Doctor Dragged From United Plane After Computer "Solves" Overbooking Problem


Recommended Posts

man was violently dragged off of a United Airlines flight Sunday evening after it was apparently overbooked, according to passengers who were on the plane.

 

 

As The Courier Journal reports, a United spokesperson confirmed in an email Sunday night that a passenger had been taken off a flight in Chicago.

 

Quote

"Flight 3411 from Chicago to Louisville was overbooked," the spokesperson said. "After our team looked for volunteers, one customer refused to leave the aircraft voluntarily and law enforcement was asked to come to the gate.

 

"We apologize for the overbook situation. Further details on the removed customer should be directed to authorities."

 

Passengers were told at the gate that the flight was overbooked and United, offering $400 and a hotel stay, was looking for one volunteer to take another flight to Louisville at 3 p.m. Monday. Passengers were allowed to board the flight, Bridges said, and once the flight was filled those on the plane were told that four people needed to give up their seats to stand-by United employees that needed to be in Louisville on Monday for a flight. Passengers were told that the flight would not take off until the United crew had seats, Bridges said, and the offer was increased to $800, but no one volunteered.

 

Then, she said, a manager came aboard the plane and said a computer would select four people to be taken off the flight. One couple was selected first and left the airplane, she said, before the man in the video was confronted.

 

 

Bridges said the man became "very upset" and said that he was a doctor who needed to see patients at a hospital in the morning. The manager told him that security would be called if he did not leave willingly, Bridges said, and the man said he was calling his lawyer. One security official came and spoke with him, and then another security officer came when he still refused. Then, she said, a third security official came on the plane and threw the passenger against the armrest before dragging him out of the plane.

 

"Everyone was shocked and appalled," Bridges said. "There were several children on the flight as well that were very upset."

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-10/doctor-dragged-united-plane-after-computer-solves-overbooking-problem

 

Once the authorities are involved, I don't care how badly you WANT to stay on that flight, it isn't going to happen and you should just accept defeat and fight it later.  This dumb fool got what he deserved.

  • Like 3

A paying customer was forcibly ejected to make room for staff, what he deserved was to fly on the plane he paid for a ticket for.

Once the authorities are involved, I don't care how badly you WANT to stay on that flight, it isn't going to happen and you should just accept defeat and fight it later.  This dumb fool got what he deserved.

 

Depends, what kind of patients was he seeing? Are lives in danger if he does not arrive? I can tell you what happens when we need a specific doctor or specialist at my hospital that we have missing, we fly them from anywhere and they have to show up or patients could decline or die. Now your probably right chances are he's just a hospitalist and can be filled in for, but still curious to know for sure.

 

That lady in the background is ridiculous. "OH MY GAWD". "Look what you've done to him". You mean look what he did to himself? He had every opportunity to get off knowing he would be required to. Then as the police have to use force, he starts screaming like a child? Get a grip.

  • Like 2
11 minutes ago, techbeck said:

Yea, that is ######.  The Airline should have made different plans for their employees.  Inconveniencing paying customers because of their mistakes is crap.

This is hard to agree with without a better understanding of how airlines schedule and assign crew (and I don't have that understanding). I know I've waited through hours of flight delays because the crew assigned to my flight were arriving first from another delayed flight, and it drove me crazy because in my head there had to be such a thing as a plan B for absent flight crew.

 

But then I remembered how even buses in my town work, where a single bus could be delayed into the abyss and there's no concept of "dynamically assigned routes" to the next available bus or something.

 

In the grand scheme of things, with the way airlines work right now, inconveniencing one passenger to maintain a critical chain of scheduled flights later might have been the responsible choice.

United really f'ed this up. Almost every airline I have flown, the staff members fly standby if the flight is full. For united to force paying customers off and have to get authorities involved just looks really bad. 

United CEO Responds

 

Following the dragging of a doctor from a plane - after he refused to leave when a computer selected him for removal when the airline overbooked the flight - United CEO Oscar Munoz has (finally) responded...

