Which Next Gen Console do you plan on buying?


If you're planning on purchasing a Next Gen Console what will it be?  

81 members have voted

  1. 1. If you're planning on purchasing a Next Gen Console what will it be?

    • Xbox Series X
    • PlayStation 5
    • Xbox Series S (rumoured Digital 1080p version)
    • PlayStation 5 Digital Edition


Recommended Posts

Mostly likely the PS5 disc version. It's certainly not going to be day 1, Im in no rush these days. Happy to give at least a year or two for it to mature.

  • Like 1
Just now, forster said:

Mostly likely the PS5 disc version. It's certainly not going to be day 1, Im in no rush these days. Happy to give at least a year or two for it to mature.

Also the PS5 disc version for me too, probably not Day One.

  • Like 1

I'll probably go for the Series X as soon as I can. 

 

I did also vote for the PS5 Digital version, there are some PS exclusives that I never played that I'd love to get my hands on.

16 minutes ago, dipsylalapo said:

I'll probably go for the Series X as soon as I can. 

 

I did also vote for the PS% Digital version, there are some PS exclusives that I never played that I'd love to get my hands on.

Same here, though I did have a PS4 Pro for a while.  I don't know *when* I'll go for the PS5 though.  It's not as important, so I recast my vote for XSX only.

Both, but if the prices are too steep then I reckon I'll get a PS5 (disc version) first.  Doubt I'll be in any rush to get the Xbox Series X at launch since I don't think there'll really be any games I'm all that bothered about initially.

 

Weirdly I prefer buying retail for my console games wherever possible, yet for PC I don't care.  Not sure why.

8 minutes ago, Phemo said:

Both, but if the prices are too steep then I reckon I'll get a PS5 (disc version) first.  Doubt I'll be in any rush to get the Xbox Series X at launch since I don't think there'll really be any games I'm all that bothered about initially.

 

Weirdly I prefer buying retail for my console games wherever possible, yet for PC I don't care.  Not sure why.

I seem to have gone all digital on the PS4 now, but only when i can get a game dirt cheap, i suspect i won't be able to hold off when i eventually get the PS5 disc version so i will spend more money on games, or maybe replay PS4 games.

You must have an option for "NONE".

 

Both consoles are disappointing at this stage.

 

I have had pretty much all sony consoles but I also had Xbox360 and it was a blast. Sony however now is forgetting what really gaming is and instead is making games that resemble quite a bit the Netflix series.

 

Sony design for PS5 clearly shows that they do not even know their target audience, long time gamers usually prefer other designs.

 

On this account the XSX has clearly a much better design and size, thermals remain to be seen. However, MS games look much better on PC.

 

I finally decided not to get another console after this generation, PC is truly next gen... but now instead of later.

 

 

8 minutes ago, Arceles said:

You must have an option for "NONE".

 

Both consoles are disappointing at this stage.

 

I have had pretty much all sony consoles but I also had Xbox360 and it was a blast. Sony however now is forgetting what really gaming is and instead is making games that resemble quite a bit the Netflix series.

 

Sony design for PS5 clearly shows that they do not even know their target audience, long time gamers usually prefer other designs.

 

On this account the XSX has clearly a much better design and size, thermals remain to be seen. However, MS games look much better on PC.

 

I finally decided not to get another console after this generation, PC is truly next gen... but now instead of later.

 

 

I did think about a NONE option but thought it was pointless and still do as it wouldn't mean anything, if someone isn't going to buy one then there is no need for them to vote.

 

My opinion is both consoles are far from disappointing.

 

 

1 minute ago, SnoopZ said:

I did think about a NONE option but thought it was pointless and still do as it wouldn't mean anything, if someone isn't going to buy one then there is no need for them to vote.

 

 

You would be surprised about how may people would choose this option but I understand your reasoning.

10 minutes ago, Arceles said:

You would be surprised about how may people would choose this option but I understand your reasoning.

Not really.  The poll asks which you're planning to buy, not if you're planning to buy one.

 

Many PC gamers tend to forget they're still a minority.  Especially at the high end you need to be at to beat these consoles.

51 minutes ago, LostCat said:

Not really.  The poll asks which you're planning to buy, not if you're planning to buy one.

