Recommended Posts

On 19/04/2023 at 10:25, Steven P. said:

They got the colors wrong by the looks of it, but I think they did a good job overall.

SNAG-0011.jpg

SNAG-0012.jpg

SNAG-0013.jpg

I think a coloring might look a little off because the lighting isn't exactly 1:1 like it was back on TNG.   Yeah we have more lights but they're also not as bright as on TNG sets.  They're still a bit lower.   Honestly I don't have a issue with the newer bridges not having many lights.   Maybe it's because I tend to sit at my desk on my PC with the lights off.  

Okay... Without giving anything away, that was a VERY good episode all over BUT... That ending... that ending... it was... PERFECT! :)

Edit:  I spoke too soon.. There's an end credit cutscene! 😮

 

  • Like 2
  • Love 1
On 20/04/2023 at 21:51, FloatingFatMan said:

Okay... Without giving anything away, that was a VERY good episode all over BUT... That ending... that ending... it was... PERFECT! :)

Edit:  I spoke too soon.. There's an end credit cutscene! 😮

 

I really hope this means we've got our spinoff series set now.  

On 20/04/2023 at 14:51, FloatingFatMan said:

Okay... Without giving anything away, that was a VERY good episode all over BUT... That ending... that ending... it was... PERFECT! :)

Edit:  I spoke too soon.. There's an end credit cutscene! 😮

 

Indeed a great episode and an excellent season and love the little humor sprinkled in here and there.  I hope they start writing future Star Trek series with these writers..

Spoiler

See I told you Q really don't die 😛

I was really hoping Wesely would have shown up for a family get together :(

Nice to 'hear' Chekov son being president and to bring back Walter Koeing to play him.

 

On 21/04/2023 at 13:47, primortal said:

Indeed a great episode and an excellent season and love the little humor sprinkled in here and there.  I hope they start writing future Star Trek series with these writers..

  Hide contents

See I told you Q really don't die 😛

I was really hoping Wesely would have shown up for a family get together :(

Nice to 'hear' Chekov son being president and to bring back Walter Koeing to play him.

Spoiler

And being called Anton, nice touch

 

 

On 21/04/2023 at 15:47, primortal said:

Indeed a great episode and an excellent season and love the little humor sprinkled in here and there.  I hope they start writing future Star Trek series with these writers..

  Hide contents

See I told you Q really don't die 😛

I was really hoping Wesely would have shown up for a family get together :(

Nice to 'hear' Chekov son being president and to bring back Walter Koeing to play him.

 

Spoiler

I don't think he's "alive".   When Jack says he's suppose to be dead, Q says not to think so "linearly".  Meaning Q can go anywhere in time he wants, back and forth.    In that sense he never really dies I guess, because he can time travel.

 

  • Like 2
On 21/04/2023 at 22:37, George P said:
  Hide contents

I don't think he's "alive".   When Jack says he's suppose to be dead, Q says not to think so "linearly".  Meaning Q can go anywhere in time he wants, back and forth.    In that sense he never really dies I guess, because he can time travel.

 

Spoiler

I took it as more of  a yes, Q did die at the end of S2  but he's meeting Jack at an ealier point in his own timeline / existance.  It kinda informs Q that he dies / asscends in the presense of Picard, and it doesn't steal from us as the audience the importance and emotional significance of that scene.

 

On 18/04/2023 at 22:37, Matthew S. said:

If that is supposed to be the Ent-D from ST: Generations they got the bridge slightly wrong...

The bridge module is interchangeable within the top of the saucer section. My guess is that the Generation bridge (which yes is very different) was irreplaceable and so they used an older part.

what a great ep.

but what has me wondering now that the borg are pretty much cooked, nothing left queen dead. but in disco they mentioned they havnt heard from the borg in hundreds of years. only borg left is the jurati borg from picard now in that timeline?