 

Quote

This is an upsetting event to all of us here at United. I apologize for us here at United. I apologize for having to re-accommodate these customers.

 

Our team is moving with a sense of urgency to work with the authorities and conduct our own detailed review of what happened.

 

We are also reaching out to this passenger to talk directly to him and further address and resolve this further address and resolve this situation.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-10/united-ceo-responds

That is seriously messed up. A couple was 'selected' as was the doctor, what about the other seat needed? They said they needed 4 seats, and by the math here only 3 were removed...

  • Like 2

They knew that it was overbooked before they let people on the plane. They should have let employees on the plane before customers and settle the mess they made at the gate before letting people board the plane.

2 hours ago, Bryan R. said:

That lady in the background is ridiculous. "OH MY GAWD". "Look what you've done to him". You mean look what he did to himself? He had every opportunity to get off knowing he would be required to. Then as the police have to use force, he starts screaming like a child? Get a grip.

They could have just waited and arrested him when he arrived at the destination.

 

Instead, they choose the idiot's route, now he gets to sue for assault (they'll settle) and United's PR takes a big hit (they'll recover). The "officers" involved will get an unpaid (well deserved) leave.

 

 

  • Like 2
2 hours ago, Bryan R. said:

That lady in the background is ridiculous. "OH MY GAWD". "Look what you've done to him". You mean look what he did to himself? He had every opportunity to get off knowing he would be required to. Then as the police have to use force, he starts screaming like a child? Get a grip.

 

My thoughts exactly.

5 minutes ago, Joe User said:

They could have just waited and arrested him when he arrived at the destination.

 

Instead, they choose the idiot's route, now he gets to sue for assault (they'll settle) and United's PR takes a big hit (they'll recover).

 

arrest him for what? He did nothing wrong...

6 minutes ago, Ravensky said:

arrest him for what? He did nothing wrong...

Failing to follow an airline employees direction, it's in the Patriot Act.  "interfering with flight crew" is the term. 

3 hours ago, Nogib said:

Once the authorities are involved, I don't care how badly you WANT to stay on that flight, it isn't going to happen and you should just accept defeat and fight it later.  This dumb fool got what he deserved.

NO ONE deserves to be treated like that. Period.  Even less so when they've committed no crime at all.  This entire incident was down to United overbooking the flight, so I hope he sues them into the poor house, they deserve it.

 

17 minutes ago, Joe User said:

Failing to follow an airline employees direction, it's in the Patriot Act.  "interfering with flight crew" is the term. 

He didn't interfere with anyone. They interfered with HIM.

 

3 hours ago, Nogib said:

Once the authorities are involved, I don't care how badly you WANT to stay on that flight, it isn't going to happen and you should just accept defeat and fight it later.  This dumb fool got what he deserved.

 

 

Well this fool is going to get paid. 

  • Like 4
3 hours ago, Nogib said:

Once the authorities are involved, I don't care how badly you WANT to stay on that flight, it isn't going to happen and you should just accept defeat and fight it later.  This dumb fool got what he deserved.

Did he? This "dumb fool" is going to come out ahead in this. United is going to come out looking like a bunch of morons which is why the CEO has responded to try and do some damage control.

 

By law united has to pay 4x the ticket price upto a limit of $1,350 for people when you get delayed for more than two hours (domestic, 4 hours international) an action that is within their control (overbooking is one of those actions). United knows this, instead they offered $400 and then $800. So yeah maybe United should have followed the law themselves before forcibly removing passengers from a plane and offering them less than they're entitled to (not once but twice).

Quote

(3) Compensation shall be 400% of the fare to the passenger's destination or first stopover, with a maximum of $1,350, if the carrier does not offer alternate transportation that, at the time the arrangement is made, is planned to arrive at the airport of the passenger's first stopover, or if none, the airport of the passenger's final destination less than two hours after the planned arrival time of the passenger's original flight.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/250.5

 

All the airlines know this which is why they try to offer you smaller amounts, vouchers, hotel stays to get around having to pay you. If you accept that, well you're a ######## idiot.