 

Many PC gamers tend to forget they're still a minority.  Especially at the high end you need to be at to beat these consoles.

Ahm... the way in which you phrase it is debatable, look at this statistics from 2018, clearly pcgaming is not a minority

https://www.theesa.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ESA_EssentialFacts_2018.pdf 

 

Also here

http://www.clairfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Gaming-Industry-and-Market-Report-2018.01-2.pdf

If I was going to buy a next gen console, I would probably go for the Xbox Series X because of paper at least, it looks the better consoles then the PS5, it's got a faster cpu, faster gpu and the SSD performance is more than fast enough to give the vast bulk of benefits that games are likely to see.

 

Throw in the ecosystem and backwards compatibility, the Xbox Series X looks by far the better platform, the only real thing the PS5 has going for it is the fast SSD which I don't think will deliver on the hype like they say over the Xbox Series X and the other is a few games that are exclusive to the PS5 which are such a small handful to not really matter.

 

As it is, I'll likely just upgrade my PC as it's pretty decent already and only really need to change the gpu and M2 drive to power ahead of the next gen consoles.

2 minutes ago, Arceles said:

Ahm... the way in which you phrase it is debatable, look at this statistics from 2018, clearly pcgaming is not a minority

https://www.theesa.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ESA_EssentialFacts_2018.pdf 

 

Also here

http://www.clairfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Gaming-Industry-and-Market-Report-2018.01-2.pdf

That first link doesn't really disagree with me?  It says people play games on PC sure, which I'm sure Facebook games also qualify under.

 

Sure, if you're including casual gamers it's not a minority at all.  And I did mention the high end.

 

The second one does mention overall revenue, but how much of that is F2P garbage or people who spend thousands on extra junk in one game?  Until I know that the numbers are meaningless.

2 minutes ago, LostCat said:

That first link doesn't really disagree with me?  It says people play games on PC sure, which I'm sure Facebook games also qualify under.

 

Sure, if you're including casual gamers it's not a minority at all.  And I did mention the high end.

 

The second one does mention overall revenue, but how much of that is F2P garbage or people who spend thousands on extra junk in one game?  Until I know that the numbers are meaningless.

We were not discussing content per se, which also you are failing to give some statistics. We are discussing that PC gaming is not a minority and little by little has been gaining weight over time, in my opinion, by poor decision making in consoles.

 

But on the other hand, consoles were great, that's why I have a lot of them, is just that PC is simply much better nowadays. And you do not really need to spend an arm and a leg for them, even better is that you can use them for more than gaming.

15 minutes ago, Arceles said:

We were not discussing content per se, which also you are failing to give some statistics. We are discussing that PC gaming is not a minority and little by little has been gaining weight over time, in my opinion, by poor decision making in consoles.

 

But on the other hand, consoles were great, that's why I have a lot of them, is just that PC is simply much better nowadays. And you do not really need to spend an arm and a leg for them, even better is that you can use them for more than gaming.

I can't give statistics that don't exist.  I'm not going to spend time and money convincing people to give me information that they won't give me because it makes their business look less impressive.

 

Instead, you can get fancy vague stats from people who want to sell you stuff!  What could be better?

Edited by LostCat

Each console has its weakness and strengths but they're so small compared to current gen I don't think it will make much of a difference and it will likely come down to which first party games you prefer and which controller you like best.

 

For me personally it is down to the games from Sony and I am looking forward to trying out their new controller to see if those haptic and adaptive feedback triggers make a difference and the 3D audio.

3 minutes ago, LostCat said:

I can't give statistics that don't exist.  I'm not going to spend time and money convincing people to give me information that they won't give me because it makes their business look less impressive.

 

Instead, you can get fancy stats from people who want to sell you stuff!  What could be better?

With those arguments I call it quits, there is no constructive discussion here.

3 minutes ago, Melfster said:

I don't understand getting a console right now why not wait until 2 or 3 years until after launch. There should be more games and it might be cheaper.

