someone else than fix it yourself right?

 

Leave stated that 54% of laws were passed in Brussels, simply not true in the last 4 years I believe the actual figure is 9% (and even they are not LAW in the UK unless the government votes on it)

Leave - £350 million can be poured back into the NHS, until apparently this was found to be not actually true (a 'mistake' I believe the words were from Nigel Farage)

Leave - we can trade with the EU tariff free because we're the 5th largest (*Edit - since the huge drop in sterling today, now the 6th) economy in the world - well maybe, but you don't KNOW that.

If we do want free trade we will very likely need to keep the freedom of movement, so all that stuff about controlling our boarders is likely totally incorrect too.

 

For the last 40 years we've had free trade, free movement of people and it's been a good thing, a progressive thing, a modern world thing.

 

The EU is not perfect, I'm not suggesting it is, but the best place to be to fix something as at the table, not out of the room.

 

So, to the leave voters, congratulations, you won you 'took your country back','little England' is now yours, and for the first time in 34 years its really not somewhere I wish to be.

 

It's like you climbed inside me, took my thoughts and wrote them out far better than i ever could!

I'm hoping the Scottish now take the lead and remove themselves from this shambles.

Just now, Mirumir said:

Are you talking about a bond issued by the Bundesbank?

EuroBunds are issued by the European Central Bank (ECB) - the Bundesbank, if I'm not mistaken, is the GERMAN equivalent to the US Treasury (or the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer), and as such does not issue Euro-wide bonds officially.  You can trade EuroBunds in Germany (and they are, in fact traded there); however, the authority derives from Brussels - not Bonn (or Berlin, for that matter).

 

Sovereign debt (or ANY debt with a negative coupon rate) means that you don't get back all you invest - why would anyone do that?  The skewing in favor of the issuer is as obvious as a knife in the back, and sovereign debt is supposed to be the refuge of choice for conservative investors (the non-wealth class); however, the EuroBund just mucked that up.

18 minutes ago, grunger106 said:

For the last 40 years we've had free trade, free movement of people and it's been a good thing, a progressive thing, a modern world thing.

Free trade isn't inherently good or bad. What matters is your country's interests. It could have been an advantageous concept 40 years ago and deteriorated into a burden over the years.

 

Anyways, none of those things are going anywhere.

 

The flow of goods and people will continue. A British tourist won't ever need a visa to go to France or Germany and vice versa.

 

 

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

This one:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

dxy2016.jpg

 

 

 

aaah.  So you consider 1 year as downward "spiral" ... ok :)  If you go back even two years you'll see that the DXY has been around 92-100 range (after a huge jump from the 70 range)... normal adjustments/conditions and certainly by no means indicative of a downward "spiral".  

 

 

Spoiler

 

Capture.JPG


 

 

Yep...sure looks like a downward spiral to me.  Your anti-US statements get nauseating .. especially when they're put into a thread which really isn't about the US.

  • Like 2
1 minute ago, jjkusaf said:

aaah.  So you consider 1 year as downward "spiral" ... ok :)  If you go back even two years you'll see that the DXY has been around 92-100 range (after a huge jump from the 70 range)... normal adjustments/conditions and certainly by no means indicative of a downward "spiral".  

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Capture.JPG

 

 

 

 

 

Yep...sure looks like a downward spiral to me.  Your anti-US statements get nauseating .. especially when they're put into a thread which really isn't about the US.

Ok...

 

Spoiler


DXY01.jpg

 

 

4 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

Ok...

 

  Hide contents

 

DXY01.jpg

 

 

Which is why I said it has been on a tear the past couple of years (well since '08).  Now you're just trying to be difficult...certainly not a continuation of a downward "spiral". :)

 

9 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

aaah.  So you consider 1 year as downward "spiral" ... ok :)  If you go back even two years you'll see that the DXY has been around 92-100 range (after a huge jump from the 70 range)... normal adjustments/conditions and certainly by no means indicative of a downward "spiral".  

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Capture.JPG

 

 

 

 

Yep...sure looks like a downward spiral to me.  Your anti-US statements get nauseating .. especially when they're put into a thread which really isn't about the US.

jjk - the inspiration for the EU itself was to counterweight the United States; and especially in terms of trade.  The same has, in fact, held true for ALL these multinational alliances - including, if not especially, Airbus Industrie.

 

JP Morgan - an American (US-based, in fact) financial institution (named after the US-based founder - James Pierpont Morgan; Morgan and FDR butted heads during the Great Depression).

While Morgan has a not-insignificant present in Europe, Citi has a bigger presence than JP Morgan; heck, Bank of America does as well (via Merrill Lynch).

I have nothing against wanting to counterweight the United States - to each their own; however, flubbing it up is Europe's own fault.

So... since the Brexit was announced...

 



The pound has plummeted to a 30 year low
Japanese stock market has crashed 8% and suspended trading
Already a push for another Scottish independence
Calls for an Irish reunification referendum
Far-right nationalists across Europe now calling for referendums and the demise of the EU
Hundreds of UK pension funds underwater
FTSE is expected to open 10% down (the bankers knocked 8% off in the 2007 financial crash, so this is big)
German DAX market expected to open 10% down
HSBC is worth £10bn less since yesterday
S&P has announced that UK now likely to lose its AAA credit rating
In two hours (as of 7am) the UK economy has lost over £255bn, the equivalent of 40 years' worth of EU contributions
The British Prime Minister has resigned

JP Morgan announced UK exit for all business

22 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

Which is why I said it has been on a tear the past couple of years (well since '08).  Now you're just trying to be difficult...certainly not a continuation of a downward "spiral". :)

I'll PM you when DXY hits a new low.

 

15 minutes ago, John. said:

Nasdaq sees worst drop since 2011!

There's an opinion that the upward ride from 2011 was fueled by the depreciating dollar. So when the dollar surged today, the U.S. stock market experienced a currency evaluation correction. In other words, since the currency has strengthened, the assets which are priced in it, depreciated. Which is the reason why the price of commodities fell too today.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      70
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!