Which Next Gen Console do you plan on buying?


If you're planning on purchasing a Next Gen Console what will it be?  

81 members have voted

  1. 1. If you're planning on purchasing a Next Gen Console what will it be?

    • Xbox Series X
    • PlayStation 5
    • Xbox Series S (rumoured Digital 1080p version)
    • PlayStation 5 Digital Edition


Recommended Posts

Mostly likely the PS5 disc version. It's certainly not going to be day 1, Im in no rush these days. Happy to give at least a year or two for it to mature.

  • Like 1
Just now, forster said:

Mostly likely the PS5 disc version. It's certainly not going to be day 1, Im in no rush these days. Happy to give at least a year or two for it to mature.

Also the PS5 disc version for me too, probably not Day One.

  • Like 1

I'll probably go for the Series X as soon as I can. 

 

I did also vote for the PS5 Digital version, there are some PS exclusives that I never played that I'd love to get my hands on.

16 minutes ago, dipsylalapo said:

I'll probably go for the Series X as soon as I can. 

 

I did also vote for the PS% Digital version, there are some PS exclusives that I never played that I'd love to get my hands on.

Same here, though I did have a PS4 Pro for a while.  I don't know *when* I'll go for the PS5 though.  It's not as important, so I recast my vote for XSX only.

Both, but if the prices are too steep then I reckon I'll get a PS5 (disc version) first.  Doubt I'll be in any rush to get the Xbox Series X at launch since I don't think there'll really be any games I'm all that bothered about initially.

 

Weirdly I prefer buying retail for my console games wherever possible, yet for PC I don't care.  Not sure why.

8 minutes ago, Phemo said:

Both, but if the prices are too steep then I reckon I'll get a PS5 (disc version) first.  Doubt I'll be in any rush to get the Xbox Series X at launch since I don't think there'll really be any games I'm all that bothered about initially.

 

Weirdly I prefer buying retail for my console games wherever possible, yet for PC I don't care.  Not sure why.

I seem to have gone all digital on the PS4 now, but only when i can get a game dirt cheap, i suspect i won't be able to hold off when i eventually get the PS5 disc version so i will spend more money on games, or maybe replay PS4 games.

You must have an option for "NONE".

 

Both consoles are disappointing at this stage.

 

I have had pretty much all sony consoles but I also had Xbox360 and it was a blast. Sony however now is forgetting what really gaming is and instead is making games that resemble quite a bit the Netflix series.

 

Sony design for PS5 clearly shows that they do not even know their target audience, long time gamers usually prefer other designs.

 

On this account the XSX has clearly a much better design and size, thermals remain to be seen. However, MS games look much better on PC.

 

I finally decided not to get another console after this generation, PC is truly next gen... but now instead of later.

 

 

8 minutes ago, Arceles said:

You must have an option for "NONE".

 

Both consoles are disappointing at this stage.

 

I have had pretty much all sony consoles but I also had Xbox360 and it was a blast. Sony however now is forgetting what really gaming is and instead is making games that resemble quite a bit the Netflix series.

 

Sony design for PS5 clearly shows that they do not even know their target audience, long time gamers usually prefer other designs.

 

On this account the XSX has clearly a much better design and size, thermals remain to be seen. However, MS games look much better on PC.

 

I finally decided not to get another console after this generation, PC is truly next gen... but now instead of later.

 

 

I did think about a NONE option but thought it was pointless and still do as it wouldn't mean anything, if someone isn't going to buy one then there is no need for them to vote.

 

My opinion is both consoles are far from disappointing.

 

 

1 minute ago, SnoopZ said:

I did think about a NONE option but thought it was pointless and still do as it wouldn't mean anything, if someone isn't going to buy one then there is no need for them to vote.

 

 

You would be surprised about how may people would choose this option but I understand your reasoning.

10 minutes ago, Arceles said:

You would be surprised about how may people would choose this option but I understand your reasoning.

Not really.  The poll asks which you're planning to buy, not if you're planning to buy one.

 

Many PC gamers tend to forget they're still a minority.  Especially at the high end you need to be at to beat these consoles.

