Recommended Posts

On 19/04/2023 at 10:25, Steven P. said:

They got the colors wrong by the looks of it, but I think they did a good job overall.

SNAG-0011.jpg

SNAG-0012.jpg

SNAG-0013.jpg

I think a coloring might look a little off because the lighting isn't exactly 1:1 like it was back on TNG.   Yeah we have more lights but they're also not as bright as on TNG sets.  They're still a bit lower.   Honestly I don't have a issue with the newer bridges not having many lights.   Maybe it's because I tend to sit at my desk on my PC with the lights off.  

Okay... Without giving anything away, that was a VERY good episode all over BUT... That ending... that ending... it was... PERFECT! :)

Edit:  I spoke too soon.. There's an end credit cutscene! 😮

 

  • Like 2
  • Love 1
On 20/04/2023 at 21:51, FloatingFatMan said:

Okay... Without giving anything away, that was a VERY good episode all over BUT... That ending... that ending... it was... PERFECT! :)

Edit:  I spoke too soon.. There's an end credit cutscene! 😮

 

I really hope this means we've got our spinoff series set now.  

  • Like 4
On 20/04/2023 at 14:51, FloatingFatMan said:

Okay... Without giving anything away, that was a VERY good episode all over BUT... That ending... that ending... it was... PERFECT! :)

Edit:  I spoke too soon.. There's an end credit cutscene! 😮

 

Indeed a great episode and an excellent season and love the little humor sprinkled in here and there.  I hope they start writing future Star Trek series with these writers..

Spoiler

See I told you Q really don't die 😛

I was really hoping Wesely would have shown up for a family get together :(

Nice to 'hear' Chekov son being president and to bring back Walter Koeing to play him.

 

On 21/04/2023 at 13:47, primortal said:

Indeed a great episode and an excellent season and love the little humor sprinkled in here and there.  I hope they start writing future Star Trek series with these writers..

  Hide contents

See I told you Q really don't die 😛

I was really hoping Wesely would have shown up for a family get together :(

Nice to 'hear' Chekov son being president and to bring back Walter Koeing to play him.

Spoiler

And being called Anton, nice touch

 

 

On 21/04/2023 at 15:47, primortal said:

Indeed a great episode and an excellent season and love the little humor sprinkled in here and there.  I hope they start writing future Star Trek series with these writers..

  Hide contents

See I told you Q really don't die 😛

I was really hoping Wesely would have shown up for a family get together :(

Nice to 'hear' Chekov son being president and to bring back Walter Koeing to play him.

 

Spoiler

I don't think he's "alive".   When Jack says he's suppose to be dead, Q says not to think so "linearly".  Meaning Q can go anywhere in time he wants, back and forth.    In that sense he never really dies I guess, because he can time travel.

 

  • Like 2
On 21/04/2023 at 22:37, George P said:
  Hide contents

I don't think he's "alive".   When Jack says he's suppose to be dead, Q says not to think so "linearly".  Meaning Q can go anywhere in time he wants, back and forth.    In that sense he never really dies I guess, because he can time travel.

 

Spoiler

I took it as more of  a yes, Q did die at the end of S2  but he's meeting Jack at an ealier point in his own timeline / existance.  It kinda informs Q that he dies / asscends in the presense of Picard, and it doesn't steal from us as the audience the importance and emotional significance of that scene.

 

On 18/04/2023 at 22:37, Matthew S. said:

If that is supposed to be the Ent-D from ST: Generations they got the bridge slightly wrong...

The bridge module is interchangeable within the top of the saucer section. My guess is that the Generation bridge (which yes is very different) was irreplaceable and so they used an older part.

what a great ep.

but what has me wondering now that the borg are pretty much cooked, nothing left queen dead. but in disco they mentioned they havnt heard from the borg in hundreds of years. only borg left is the jurati borg from picard now in that timeline?

