Doctor Dragged From United Plane After Computer "Solves" Overbooking Problem


Recommended Posts

man was violently dragged off of a United Airlines flight Sunday evening after it was apparently overbooked, according to passengers who were on the plane.

 

 

As The Courier Journal reports, a United spokesperson confirmed in an email Sunday night that a passenger had been taken off a flight in Chicago.

 

Quote

"Flight 3411 from Chicago to Louisville was overbooked," the spokesperson said. "After our team looked for volunteers, one customer refused to leave the aircraft voluntarily and law enforcement was asked to come to the gate.

 

"We apologize for the overbook situation. Further details on the removed customer should be directed to authorities."

 

Passengers were told at the gate that the flight was overbooked and United, offering $400 and a hotel stay, was looking for one volunteer to take another flight to Louisville at 3 p.m. Monday. Passengers were allowed to board the flight, Bridges said, and once the flight was filled those on the plane were told that four people needed to give up their seats to stand-by United employees that needed to be in Louisville on Monday for a flight. Passengers were told that the flight would not take off until the United crew had seats, Bridges said, and the offer was increased to $800, but no one volunteered.

 

Then, she said, a manager came aboard the plane and said a computer would select four people to be taken off the flight. One couple was selected first and left the airplane, she said, before the man in the video was confronted.

 

 

Bridges said the man became "very upset" and said that he was a doctor who needed to see patients at a hospital in the morning. The manager told him that security would be called if he did not leave willingly, Bridges said, and the man said he was calling his lawyer. One security official came and spoke with him, and then another security officer came when he still refused. Then, she said, a third security official came on the plane and threw the passenger against the armrest before dragging him out of the plane.

 

"Everyone was shocked and appalled," Bridges said. "There were several children on the flight as well that were very upset."

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-10/doctor-dragged-united-plane-after-computer-solves-overbooking-problem

 

Once the authorities are involved, I don't care how badly you WANT to stay on that flight, it isn't going to happen and you should just accept defeat and fight it later.  This dumb fool got what he deserved.

  • Like 3

A paying customer was forcibly ejected to make room for staff, what he deserved was to fly on the plane he paid for a ticket for.

Once the authorities are involved, I don't care how badly you WANT to stay on that flight, it isn't going to happen and you should just accept defeat and fight it later.  This dumb fool got what he deserved.

 

Depends, what kind of patients was he seeing? Are lives in danger if he does not arrive? I can tell you what happens when we need a specific doctor or specialist at my hospital that we have missing, we fly them from anywhere and they have to show up or patients could decline or die. Now your probably right chances are he's just a hospitalist and can be filled in for, but still curious to know for sure.

 

That lady in the background is ridiculous. "OH MY GAWD". "Look what you've done to him". You mean look what he did to himself? He had every opportunity to get off knowing he would be required to. Then as the police have to use force, he starts screaming like a child? Get a grip.

  • Like 2

Yea, that is ######.  The Airline should have made different plans for their employees.  Inconveniencing paying customers because of their mistakes is crap.

11 minutes ago, techbeck said:

Yea, that is ######.  The Airline should have made different plans for their employees.  Inconveniencing paying customers because of their mistakes is crap.

This is hard to agree with without a better understanding of how airlines schedule and assign crew (and I don't have that understanding). I know I've waited through hours of flight delays because the crew assigned to my flight were arriving first from another delayed flight, and it drove me crazy because in my head there had to be such a thing as a plan B for absent flight crew.

 

But then I remembered how even buses in my town work, where a single bus could be delayed into the abyss and there's no concept of "dynamically assigned routes" to the next available bus or something.

 

In the grand scheme of things, with the way airlines work right now, inconveniencing one passenger to maintain a critical chain of scheduled flights later might have been the responsible choice.

United really f'ed this up. Almost every airline I have flown, the staff members fly standby if the flight is full. For united to force paying customers off and have to get authorities involved just looks really bad. 

United CEO Responds

 

Following the dragging of a doctor from a plane - after he refused to leave when a computer selected him for removal when the airline overbooked the flight - United CEO Oscar Munoz has (finally) responded...

 

Quote

This is an upsetting event to all of us here at United. I apologize for us here at United. I apologize for having to re-accommodate these customers.

 

Our team is moving with a sense of urgency to work with the authorities and conduct our own detailed review of what happened.

 

We are also reaching out to this passenger to talk directly to him and further address and resolve this further address and resolve this situation.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-10/united-ceo-responds

That is seriously messed up. A couple was 'selected' as was the doctor, what about the other seat needed? They said they needed 4 seats, and by the math here only 3 were removed...

  • Like 2

They knew that it was overbooked before they let people on the plane. They should have let employees on the plane before customers and settle the mess they made at the gate before letting people board the plane.

2 hours ago, Bryan R. said:

That lady in the background is ridiculous. "OH MY GAWD". "Look what you've done to him". You mean look what he did to himself? He had every opportunity to get off knowing he would be required to. Then as the police have to use force, he starts screaming like a child? Get a grip.

They could have just waited and arrested him when he arrived at the destination.

 

Instead, they choose the idiot's route, now he gets to sue for assault (they'll settle) and United's PR takes a big hit (they'll recover). The "officers" involved will get an unpaid (well deserved) leave.

 

 

  • Like 2
2 hours ago, Bryan R. said:

That lady in the background is ridiculous. "OH MY GAWD". "Look what you've done to him". You mean look what he did to himself? He had every opportunity to get off knowing he would be required to. Then as the police have to use force, he starts screaming like a child? Get a grip.

