Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, anthdci said:

Is there much change from SN3? I presume we don’t get much information about that

 

They reused the SN-03 lower skirt, which includes the 6 landing legs.

 

There are also plumbing upgrades, including a revamped pressurization system. Problems with pressurization and a human error killed SN-03. Welding is constantly being improved. Domes are also bring improved.

 

SN-05 has numerous changes, and they're prepping to add the revamped fins and larger landing legs. 

 

Also, wider rings are in the plan...

 

 

 

 

3 hours ago, DocM said:

On to mounting three Raptor engines and a static fire...

 

"SN4 PASSED CRYO PROOF! :D"

 

 

 

I think SN4 is only planned for a single raptor and hopefully a 150m hop test with SN5 going full 3 engines.

20 hours ago, Skiver said:

I think SN4 is only planned for a single raptor and hopefully a 150m hop test with SN5 going full 3 engines.

Yup. Good odds SN-04  gets longer landing legs and the nose cone. 40/60 it gets fins.

  • Like 2

Postponed "a few days."

 

The Cameron County Judge (county/parish executive in most states) signed off on a Route 4 road closure, but the state roads dept. had other plans and pulled rank. 

 

They'll likely do equipment checks, a wet dress rehersal, then fire up the pre-burners and let 'er rip.

 

Edited by DocM

I'm so excited that they are already going for reusable vehicles that are not supposed to go back to earth, I suspect this could put us on a quick path toward space only transportation vehicles, which could quickly open a lot of new and exciting possibilities.

Here's to hoping for an orbital construction yard soon 😄

SN-04 STATIC FIRE!!

 

SN-05 is being stacked, SN-06 is right behind her.

 

Single Raptor engine, ~4 seconds. Ramping to the 3 engine center cluster, with 6 engines being the usual compliment (3 each sea level & vacuum optimized)

 

The Super Heavy booster gets 31 sea level engines.

 

NASASpaceFlight stream

 

LabPadre stream

 

  • Like 1

May 16 (tomorrow) a static fire, May 18 a hop.

 

Updated FAA NOTAM

 

FDC 0/1466 - TX..AIRSPACE BROWNSVILLE, TX..TEMPORARY FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS WI AN AREA DEFINED AS 260124N/0970742W TO 255818N/0970742W TO 255818N/0971108W TO 260124N/0971108W TO 260124N/0970742W SFC-16000FT TO PROVIDE A SAFE ENVIROMENT FOR SPACE LAUNCH AND REENTRY OPERATIONS PURSUANT TO 14 CFR SECTION 91.143. SPACEX ARE AUTH IN THE AIRSPACE. SPACEX TELEPHONE 321-361-7062 IS IN CHARGE OF THE OPERATION. HOUSTON /ZHU/ ARTCC TELEPHONE 281-230-5560 IS THE FAA CDN FACILITY. 18 MAY 11:00 2020 UNTIL 18 MAY 19:00 2020. CREATED: 15 MAY 21:15 2020

  • Like 2

Buckle up kiddies...

 

1 hour after the successful SN-04 static fire with a 25 tonne mass simulator, the FAA issued a 2 year suborbital RLV launch license. This is for any number for Starship missions.

 

https://t.co/ksyfzc4Gj1?amp=1

 

Monday's NOTAM is for up to 26,000 feet.

 

Also; they'll be removing the flare stack, replacing it with a condensation unit so they can trap & liquify vented methane instead of burning it.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
21 hours ago, DocM said:

Buckle up kiddies...

 

1 hour after the successful SN-04 static fire with a 25 tonne mass simulator, the FAA issued a 2 year suborbital RLV launch license. This is for any number for Starship missions.

 

https://t.co/ksyfzc4Gj1?amp=1

 

Monday's NOTAM is for up to 26,000 feet.

 

Also; they'll be removing the flare stack, replacing it with a condensation unit so they can trap & liquify vented methane instead of burning it.

 

 

 

Not much left of SN4. Roll up SN5.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Windows 95 offered the ability to add and edit the right click menus, on a per file type basis. This feature seems to be missing in the new file explorer. Are they bringing it back as a "new" feature?
    • It's nearly time to replace my aging Founders Edition 3080, it doesn't OC as nicely as it used to and it's running around 10c warmer than it did when I first bought it.  I don't have budget for much more than what I spent on the 3080 and locally, that means the best GPU I can manage is a 9070XT. On this basis I have a few questions: 1. At present I don't use ray tracing, if this was to change, would this GPU be an issue? 2. How does it compare on a performance basis? 3. Are the drivers worse or better than those for nVidia? 4. Linux support, is it there? 5. Anything else I should be aware of if I were to make this change? 6. Is it a good idea or shall I try and keep the 3080 a little longer.
    • What OS is that? It looks a bit like Mac OS but the command line suggests it isn't, either way I like it!
    • Outlook classic is inherently better than new outlook, for a number of reasons. That said, if the only reason people need office is to read email, they should just use thunderbird.
    • Windows 11 is a big thumbs down from me. I used for a period of a few days while it was in insider and windows 10 was the main OS, and realised it wasn't for me. I am still waiting for Windows to be tolerable again, a shame as at one point I was very pro Microsoft.  
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      74
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      69
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!