This fit 21-year-old ignored the flu. Then it killed him, mom says


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, HawkMan said:

Well, firstly there's the thing that healthy normal (non risk group) people don't die from the flu, they get sick for a few days, and get better. drink fluids.

 

outside of that. before you go attacking people, maybe look up facts about recent research. you don't have to "fight" everyone that informs you about something you didn't know. 

 

http://www.bbc.com/news/health-3898898

Now it's Vitamin D? LOL I agree that getting proper nutrition can reduce disease and sickness. I will also point out we already fortify certain foods like mike, cereal, and other things with Vitamin D but the flu is still prevalent here in the US. What did your reply have to do with my comment? No reason not to get the flu shot. When you secure your box do you just run an AV and firewall then call it day? No, you deploy a multi-layer defense right? The same with preventing disease and sickness.

Edited by oldtimefighter
  • Like 1
  • Dislike 2
6 hours ago, oldtimefighter said:

What? That is wrong! Are you a medical professional? No? Don't tell people a flu shot is not really necessary. The flu shot is to prevent getting the flu which is enough. Thanks but when I have a crime issue I will ask you for advice.

 

14 minutes ago, oldtimefighter said:

Now it's Vitamin D? LOL I agree that getting proper nutrition can reduce disease and sickness. I will also point out we already fortify certain foods like mike, cereal, and other things with Vitamin D but the flu is still prevalent here in the US. What did your reply have to do with my comment? No reason not to get the flu shot. When you secure your box do you just run an AV and firewall then call it day? No, you deploy a multi-layer defense right? The same with preventing disease and sickness.

 

I can't speak for a flu shot because i've never had one in my life, but I do believe vitamin D is very important. Most people are vitamin D deficient. I also take Vitamin D supplements along with C, Multi, Fish Oil, Garlic, and Calcium. I must be doing something right, I'm almost never sick. The last time I remember being really sick (double ended flu) was 2007.

  • Like 2

The flu bug going around here, Southern California, has been pretty severe. I had the common cold near Christmas, luckily I missed this years flu so far. I think the last time I did have the flu, was in high school. These days, I feel my immune system is fairly strong, I do work in a Children's Hospital where bugs/germs are everywhere and I now am required to get the yearly flu-shot.

1 hour ago, Jimmy #1 said:

when she asked around, she found out that the shot had an older strain, and not currently active one, so instead of preventing flu it make it worse (as your immune system gears up for strain in the shot)    

That's not how vaccines work.

 

1 hour ago, Jimmy #1 said:

As hawkman said, unless you are in a risk group, getting the shot is not needed.

Sorry, that's just wrong. 100% completely and totally wrong.

 

Unless you're in a higher risk group the chance of you contracting a fatal case is lower. That's it. 

 

 

  • Like 1
On 1/14/2018 at 8:55 AM, Mirumir said:

Bat[beep]crazy.

 

 

More propaganda to push flu vaccines that don't work. They even admit they have only a 10% success rate.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/this-years-flu-vaccine-may-only-be-10-effective-experts-warn/ 

  • Dislike 1
2 hours ago, Jimmy #1 said:

this years flu shots here where i live where completely ineffective.  i got that info from a medical professional, who had the shot and then herself got very sick.  

 

when she asked around, she found out that the shot had an older strain, and not currently active one, so instead of preventing flu it make it worse (as your immune system gears up for strain in the shot)    

she is a doctor in Canada with 30 years experience and she said she will not be getting a shot again, unless she can be certain that the strain is the one currently going around.

 

As hawkman said, unless you are in a risk group, getting the shot is not needed.