 

My thoughts exactly.

5 minutes ago, Joe User said:

They could have just waited and arrested him when he arrived at the destination.

 

Instead, they choose the idiot's route, now he gets to sue for assault (they'll settle) and United's PR takes a big hit (they'll recover).

 

arrest him for what? He did nothing wrong...

6 minutes ago, Ravensky said:

arrest him for what? He did nothing wrong...

Failing to follow an airline employees direction, it's in the Patriot Act.  "interfering with flight crew" is the term. 

3 hours ago, Nogib said:

Once the authorities are involved, I don't care how badly you WANT to stay on that flight, it isn't going to happen and you should just accept defeat and fight it later.  This dumb fool got what he deserved.

NO ONE deserves to be treated like that. Period.  Even less so when they've committed no crime at all.  This entire incident was down to United overbooking the flight, so I hope he sues them into the poor house, they deserve it.

 

17 minutes ago, Joe User said:

Failing to follow an airline employees direction, it's in the Patriot Act.  "interfering with flight crew" is the term. 

He didn't interfere with anyone. They interfered with HIM.

 

3 hours ago, Nogib said:

Once the authorities are involved, I don't care how badly you WANT to stay on that flight, it isn't going to happen and you should just accept defeat and fight it later.  This dumb fool got what he deserved.

 

 

Well this fool is going to get paid. 

  • Like 4
3 hours ago, Nogib said:

Once the authorities are involved, I don't care how badly you WANT to stay on that flight, it isn't going to happen and you should just accept defeat and fight it later.  This dumb fool got what he deserved.

Did he? This "dumb fool" is going to come out ahead in this. United is going to come out looking like a bunch of morons which is why the CEO has responded to try and do some damage control.

 

By law united has to pay 4x the ticket price upto a limit of $1,350 for people when you get delayed for more than two hours (domestic, 4 hours international) an action that is within their control (overbooking is one of those actions). United knows this, instead they offered $400 and then $800. So yeah maybe United should have followed the law themselves before forcibly removing passengers from a plane and offering them less than they're entitled to (not once but twice).

Quote

(3) Compensation shall be 400% of the fare to the passenger's destination or first stopover, with a maximum of $1,350, if the carrier does not offer alternate transportation that, at the time the arrangement is made, is planned to arrive at the airport of the passenger's first stopover, or if none, the airport of the passenger's final destination less than two hours after the planned arrival time of the passenger's original flight.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/250.5

 

All the airlines know this which is why they try to offer you smaller amounts, vouchers, hotel stays to get around having to pay you. If you accept that, well you're a ######## idiot.

Edited by -Razorfold

My thoughts on this earlier today

 

They should be ashamed of themselves, overbooking is their fault and the paying customers are ultimately the losers each time.

1 hour ago, Joe User said:

Failing to follow an airline employees direction, it's in the Patriot Act.  "interfering with flight crew" is the term. 

HE didn't interfere with them, they started it... so technically he did nothing wrong and has EVERY right to sue the ###### out of the airline.

  • Like 4

Whether he was technically wrong or right will be immaterial. This is disaster for their PR. They need to learn that freaking everything will be recorded by 20 people on their phones, and this just looks plain horrible. That appearance is all most people will see; thugs beating a man and dragging him down the aisle. There will definitely be a suit, a massive PR hit, and probably a (slight) change in policy for every airline.

  • Like 5
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "Claude, is our CEO a compete and utter fool by wasting money on AI in this already worthless Teams chat?"
    • Endless Wars  Endless Shrimp!!! 🦐    
    • How can it beat a Steam machine without a serious GPU? The two CU iGPU only provides about 5fps in gaming. That's not going to make any gamer happy.
    • Anthropic introduces Claude Tag, a new AI teammate for Slack by Fiza Ali Anthropic has announced Claude Tag, a new feature that lets teams work with Claude directly inside Slack. The idea is simple: once Claude is added to a Slack workspace and given access to selected channels, users can tag @Claude in conversations and assign tasks. Claude can then work through those requests using connected tools and data sources before posting its results back into a Slack thread. What makes Claude Tag different from a typical chatbot is that it's designed to operate as a shared assistant for an entire team rather than a single user. Everyone in a channel interacts with the same Claude instance. This allows the team members to see ongoing work and continue tasks started by others. Furthermore, Anthropic says the AI can build context over time by following conversations in channels where it has permission to operate. This means users don't have to repeatedly provide the same background information for every request. The system is also designed for asynchronous work. Instead of waiting for responses in a chat window, users can assign a task to Claude and return later once the work is complete. Anthropic says Claude can break larger requests into multiple steps and use connected tools to complete them. Moreover, the system can also schedule follow-up tasks and continue working on projects over extended periods. Another feature allows Claude to keep the users updated and follow up on unresolved tasks when its optional "ambient" mode is enabled. The company says the tool is already being used internally for software development, data analysis, support workflows, and debugging. According to Anthropic, around 65% of its product team's code is now generated through its internal version of Claude Tag. For organisations concerned about security, administrators can control which channels, tools, and data sources Claude can access. Separate Claude instances can also be configured for different departments, helping keep information isolated between teams. Administrators can also monitor activity logs, review completed tasks, and set spending limits at both the organisation and channel level. Claude Tag is now available in beta for Claude Enterprise and Claude Team customers and runs on Claude Opus 4.8 that was announced this May. The feature will also replace Anthropic's existing Claude in Slack application, with current users able to migrate within a 30-day migration window. Lastly, eligible customers will receive introductory credits to help teams evaluate the new experience.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      110
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!