No TPM? No Windows 11 for you!


Recommended Posts

Just found out I won't be upgrading, the requirements include a TPM module (even if you don't plan on using Bitlocker). I'm still using my Asus Maximus VII Ranger which does not have a TPM module. It does have a slot for a TPM module but it's TPM-L 2.0 (20-1), NO-ONE sells the module anymore, the only ASUS ones that seem to exist now are TPM-M (14-1)

 

If you want to check if you have a TPM module, run tpm.msc and good luck.

Edited by PsYcHoKiLLa
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1409119-no-tpm-no-windows-11-for-you/
Share on other sites

If you have a modern CPU (after Haswell, which is 4th gen) then you will most likely have it in your CPU. Most motherboard manufacturers have Trusted Computing turned off by default, this is my AORUS Z390 Pro WiFi board (which is 8th and 9th gen):

 

snag-0021.png

 

 

The TPM Module has additional hardware based encryption for your Windows install and data on the harddisks. If you have a TPM Module, then you will have to clear TPM each time you want to clean install Windows on your system. (I am still learning how it all works).

3 hours ago, PsYcHoKiLLa said:

Just found out I won't be upgrading, the requirements include a TPM module (even if you don't plan on using Bitlocker). I'm still using my Asus Maximus VII Ranger which does not have a TPM module. It does have a slot for a TPM module but it's TPM-L 2.0 (20-1), NO-ONE sells the module anymore, the only ASUS ones that seem to exist now are TPM-M (14-1)

 

If you want to check if you have a TPM module, run tpm.msc and good luck.

I just bought a Asus TPM-M R2.0 module that is supposed to be TPM 2.0 from amazon (us) for $15. It is 14 pin. 

 

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01DQQLH74/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

My two desktops have a Intel i7-4790K which apparently have TPM 1.2.

 

But Microsoft says you need TPM 2.0 so I guess I will not be able to upgrade the simple way?

 

I guess I will need to install Windows from an ISO on a USB and remove the "appraiserres.dll" entry?

 

If I do it this way will my copy of Windows 11 still activate using my Windows 10 key?

 

Unless you have a very modern PC this is really going to make a lot of users upset having to go the extra mile getting Windows 11 installed :( 

 

Why Microsoft why??????????????

 

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, Xenon said:

I just bought a Asus TPM-M R2.0 module that is supposed to be TPM 2.0 from amazon (us) for $15. It is 14 pin. 

 

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01DQQLH74/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Or you could have saved the money and used the BUILT IN TPM that ALL moderns processors already have.

1 minute ago, corrosive23 said:

Or you could have saved the money and used the BUILT IN TPM that ALL moderns processors already have.

A module also offers far more protections for security minded individuals.

The weird thing is that the tool says that my computer isn't compatible yet I can't really think of any reason why that would be the case.

 

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

AMD Vega 56

MSI Pro VH A320 Plus

 

The TPM is switched on, I've been using it since the day I built the PC for BitLocker so it's obviously working. UEFI and Secure boot is on so I don't really know what the issue is there. Of course the tool doesn't really give any useful information.

1 minute ago, Steven P. said:

A module also offers far more protections for security minded individuals.

In what manner?  Honest question, this is the first I've heard of that.

Just now, Vince800 said:

The weird thing is that the tool says that my computer isn't compatible yet I can't really think of any reason why that would be the case.

 

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

AMD Vega 56

MSI Pro VH A320 Plus

 

The TPM is switched on, I've been using it since the day I built the PC for BitLocker so it's obviously working. UEFI and Secure boot is on so I don't really know what the issue is there. Of course the tool doesn't really give any useful information.

Secure Boot disabled?

1 minute ago, Steven P. said:

A module also offers far more protections for security minded individuals.

I wonder if that DLL also removes checks for the DirectX 11 because I think in some cases you can upgrade the firmware to give you TPM 2.0 ... integrated graphics are going to be more of a bitch.

5 minutes ago, corrosive23 said:

Or you could have saved the money and used the BUILT IN TPM that ALL moderns processors already have.

I am using a i7 7700k on asus prime z270-a I have cant find anything in my bios with tpm. You know a way please post it. 

4 minutes ago, Xenon said:

I am using a i7 7700k on asus prime z270-a I have cant find anything in my bios with tpm. You know a way please post it. 

Look for the PTT (Intel Platform Trust Technology) option.

6 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

In what manner?  Honest question, this is the first I've heard of that.

Secure Boot disabled?

GIGABYTE_GC_TPM2_0_S@@gzzg37.jpg

 

I don't know, tell me why a motherboard would have a TPM 2.0 Module header if the board only supports CPUs where this is already built in?

Just now, Steven P. said:

GIGABYTE_GC_TPM2_0_S@@gzzg37.jpg

 

I don't know, tell me why a motherboard would have a TPM 2.0 Module header if the board only supports CPUs where this is already built in?

Legacy? In the event a CPU manufacturer decided to be an ass and not include it? Because not everyone knows it exists and they can suck more money from people? I don't know exactly why, but I don't see how it would be more secure. 

 

4 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

Legacy? In the event a CPU manufacturer decided to be an ass and not include it? Because not everyone knows it exists and they can suck more money from people? I don't know exactly why, but I don't see how it would be more secure. 

 

DOUBLE TPM? (like Bacon Double Cheeseburger)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!