 

The flu shot is not effective against all strains of flu because the viruses being spread commonly change from year to year and they cant give you a vaccination against every kind every year so they pick the most common and or more virulent strains to vaccinate against, Its always effective if they get the strain you get right and not effective or less effective otherwise. However, saying your better off not getting the flu shot is like making an argument that since airbags sometimes cut people wide open in accidents that we should remove them from vehicles. Fact: the flu shot does not kill and at worst a small number of people get a mild sickness from the body reacting to the killed virus. 2, The flu shot saves thousands of lives by both herd immunity and direct protection especially in the geriatric and vulnerable populations. The misinformation being spread needs to be countered at every turn as in the immediate, is more dangerous than any anti global warming conspiracy theories. Your appeal to authority by mentioning your Doctor friend means nothing to me at all. Dr Oz promotes BS all the time and hes a cardiologist. Your understanding of the immune system is completely flawed and your advice of not getting the flu shot flies in the face of herd immunity. You are a danger to the public for spreading information like that. The vaccine causes the production of antibodies and this is not "strain" it is strengthening and is a necessary part of immunity/herd immunity. Use Google Scholar and educated yourself on medicine and evidenced based practice before making ridiculous claims. I will cite anything I say on request to a respectable journal, You wont be able to do that. It is also important to point out that since the flu is effective against the strains it was designed against for that year, that you don't see all the infections from that particular flu strain. That alone prevents tens of thousands of flu cases and thousands of deaths because those ones they vaccinated against would otherwise be infecting people.

Edited by sidroc
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
11 minutes ago, sidroc said:

The flu shot is not effective against all strains of flu because the viruses being spread commonly change from year to year and they cant give you a vaccination against every kind every year so they pick the most common and or more virulent strains to vaccinate against, Its always effective if they get the strain you get right and not effective or less effective otherwise. However, saying your better off not getting the flu shot is like making an argument that since airbags sometimes cut people wide open in accidents that we should remove them from vehicles. Fact: the flu shot does not kill anyone and at worst a small number of people get a mild sickness from the body reacting to the killed virus. 2, The flu shot saves thousands of lives by both herd immunity and direct protection especially in the geriatric and vulnerable populations. The misinformation being spread needs to be countered at every turn as in the immediate, is more dangerous than any anti global warming conspiracy theories.

Sorry I would never willingly inject Formaldehyde directly into my bloodstream. Even the EPA says its a carcinogen which causes Lymphoma, leukemia which is the most common types of cancer found in children and children receive the most vaccines.

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-in-children/types-of-childhood-cancers.html

https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-09/documents/formaldehyde.pdf

15 minutes ago, alpha2beta said:

More propaganda to push flu vaccines that don't work. They even admit they have only a 10% success rate.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/this-years-flu-vaccine-may-only-be-10-effective-experts-warn/ 

"Even 10 percent effective is better than nothing, and a lot of it has to do with herd immunity -- the more people are protected from it, the more other people will also be protected," she said. "In fact, in a year where it's low effectiveness, it's even more important that everybody get it so we can get as much resistance and we don't allow the virus to thrive and grow and keep changing."

 

If you're going to link to an article, you should use one that doesn't disprove your argument.

  • Like 3
5 minutes ago, alpha2beta said:

Sorry I would never willingly inject Formaldehyde directly into my bloodstream. Even the EPA says its a carcinogen which causes Lymphoma, leukemia which is the most common types of cancer found in children.

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-in-children/types-of-childhood-cancers.html

https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-09/documents/formaldehyde.pdf

If I get a warning for saying this so be it. You are a dangerous idiot. The science of dosing eludes you clearly. I will cite the FDA for this one https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/ucm187810.htm.  The next time I have someone going Septic in my ED with the flu, I will wonder if someone like you could be responsible.

  • Like 7
Just now, sidroc said:

If I get a warning for saying this so be it. You are an idiot. The science of dosing eludes you clearly. I will cite the FDA for this one https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/ucm187810.htm.

Massive increase in childhood cancer over the last 20 years more vaccines then ever in the 20 years apparently have no connection.

And if they are so safe then why do we need a vaccine court?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine_court When the company that manufactures the vaccine is above the law.  

6 minutes ago, alpha2beta said:

Sorry I would never willingly inject Formaldehyde directly into my bloodstream. Even the EPA says its a carcinogen which causes Lymphoma, leukemia which is the most common types of cancer found in children.