One of the benefits will be backwards compatibility, so hopefully most of our games will work on Next Gen, I don't think I could wait 2-3 years.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Linux 7.1 arrives with an NTFS overhaul and major hardware performance boosts by Paul Hill The founder of the Linux kernel has just announced the availability of Linux 7.1. This is a stable version of the kernel that will now be tested by various Linux distributions before it is shipped to users through update managers. Some users, like those on Debian, for example, might not get it for a long time, if at all, while Fedora users can expect it in the near future. With Linux 7.1 out on time, the merge window for Linux 7.2 is now open, giving contributors the opportunity to send in major new features that have been waiting for the last two months. Torvalds warned that he is currently travelling and will be in another timezone, so timing for the merge window may be irregular due to timezone differences and limited internet access. Torvalds said that he has already fetched early pull requests to allow him to do some offline work, but the travel could still cause disruption. Right now, he is not planning to extend the release, but did consider it. He said he might later regret not extending, though. In terms of this last week of development for Linux 7.1, Torvalds said there were no major or alarming changes. This week consisted mostly of smaller driver updates to GPU, networking, and sound, networking fixes, trace tooling fixes, and misc minor fixes. The shortlog this week lists fixes for driver bugs, memory leaks, I/O and USB fixes, networking and RDMA fixes, DRM/graphics fixes, and tooling and verification improvements. Specific fixes include USB series heap-overflow and buffer overflow fixes, and multiple use-after-free, memory-leak, and refcount corrections across subsystems such as i2c, zram, gpio, and net. There are fixes for graphics drivers, including amdgpu, i915, and virtio, as well as hypervisor and virtualization tweaks affecting mshv, vmbus, and hyperv. According to Phoronix, anyone running Linux 7.1 should look out for the new NTFS driver, Intel FRED for improved performance on Panther Lake and future CPUs, faster graphics with Intel Arc Battlemage, and improvements for older AMD Radeon GPUs. If you are running Linux on your computer and everything is fine, then you don’t need to worry about updating to Linux 7.1 as a priority; just wait for it to be pushed to you. If you have tried Linux on hardware but it didn’t work properly, trying again with a distro that uses Linux 7.1 could cause Linux to work on your machine, thanks to the new hardware support.
    • you can also do this with this tool: PowerSettingsExplorer made by mbk1969 at 3dguru forum.. I found it by accident researching on modern standby and annoying quirks of it in 2022
    • AB Download Manager 1.9.1 by Razvan Serea AB Download Manager is an open-source, feature-rich download manager designed to accelerate downloads, organize files efficiently, and provide seamless control over downloads. With support for multiple connections, resume capability, and an intuitive interface, it enhances the downloading experience for users seeking speed and reliability. The software integrates with various browsers, enabling quick link grabbing and batch downloading. It supports HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP protocols, ensuring broad compatibility with different file sources. Users can schedule downloads, set speed limits, and categorize files automatically for better organization. AB Download Manager is lightweight yet powerful, making it a great alternative to proprietary download managers. Its open-source nature allows developers to contribute, customize, and improve the software as needed. Whether you're downloading large files, managing multiple downloads at once, or seeking an ad-free experience, this tool offers a practical and efficient solution. Key features of AB Download Manager: Multi-Connection Support – Accelerates downloads by splitting files into multiple segments. Resume Capability – Allows paused or interrupted downloads to be resumed without starting over. Batch Downloading – Supports downloading multiple files at once for improved efficiency. Browser Integration – Captures download links directly from browsers for seamless operation. HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP Support – Ensures compatibility with a wide range of file sources. Download Scheduling – Enables users to automate downloads at specific times. Speed Limiting – Lets users control bandwidth usage for optimized performance. File Categorization – Automatically organizes downloaded files into designated folders. User-Friendly Interface – Simple and intuitive design for easy navigation. Cross-Platform Compatibility – Works on multiple operating systems. Ad-Free Experience – No intrusive ads or tracking for a clean user experience. AB Download Manager 1.9.1 changelog: Added An option to customize notification sounds (#1259) Fixed Ongoing notification was laggy on Samsung One UI devices (#1269) Improved Updated Translations Minor UI/UX improvements Download: AB Download Manager 1.9.1 | Portable | ~80.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 | Android Links: AB Download Manager Website | Github Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • watching him because of the Mr Klinton cat
    • yup dude, ADS on this website are terrible
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      140
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!