What was the last movie you watched? (2022 edition)


Recommended Posts

A New Year, a new thread. You can view the 2021 edition here.

 

The Suicide Squid 

 

I enjoyed it ... Margot Robbie killed it (per usual) as Harley Quinn, the walking shark thing was funny.  I did feel bad for Starro at the ending. :(  

 

7/10

Ghostbusters: Afterlife

 

Wow, what a great sequel. It had all the heart of the original, pacing was good, acting was spot on, story was coherent with plenty of call backs. It felt like a lovely tribute to Ramis, and a well deserved entry into the franchise.  Absolutely loved it.

  • Like 2

Finally saw Ghostbusters Afterlife last night, 8/10 from me but I'm a big GB fan from the start so all the nostalgia/fan service and specially the hit to the feels in the final act were great IMO.  A little more comedy and it could've been a 9/10.

On 09/01/2022 at 14:14, Dick Montage said:

Ghostbusters: Afterlife

 

Wow, what a great sequel. It had all the heart of the original, pacing was good, acting was spot on, story was coherent with plenty of call backs. It felt like a lovely tribute to Ramis, and a well deserved entry into the franchise.  Absolutely loved it.

Loved it too, good nostalgic fun and it seemed to setup the ending for more too.

 

BTW I have not seen the girl-power reboot though.

On 09/01/2022 at 08:57, Xenon said:

Casablanca. 9/10. The 1st time I have ever seen it.  Stars Humphrey Bogart, Ingrid Bergman, and Paul Henreid. 

A little late to the party 😜

On 09/01/2022 at 08:29, Steven P. said:

Loved it too, good nostalgic fun and it seemed to setup the ending for more too.

 

BTW I have not seen the girl-power reboot though.

Yeah no chance I am going to see that - those actresses are annoying as hell in other movies already .

 

Last good Ghostbusters experience was a PC game that was highly rated and surprisingly fun.

I just watch the new Ghostbusters last night and loved it. Finished up the new Matrix movie as well. While the ending could have been better, it was surprisingly good.

  • Steven P. pinned this topic

Death to 2021 - Netflix link

 

It tried to bring comedy to awful events, so it absolutely did not hit the mark. I miss Charlie Brooker's own year reviews (the last one he did was at the end of 2016). Apparently he was involved with last year's Death to 2020 which I gave a 7 on IMDB, this year he was not involved.

 

My verdict 5/10.

 

PS: I split this year's posts into a new topic.

On 09/01/2022 at 18:16, E.Worm Jimmy said:

A little late to the party 😜

Yeah no chance I am going to see that - those actresses are annoying as hell in other movies already .

 

Last good Ghostbusters experience was a PC game that was highly rated and surprisingly fun.

If you're talking about the game with the original cast doing the voice acting and you playing as some no named 5th rookie, then yeah, it's great.  It's also canon btw, I always thought of it as an official 3rd movie story wise, while afterlife could be 4th.

  • Like 1
On 09/01/2022 at 13:07, George P said:

If you're talking about the game with the original cast doing the voice acting and you playing as some no named 5th rookie, then yeah, it's great.  It's also canon btw, I always thought of it as an official 3rd movie story wise, while afterlife could be 4th.

Yeah it was amazing - that's the one!

On 09/01/2022 at 15:29, Steven P. said:

BTW I have not seen the girl-power reboot though.

Nor should you.  It was dire, didn't capture any of the heart of the original and was a generic comedy with a franchise title.  It did all of the characters a disservice and played upon really crass stereotypes.

 

And Sony realised this.  They tempted to firefight with the "You don't like it because you can't stand strong female leads" argument.

So last night I took a punt on Matrix Resurrections.  I think it's only fair to suggest that my opinion was always going to be biased off the back of loving The Matrix, The Animatrix, and then really just disliking Reloaded and Revolutions.

 

I thought this was going to be a massive release, a tent-pole movie...  It did not come across that way.  Whereas the original had ground-breaking, in-camera effects and genre-defining CG; some of the SFX in this felt like it had the production values of a dream sequence within a Hallmark Christmas movie.  The story was simple, which can be a positive, but not in this case as it was presenting itself as somehow "more" within the setpieces that didn't advance the narrative.  But what really grated was the way it felt so proud of itself, continuously patting itself on the back and figuratively giving a knowing nod directly into the camera by being oh-so self-referential - it was absolutely cringeworthy and overstated itself.

