Quick poll on the UK's decision to leave the EU


Remain 48% Leave 52%  

253 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you support the decision for the UK to leave the European Union?

    • Yes
      93
    • No
      134


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Eric said:

That's odd, then. I don't how they would have come up with the data other than aggregating opinion polls.

I suspect some newspaper has made it up to try and start an argument rather than accepting the result for what it is and getting on with things?

4 minutes ago, MikeChipshop said:

There were no exit polls for this vote.

 

I was fully Remain. And am pretty ticked off now, especially when you look at the votes compared to other data like educational background and age. I need to get a new haircut because i like to look pretty when i get ######ed.

 

Then again i live in Scotland, so eff knows what's going to happen here now!

Hadrian's Wall is going to get a spruce up ;)

  • Like 2

I am genuinely embarrassed to be called British today.
Both campaigns have been negatively run, however.


We as a nation have voted for a step back 60 years, it's people voting for 'the way it used to be' - when beer was cheap, measurements were in imperial and everyone was white and foreigners were things you tutted while looking for a shop that sells proper English food and on holiday.
When Britain was and empire, and won the world cup and World War II and people sang royal Britannia.

 

Here's a reality check, the world has moved on, and that should be embraced.

 

The issues we have in Britain are primarily of our own making, and we should be forcing our government to change things that needed - NHS, Tax avoidance, bank regulation.

But no, instead we'll blame the EU, because its much easier to blame something on someone else than fix it yourself right?

 

Leave stated that 54% of laws were passed in Brussels, simply not true in the last 4 years I believe the actual figure is 9% (and even they are not LAW in the UK unless the government votes on it)

Leave - £350 million can be poured back into the NHS, until apparently this was found to be not actually true (a 'mistake' I believe the words were from Nigel Farage)

Leave - we can trade with the EU tariff free because we're the 5th largest (*Edit - since the huge drop in sterling today, now the 6th) economy in the world - well maybe, but you don't KNOW that.

If we do want free trade we will very likely need to keep the freedom of movement, so all that stuff about controlling our boarders is likely totally incorrect too.

 

For the last 40 years we've had free trade, free movement of people and it's been a good thing, a progressive thing, a modern world thing.

 

The EU is not perfect, I'm not suggesting it is, but the best place to be to fix something as at the table, not out of the room.

 

So, to the leave voters, congratulations, you won you 'took your country back','little England' is now yours, and for the first time in 34 years its really not somewhere I wish to be.

 

1 minute ago, grunger106 said:

I am genuinely embarrassed to be called British today.
Both campaigns have been negatively run, however.


We as a nation have voted for a step back 60 years, it's people voting for 'the way it used to be' - when beer was cheap, measurements were in imperial and everyone was white and foreigners were things you tutted while looking for a shop that sells proper English food and on holiday.
When Britain was and empire, and won the world cup and World War II and people sang royal Britannia.

 

Here's a reality check, the world has moved on, and that should be embraced.

 

The issues we have in Britain are primarily of our own making, and we should be forcing our government to change things that needed - NHS, Tax avoidance, bank regulation.

But no, instead we'll blame the EU, because its much easier to blame something on someone else than fix it yourself right?

 

Leave stated that 54% of laws were passed in Brussels, simply not true in the last 4 years I believe the actual figure is 9% (and even they are not LAW in the UK unless the government votes on it)

Leave - £350 million can be poured back into the NHS, until apparently this was found to be not actually true (a 'mistake' I believe the words were from Nigel Farage)

Leave - we can trade with the EU tariff free because we're the 5th largest (*Edit - since the huge drop in sterling today, now the 6th) economy in the world - well maybe, but you don't KNOW that.

If we do want free trade we will very likely need to keep the freedom of movement, so all that stuff about controlling our boarders is likely totally incorrect too.

 

For the last 40 years we've had free trade, free movement of people and it's been a good thing, a progressive thing, a modern world thing.

 

The EU is not perfect, I'm not suggesting it is, but the best place to be to fix something as at the table, not out of the room.

 

So, to the leave voters, congratulations, you won you 'took your country back','little England' is now yours, and for the first time in 34 years its really not somewhere I wish to be.

 

What a brilliant post.

  • Like 3
16 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

Back on their downward spiral?  The USD has been on a tear in the recent years....and has been doing nothing rising since its low point in Apr '08  :laugh::laugh::laugh: (the financial crisis).  So...what "back on their downward spiral".  