On 25/04/2023 at 10:51, Louisifer said:

Inactive borg vessels are still out there, in fact theres an episode of ST Prodigy called "Let Sleeping Borg Lie" that highlights the perils of curiosity 🫥

First season of Picard there were also derelict Borg cubes.

Spoiler

But "this" queen came from the Delta quadrant I believe.

 

There's left over cubes for sure but as far as we know, no prime timeline/universe queen to give commands.   People need to remember that the Jirati queen is from that Q created alternate timeline that decided to pop over.  And even then it's just her, one funky looking ship and that's it.  

As far as s3 goes though, they've basically just ignored s1 and s2.  

On 22/04/2023 at 14:17, Dick Montage said:

My guess is that the Generation bridge (which yes is very different) was irreplaceable and so they used an older part.

It was irreplaceable so they...replaced it?

*irreparable

On 25/04/2023 at 07:51, Louisifer said:

Inactive borg vessels are still out there, in fact theres an episode of ST Prodigy called "Let Sleeping Borg Lie" that highlights the perils of curiosity 🫥

Prodigy takes place between Lower Decks and Picard in the timeline. Some 10-15 years earlier.

On 25/04/2023 at 08:32, George P said:

As far as s3 goes though, they've basically just ignored s1 and s2.  

No.

Spoiler

They mention Jurati's Borg (indirectly as the "weird s*** on the Stargazer). How Q was supposed to be dead. Picard's synth body. Data dying "again".  The L.A. Ten Forward. Nepenthe and Riker/Troi's son having died. Fenris Rangers. Picard "waiting to die". Laris (albeit briefly). Raffi's history as an addict and her estranged son and not seeing her grandchild - we saw her son's pregnant wife on Freecloud. 

It's spread throughout the show and those references are more satisfying having watched Seasons 1 & 2.

On 25/04/2023 at 17:02, PeterTHX said:

Prodigy takes place between Lower Decks and Picard in the timeline. Some 10-15 years earlier.

When the Borg are involved 15 years is nothing, its just a matter of time. I'm sure at some point over the next few hundred years the right cube will get activated seek out other cubes and rebuild what it can of the collective. I'm sure they'll resurrect a queen too despite her individuality and loneliness in the collective.

On 25/04/2023 at 16:43, Pork Chopper said:

Maybe it has already been explained but who was that alien that Vadic had conversations with a few times?  Seems like he/she was her boss.

Spoiler

It was the Borg queen.

 

On 25/04/2023 at 17:02, PeterTHX said:

 

On 22/04/2023 at 22:17, Dick Montage said:

My guess is that the Generation bridge (which yes is very different) was irreplaceable and so they used an older part.

It was irreplaceable so they...replaced it?

*irreparable

 

Autocorrect + typing + walking = mess

On 25/04/2023 at 18:02, Pork Chopper said:

But as I recall it didn't look like her when she appeared in the finale.

It would give too much away if it did 

On 25/04/2023 at 18:22, primortal said:

It would give too much away if it did 

How do you know it was the Borg Queen?  Ignoring the fact that it would give away the plot (as if we didn't know the Borg were the real bad guys) why would the Borg Queen disguise herself when speaking to Vadic?

On 26/04/2023 at 09:04, Pork Chopper said:

How do you know it was the Borg Queen?  Ignoring the fact that it would give away the plot (as if we didn't know the Borg were the real bad guys) why would the Borg Queen disguise herself when speaking to Vadic?

 

On 25/04/2023 at 21:04, Pork Chopper said:

How do you know it was the Borg Queen?  Ignoring the fact that it would give away the plot (as if we didn't know the Borg were the real bad guys) why would the Borg Queen disguise herself when speaking to Vadic?

Spoiler

Listen to the conversation between Picard and the Borg Queen.  She talks about their collaboration.

Again if they showed the Borg Queen talking to Vadic early into the season we’d know the Borg are the big baddy instead of the Changelings.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      558
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!