Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Draggendrop said:

>

Dump the up mass for now...fly and iterate as you go...NASA is not involved...they can do what they want, when they want.

>

 

Upmass may not change that much.

 

It's possible  an all-in-one metal hull may be of similar mass or lighter than the combination of composite tanks +  LOX tanks Invar lining + metallic TPS + its mounting hardware. 

 

Extra points for reduced structural complexity & "touch"  hours.

Edited by DocM
  • 2 weeks later...
On 12/9/2018 at 3:23 AM, DocM said:

 

Upmass may not change that much.

 

It's possible  an all-in-one metal hull may be of similar mass or lighter than the combination of composite tanks +  LOX tanks Invar lining + metallic TPS + its mounting hardware. 

 

Extra points for reduced structural complexity & "touch"  hours.

 Yes. 

 Actually some new metal alloys are even better on strength-to-weight than carbon composites. Elon had referred to the change to metals as counter-intuitive. I think this is because the prevailing view was carbon composites had to be used for rockets to save weight. 

 

See discussion here: 

https://exoscientist.blogspot.com/2018/06/darpas-spaceplane-x-33-version-page-2.html 

 

 There are some aluminum, titanium, and steel alloys mentioned. I'm inclined to think it's a titanium or steel alloy as Elon referred to it as "heavy". Titanium or steel would also have the advantage of having better heat resistance. And some of the high strength alloys can be 3D-printed, which is a focus of Elon's.

 

 

  Bob Clark

Hopefully we will find out soon.

 

The real problem speculating ...is that there are so many alloys available...to solve various particular problems.

 

Everything is a trade off. 

 

For the Starship applications....a few area's have different concerns.

 

It will all boil down to cost, availability, dissimilar expansion joints, high heat properties and tooling...to name a few.

 

100 engineers in 100 area's of expertise can give you 100 different answers...what is SpaceX's priorities as a whole, at the moment.

 

Stay tuned for new info in the new year...a few weeks away.

  • Like 1
16 minutes ago, DocM said:

Many alloys have been mentioned for the Starship's "heavy metal,"  but Musk went out of his way to like and link to an article about high entropy alloys.

liking an article does not imply that is what they chose.

 

I place a "like" on engineering articles because of the thought and math that went in it...not because I endorse it.

 

I do not remember Elon  mentioning any alloy...period...and everyone online is an "expert of some sort...some warranted , most not"... but until we hear a SpaceX statement...it's all speculation. 

Cropped view of a night shot inside the sprung structure shows a nose cone.

 

Spacexbocachicanight122218-crop.thumb.jpg.a1bd4d4a5e2d3b64f6864eba42d2dadb.jpg

Credt: bocachicagal

 

So much for clean room assembly... I think we have a Big Falcon Hopper being built in the middle of a Texas marshland, with the main structure being built by Caldwell - a company that builds municipal water tanks.

 

OldSpace guys: "Lord, help us 😵

 

Dogs & Cats, living together! Mass Hysteria!!"

 

 

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1

Okay, yeah. This has to be the SC superalloy we've been hearing about, then. Can't imagine they're gonna use straight-up stainless steel on the final product.

 

- That thermal & tensile strength must be crazy good to withstand 12k+ psi pressure (or more) ... can't wait until specifics are released (if they are released). Wow.

- "Radically redesigned" Raptors, eh? 12k psi on the turbopumps ... yeeesh ... hungry. The Merlins are not quite 3* less pressure, so we can't infer performance based on that alone because it's not linear.

- I wonder if they're going to get good data from the lower weight "testing" version of Starship ... and I'm sure they're aware of that.

 

All "wait and see" stuff, so far. (Y) 

  • Like 2
6 hours ago, Unobscured Vision said:

Okay, yeah. This has to be the SC superalloy we've been hearing about, then. Can't imagine they're gonna use straight-up stainless steel on the final product.

 

- That thermal & tensile strength must be crazy good to withstand 12k+ psi pressure (or more) ... can't wait until specifics are released (if they are released). Wow.

- "Radically redesigned" Raptors, eh? 12k psi on the turbopumps ... yeeesh ... hungry. The Merlins are not quite 3* less pressure, so we can't infer performance based on that alone because it's not linear.

- I wonder if they're going to get good data from the lower weight "testing" version of Starship ... and I'm sure they're aware of that.

 

All "wait and see" stuff, so far. (Y) 

I don't know where you are getting your info from, but it is mixed up.

 

The superalloy(s) were always for the Raptor with several proprietary solutions in test.

 

The "heavy metal" is for the "ship", and it is stainless 301. SpaceX almost has it's own "foundry" up and running.  Stainless will work just fine with many advantages. You need to do some research on stainless. There is no such thing as "straight up stainless".

 

Seriously...you need to keep up with the "data released" and ask questions if unsure. Posting incorrect data messes everyone up when they are checking this thread for data...and it wastes others time correcting it....some of us don't have the luxury of time.