This one:

 

Spoiler

 

dxy2016.jpg

 

 

 

10 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

What is it? 

The EuroBund is the EU equivalent to US ten-year Treasuries.

 

It runs the same length of term as well.  Due to that, it is as close to an official measure of relative strength between the two currencies - as determined by their respective issuing agencies.

 

Like Treasuries, EuroBunds are term-defined sovereign debt (non-callable, in other words) and - like Treasuries - non-taxable to EU citizens.

 

Treasuries (even ten-year Treasuries) still have yield, as their coupon rates are above zero; however, that can't be said about the same-length EuroBund - it has a NEGATIVE yield.  In short, if you invest a thousand euros in EuroBunds of ten years, you won't even get back all you invested. (Hence my comment about the "knife in the back" - and why Janet Yellen has tried to avoid the Fed going sub-zero on Treasuries.)

 

Further, like Treasuries, ten-year EuroBunds are the investment of choice for the conservative (if not the chicken) EU-based investor (the non-rich, in other words) - however, why in the world would you invest in anything that doesn't pay out what you invest?  (Treasuries may be taxable, but they still have a yield; the EuroBund no longer does.)

I think the benefits of being in the EU outweighed the cons.

 

It seems to me it was more of "I want to vote for it, just because I can, even though I don't understand it".

  • Like 3
4 minutes ago, PGHammer said:

The EuroBund is the EU equivalent to US ten-year Treasuries.

 

It runs the same length of term as well.  Due to that, it is as close to an official measure of relative strength between the two currencies - as determined by their respective issuing agencies.

 

Like Treasuries, EuroBunds are term-defined sovereign debt (non-callable, in other words) and - like Treasuries - non-taxable to EU citizens.

 

Treasuries (even ten-year Treasuries) still have yield, as their coupon rates are above zero; however, that can't be said about the same-length EuroBund - it has a NEGATIVE yield.  In short, if you invest a thousand euros in EuroBunds of ten years, you won't even get back all you invested. (Hence my comment about the "knife in the back" - and why Janet Yellen has tried to avoid the Fed going sub-zero on Treasuries.)

 

Further, like Treasuries, ten-year EuroBunds are the investment of choice for the conservative (if not the chicken) EU-based investor (the non-rich, in other words) - however, why in the world would you invest in anything that doesn't pay out what you invest?  (Treasuries may be taxable, but they still have a yield; the EuroBund no longer does.)

Are you talking about a bond issued by the Bundesbank? What's the ISIN?

13 minutes ago, grunger106 said:

I am genuinely embarrassed to be called British today.
Both campaigns have been negatively run, however.


We as a nation have voted for a step back 60 years, it's people voting for 'the way it used to be' - when beer was cheap, measurements were in imperial and everyone was white and foreigners were things you tutted while looking for a shop that sells proper English food and on holiday.
When Britain was and empire, and won the world cup and World War II and people sang royal Britannia.

 

Here's a reality check, the world has moved on, and that should be embraced.

 

The issues we have in Britain are primarily of our own making, and we should be forcing our government to change things that needed - NHS, Tax avoidance, bank regulation.

But no, instead we'll blame the EU, because its much easier to blame something on someone else than fix it yourself right?

 

Leave stated that 54% of laws were passed in Brussels, simply not true in the last 4 years I believe the actual figure is 9% (and even they are not LAW in the UK unless the government votes on it)

Leave - £350 million can be poured back into the NHS, until apparently this was found to be not actually true (a 'mistake' I believe the words were from Nigel Farage)

Leave - we can trade with the EU tariff free because we're the 5th largest (*Edit - since the huge drop in sterling today, now the 6th) economy in the world - well maybe, but you don't KNOW that.

If we do want free trade we will very likely need to keep the freedom of movement, so all that stuff about controlling our boarders is likely totally incorrect too.

 

For the last 40 years we've had free trade, free movement of people and it's been a good thing, a progressive thing, a modern world thing.

 

The EU is not perfect, I'm not suggesting it is, but the best place to be to fix something as at the table, not out of the room.

 

So, to the leave voters, congratulations, you won you 'took your country back','little England' is now yours, and for the first time in 34 years its really not somewhere I wish to be.

 

x1000000

  • Like 1
15 minutes ago, grunger106 said:

I am genuinely embarrassed to be called British today.
Both campaigns have been negatively run, however.