Edited by -Razorfold

My thoughts on this earlier today

 

They should be ashamed of themselves, overbooking is their fault and the paying customers are ultimately the losers each time.

1 hour ago, Joe User said:

Failing to follow an airline employees direction, it's in the Patriot Act.  "interfering with flight crew" is the term. 

HE didn't interfere with them, they started it... so technically he did nothing wrong and has EVERY right to sue the ###### out of the airline.

  • Like 4

Whether he was technically wrong or right will be immaterial. This is disaster for their PR. They need to learn that freaking everything will be recorded by 20 people on their phones, and this just looks plain horrible. That appearance is all most people will see; thugs beating a man and dragging him down the aisle. There will definitely be a suit, a massive PR hit, and probably a (slight) change in policy for every airline.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
    • Amazon Prime Day 2026 deal sees Samsung Odyssey 49" 240Hz QD-OLED monitor at lowest price by Sayan Sen Earlier today we covered a very good deal on JBL's BAR 800 Dolby Atmos soundbar system as the unit is available for just $600 as part of Amazon Prime Day 2026 deals. That's not all though as there are many more discounts to choose from. If you are looking for a high-end monitor, Samsung's 49 inch G9 QD-OLED gaming monitor is a solid deal too as it's currently just $855 (purchase link under the specs table down below). It is a super-ultrawide (32:9) 1440p curved gaming monitor and as such should offer a very immersive experience. The G93SC is a 49-inch QD-OLED (Quantum Dot OLED) screen and that means it should have excellent contrast as well as color reproduction. Brightness is a bit lacking though so if you are looking to set it up in a relatively bright room, you may be better off with something else. Speaking of external light and brightness, the major difference on the G93SC vs the newer G93SD is that the latter comes with Samsung's "Glare Free" technology to reduce glare while the C model packs a glossy finish. The technical specifications of the Samsung G93SC are given in the table below: Specification Value Panel Type OLED Screen Shape Curved Screen Curvature 1800R Resolution DQHD (5120 × 1440) Aspect Ratio 32:9 Brightness (Typical) 250 cd/m² Brightness (Minimum) 200 cd/m² Contrast Ratio 1,000,000:1 HDR Support VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400 HDR10+ HDR10+ Gaming Response Time 0.03 ms (GTG) Refresh Rate Up to 240 Hz Viewing Angle 178° Horizontal / 178° Vertical Color Support 1 Billion Colors Color Gamut 99% DCI-P3 (CIE1976) Adaptive Sync FreeSync Premium Pro / G-SYNC Compatible DisplayPort 1 × DisplayPort 1.4 HDMI 1 × HDMI 2.1 Micro HDMI 1 × Micro HDMI 2.1 USB Hub 3 × USB 3.0 Speakers Built-in Speaker Output 5W × 2 Channels Operating Temperature 10°C – 40°C Operating Humidity 10–80% (Non-condensing) Stand Type Height Adjustable Stand (HAS) Height Adjustment 120.0 ± 5.0 mm Tilt -2° (±2°) to 15° (±2°) Wall Mount 100 × 100 mm (VESA) Included HDMI Cable HDMI-to-Micro HDMI Cable Included DisplayPort Cable Yes Get it at the link below: Samsung 49" Odyssey G93SC Series Curved Gaming Monitor, QD-OLED: $854.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US with Prime) Prime subscription can be cancelled within three business days at no cost. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Actually Windows 11 is the GUI from Windows 10 X slapped onto Windows 10. Hence the many performance issues and initial limitations of the UI, like all the restrictions on the task bar placement and features. You could not even right click on the Taskbar and bring up task manager when it first shipped. Windows 10X was truly a new OS from the ground up. Basically a lightweight OS that ran containers for various app types. Win32 got its own container. Performance was not good and OEM’s pushed back on it, but wanted a new OS to push Pc sales. Hence Windows 11. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_10X
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      457
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!