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-in-children/types-of-childhood-cancers.html

https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-09/documents/formaldehyde.pdf

The first document doesn't even contain the word formaldehyde and the second is about inhaling formaldehyde.

 

There are perfectly safe levels of things that you can ingest or inject but should never inhale. For example, water.

  • Like 2
10 minutes ago, sidroc said:

If I get a warning for saying this so be it. You are a dangerous idiot. The science of dosing eludes you clearly. I will cite the FDA for this one https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/ucm187810.htm.  The next time I have someone going Septic in my ED with the flu, I will wonder if someone like you could be responsible.

I use real nutrition to keep myself healthy, I work in public around lots of sick people and have not been sick in over 10 years. Not even a cold let alone the flu.

  • Haha 2
9 minutes ago, alpha2beta said:

And if they are so safe then why do we need a vaccine court?

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) was established by the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA), passed by the United States Congress in response to a threat to the vaccine supply due to a 1980s scare over the DPT vaccine. Despite the belief of most public health officials that claims of side effects were unfounded, large jury awards had been given to some plaintiffs, most DPT vaccine makers had ceased production, and officials feared the loss of herd immunity.

 

It's a specialized court. Like family court, traffic court, etc... 

 

10 minutes ago, Joe User said:

The first document doesn't even contain the word formaldehyde and the second is about inhaling formaldehyde.

 

There are perfectly safe levels of things that you can ingest or inject but should never inhale. For example, water.

https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/substances/formaldehyde/formaldehyde-fact-sheet

"NCI, looked at 25,619 workers in industries with the potential for occupational formaldehyde exposure and estimated each worker’s exposure to the chemical while at work (5). The results showed an increased risk of death due to leukemia, particularly myeloid leukemia, among workers exposed to formaldehyde."

 

4 minutes ago, alpha2beta said:

https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/substances/formaldehyde/formaldehyde-fact-sheet

"NCI, looked at 25,619 workers in industries with the potential for occupational formaldehyde exposure and estimated each worker’s exposure to the chemical while at work (5). The results showed an increased risk of death due to leukemia, particularly myeloid leukemia, among workers exposed to formaldehyde."

 

I'll repeat myself, since the link talks about inhalation and absorption.

 

There are perfectly safe levels of things that you can ingest or inject but should never inhale. For example, water. 

 

Second, there are safe levels of things you can put on your skin without adverse effects. For example, alcohol.

39 minutes ago, alpha2beta said:

Sorry I would never willingly inject Formaldehyde directly into my bloodstream. Even the EPA says its a carcinogen which causes Lymphoma, leukemia which is the most common types of cancer found in children and children receive the most vaccines.

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-in-children/types-of-childhood-cancers.html

https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-09/documents/formaldehyde.pdf

 

23 minutes ago, alpha2beta said:

I use real nutrition to keep myself healthy, I work in public around lots of sick people and have not been sick in over 10 years. Not even a cold let alone the flu.

 

15 minutes ago, alpha2beta said:

Oh boy ... 

 

Anyway, with respect to your postings of Formaldehyde.  A flu vaccine has between 5 and 25ug of Formaldehyde.  1 apple, for comparison, has 6.3-22.3 mg/kg of naturally occurring Formaldehyde. 

 

Oh, but you eat apples and therefore aren't getting Formaldehyde injected directly in your bloodstream (which doesn't happen with flu shots anyway)...right?  Well, that apple gets digested and guess where some of that Formaldehyde ends up (hint:  bloodstream).  Also, that is just an apple ... there is naturally occurring Formaldehyde in just about everything you eat (especially fruits and vegetables). 

 

....stay away from pears (upwards of 60mg/kg)  :) 

Source

39 minutes ago, alpha2beta said:

Sorry I would never willingly inject Formaldehyde directly into my bloodstream. Even the EPA says its a carcinogen which causes Lymphoma, leukemia which is the most common types of cancer found in children and children receive the most vaccines.

