Recommended Posts

Start to finish I'm interested in how they're putting it together and making it work. Complexity level isn't three times what it was -- it's nine on the Booster alone (3^2). Now get the Starship onto it and it rises another order of magnitude to twenty-seven.

 

And that's just for this vehicle.

 

Chances of getting this one back on the first flight? ~30%. Expect bad things to happen, hope for the best. We can bet Elon and the SpaceX brains are simulating this one endlessly to improve the odds. That flight software is gonna be bleeding edge, even by SpaceX standards (which is already bleeding edge but "stable" by comparison). :yes:

 

What I think will happen (if it goes badly) is we'll see the software over-correct on a maneuver and we get out of balance on the way down. Think of the first Falcon 9 attempts in landing on the ASDS. It'll overcorrect and throw the mass out of balance, then the inertia will be on the x-y axis (like those first F9 attempts).

 

~30% that it lands where it's supposed to, another ~10% beyond the 30% that it's off-course and that'll be cause to ditch into the Gulf and/or unzip the tanks and destroy it. I'd like for that to not happen, obviously.

 

My thoughts only and I'm pretty sure it's overblown.

For those unfamiliar with the McDonnell-Douglas DC-X* this is Flight #8, which is when it performed a "Swan Dive" maneuver much like what Starship will do.

 

DC-X inspired much of the reusability work today at both SpaceX and Blue Origin.

 

* Delta Clipper eXperimental

 

July 7, 1995 at the White Sands Missile Range, NM.

 

 

Black_Day_White_Sands_MAIN_AUG2010.jpg

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Oopsie!!

 

Mk1 popped its top during pressurization tests. Looked like a weld unzipped. Musk says they're moving on to Mk3.

 

When he says "quite different" one example seen on Mk2 is the upper dome was built an entirely different way.

 

 

1702958959_Mk1StarshipNov20pressurefailure2.thumb.jpg.ec26fa374ea39345b50813dd636f5c26.jpg

Bummer. But makes sense to scrap this thing and move on, if the original contruction pops like this you can bet any patch jobs are going to have a hard time doing better. 

 

Hopefully items like the wings and landing gear can be transferred to Mk3. 

Yep ... this happens. It's what testing is about and even Elon and Gwen have said in the past that if they don't break something they aren't doing it right.

 

All is well. :yes: 

  • Like 2

Cocoa FL.

 

Vehicle construction is being transferred to the new SpaceX Operations Area at the Kennedy Space Center. Starship Mk2 should be moved there shortly. Smaller fabrication jobs may remain at Cocoa. 

 

Boca Chica

 

The full Super Heavy / Starship pad is under construction. 

 

SpaceX has already begun ring segment production for Starship Mk3 using a new system; an IMCAR Spa fabrication & welding machine.

 

LabPadre stream

post-10859-0-51417200-1574722906.jpg

 

 

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I like the show more options. The only problem with it is that it's not always in a consistent spot in the menu. If the copy/paste/cut, happens to show on top, then more option is the last in the menu. But if copy/paste/cut happens to show on the bottom, then more options is before the copy/paste/cut. But I do like the more options because it hides the stuff that I rarely use. But I would like to choose what it is or isn't hiding. That would make it better.
    • I wonder if "put it back the way it was for decades" ever crossed their minds? 🤣
    • Rescind the stupid "Show more options" in context menus and just give us the full menu instead of adding more steps to get to what we want. The "simpler by default" makes me think they'll go in the opposite direction. Every context menu should have a configure button so you can pick and choose what options should be shown, I know you can do that with some registry fu but that shouldn't be required.
    • This is why competition must exist. Finally, pressure is mounting on Microsoft to move in the right direction.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable by Taras Buria Five years ago, Windows 11 introduced redesigned context menus, offering users a simpler, more modern design. However, customers quickly discovered that the new menus leave a lot to be desired. Many are unhappy with performance (they are really slow), while others dislike the double-layed design, where many options are hidden behind the "Show more options" button. In addition, over the years, menus became cluttered and overloaded. While Microsoft has already fixed plenty of pain points across Windows 11, context menus remain mostly unchanged. Fortunately, Microsoft is finally listening. Marcus Ash, Design and Research Lead for Windows at Microsoft, responded to a tweet on X, confirming that the company is working on fixing Windows 11's context menus. Reworked context menus are supposed to be faster, simpler by default, and "configurable to what you use most." What the latter means is unknown, just like whether Microsoft plans to keep the classic menu alongside the modern one, but according to Marcus, the wait should finally be over soon, as he promised to "share our approach soon." Improved context menus will most likely appear first in Windows 11 preview builds in the Experimental Channel. While we wait for Microsoft to release them, you can try fixing context menus on your PC with a simple tool called Windows 11 Context Menu Manager. It lets you disable entries you do not need, not only cleaning up context menus, but also making them significantly faster. Microsoft has already improved Windows 11's Start menu and taskbar, so hopefully it will address user criticism of the context menu as well. Stay tuned for new Windows 11 preview builds, which usually arrive every Friday.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!