We as a nation have voted for a step back 60 years, it's people voting for 'the way it used to be' - when beer was cheap, measurements were in imperial and everyone was white and foreigners were things you tutted while looking for a shop that sells proper English food and on holiday.
When Britain was and empire, and won the world cup and World War II and people sang royal Britannia.

 

Here's a reality check, the world has moved on, and that should be embraced.

 

The issues we have in Britain are primarily of our own making, and we should be forcing our government to change things that needed - NHS, Tax avoidance, bank regulation.

But no, instead we'll blame the EU, because its much easier to blame something on someone else than fix it yourself right?

 

Leave stated that 54% of laws were passed in Brussels, simply not true in the last 4 years I believe the actual figure is 9% (and even they are not LAW in the UK unless the government votes on it)

Leave - £350 million can be poured back into the NHS, until apparently this was found to be not actually true (a 'mistake' I believe the words were from Nigel Farage)

Leave - we can trade with the EU tariff free because we're the 5th largest (*Edit - since the huge drop in sterling today, now the 6th) economy in the world - well maybe, but you don't KNOW that.

If we do want free trade we will very likely need to keep the freedom of movement, so all that stuff about controlling our boarders is likely totally incorrect too.

 

For the last 40 years we've had free trade, free movement of people and it's been a good thing, a progressive thing, a modern world thing.

 

The EU is not perfect, I'm not suggesting it is, but the best place to be to fix something as at the table, not out of the room.

 

So, to the leave voters, congratulations, you won you 'took your country back','little England' is now yours, and for the first time in 34 years its really not somewhere I wish to be.

 

It's like you climbed inside me, took my thoughts and wrote them out far better than i ever could!

I'm hoping the Scottish now take the lead and remove themselves from this shambles.

Just now, Mirumir said:

Are you talking about a bond issued by the Bundesbank?

EuroBunds are issued by the European Central Bank (ECB) - the Bundesbank, if I'm not mistaken, is the GERMAN equivalent to the US Treasury (or the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer), and as such does not issue Euro-wide bonds officially.  You can trade EuroBunds in Germany (and they are, in fact traded there); however, the authority derives from Brussels - not Bonn (or Berlin, for that matter).

 

Sovereign debt (or ANY debt with a negative coupon rate) means that you don't get back all you invest - why would anyone do that?  The skewing in favor of the issuer is as obvious as a knife in the back, and sovereign debt is supposed to be the refuge of choice for conservative investors (the non-wealth class); however, the EuroBund just mucked that up.

18 minutes ago, grunger106 said:

For the last 40 years we've had free trade, free movement of people and it's been a good thing, a progressive thing, a modern world thing.

Free trade isn't inherently good or bad. What matters is your country's interests. It could have been an advantageous concept 40 years ago and deteriorated into a burden over the years.

 

Anyways, none of those things are going anywhere.

 

The flow of goods and people will continue. A British tourist won't ever need a visa to go to France or Germany and vice versa.

 

 

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

This one:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

dxy2016.jpg

 

 

 

aaah.  So you consider 1 year as downward "spiral" ... ok :)  If you go back even two years you'll see that the DXY has been around 92-100 range (after a huge jump from the 70 range)... normal adjustments/conditions and certainly by no means indicative of a downward "spiral".  

 

 

Spoiler

 

Capture.JPG


 

 

Yep...sure looks like a downward spiral to me.  Your anti-US statements get nauseating .. especially when they're put into a thread which really isn't about the US.

  • Like 2
1 minute ago, jjkusaf said:

aaah.  So you consider 1 year as downward "spiral" ... ok :)  If you go back even two years you'll see that the DXY has been around 92-100 range (after a huge jump from the 70 range)... normal adjustments/conditions and certainly by no means indicative of a downward "spiral".  

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Capture.JPG

 

 

 

 

 

Yep...sure looks like a downward spiral to me.  Your anti-US statements get nauseating .. especially when they're put into a thread which really isn't about the US.

Ok...

 

Spoiler


DXY01.jpg

 

 

4 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

Ok...

 

  Hide contents

 

DXY01.jpg

 

 

Which is why I said it has been on a tear the past couple of years (well since '08).  Now you're just trying to be difficult...certainly not a continuation of a downward "spiral". :)

 

9 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

aaah.  So you consider 1 year as downward "spiral" ... ok :)  If you go back even two years you'll see that the DXY has been around 92-100 range (after a huge jump from the 70 range)... normal adjustments/conditions and certainly by no means indicative of a downward "spiral".  

