London fire: Six killed as Grenfell Tower engulfed


Recommended Posts

Six people have been confirmed dead after a huge fire raged through the night at a west London tower block, and police expect that number to rise.

 

Eyewitnesses described people trapped in the burning Grenfell Tower, in north Kensington, screaming for help and yelling for their children to be saved.

 

Firefighters rescued "large numbers", but London Mayor Sadiq Khan said "a lot" of people were unaccounted for.

 

The 24-storey block, which is still on fire, looks at risk of collapsing.

 

During the night, eyewitnesses said they saw lights - thought to be mobile phones or torches - flashing at the top of the block of flats, and trapped residents coming to their windows - some holding children.

 

It is understood that "several hundred" people would have been in the block when the fire broke out shortly after midnight, most of them sleeping.

 

More....

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-40269625

Latest figures:

 

74 being treated in hospital, 20 of those in critical condition.

6 confirmed dead.

120 flats/apartments in the building.

Unknown number still unaccounted for.

 

That death toll WILL rise sadly.  I just hope those that lost their lives did so from the smoke rather than the flames... 

 

  • Like 3
58 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Latest figures:

 

74 being treated in hospital, 20 of those in critical condition.

6 confirmed dead.

120 flats/apartments in the building.

Unknown number still unaccounted for.

 

That death toll WILL rise sadly.  I just hope those that lost their lives did so from the smoke rather than the flames... 

 

I assume it is an old tower. Here in Canada most building are new and designed so that it is almost impossible for the fire to spread. The way the air flows into each unit from the common areas and not the other way round and the sprinkler systems to stop the fire immediately. 

 

 

Terrible way to die :(

1 minute ago, E.worm Jimmy said:

I assume it is an old tower. Here in Canada most building are new and designed so that it is almost impossible for the fire to spread. The way the air flows into each unit from the common areas and not the other way round and the sprinkler systems to stop the fire immediately. 

 

 

Terrible way to die :(

 

Looks like a 60's/70's build.

 

The building had a refit last year and was certified as up to code, HOWEVER, from experience I know that when it's hot, residents in these places have a really bad habit of propping open fire doors to improve cooling, not realising that they're also creating a wind tunnel that'll spread flames in minutes.  

 

I'm absolutely NOT saying that happened here, but fire doors are meant to retard fire & smoke for at least 30 minutes and that didn't appear to happen here...  There's also some reports that the plastic outer cladding the building was covered with last year may have caused the flames to spread rapidly up the outside of the structure.

 

It'll be several days at least before they know the causes though, so anything here or anywhere else is pure conjecture.

 

My thoughts are with those who lost their lives, the survivors, and their families. :(

 

  • Like 2
1 minute ago, E.worm Jimmy said:

I assume it is an old tower. Here in Canada most building are new and designed so that it is almost impossible for the fire to spread. The way the air flows into each unit from the common areas and not the other way round and the sprinkler systems to stop the fire immediately. 

 

 

Terrible way to die :(

By UK standards, no it's a 1974 construction, 24 floor building, reasonably modern.... I've been following this on the news, and the consensus seems to follow the train of thought - that the materials used in or behind the facia panels were not up to fire safety regulations, some residents have alikened it to plastic.

There's also reports that residents in the area had raised fire risk and other safety concerns for the building with the local council, and that their concerns were ignored.  If true, there's going to be hell to pay for this one...

12 now confirmed dead, with the number expected to rise.

Reports of people jumping from windows, others throwing their children from them, nothing about their fate.

One story about a woman getting people's attention as she prepared to drop her baby from the 10th floor. Thankfully, a man was able to catch it as it fell.

 

This is absolutely horrific. :(

 

4 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

12 now confirmed dead, with the number expected to rise.

Reports of people jumping from windows, others throwing their children from them, nothing about their fate.

One story about a woman getting people's attention as she prepared to drop her baby from the 10th floor. Thankfully, a man was able to catch it as it fell.

 

This is absolutely horrific. :(

 

Sadly, jumping is probably a better way to die and mercy for the kids.

  • Like 2
Quote

London fire: Grenfell Tower cladding 'linked to other fires'

 

The cladding installed on Grenfell Tower was also used on other buildings that have been hit by fires around the world, the BBC has learned.