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-in-children/types-of-childhood-cancers.html

https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-09/documents/formaldehyde.pdf

Take your Facebook nonsense out of here. You're the problem with society today. Quit spreading this bullcrap.

  • Like 2
8 minutes ago, Jim K said:

 

 

Oh boy ... 

 

Anyway, with respect to your postings of Formaldehyde.  A flu vaccine has between 5 and 25ug of Formaldehyde.  1 apple, for comparison, has 6.3-22.3 mg/kg of naturally occurring Formaldehyde. 

 

Oh, but you eat apples and therefore aren't getting Formaldehyde injected directly in your bloodstream...right?  Well, that apple gets digested and guess where some of that Formaldehyde ends up (hint:  bloodstream).  Also, that is just an apple ... there is naturally occurring Formaldehyde in just about everything you eat (especially fruits and vegetables). 

 

....stay away from Pears (upwards of 60mg/kg)  :) 

Source

Naturally occurring and synthetic are molecularity not the same. Plus no one has any reason for why caner is at such a high more then ever, no reason it just happens deal with it. That's most anti science thing someone could say.

  • Haha 2

Had the flu about a year ago. Bed ridden for 4 days and cough and runny nose for a month afterwards. Took no medication aside from 2 advil to relieve the headache after 4 days of it pounding. I let my body do what it was designed to do and I came out the other end perfectly okay. I am by no means fit nor do I live a super healthy active lifestyle. It was complete hell (fever, cough with bloody flem (google said could have been pneumonia like symptoms due to the flu), full body aches, pounding headache. I trusted my body to heal itself and it did.

 

Regardless of what people say on here, I don't feel the flu shot is effective at all. They make educated guesses and hope for the best. I've seen more people get sick due to a reaction with the flu shot than people it has protected 100%. I am sure most of the success of the flu shot isn't even caused by the shot.

 

I have never taken it, and in the past 15 years I've had the flu once. That's just my own experience and two cents.

  • Like 1
  • Dislike 1
1 hour ago, Circaflex said:

The flu bug going around here, Southern California, has been pretty severe. I had the common cold near Christmas, luckily I missed this years flu so far. I think the last time I did have the flu, was in high school. These days, I feel my immune system is fairly strong, I do work in a Children's Hospital where bugs/germs are everywhere and I now am required to get the yearly flu-shot.

So since you work at a Children's Hospital you never thought about why so many children get Cancer and the causes for it. Or are one of those people that blame it on genetics even tho family history shows no one had it prior.

37 minutes ago, alpha2beta said:

Naturally occurring and synthetic are molecularity not the same. Plus no one has any reason for why caner is at such a high more then ever, no reason it just happens deal with it. That's most anti science thing someone could say.

Oh really ... I'm sure you have a source for that (with respect to your statement of naturally occurring and synthetic Formaldehyde)?  Please, no conspiracy sites.

 

Why are cancer rates on the up and up?  I don't know ... people living longer?  Better diagnostics leading to Physicians to catching it early...which may explain why the mortality of cancer is dropping (down 25% from 1991)?  Oh...but cancer increase is due to the flu shot ... right? 

 

The flu shot has been around for what, over 50 years (though more common since the late 70's)?  Interesting....

 

Capture.thumb.JPG.6c876f1337d2dabf78cadf23174f28d0.JPG

Source

 

....well, at least you didn't say it has antifreeze in it.  :)