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Capture.JPG

 

 

 

 

Yep...sure looks like a downward spiral to me.  Your anti-US statements get nauseating .. especially when they're put into a thread which really isn't about the US.

jjk - the inspiration for the EU itself was to counterweight the United States; and especially in terms of trade.  The same has, in fact, held true for ALL these multinational alliances - including, if not especially, Airbus Industrie.

 

JP Morgan - an American (US-based, in fact) financial institution (named after the US-based founder - James Pierpont Morgan; Morgan and FDR butted heads during the Great Depression).

While Morgan has a not-insignificant present in Europe, Citi has a bigger presence than JP Morgan; heck, Bank of America does as well (via Merrill Lynch).

I have nothing against wanting to counterweight the United States - to each their own; however, flubbing it up is Europe's own fault.

So... since the Brexit was announced...

 



The pound has plummeted to a 30 year low
Japanese stock market has crashed 8% and suspended trading
Already a push for another Scottish independence
Calls for an Irish reunification referendum
Far-right nationalists across Europe now calling for referendums and the demise of the EU
Hundreds of UK pension funds underwater
FTSE is expected to open 10% down (the bankers knocked 8% off in the 2007 financial crash, so this is big)
German DAX market expected to open 10% down
HSBC is worth £10bn less since yesterday
S&P has announced that UK now likely to lose its AAA credit rating
In two hours (as of 7am) the UK economy has lost over £255bn, the equivalent of 40 years' worth of EU contributions
The British Prime Minister has resigned

JP Morgan announced UK exit for all business

22 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

Which is why I said it has been on a tear the past couple of years (well since '08).  Now you're just trying to be difficult...certainly not a continuation of a downward "spiral". :)

I'll PM you when DXY hits a new low.

 

15 minutes ago, John. said:

Nasdaq sees worst drop since 2011!

