Recommended Posts

RP-1 cannot be made by in-situ resource utilization on the Moon, Mars, Ceres, or other interesting bodies. Methane can, and in some places it's laying about as methane ice or as a liquid. It also delivers a higher iSP than RP-1, important once out of the atmosphere.

 

Looks like a GSE (ground support equipment) leak, not the vehicle. Still got tons of data from SN4 so...

 

Build, test, fail, fix, iterate...no one has built a methane engine or rocket at anywhere near this scale before.

 

They were going to re-do the GSE anyhow, adding vented methane capture & liquifiication, and a new rest pad further from the tank farm is half done.

 

Starship SN5 is already  stacked in High Bay 1 with a redesigned lower dome & engine mount, SN6 parts are waiting to be sacked, and SN7 parts are being made. The foundation for High Bay 2 has been poured.

 

 

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1

 

Elon Musk: "SpaceX is building floating, superheavy-class spaceports"... 

Obviously, the best location for Spaceport is on Sea Platform to avoid local restrictions.

Spaceport on island also could have problems from environmentalists, there are always some sea birds' nests...

 

image.thumb.png.218067803d75e66cbb09aa065c1751fc.png

  • Like 2
  • 3 weeks later...

SN-05 test schedule

Static fire: July 10
Backups: July 11 & July 12

150m hop: July 13
Backups: July 14 & July 15

Times: all days 0900-1800 Eastern

 

New cargo noses, Super Heavy High Bay 2 construction, SN-05 preps, etc.

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      260
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      84
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!