  • Like 3
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ocenaudio 3.19.5 by Razvan Serea  Ocenaudio is a full featured, fast and easy to use audio and music editor. It is the ideal software for people who need to edit and analyze audio files without complications. Ocenaudio also has powerful features that will please more advanced users. To assist ocenaudio development, a powerful toolset of audio editing, analysis and manipulation called Ocen Framework was created. ocenaudio is also based on Qt framework, a well known library for cross-platform development. Cross-platform support ocenaudio is available for all major operating systems: Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Native applications are generated for each platform from a common source, in order to achieve excelent performance and seamless integration with the operating system. All versions of ocenaudio have a uniform set of features and the same graphical interface, so the skills you learn in one platform can be used in the others. VST plugins support Ocenaudio supports VST (Virtual Studio Technology) plugins, giving its users access to numerous effects. Like the native effects, VST effects can use real-time preview to aide configuration. Real-time preview of effects Applying effects such as EQ, gain and filtering is an important part of audio editing. However, it is very tricky to get the desired result by adjusting the controls configuration alone: you must listen the processed audio. To ease the configuration of audio effects, ocenaudio has a real time preview feature: you hear the processed signal while adjusting the controls. The effect configuration window also includes a miniature view of the selected audio signal. You can navigate on this miniature view in the same way as you do on the main interface, selecting parts that interest you and listening to the effect result in real time. Multiselection for delicate editions To speed up complex audio files editing, ocenaudio includes multi-selection. With this amazing tool, you can simultaneously select different portions of an audio file and listen, edit or even apply an effect to them. For example, if you want to normalize only the excerpts of an interview where the interviewee is talking, just select them and apply the effect. Eficient edition of large files With ocenaudio, there is no limit to the length or the quantity of the audio files you can edit. Using an advanced memory management system, the application keeps your files open without wasting any of your computer's memory. Even in files several hours long, common editing operations such as copy, cut or paste happen almost instantly. Fully featured spectrogram Besides offering an incredible waveform view of your audio files, ocenaudio has a powerful and complete spectrogram view. In this view, you can analyze the spectral content of your audio signal with maximum clarity. Advanced users will be surprised to find that the spectrogram settings are applied in real time. The display is updated immediately when altering features such as the number of frequency bands, window type and size and dynamic range of the display. Ocenaudio 3.19.5 changelog: Fixes crashes related to audio devices on Windows (DirectSound and ASIO) Fixes several crashes and memory corruption issues Fixes opening several headerless files at once, which previously dropped all but one Improves batch export by suggesting and remembering the destination folder Fixes accented and non-Latin characters in VST plug-in and compressed-archive file names Adds zstd compression support and updates the archive library Other bug fixes and improvements Download: Ocenaudio 64-bit | Portable | ~40.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Ocenaudio for Linux and Mac OS View: Ocenaudio Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I did think about a Echo show once and it would be useful to see what my cameras see. But my brother got one and I changed my mind. Adverts and not really worth the price just to see my cameras. I have a load of dots and a Echo Gen 4, they will do.
    • I asking where you are from or live, because if you don't live in the U.K, why are you so bothered? That is another reason I voted out, E.U and people poking their noses in where they should not be. Sadly we still have it, Trump, and his cronies. Putin as well and no doubt others. It makes no difference what we believe, if we made the right choice or not, we are out. As I said to someone when the news first broke we have voted out, we just need to make the best of it. I have no problems with closer ties to the E.U, we still need to trade. Just don't want to be in their club.
    • So you think I voted out because i am anti-immigrant. I am fed up with those that come over and think that we owe them something. The ones that are at the moment coming over from France where they are already in a safe country because they think and no doubt will get everything chucked at them. While people who were born and bred here get very little. I have nothing against as i have said before those that come here and work. In fact I know full well that our NHS would struggle without them. I do have a problem with those that come over here and try to push their religion and their way of life onto us. My reasons for voting out was because of what the E.U is and is also becoming. I did not agree with Freedom of movement, not because I don't want people over here, but because people need to be checked before being allowed to cross borders and that goes both ways. But my main thing was because the E.U is becoming if not already a united states of Europe. The only reason countries like Poland and Romania joined was because they had no money. When my partner left Poland, she had nothing, Poland had nothing, that is why she left. Wanted to learn something and earn a living. The E.U would have us back according to Michel Barnier. https://www.euronews.com/my-eu...ator-barnier-tells-euronews Why are you so scared to say what country you are in?
    • I wonder what that line really meant...
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      205
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      145
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!