There's an opinion that the upward ride from 2011 was fueled by the depreciating dollar. So when the dollar surged today, the U.S. stock market experienced a currency evaluation correction. In other words, since the currency has strengthened, the assets which are priced in it, depreciated. Which is the reason why the price of commodities fell too today.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Micron reveals AI companies are spending billions to lock up its memory years in advance by Karthik Mudaliar The demand for more memory is far from over, and Micron is turning the AI-driven memory shortage into a much more predictable business. The company has revealed that it has signed 16 strategic supply agreements backed by roughly $22 billion in customer deposits and other financial commitments. The contracts cover DRAM and NAND deliveries over several years, with some running through 2030. With the AI boom, demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) has grown so quickly that large customers are now prepared to help finance future production in exchange for a guaranteed supply. According to Micron’s latest financial results, the company received commitments worth about $22 billion across its new agreements. Around $18 billion is expected to arrive as cash deposits, while the rest will come through other financial arrangements. Micron says the agreements could generate approximately $100 billion in future contracted obligations. They cover around 20% of its expected DRAM shipments and one-third of its NAND shipments during their respective terms. It should be noted that although AI infrastructure is the main force behind the current shortage, not all 16 agreements with Micron involve AI companies. Micron said the customers also include consumer electronics and automotive businesses, two sectors that increasingly compete with data centers for the same manufacturing capacity. HBM is consuming an increasing share of that supply. Unlike conventional desktop or server RAM, HBM stacks multiple memory dies vertically and places them close to an AI accelerator. This gives GPUs and other AI chips access to data at much higher speeds, but it also requires more complicated manufacturing and packaging. Micron says its 12-layer HBM4 memory is now shipping in high volume for a lead customer, with samples also supplied to other companies. The chipmaker has already generated more than $1 billion in HBM4 revenue and says the product is ramping twice as quickly as its earlier HBM3E generation. Samsung has similarly warned that the memory shortage could continue into 2027 and beyond. Consumer memory companies have also had to address sharp increases in DDR5 pricing, suggesting the effects are already reaching beyond the data center. For consumers, that could mean the AI memory crunch lasts longer than expected, even as manufacturers invest heavily in new production.
    • XnConvert 1.112 by Razvan Serea  XnConvert is a cross-platform batch image-converter and resizer with a powerful and ease of use experience. All common picture and graphics formats are supported (i.e. JPG, PNG, TIFF, GIF, Camera RAW, JPEG2000, WebP, OpenEXR) as well as supporting over 500 other image formats. Also available within the batch operations include rotating, adding of watermarks, adding of text along with many image-adjustment features such as brightness, shadows and more. Among the features included are: Batch adding of files and folders Support for drag and drop of files Batch rotating, cropping, resizing and more Adding of photo masks Preserving or removing image metadata in conversions Multipage image file support (i.e animated GIF, APNG, TIFF) Command line integration via NConvert Filters - such as 'Blur', 'Gaussian Blur', 'Emboss', "Sharpen' and much more Effects - such as 'Old camera' and much more Download: XnConvert 64-bit | Standalone | ~30.0 MB (Freeware) Download: XnConvert 32-bit | Standalone Links: XnConvert Website | Screenshot | Release Announcement Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with chat cost tracking and multi-agent chats by Paul Hill Microsoft has just launched Visual Studio Code 1.126, its latest weekly release. This time, the company has focused on letting you see the total cost of chat sessions to spot expensive conversations; enabling multiple chats per session that run side-by-side in one agent host Copilot session; and letting you browse new folders safely in restricted mode. We have now reached the stage where free AI in IDEs is coming to an end. To help you keep track of your costs, VS Code now lets you see the entire cost of a chat session, rather than just individual turns. This should give you more transparency about which sessions consume the most credits, so you can better manage your usage over time and spend less. For those of you using the Agents window, you know it is possible to run and manage multiple agent sessions at once. In this update, a Copilot session started from an agent host can hold several chats at once. Explaining how this feature works, Microsoft writes: Finally, from this update forward, Microsoft will remove the pop-up when opening an untrusted folder. When you open a new folder now, it will automatically open in Restricted Mode. You will see a banner that lets you manage the trust level of the folder. Microsoft has made this change so that it’s easier to start inspecting code without giving it trust right away. If you have VS Code, you can check for updates within the app now to get this new version. Otherwise, you can download it from the Visual Studio Code website.
    • Anthropic accuses Alibaba of using 25,000 fake accounts to copy Claude's capabilities by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic has accused Alibaba of using nearly 25,000 fraudulent accounts to extract capabilities from Claude on a huge scale. According to a report from Reuters, Anthropic told US lawmakers that operators linked to Alibaba and the company’s Qwen AI team generated 28.8 million exchanges with Claude between April 22 and June 5, 2026. That is a lot of Claude conversations, but Anthropic says this was not ordinary chatbot use. The company believes the accounts were part of a coordinated effort to collect answers that could help train or improve rival AI systems. The alleged campaign reportedly focused on some of Claude’s most valuable skills, including software development, multi-step reasoning, and agentic tasks. In practical terms, that means getting an AI model to plan and complete work across several stages rather than simply answering a single question. This is called 'distillation,' where AI companies use outputs from a larger model to train a smaller and cheaper one. The smaller model learns to imitate useful parts of the more capable system without needing the same amount of computing power. The distillation process isn't automatically suspicious, but the problem comes when one company gathers another provider's outputs without permission and at an industrial scale. Also, this does not mean Alibaba obtained Claude’s source code, model weights, or original training data. Instead, Anthropic claims the accounts repeatedly asked Claude carefully designed questions and collected the answers. Those answers could then be used as training material for another model. Anthropic has made similar accusations against DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax earlier this year. As Neowin previously reported, Anthropic said those three companies collectively generated more than 16 million Claude exchanges through roughly 24,000 accounts. Anthropic says the new campaign produced almost twice as many exchanges in a matter of weeks. Anthropic reportedly told lawmakers that the campaign could help Chinese AI developers approach the capabilities of its Mythos Preview model. Mythos is focused on advanced cybersecurity work, including finding and exploiting complex software vulnerabilities. via Reuters | Photo via DepositPhotos.com
    • An Indian manufacturer that assembles roughly one-third of Apple's iPhones and supplies semiconductor components to Tesla confirmed Monday that attackers had stolen and publicly published a 630-gigabyte cache of confidential files — including engineering blueprints stamped "TRADE SECRET," a 52-page quality inspection document for iPhone circuit board components, and cryptographic certificates that security experts say could be weaponized in follow-on attacks. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/319019/20260624/apple-tesla-supplier-tata-electronics-confirms-630-gb-data-theft-iphone-specs-dark-web.htm
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      176
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      133
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!