Recommended Posts

Just as you were getting used to v1.03, here's v1.04. ;)

Download at: http://ccleaner.jump.to

Changes are as follows:

v1.04.043 - [8 Feb 2004]

- Added context menu to Registry result listview.

- Tweaked Application Path cleaning.

- Added Office 2003 cleaning.

- Added Tray Notification Cache cleaning.

- Tweaked File Extension cleaning.

- Added Installer Cleaning.

- Fixed issue with the very old Windows NT4.

- Altered fonts used within application.

Although visually everything looks the same.

Thanks for adding a 'Select All' option in the registy cleaner. Could you also add a 'Fix All' option when you go into the 'Fix Selected Issues' menu so that you dont have to click 'Fix' on every one.

Thanks again for this great program! :)

Sure can, it's on my list of things to add.

Does anyone know who I contact to get CCleaner added to the software news?

very cool... can you add paint to the programs list? that would be sweet! :)

Does anyone know who I contact to get CCleaner added to the software news?

im not sure im surprised they haven't put it up yet. this is the coolest program! ask one of the mods or post your question in forum issues.

- mike

well, a quick comparison between this app and window washer

ran ccleaner first then window washer. (both on default)

window washer found an additional 79 megs worth of wasted stuff. hmmm methinks the app might need a little more tweaking

Do you have any info on what the 79MBs consisted of?

Are you going to tell me that you have a program that you claim is just like ww but faster yet you have never ran the 2 side by side? I was trying to be nice saying it was good but needed to be tweaked more and you haven't even compared the 2?

It was 1299 internet related files at 26.8 megs

and 302 windows files at 52 megs

You want my opinion then? This little app isn't worth the time it takes to download. It's generic. I could pick 20 different programs that do the same thing only they do it better.

Take a look at Window Washer.

Your little project isn't anywhere near what this is.

It isn't a Window Washer clone when it does 10 times less than the real thing.

hell, it isn't even a clone of a poorly written app. I could get the same results from a few batch files and do the same thing your does.

Does yours have a cookie wizard interface?

Is there a plugin wizard on yours?

Can you schedule your to run at different times thru the interface?

Hell, can you even stop yours from running after it's been started?

Does it clean the memory dump?

What about the swap file or the disk checking temp files?

does is clean unused access, outlook, excel, photoeditor, powerpoint and word files?

What about netscape stuff? Does it even look for netscape?

What about AOL? Anything with aol? and on and on and on...

THAT'S why it's faster. Becouse it doesn't do as much and isn't as extensive.

So again, how exactly is this a Window Washer clone?

Edited by notsobetter
Are you going to tell me that you have a program that you claim is just like ww but faster yet you have never ran the 2 side by side? I was trying to be nice saying it was good but needed to be tweaked more and you haven't even compared the 2?

It was 1299 internet related files at 26.8 megs

and 302 windows files at 52 megs

You want my opinion then? This little app isn't worth the time it takes to download. It's generic. I could pick 20 different programs that do the same thing only they do it better.

Take a look at Window Washer.

Your little project isn't anywhere near what this is.

It isn't a Window Washer clone when it does 10 times less than the real thing.

hell, it isn't even a clone of a poorly written app. I could get the same results from a few batch files and do the same thing your does.

Does yours have a cookie wizard interface?

Is there a plugin wizard on yours?

Can you schedule your to run at different times thru the interface?

Hell, can you even stop yours from running after it's been started?

Does it clean the memory dump?

What about the swap file or the disk checking temp files?

does is clean unused access, outlook, excel, photoeditor, powerpoint and word files?

What about netscape stuff? Does it even look for netscape?

What about AOL? Anything with aol? and on and on and on...

THAT'S why it's faster. Becouse it doesn't do as much and isn't as extensive.

So again, how exactly is this a Window Washer clone?

It's a shame you don't like the software, but luckily most people here seemed to. :)

Are you going to tell me that you have a program that you claim is just like ww but faster yet you have never ran the 2 side by side? I was trying to be nice saying it was good but needed to be tweaked more and you haven't even compared the 2?

It was 1299 internet related files at 26.8 megs

and 302 windows files at 52 megs

You want my opinion then? This little app isn't worth the time it takes to download. It's generic. I could pick 20 different programs that do the same thing only they do it better.

Take a look at Window Washer.

Your little project isn't anywhere near what this is.

It isn't a Window Washer clone when it does 10 times less than the real thing.

hell, it isn't even a clone of a poorly written app. I could get the same results from a few batch files and do the same thing your does.

Does yours have a cookie wizard interface?

Is there a plugin wizard on yours?

Can you schedule your to run at different times thru the interface?

Hell, can you even stop yours from running after it's been started?

Does it clean the memory dump?

What about the swap file or the disk checking temp files?

does is clean unused access, outlook, excel, photoeditor, powerpoint and word files?

What about netscape stuff? Does it even look for netscape?

What about AOL? Anything with aol? and on and on and on...

THAT'S why it's faster. Becouse it doesn't do as much and isn't as extensive.

So again, how exactly is this a Window Washer clone?

Jeez.. It's a damn FREE program. If you want to buy Window Washer, have a blast. This guy is just being nice and trying to give someone a free program. Who knows if he is planning on adding additional features to it or not.

To the author, good luck with future development of this program. I love it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!