Recommended Posts

This is the $500 M reduced from the $700M just a short time ago.

 

This was kept internal...hence only $200 M out on investment hunting.

 

Initially reported by the WSJ, "paywalled" but here...

 

Elon Musk’s SpaceX Is Raising $500 Million in Funding

https://www.wsj.com/articles/elon-musks-spacex-is-raising-500-million-in-funding-11545142054

 

and here...

 

SpaceX raising $500 million to help build satellite broadband network

http://SpaceX raising $500 million to help build satellite broadband network

 

This is Starlink investment for proposed June 2019 initial launch salvo from F9's to get a preliminary network running by 2020.

 

This is only one of many rounds, primarily for initial costs...the final estimate of constellation cost is $10B.

 

I'll put the data in the Starlink thread. 

 

This spring we have two  Falcon Heavy launches,

 

March: ArabSat-6 commsat

 

April: USAF STP-2, a collection of smallsats and a solar sail

 

Same boosters for both missions; one is at McGregor for testing,  and the second is on its way.

  • Like 1

It will be a good year...and the above image does not show their normal launch manifest, development of Boca Chica, development of the new Starship factory in LA,  test stands at Macgreger, Raptor development, Florida pier facilities and visitor center work or the possible restart  of the new ASDS  again.

 

Buckle up!

 

  • Like 2

The first Falcon Heavy Block 5's  side booster on the test stand at McGregor, this one for ArabSat-6. 

 

In the background is the new "upper stage" engine test stand, assumed to be for Starship engine tests.

 

 

Adjusted for haze

IMG_20190110_101644.thumb.jpg.01d5571722822160ca13c584b2a262d2.jpg

27 minutes ago, Beittil said:

Not per se, just long overdue if you ask me. They just don't need that much production staff anymore to crank out engines and boosters... 

I wish this was more the case but it really isn't. Overall the cuts are not great and we are losing some good people and certainly not just limited to production. 

I would think those hired to develop & build a huge composite launch system with ablative TPS are no longer needed given Starship and Super Heavy's transition to stainless steel and an active TPS.

 

They also need to free up payroll for StarLink etc. hires. 6 pages of openings on the Careers page.

 

Also, if they're like many other companys they periodically "cull" those with the lowest personnel review scores, often several percent.

Edited by DocM
  • 2 weeks later...

Why is arabsat going on heavy by the way? I read it was 6000kg which is well within the falcon 9 expendable mode and cheaper than the heavy reusable? Mean it could have gone up well before now. Not that I am complaining I can't wait to see another heavy go up.

AIUI,

 

SpaceX is trying to move GEO launches to FH in general, lengthening the lifespan of the F9 fleet. The center core is an extra-tough build for those high energy launches.

 

Pricing will be interesting, with a Flight Proven™ FH being almost as cheap as a new F9.  

 

Want a really high energy launch like BEO? $5m more for 90% of an expended's capability. Boosters go to drone ships with KSC having two this summer; Of Course I Still Love You and A Shortfall of Gravitas.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Surprise Execs are dumb. I hope the rehired engineers said were not coming back until we get 2x our salary.
    • Ford execs say they made a mistake when they replaced human engineers with AI by David Uzondu Ford recently announced that over the last three years, it's had to rehire about 350 "gray beard" engineers to mentor younger staff and reprogram diagnostic systems and AI tools that were failing to meet up to quality expectations. The company's VP of vehicle hardware engineering, Charles **** said that leaders overlooked the deep experience of veterans who survived many product cycles. **** admitted that simply replacing them with AI was a huge mistake, and that while AI is "a fantastic tool," it remains "only as good as the information you use to train it." The rehired engineers now run mandatory meetings to troubleshoot vehicles and reprogram automated engineering software and AI tools to prevent glitches before production. These technical specialists hunt for failure points before parts ever reach the plant floor, helping prevent the massive recalls and defects that previously cost the company billions as it aims to cut one billion dollars in expenses this year. In last year's JD Power Quality Survey, an annual study that measures the quality of a car during the first three months of ownership, Ford finished 10th among mainstream brands and scored below the industry average. But this year, JD Power ranked the automaker as the top mainstream brand, placing it above the likes of Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co. Ford attributed this massive improvement directly to the expertise of these returned engineers. Ford's realization that AI cannot magically design and test quality vehicles without senior human oversight is just the tip of the iceberg. When Careerminds looked at companies that conducted AI-driven layoffs, researchers found out that 35.6% of those companies had to rehire more than half of the employees they previously fired. Another 32.7% had to rehire between 25% and 50% of them. In 2024, Sebastian Siemiatkowski, CEO of Klarna, proudly announced that its new chatbot was doing the work of 700 full-time customer service agents. As a result, the fintech company froze hiring and cut hundreds of positions. But by mid 2025, and into 2026, Klarna was scrambling to recruit human agents again because customer satisfaction had plummeted. It turns out, while AI is very good at answering basic questions like how to check an account balance, when faced with complex customer issues that require nuance, the thing usually resorts to the unhelpful, robotic corporate jargon we all know and love.
    • Free AI in IDEs is shifting to paid models Or you know, you could just learn to actually design and code apps, use frameworks to handle the repetitive parts and not use AI at all - and voila... free for life!
    • In a sane world US antitrust laws wouldn't even allow these companies to be in the position to be subjected to EU directives. As you say, better than oligarch nothing.
    • Apple reportedly has a second-generation iPhone Fold planned for 2027 Good grief, Apple hasn't even released a first folding phone and the Apple faithful is already obsessing over the sequel? Seriously people, go out and touch grass... because this level of obsession is borderline stalkery/neurotic.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      405
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      129
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!