Doctor Dragged From United Plane After Computer "Solves" Overbooking Problem


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, J. X. Maxwell said:

Don't overbook

Unfortunately that's not an option for airlines because sometimes people don't show up and that mean an empty seat, an empty seat that could have gone to another paying customer. 

3 minutes ago, Doli said:

Unfortunately that's not an option for airlines because sometimes people don't show up and that mean an empty seat, an empty seat that could have gone to another paying customer. 

strange conception: if passenger had paid for seat, but didn't appear ==>> company gained money + less weight to take off.

Just now, SarK0Y said:

strange conception: if passenger had paid for seat, but didn't appear ==>> company gained money + less weight to take off.

...or still get the money from the person that didn't show up if they have a nonrefundable ticket and fill the seat and get more money.

There is absolutely no reason for this gentleman to have been forcibly dragged out, bloodied up and ultimately taken to the hospital...all because (really) United overbooked their flight.  They could have handled this so much better ... I do not blame the victim at all in this.

 

Major PR hit for United and hopefully they will change their practice ... though I doubt it as in a few days this will be "yesterday's" news and be forgotten.  

 

This should never happen to a passenger ... simply because the plane is overbooked.

 

C9FMXliUwAE4096.thumb.jpg.c82b49661aac2cd12e2e344f5acafba6.jpg

 

Saw this on Twitter ...

 

C9FGTT5WsAA3Cz-.thumb.jpg.1fdf81cf9ae27554a01fe4f1a7ee4ab0.jpg

 

Fitting.

In the EU many passengers literally want to be denied boarding - it's automatic 600 EUR (well, not automatic, sometimes you have to go via a 3rd party which keeps roughly 25%, but then you don't have to deal with lawyers if the company decides they'll their chances). Overbooking seems to be quite popular in the US - I guess it has to do with refund/exchange ticket policies.

  • Like 2
50 minutes ago, Jim K said:

There is absolutely no reason for this gentleman to have been forcibly dragged out, bloodied up and ultimately taken to the hospital...all because (really) United overbooked their flight.  They could have handled this so much better ... I do not blame the victim at all in this.

 

Major PR hit for United and hopefully they will change their practice ... though I doubt it as in a few days this will be "yesterday's" news and be forgotten.  

 

This should never happen to a passenger ... simply because the plane is overbooked.

 

C9FMXliUwAE4096.thumb.jpg.c82b49661aac2cd12e2e344f5acafba6.jpg

 

Saw this on Twitter ...

 

C9FGTT5WsAA3Cz-.thumb.jpg.1fdf81cf9ae27554a01fe4f1a7ee4ab0.jpg

 

Fitting.

Well, he was essentially denied boarding. At that stage he should have left and sued them for statutory or situation-specific compensation for breach of contract. Now, the airplane is a private property and the airline can kick you out whenever they want (though if they do they risk ending up with the PR disaster this is). He can of course sue for excessive force, but the fact is he failed to comply with the instructions of the airport authorities which won't help him.

7 minutes ago, Breach said:

Well, he was essentially denied boarding. At that stage he should have left and sued them for statutory or situation-specific compensation for breach of contract. Now, the airplane is a private property and the airline can kick you out whenever they want (though if they do they risk ending up with the PR disaster this is). He can of course sue for excessive force, but the fact is he failed to comply with the instructions of the airport authorities which won't help him.

Doesn't change my view in any way ... a passenger should not be physically harmed simply because United overbooked a flight.  They should have looked at alternative methods ... not get law enforcement involved because of their mistake.

 

Also, if you are going to deny me boarding ... you should do it before I've boarded.

3 minutes ago, Jim K said:

Doesn't change my view in any way ... a passenger should not be physically harmed simply because United overbooked a flight.  They should have looked at alternative methods ... not get law enforcement involved because of their mistake.

Yes, I agree that paying passengers shouldn't be physically harmed, but what are they supposed to do when they say 'get out' and he says 'I won't' (assuming this is what happened here)? Find a more vulnerable passenger? Stay on the tarmac until someone decides to leave?

1 hour ago, SarK0Y said:

strange conception: if passenger had paid for seat, but didn't appear ==>> company gained money + less weight to take off.

Indeed, they get the money anyway, plus they save fuel so it's a win already. Selling the same seat twice just to make even more money sounds like... a very crooked way of doing business. Not to mention that selling your seat also to someone else implies that they're never going to provide you with the service to begin with...