 

The exterior cladding, added in 2015, had a polyethylene - or plastic - core instead of an even more fireproof alternative, BBC Newsnight understands.

 

High-rise buildings in France, the UAE and Australia that had similar cladding have all been hit by fires that spread.

Rydon, which completed the renovations, said the work met all fire regulations.

 

They also insisted that, building control and safety standards had been fully met.

And Harley Facades, the company that fitted the panels to the building, said in a statement: "At this time, we are not aware of any link between the fire and the exterior cladding to the tower."

 

The west London tower block was refurbished at a cost of almost £9m.

 

The exterior of the 1970s-built tower was modernised with replacement windows, while additional homes were added using vacant space in the building.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-40283980

 

It doesn't really matter if this stuff DID meet regs or not, now that THIS has been dug up, in the "Court of Public Opinion", this company is now toast... 

I was thinking, as I am no way an expert, but if the fire was accelerated due to the materials used in the cladding....

Does anyone remember the fireproofed airline seating scandal back in the '80's or possibly '90's, when fireproof materials passed fire safety tests in lab conditions, but failed dramatically in an actual airliner fire..?

If the materials used here passed lab tests only, then a new and overhauled system of lab testing should be more critical moving forward.

2 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-40283980

 

It doesn't really matter if this stuff DID meet regs or not, now that THIS has been dug up, in the "Court of Public Opinion", this company is now toast... 

Exactly. We got to remember that at some point in time Asbestos met "the regs" too!

Such a horrendous thing to happen, I can't bare to even think what people have been going through to think that throwing children out of windows was the only and best choice. 

I'm just glad that so far the thing is still standing, I can't imagine how much worse this would have been if this thing had collapsed whilst firefighters were working to get this under control.

  • Like 2
13 minutes ago, Skiver said:

Such a horrendous thing to happen, I can't bare to even think what people have been going through to think that throwing children out of windows was the only and best choice. 

I'm just glad that so far the thing is still standing, I can't imagine how much worse this would have been if this thing had collapsed whilst firefighters were working to get this under control.

I understand what you're saying, and at this point, I'm just stating the obvious... We have had a very brutal history lesson of what happens in a tower collapse.

  • Like 2

Maybe it's time we stopped building things so tall that fire services can't reach them?  We could also take a leaf from the USA's books, and start installing external fire escapes as well as internal ones.  It would't have helped on this one where the fire was both inside and out, but it'd help future fires.

 

I think we also need to seriously look at some of these really old fire traps and demolish the bloody things...

 

  • Like 1
12 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

I think we also need to seriously look at some of these really old fire traps and demolish the bloody things...

 

I could not agree more, But the current problem is we have no place to put the people who live in them  if we demolish them.

 

The thing that gets me,  if part of that refit they had fitted sprinklers at a cost of about £1200 per flat this may not have happened.

12 minutes ago, TheReaperMan said:

I could not agree more, But the current problem is we have no place to put the people who live in them  if we demolish them.

 

The thing that gets me,  if part of that refit they had fitted sprinklers at a cost of about £1200 per flat this may not have happened.

Unpopular statement time but that's a cost of £144K for a flat like this to install sprinklers - where is that money coming from? I don't know the area well but I suspect this isn't the only block of flats that would need it. If you do one you have to do them all. I'm not for one second suggesting we can put prices on a single person life, never mind the 12 confirmed that were lost in this fire. However, there needs to be money for this and quite simply we don't have the money for everything. If the money is spent here, it will take another 5 police officers off the street, or that Ambulance that needed to be replaced won't be, a school will be forced to remove Teaching Assistants from classrooms and the list goes on. 

 

I think the fire chief has also stated that sprinklers would not have likely helped a fire like this. There will be plenty if's and buts about that statement and at the end of the day it's too late and no-one will truly know whether he is right or not but I'd hope he would have a good enough idea to be saying things like that publically. 

  • Like 1

Whilst I agree that the money has to come from somewhere, but with the governments building program, I think they really DO need to look at these old tower blocks and get rid of them.  People should not be packed into buildings like sardines.  I know there are space issues, but this just isn't good enough.  Firefighters simply can't reach above approx 10th floor with their equipment in an emergency, so anyone above that limit must either get themselves out, or are as good as dead.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!