51 minutes ago, LostCat said:

Not really.  The poll asks which you're planning to buy, not if you're planning to buy one.

 

Many PC gamers tend to forget they're still a minority.  Especially at the high end you need to be at to beat these consoles.

Ahm... the way in which you phrase it is debatable, look at this statistics from 2018, clearly pcgaming is not a minority

https://www.theesa.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ESA_EssentialFacts_2018.pdf 

 

Also here

http://www.clairfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Gaming-Industry-and-Market-Report-2018.01-2.pdf

If I was going to buy a next gen console, I would probably go for the Xbox Series X because of paper at least, it looks the better consoles then the PS5, it's got a faster cpu, faster gpu and the SSD performance is more than fast enough to give the vast bulk of benefits that games are likely to see.

 

Throw in the ecosystem and backwards compatibility, the Xbox Series X looks by far the better platform, the only real thing the PS5 has going for it is the fast SSD which I don't think will deliver on the hype like they say over the Xbox Series X and the other is a few games that are exclusive to the PS5 which are such a small handful to not really matter.

 

As it is, I'll likely just upgrade my PC as it's pretty decent already and only really need to change the gpu and M2 drive to power ahead of the next gen consoles.

2 minutes ago, Arceles said:

Ahm... the way in which you phrase it is debatable, look at this statistics from 2018, clearly pcgaming is not a minority

https://www.theesa.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ESA_EssentialFacts_2018.pdf 

 

Also here

http://www.clairfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Gaming-Industry-and-Market-Report-2018.01-2.pdf

That first link doesn't really disagree with me?  It says people play games on PC sure, which I'm sure Facebook games also qualify under.

 

Sure, if you're including casual gamers it's not a minority at all.  And I did mention the high end.

 

The second one does mention overall revenue, but how much of that is F2P garbage or people who spend thousands on extra junk in one game?  Until I know that the numbers are meaningless.

2 minutes ago, LostCat said:

That first link doesn't really disagree with me?  It says people play games on PC sure, which I'm sure Facebook games also qualify under.

 

Sure, if you're including casual gamers it's not a minority at all.  And I did mention the high end.

 

The second one does mention overall revenue, but how much of that is F2P garbage or people who spend thousands on extra junk in one game?  Until I know that the numbers are meaningless.

We were not discussing content per se, which also you are failing to give some statistics. We are discussing that PC gaming is not a minority and little by little has been gaining weight over time, in my opinion, by poor decision making in consoles.

 

But on the other hand, consoles were great, that's why I have a lot of them, is just that PC is simply much better nowadays. And you do not really need to spend an arm and a leg for them, even better is that you can use them for more than gaming.

15 minutes ago, Arceles said:

We were not discussing content per se, which also you are failing to give some statistics. We are discussing that PC gaming is not a minority and little by little has been gaining weight over time, in my opinion, by poor decision making in consoles.

 

But on the other hand, consoles were great, that's why I have a lot of them, is just that PC is simply much better nowadays. And you do not really need to spend an arm and a leg for them, even better is that you can use them for more than gaming.

I can't give statistics that don't exist.  I'm not going to spend time and money convincing people to give me information that they won't give me because it makes their business look less impressive.

 

Instead, you can get fancy vague stats from people who want to sell you stuff!  What could be better?

Edited by LostCat

Each console has its weakness and strengths but they're so small compared to current gen I don't think it will make much of a difference and it will likely come down to which first party games you prefer and which controller you like best.

 

For me personally it is down to the games from Sony and I am looking forward to trying out their new controller to see if those haptic and adaptive feedback triggers make a difference and the 3D audio.

3 minutes ago, LostCat said:

I can't give statistics that don't exist.  I'm not going to spend time and money convincing people to give me information that they won't give me because it makes their business look less impressive.

 

Instead, you can get fancy stats from people who want to sell you stuff!  What could be better?

With those arguments I call it quits, there is no constructive discussion here.

3 minutes ago, Melfster said:

I don't understand getting a console right now why not wait until 2 or 3 years until after launch. There should be more games and it might be cheaper.

One of the benefits will be backwards compatibility, so hopefully most of our games will work on Next Gen, I don't think I could wait 2-3 years.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!