 

You can do better, I have seen you do much better....just a friendly reminder.

With respect to SX300 and SX500 superalloys for Raptor...still approaching 300 bar...

 

Quote

Our superalloy foundry is now almost fully operational. This allows rapid iteration on Raptor.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1076686201061404672

 

and 

 

Quote

SpaceX metallurgy team developed SX500 superalloy for 12000 psi, hot oxygen-rich gas. It was hard. Almost any metal turns into a flare in those conditions.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1076684059827302400

 

and a "redesign" of Raptor...ready for final testing...shortly...

 

There may have been a few extra "efficiency tweaks" and a  "foundry development" to boot.

 

This is a major step in vertical integration for such a complex engine...all in house...excellent move.

 

We need the technical overview ...

 

---------------------------

Then...

Quote

Stainless steel is correct, but different mixture of alloys & new architecture. Unlike Atlas, Starship is buckling stable on launchpad even when unpressurized.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1076595190658265088

 

and...

 

Quote

While there are some material similarities, Starship is very different from the Atlas design

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1076606482332807168

 

Along with the tweets of the past few weeks...

 

Appears the "hopper will be of "stainless 301"...tough as hoot and easy to fabricate for testing...all the while having an almost endless pool of "TIG" welders around...KISS

 

The Starship for orbital insertion will be a "special alloy version for this stainless iteration....could there be a probable SpaceX  SX(*****) version for their stainless variant being cast in their foundry, but "metal yard" out sourced for sheet ...This is very impressive.

 

Fly and test variants...then inhouse it if costs become silly....not like they haven't done this before.

 

-------------------------------

Elon has stated that after the hopper is "done"...a "technical overview" will be given...That will be one heck of a "Tech Fest" 

 

Meanwhile...

 

Expanding-Brain.thumb.jpg.c6c0650b3bdadf073076b122377888ff.jpg

 

larger image...

https://i.ibb.co/vYH6Gnh/Expanding-Brain.jpg

posted by NSF user blasphemer...just had to put it here....This is true and hilarious.....

 

-------------------------------------------

This will be a difficult "mind adjustment" for some...but...from my experience, aluminium has always been thought of for aviation and marine applications due to "weight" if you will...stainless variants have brilliant specs...but the "weight" and/or cost always removed it from consideration and mass production.

 

If it is used on a much larger structure and combined with reusability for a particularly demanding regime...costs can be absorbed and mass can be deceptive when considering wall thickness and bracing for large structures...

 

Can't wait for the technical overview...meanwhile, online...some get it,...some prefer not to....their loss, but they get a shiny metallic rocket as consolation.

 

As a side note...for those of us with fab shops...heavy metal has always been considered "stainless", the ideal metal for longevity and toughness...just usually out of range for the hobby shops unless it is real important.When Elon first tweeted it, a few of us on NSF knew what it meant...but only a slight mention was made...because we knew people would go ballistic there...not so anywhere else though...kind of funny with dedicated forums sometimes.

 

Life goes on...waiting for Elon's Technical Presentation forecast for.................spring maybe?

 

// side note...I would bet that the Boring Companies advances may also have had a role to play....crunching rock is not done with light metal...

Edited by Draggendrop
  • Like 1

Noticed another item; the  structure has an internal lattice, which some questioned as a sign of  flimsiness but ISTM should turn its "balloon tank" into a fairly rigid structure.

 

Stainless steel is also good for laser welding, which makes for easier patching/repairs. 

 

 

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1

A "skeleton" if you will, or lattice structure will add strength for the intended purpose..as engineered.

 

37 minutes ago, Unobscured Vision said:

/snip/   The math agrees with me also.

You may want to rephrase that...unless you have all the specifications for this unit...and have done all the real world engineering on this structure.

 

You need to be mindful of expressions....you will be called out to prove it. An opinion is another matter that requires no proof.....but can make one look foolish as well.

1 hour ago, DocM said:

Noticed another item; the  structure has an internal lattice, which some questioned as a sign of  flimsiness but ISTM should turn its "balloon tank" into a fairly rigid structure.

 

Stainless steel is also good for laser welding, which makes for easier patching/repairs. 

/snip

Bit tired today...forgot to mention...

 

Since they are working with "real metal" ( this ought to tick off someone....)..The laser hand held was interesting.

 

The oil and gas industry have automated welding and testing rigs for pressurized pipelines...I am sure SpaceX is more than aware of this and may employ these types of machinery on the production line...don't mind me as I am very biased towards stainless derivatives and have been for a very long time.

 

It is nice to see an opportunity, in this field, to use a material such as a stainless...why launch the missile when we can launch the silo...😎, which, along those lines, was probably said during one of their meetings....and Elon apparently  said...make it so...

4 minutes ago, Unobscured Vision said:

/sigh ... 

If one is going to hope to work in engineering in the future...I am not kidding, this is a reasonable reminder that it is time to buckle down...and if one makes a precise statement, you will get called out on it and labeled...like it or not.

