Doctor Dragged From United Plane After Computer "Solves" Overbooking Problem


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Riva said:

I dont even have to say he is full of BS since his letter praising staff for the incident this morning leaked.

The first two things he should have done are to offer an apology and some compensations. It would have done a lot to contain the damage.

 

"I want to apologize on the behalf of United Airlines. This is not what you should expect of UA.

 

As a token of this apology, United Airlines offers to let Mr. Whatever fly on first class free of charge for the next year."

10 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

The first two things he should have done are to offer an apology and some compensations. It would have done a lot to contain the damage.

 

"I want to apologize on the behalf of United Airlines. This is not what you should expect of UA.

 

As a token of this apology, United Airlines offers to let Mr. Whatever fly on first class free of charge for the next year."

 

That is a good start, although you need a TARDIS to make it work at this point.

 

If the executive had interrupted his golf game for a minute, he would have realized that his company committed violent assault on it's own customer and every single potential customer would have to wonder just a bit if they were next. Cue in mass exodus of customers...

 

Lifetime First Class and immediate announcement of employee training (including himself) for zero-tolerance on physical assault of customers are starting minimums.

 

That's probably not going to be enough at this point and a campaign something like "our pizza sucks" which Dominos used to rescue their company is probably needed here.

 

https://hbr.org/2016/11/how-dominos-pizza-reinvented-itself

http://www.cpbgroup.com/work/dominos/dominos-pizza-turnaround

 

  • Like 1
31 minutes ago, Riva said:

This airline incidentally has a high fatality rate for pets in transit.

That is correct. We've had our own bad experience with a puppy we had transferred using UA. They basically didn't feed our tiny puppy the whole flight and we suspect that his crate was dropped.

 

With that said, and my previous statements, I still don't like how this passenger acted. He simply needed to get off when force going to be the only option left. Yes, UA are crap. Their policies are apparently crap. The CEO is apparently crap. People should vote with their wallet, not protest and make a scene on a flight full of people.

On 4/10/2017 at 3:26 PM, Jim K said:

There is absolutely no reason for this gentleman to have been forcibly dragged out, bloodied up and ultimately taken to the hospital...all because (really) United overbooked their flight.  They could have handled this so much better ... I do not blame the victim at all in this.

 

Major PR hit for United and hopefully they will change their practice ... though I doubt it as in a few days this will be "yesterday's" news and be forgotten.  

 

This should never happen to a passenger ... simply because the plane is overbooked.

 

C9FMXliUwAE4096.thumb.jpg.c82b49661aac2cd12e2e344f5acafba6.jpg

 

Saw this on Twitter ...

 

C9FGTT5WsAA3Cz-.thumb.jpg.1fdf81cf9ae27554a01fe4f1a7ee4ab0.jpg

 

Fitting.

He actually got back on the flight. Not sure what happened to him afterwards but there is footage of him running back to his seat so I don't know if he actually went to the hospital.

5 minutes ago, trag3dy said:

He actually got back on the flight. Not sure what happened to him afterwards but there is footage of him running back to his seat so I don't know if he actually went to the hospital.

 

 

Quote

On Tuesday afternoon, Dao's lawyers said he was being treated at a Chicago hospital.

CNN

5 hours ago, patseguin said:

No, an opinion would be something like "He was combative so he deserved to be knocked unconscious.". I was merely speculating that there was more to what happened than shown the video.

Actually, no, that's modification of an opinion, the opinion part of that statement was 'he deserved to be knocked unconscious'.

I have no opinion on the matter as I don't know the whole story, but feel sympathetic towards the victim at this point, something that can be changed if the victim is indeed a perpetrator.

  • Like 3
3 hours ago, DevTech said:

https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2017/04/united-video-scandal-law/522552/?utm_source=nextdraft&utm_medium=email

 

"According to its contract of carriage, United can deny boarding on oversold flights if passengers don’t accept compensation. Here is the key part of the contract language, under Rule 25 Denied Boarding Compensation (which, notably, says nothing about forcibly removing passengers after they have boarded the plane to make room for United workers):"

 

"Boarding Priorities - If a flight is Oversold, no one may be denied boarding against his/her will until UA or other carrier personnel first ask for volunteers who will give up their reservations willingly in exchange for compensation as determined by UA. If there are not enough volunteers, other Passengers may be denied boarding involuntarily in accordance with UA’s boarding priority."