On 25/04/2023 at 10:51, Louisifer said:

Inactive borg vessels are still out there, in fact theres an episode of ST Prodigy called "Let Sleeping Borg Lie" that highlights the perils of curiosity 🫥

First season of Picard there were also derelict Borg cubes.

Spoiler

But "this" queen came from the Delta quadrant I believe.

 

There's left over cubes for sure but as far as we know, no prime timeline/universe queen to give commands.   People need to remember that the Jirati queen is from that Q created alternate timeline that decided to pop over.  And even then it's just her, one funky looking ship and that's it.  

As far as s3 goes though, they've basically just ignored s1 and s2.  

On 22/04/2023 at 14:17, Dick Montage said:

My guess is that the Generation bridge (which yes is very different) was irreplaceable and so they used an older part.

It was irreplaceable so they...replaced it?

*irreparable

On 25/04/2023 at 07:51, Louisifer said:

Inactive borg vessels are still out there, in fact theres an episode of ST Prodigy called "Let Sleeping Borg Lie" that highlights the perils of curiosity 🫥

Prodigy takes place between Lower Decks and Picard in the timeline. Some 10-15 years earlier.

On 25/04/2023 at 08:32, George P said:

As far as s3 goes though, they've basically just ignored s1 and s2.  

No.

Spoiler

They mention Jurati's Borg (indirectly as the "weird s*** on the Stargazer). How Q was supposed to be dead. Picard's synth body. Data dying "again".  The L.A. Ten Forward. Nepenthe and Riker/Troi's son having died. Fenris Rangers. Picard "waiting to die". Laris (albeit briefly). Raffi's history as an addict and her estranged son and not seeing her grandchild - we saw her son's pregnant wife on Freecloud. 

It's spread throughout the show and those references are more satisfying having watched Seasons 1 & 2.

On 25/04/2023 at 17:02, PeterTHX said:

Prodigy takes place between Lower Decks and Picard in the timeline. Some 10-15 years earlier.

When the Borg are involved 15 years is nothing, its just a matter of time. I'm sure at some point over the next few hundred years the right cube will get activated seek out other cubes and rebuild what it can of the collective. I'm sure they'll resurrect a queen too despite her individuality and loneliness in the collective.

On 25/04/2023 at 16:43, Pork Chopper said:

Maybe it has already been explained but who was that alien that Vadic had conversations with a few times?  Seems like he/she was her boss.

Spoiler

It was the Borg queen.

 

On 25/04/2023 at 17:02, PeterTHX said:

 

On 22/04/2023 at 22:17, Dick Montage said:

My guess is that the Generation bridge (which yes is very different) was irreplaceable and so they used an older part.

It was irreplaceable so they...replaced it?

*irreparable

 

Autocorrect + typing + walking = mess

On 25/04/2023 at 18:02, Pork Chopper said:

But as I recall it didn't look like her when she appeared in the finale.

It would give too much away if it did 

On 25/04/2023 at 18:22, primortal said:

It would give too much away if it did 

How do you know it was the Borg Queen?  Ignoring the fact that it would give away the plot (as if we didn't know the Borg were the real bad guys) why would the Borg Queen disguise herself when speaking to Vadic?

On 26/04/2023 at 09:04, Pork Chopper said:

How do you know it was the Borg Queen?  Ignoring the fact that it would give away the plot (as if we didn't know the Borg were the real bad guys) why would the Borg Queen disguise herself when speaking to Vadic?

 

On 25/04/2023 at 21:04, Pork Chopper said:

How do you know it was the Borg Queen?  Ignoring the fact that it would give away the plot (as if we didn't know the Borg were the real bad guys) why would the Borg Queen disguise herself when speaking to Vadic?

Spoiler

Listen to the conversation between Picard and the Borg Queen.  She talks about their collaboration.

Again if they showed the Borg Queen talking to Vadic early into the season we’d know the Borg are the big baddy instead of the Changelings.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      579
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!