 

I have been in this field for a very long time...it would be wise to listen once in a while.

 

I have rarely heard certified junior engineers express themselves as such...let alone students, the longer you are in engineering, the more you don't know and it is humbling...but gives focus.

 

Always choose words carefully. It reflects on you...and ticks off veterans of the field who have done their time and more...ones who don't take kindly to a perception of arrogance..it will cost you a job.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Oh, of course not. The real "victims" are the people who snipe kids in the head, have killed more journalist than all the worlds wars combined, do double tap strikes on medical personnel, claim history started on October 7th, have a $700 million dollar annual Hasbara budget and pay influencers $7k a post to spout exactly this kind of propaganda. How dare you question the most moral army in the world. Victimhood belongs to these genocidal freaks alone. Anyone who denies that is literally Hitler. If you're going to support a terrorist state, the least you could do is come up with better talking points.
    • Gears of War: E-Day brings 12-player co-op, smoother traversal mechanics, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Right as the Xbox Games Showcase came to an end today, The Gears of War developer The Coalition took over to show off its next project: E-Day. This prequel project was announced back in 2024, but now we have a lot more details about its campaign, new gameplay mechanics, and even a release date. The studio says this is the first time it has managed to get the time to build the entire game in a new engine, as it had worked non-stop on new titles for years while porting classic code and assets. With Unreal Engine 5 now powering Gears of War: E-Day, The Coalition says it started completely anew, with all assets, animations, environments, and others being built from scratch. The campaign will take place across three days in the city of Kalona. The story will follow the events through the eyes of Bravo Squad. This is made up of the returning classic duo Marcus and Dom, as well as the new characters Mags Carter and Lucas Reyes. Watch the trailer below to see Marcus in action without his iconic armor and gear, just as the Locust invasion kicks off. The story will draw on classic Gears novels like Aspho Fields as well, with the studio even collaborating with author Karen Traviss. "That continuity is what makes the destruction land," says the studio. "In E-Day, you watch a living city torn apart—homes still lit, meals half-finished—while people abandon their cars and run for cover. Small details—a child’s toy, an uneaten dinner—make the loss real as everyday places collapse under the Locust assault." The movement system is getting a big overhaul here. Players will be able to slide while running, jump across gaps, climb head-height covers, and even crawl on the ground to avoid fire from enemies. As for the returning horde mode, The Coalition teased a new 12-player PvE mode. This will involve three squads of Gears going up against the incoming Locusts in larger city maps than usual. The studio says that it is going to reimagine the classic formula just as co-op games are going through a resurgence. Multiplayer was touched on today too, where Versus is coming back touting four versus four Gears PVP action set across Kalona maps. More details about multiplayer will be revealed later. Open beta weekends are kicking off this August for fans wanting to jump in early too. Gears of War: E-Day is releasing on Xbox Series X|S and PC on October 6 with pre-orders available now. It will also be a part of Xbox Game Pass on day one. Microsoft has confirmed this as an Xbox platform exclusive, as there are no plans to bring it to PlayStation or Switch.
    • Microsoft announces the return of Xbox exclusives with Gears of War and Clockwork Revolution by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft had plenty of announcements to make today at the Xbox Games Showcase celebrating 25 years of the gaming brand. Now, under the leadership of the new Xbox CEO Asha Sharma, Xbox games are going back to their original release methods. She appeared in the livestream itself to announce the return of Xbox console exclusives. This means two major upcoming games from first-party studios won't be coming to PlayStation or Nintendo consoles: Gears of War: E-Day from The Coalition and Clockwork Revolution from InExile. Both titles will only be coming out on Xbox Series X|S consoles and Windows PCs, ditching any plans they had for PlayStation. "These are not timed exclusives," confirmed Microsoft. "We’re committed to investing in and growing XBOX both on console and beyond." The company confirmed that any already announced Xbox titles for PlayStation, under previous leadership, will continue to arrive for the rival platform. This means games like the new Halo remake, Forza Horizon 6, Fable, and State of Decay 3 will still be available on PlayStation, either at launch or later. It sounds like any new projects announced by the company will avoid other consoles in the same way. Microsoft first opened the floodgates by bringing titles like Sea of Thieves, Grounded, Hi-Fi Rush, and Pentiment to PlayStation and Nintendo consoles back in 2024. Since then, almost every new game release from Xbox Game Studios has arrived for rival consoles alongside Xbox and PC. This decision follows Sony's plans to ditch its own multiplatform releases too. Outside of multiplatform live service titles, the PlayStation maker is even abandoning its PC porting endeavors that started years ago.
    • I'm missing the beginning part of this equation... but for the sake of the convo, you don't get to take a $250(?) set of normally priced RAM, jack it up to over $500/600/800 just because of a market shift, then lower it back down to more than what it was originally and call that a "sale". Not the author of this post... the manufacturer/seller.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!