 

So you really stretch the idea of private property to cover a large amount of money already paid to be sitting in a seat on that private property and the even if you were the only person this year to actually read the fine print you would have been rewarded with the info that accorting to United's own policies you can't be bumped once your are actually sitting in the plane.

 

So no, they didn't have the "evil sneaky fine print" right to do this, they had no moral right whatsoever to do this and they certainly had no common sense in their management chain to have allowed this to happen.

 

"Paying customers have rights outlined in the agreement they make when buying those services, and those services clearly outline the policy when overbooking/bumping occurs."

 

Yup, that agreement says he gets to stay in his seat!

 

 

http://www.popularmechanics.com/flight/airlines/news/a26010/united-airlines-bump-passenger-rights/
 

https://www.united.com/web/en-US/content/contract-of-carriage.aspx
 

Quote

Seat assignments, regardless of class of service, are not guaranteed and are subject to change without notice. UA reserves the right to reseat a Passenger for any reason, including from an Economy Plus seat for which the applicable fee has been paid (fees range from 9 USD/CAD to 299 USD/CAD per flight segment per person), and if a Passenger is improperly or erroneously upgraded to a different class of service. If a Passenger is removed from an Economy Plus seat for which a fee has been paid, and the Passenger is not re-accommodated in an Economy Plus seat or a seat of equal or greater value, or if a Passenger is downgraded from a class of service and is not re-accommodated in a seat in an equal or greater class of service for which a fee has been paid, the Passenger will be eligible for a refund in accordance with Rule 27. UA also prohibits Passengers from selling their seat assignments at any time and/or exchanging them at the time of boarding without first advising a member of the crew.

Quote

Schedules are Subject To Change Without Notice - Times shown on tickets, timetables, published schedules or elsewhere, and aircraft type and similar details reflected on tickets or UA’s schedule are not guaranteed and form no part of this contract. UA may substitute alternate carriers or aircraft, delay or cancel flights, and alter or omit stopping places or connections shown on the ticket at any time. UA will promptly provide Passengers the best available information regarding known delays, cancellations, misconnections and diversions, but UA is not liable for any misstatements or other errors or omissions in connection with providing such information. No employee, agent or representative of UA can bind UA legally by reason of any statements relating to flight status or other information. Except to the extent provided in this Rule, UA shall not be liable for failing to operate any flight according to schedule, or for any change in flight schedule, with or without notice to the passenger.

Quote

Safety – Whenever refusal or removal of a Passenger may be necessary for the safety of such Passenger or other Passengers or members of the crew including, but not limited to:

  • Passengers whose conduct is disorderly, offensive, abusive, or violent;
  • Passengers who fail to comply with or interfere with the duties of the members of the flight crew, federal regulations, or security directives;

Seems like they have their bases covered in the Contract of Carriage.

8 minutes ago, Emn1ty said:

Same could be said about all company contracts, they're there with addendums and loopholes designed specifically to bail the 'company' out if ###### goes south unfortunately, very few realise that those loopholes can be reversed depending on the situation.

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, The Evil Overlord said:

Same could be said about all company contracts, they're there with addendums and loopholes designed specifically to bail the 'company' out if ###### goes south unfortunately, very few realise that those loopholes can be reversed depending on the situation.

Yes they can, however this guy seems to have made a few of his own mistakes during this encounter.

  • Like 1
On 4/10/2017 at 11:53 AM, Nogib said:

Once the authorities are involved, I don't care how badly you WANT to stay on that flight, it isn't going to happen and you should just accept defeat and fight it later.  This dumb fool got what he deserved.

I would say that is cowardly advice ignoring all the civil rights accomplishments in the last 1000years. If you think surrendering your rights works, tell that to the JEWS in NAZI GERMANY...

 

Wow you called him a "dumb fool" too... just wow.

 

If you had any sense of decency and were on such a plane, you should walk off in protest.

  • Like 2
  • Dislike 1
39 minutes ago, Emn1ty said:

Yes they can, however this guy seems to have made a few of his own mistakes during this encounter.

True, I keep thinking about the 'Hold your Ground' (rule) not sure if it's an actual rule as I'm not versed in U.S. laws or bylaws, but a lot of people do take that to some ridiculous heights

  • Like 3
9 hours ago, Emn1ty said:

So their options were to ground the flight and wait, or remove some people from the flight and make it work.

OR the staff that were supposed to replace the paying customers could have gone on a different flight, even another airline.