5 minutes ago, Breach said:

Yes, I agree that paying passengers shouldn't be physically harmed, but what are they supposed to do when they say 'get out' and he says 'I won't' (assuming this is what happened here)? Find a more vulnerable passenger? Stay on the tarmac until someone decides to leave?

They should have thought about that before they let the passengers on the plane.  Not ... "whoops...we got 4 United employees ... get off."   Or...I don't know ... by time all of this was arranged that could have probably given the 4 employees a rental car, some per diem and asked them to drive to Louisville (300 miles)...they probably would have beat the plane anyway ;)

 

What shouldn't have happened is this victim, who was in his seat and obviously wanting to get home (regardless of reason), getting beat up and sent to the hospital.  

  • Like 8
3 minutes ago, Jim K said:

They should have thought about that before they let the passengers on the plane.  Not ... "whoops...we got 4 United employees ... get off."   Or...I don't know ... by time all of this was arranged that could have probably given the 4 employees a rental car, some per diem and asked them to drive to Louisville (300 miles)...they probably would have beat the plane anyway ;)

 

What shouldn't have happened is this victim, who was in his seat and obviously wanting to get home (regardless of reason), getting beat up and sent to the hospital.  

20/20 hindsight, I'm sure they'd have done a number of things differently. You call airport security, you automatically should know that an escalation could ensue and you make headlines. So United did something dumb, but I'm sure tensions were high at that stage and they didn't want to show weakness in front of the other passengers. On the other hand the goons are airport staff and though obviously mediation skills are unlikely on their job descriptions should have handled this better.

  • Like 2

Well all the internet lawyers have made their appearance,  and have straighten out this mess so that all of us slow witted fools can now fully understand what is right and what is wrong.  Thank you all you highly smart lawyers, not really sure who the smarter lawyers, those of you here on Neowin or those on CNN, CBS, NBC, Fox newx, ex. 

2 hours ago, Zagadka said:

Whether he was technically wrong or right will be immaterial. This is disaster for their PR. They need to learn that freaking everything will be recorded by 20 people on their phones, and this just looks plain horrible. That appearance is all most people will see; thugs beating a man and dragging him down the aisle. There will definitely be a suit, a massive PR hit, and probably a (slight) change in policy for every airline.

There will potentially be a change in policy, but only as long as this remains in the public's memory, which won't be long.

14 minutes ago, Pam14160 said:

Well all the internet lawyers have made their appearance,  and have straighten out this mess so that all of us slow witted fools can now fully understand what is right and what is wrong.  Thank you all you highly smart lawyers, not really sure who the smarter lawyers, those of you here on Neowin or those on CNN, CBS, NBC, Fox newx, ex. 

The people on Neowin here are almost surely smarter than the talking heads on most cable news networks.

  • Like 2

The cops are even more guilty than United but of course they will never be charged. They violently beat a man who was clearly not a threat. Their job is to try and deescalate situations and help people but of course in practice they do the exact opposite. 

 

I'm pretty sure if this guy tries to sue he's going to be charged with resisting arrest and assaulting the police which is a felony.

 

This kind of brutality is pretty standard procedure now and no one gives a damn anymore. 

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, Nogib said:

He certainly did.  He literally ASKED for it to go down that way.

He asked to be beaten up by thugs? You are one piece of work. Let me guess you also support the cops spraying ice cold water on protesters and firing at them right?

  • Like 3
16 minutes ago, Pam14160 said:

Well all the internet lawyers have made their appearance,  and have straighten out this mess so that all of us slow witted fools can now fully understand what is right and what is wrong.  Thank you all you highly smart lawyers, not really sure who the smarter lawyers, those of you here on Neowin or those on CNN, CBS, NBC, Fox newx, ex. 

no, i'm not a lawyer & never was :) but situation looks curious enough.

3 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

He didn't interfere with anyone. They interfered with HIM.

 

 

2 hours ago, Ravensky said:

HE didn't interfere with them, they started it... 

LOL, no.

 

Read your contract. 

1 hour ago, Nogib said:

He certainly did.  He literally ASKED for it to go down that way.

 

LOL, no. 

 

Paul Blart's airline cousins didn't follow proper procedures. They'll get a few days off, and somewhere an insurance company will pay out a few hundred thousand.

 

55 minutes ago, Breach said:

Yes, I agree that paying passengers shouldn't be physically harmed, but what are they supposed to do when they say 'get out' and he says 'I won't' (assuming this is what happened here)? Find a more vulnerable passenger? Stay on the tarmac until someone decides to leave?

He's non violent. You arrest him when he leaves.

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!