  • Like 2
On 10/01/2022 at 12:10, Sulphy said:

REsident Evil: Welcome to Raccoon City ..... first half was ok... 

God that one hurt to watch.  I liked the idea of putting the events of RE and RE2 together in one movie (they happen at the same time in the games as well) but boy did they manage to crap it all up.   So bad.

 

It still amazes me how no one can make a good video game movie when the games have laid out everything for you.   Well, actually I think the newer Tomb Raider reboot did a good job.  Sure it's no masterpiece in storytelling but it's not some abomination  of a film to.  

  • Like 2
On 10/01/2022 at 10:09, Dick Montage said:

So last night I took a punt on Matrix Resurrections.  I think it's only fair to suggest that my opinion was always going to be biased off the back of loving The Matrix, The Animatrix, and then really just disliking Reloaded and Revolutions.

 

I thought this was going to be a massive release, a tent-pole movie...  It did not come across that way.  Whereas the original had ground-breaking, in-camera effects and genre-defining CG; some of the SFX in this felt like it had the production values of a dream sequence within a Hallmark Christmas movie.  The story was simple, which can be a positive, but not in this case as it was presenting itself as somehow "more" within the setpieces that didn't advance the narrative.  But what really grated was the way it felt so proud of itself, continuously patting itself on the back and figuratively giving a knowing nod directly into the camera by being oh-so self-referential - it was absolutely cringeworthy and overstated itself.

Oh man, what a disappointment, and the last 20 mins was just silly and stupid! i enjoyed about the fist 40 minutes of it... then went south! I had such high hopes, because in general, i enjoyed the first 3... 1st one was obviously epic!

On 10/01/2022 at 10:27, Sulphy said:

Oh man, what a disappointment, and the last 20 mins was just silly and stupid! i enjoyed about the fist 40 minutes of it... then went south! I had such high hopes, because in general, i enjoyed the first 3... 1st one was obviously epic!

The first was really something new at the time (to an audience that had largely not been exposed to such concepts within accessible modern cinema).  The 2nd and 3rd just spiralled towards utter hyperbole by extending what was essentially a relatively simple, clean story into convoluted mess - but I can see why, studios cashing in and riding a wave of amazingly good reception towards the first.

Eternals - meh, it was alright, I guess.  Should have been a Disney+ series, I think.  Had real issues with that ending.  

 

Spoiler

Earth would have effed with a huge marble thing coming out of its core.

 

Mudbound (Netflix) - This had been on my list to watch for a long time.  Finally got around to it last night.  Very, very good movie.

On 17/01/2022 at 16:53, Jim K said:

Eternals - meh, it was alright, I guess.  Should have been a Disney+ series, I think.  Had real issues with that ending.  

 

  Hide contents

Earth would have effed with a huge marble thing coming out of its core.

 

Mudbound (Netflix) - This had been on my list to watch for a long time.  Finally got around to it last night.  Very, very good movie.

Feel the same way you do about Eternals.

 

Spoiler

The plot ended up being silly imo, so the Eternals go mad if their memory is not wiped after each Emergence, and when they realize this they decide to start ending natural creation/evolution by stopping the emergence. I almost started to wonder if we were going to get a Matrix type ending where the Eternals are afforded the idea of having "stopped" the emergence, but their minds are wiped anyway, that would have been a better ending to the film. 

 

And there's more to come eh?

 

  • 5 weeks later...

Just watched the newest Scream redo/sequel, 7/10.   They kept trying to fake you out with the jump scares in this one, doing the whole music bit and having as many as 3-4 fake outs back to back.  It got pretty annoying at one point IMO.  I understand the music is suppose to build tension and grab your complete focus but it's a dumb giveaway that you're either going to get a jump scare or a fake out now.

 

I much rather movies ditch the music and go with more eerie quiet and normal room sounds.  I think that works better.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      195
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!