 

Stop trying to justify what UA did.  They had NO legal recourse for removing that passenger by force.  He'd paid for his seat, they'd accepted that by allowing him to TAKE the seat. Later choosing to remove him is THEM breaking the contract, not the passenger.

8 hours ago, Riva said:

 

The law enforcement officers losing it and being violent. Come and see british cops being assertive without being dicks

AFAIK, they weren't proper cops, they were airport security, private cops.

 

  • Like 1
5 hours ago, Emn1ty said:

 

 

A few things, first and foremost the CEO has all but essentially accepted culpability for UA being at fault. 

 

As per the quotes you posted....

"Seat assignments, regardless of class of service, are not guaranteed and are subject to change without notice. UA reserves the right to reseat a Passenger for any reason"

 

That's "reseat" and is not the same as kick off, they were not trying to reseat him. This that first one is moot. 

 

And "Passengers who fail to comply with or interfere with the duties of the members of the flight crew"

 

That's going to be hard to prove he interfered or failed to comply with the duties of the crew members. Being kicked out of his seat to make room for a UA employee is not going to go over well as being seen as interfering or not complying. Not that any of this actually matters, UA's back is in a corner with little if any wiggle room to get free.

 

Personally, I hope he refuses a settlement and takes them to a court.  A settlement means other companies will keep on treating their customers like garbage. A court ruling, on the other hand, will force them to reevaluate their policies and stop treating customers badly.

 

Customers are the only reason a company exists.  Without customers, there's no income and without income, no company.

 

  • Like 3
3 hours ago, Fulcrum said:

I would say that is cowardly advice ignoring all the civil rights accomplishments in the last 1000years. If you think surrendering your rights works, tell that to the JEWS in NAZI GERMANY...

Hahaha, took us 6 pages to finally apply Godwin's law...

  • Like 1
14 hours ago, papercut2008uk said:

Now the media machine is digging up the guys past to justify what happened.

 

Doctor dragged off United flight was felon who traded prescription drugs
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4401980/Dr-dragged-United-swapped-drugs-secret-gay-sex.html

 

What they don't seem to understand is this whole situation isn't about the guy, it's about what could happen to anyone that is faced with this situation. 

Isn't this what DailyMail always do?

 

If someone get hit by a car, DM would run a story about how he/she stole candy from a store when he/she was 12-years old.

11 hours ago, The Evil Overlord said:

Actually, no, that's modification of an opinion, the opinion part of that statement was 'he deserved to be knocked unconscious'.

I have no opinion on the matter as I don't know the whole story, but feel sympathetic towards the victim at this point, something that can be changed if the victim is indeed a perpetrator.

OK you win. ;-)

  • Like 1
Quote

United Airlines boss Oscar Munoz will not resign

 

United Airlines' chief executive has said he will not quit amid an explosive backlash to video of a screaming man being dragged off a plane.

Oscar Munoz said he felt "shame and embarrassment" and vowed it would never happen again to a seated passenger on one of United's overbooked aircraft.

Source and more

 

Can't say that I'm surprised.

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, Nick H. said:

Source and more

 

Can't say that I'm surprised.

To be fair, it wasn't his fault. The ones that asked security to drag him off the plane though, THEY should be fired immediately.

 

  • Like 2
22 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

To be fair, it wasn't his fault. The ones that asked security to drag him off the plane though, THEY should be fired immediately.

Oh, I completely agree. He made his own mistakes with the way he communicated internally, but even that isn't a reason for him to resign.

  • Like 2
13 hours ago, Emn1ty said:

 

What was the point of your comment? It's irrelevant whether United had the right to have the passenger removed or not. Talk about missing the whole point...

 

8 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

AFAIK, they weren't proper cops, they were airport security, private cops.

 

They were not proper cops but I believe they were city of Chicago employees and not private security.

 

United is getting a lot of flack for this and they should but it doesn't seem many people are talking about the actual organization that beat this man and dragged him off the plane (then let him get back on the plane somehow)  which was the Chicago Aviation officers.

 

I guess they been asking to carry guns. Thank God they weren't already and looks like won't any time in the near future...

 

http://chicago.suntimes.com/news/viral-video-kills-chance-aviation-security-officers-will-be-armed/

10 minutes ago, Nick H. said:

Oh, I completely agree. He made his own mistakes with the way he communicated internally, but even that isn't a reason for him to resign.

As a customer I would rather they'd try to fix things for the potential next time than just fire someone / push someone to resign and forget about it.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!