Recommended Posts

I voted no, for other reasons, mainly being the 2 computers I had Windows 11 on weren't supported and after an update I was told that, so reinstalled my system images of Windows 10.

I did like Windows 11 for the 3-4 months it was installed though. Not going out of my way to do anything to try and upgrade computers though. I'll be running Linux on everything once Windows 10 dies.

  • Like 2

12 systems at work Win 11, all upgrades from 10. No issues. 3 on Win 10 because of incompatible CPU.

2 at home Win 11, 1 an upgrade from 10 1 came with 11. No issues.

On 15/01/2023 at 11:11, Nick H. said:

Voted that I'm sticking with Windows 10. Even if I met the requirements, I see no reason to move to Windows 11. Any troubleshooting that I have done for clients using Windows 11 has been a bit of a headache, I don't know why I would inflict that on my own system. :laugh:

This for sure.

  • Like 1

Hello,

I have some new computers running Windows 11, but most of my primary-use systems are running Windows 10.

Windows 11 does have some useful default security features, but some of them also happen to be present in Windows 10 as optional features to enable.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

Windows 11 is bloatware.  Ads, widgets, Edge integration; it repulses me.  I'll run 10 until my PC dies, and after that it's either Linux or start drinking Apple's Kool-Aid.

I have 4 working Windows machines at the moment, 3 on 11 and one on 10. I mostly hated 11 at first, but as things got sorted out (and I got used to it), eventually I became more comfortable using it. There are still some things that annoy me, but I can usually deal with them. I will use 10 though, on a big project I've been working on for a couple of years. I've thought about going with Linux (just to simplify my life), but the software I am used to working with is Windows only. I also tried Macs a few times, starting with the very first iMac (Bondi Blue), but the Macs all ended up going to friends (or in one case, a "frenemy")! 😉     

On 17/01/2023 at 10:29, cmcgregor80 said:

Are ads normal in your country for windows 11? I don't have a single one. Is it an american thing? Plus What linux distro will you use to avoid bloatware? Don't tell me Ubuntu or Mint or any of those bloated distros. Plus you shouldn't drink apples kool-aid they have a browser included in their OS too. Linux also usually comes with a browser. You could go mobile but iOS and Android have their browser integrated into the OS so not sure what you're gonna do, unless its not the browser integration you hate but edge. You could of course use a worse version of it by google or join the 20 people still using firefox.

I don't see any ads either, no clue what these complains are about.

On 17/01/2023 at 12:03, nekrosoft13 said:

I don't see any ads either, no clue what these complains are about.

They're talking about the nags for Microsoft hooks, i.e logging into one drive, using a microsoft account, subscribing to office. Telemetry, etc...

Basically, complaining about nothing.

On 16/01/2023 at 22:00, PluralGrey said:

Windows 11 is bloatware.  Ads, widgets, Edge integration; it repulses me.  I'll run 10 until my PC dies, and after that it's either Linux or start drinking Apple's Kool-Aid.

Dude, just turn all that crap off and stop whining. Yes, you might see an Edge icon appear on your desktop or be encouraged to subscribe to Microsoft 365, but I get this on Windows 10 as well. Life is to shots to have a cow about this crap.

Hate the 11 interface, and the fact everything seems to take more clicks\effort to do in 11 than previous versions, several PC's that support it, but only running it on a non-supported system for insider and testing.

On 15/01/2023 at 12:59, nerim said:

While I prefer 10, I'll likely have to go to 11 eventually anyway...some day.

Maybe not. Windows 12 might be out by the time Win10 'expires' in Oct 2025 and they will probably get that one right.

but that seems to be the norm since at least Win98 to date with Microsoft with good/bad/good/bad pattern and Win11 is on the 'bad' cycle currently and appears it will remain that way as it does not seem like Win11 will reach the wide adoption that Win10 has.

p.s. hell, there have really only been three dominate OS's from Microsoft over the last 20 years or so... WinXP/Win7/Win10.

On 18/01/2023 at 08:06, Dadwen said:

Hate the 11 interface, and the fact everything seems to take more clicks\effort to do in 11 than previous versions, several PC's that support it, but only running it on a non-supported system for insider and testing.

If that's true, all the more reason I am glad I don't use Win11.

which is why I am also of the mindset I don't like change for the sake of change as the more time proven core interface we have had for ages (pretty much since 1995 with Win95, although maybe a bit more recent on some level with addition of the basic search function of the general menu for programs which I want to say started on Vista off the top of my head) on Windows should not be screwed with as once something works well, you just don't screw with it. tweak it, maybe (like minor visual changes etc is okay but core function should remain basically the same). but definitely nothing that's going to make things more difficult to do.

I don't know about everyone else but when I load programs I either do it from a desktop icon or generally press the windows key and then start searching for the program (like usually the first two or three letters or so is enough to highlight the program) and then press enter to load it (or if more than one program comes up it's quick enough to press up or down arrows to highlight it) since it tends to be the quickest to load up this way. anything that fails that very basic standard would just be a disaster if you ask me. I don't know whether Win11 fails here, since I never used it, but given what you say, even if it's not as major as what I just mentioned, it appears things are a step backwards given what you said.

  • Like 2

To me, the answer to this is kinda similar to questions about what I want in a phone or a car - something simple that works.

For my OS, I don't want to spend time stuffing around with it. I don't want to install third party apps to get it to work how I want, I don't want something pretty that requires more steps to do basic functions. I just want something lean that does the basic tasks I need to do and for me, that is Win10 (I use the LTSC version). At some point if Microsoft adds specific functionality to Win11 that I can't live without, or shelves Win10, I will swap over. At the moment Windows 11 feels like a bunch of shiny stuff to attract the people who like the shiny stuff, and that is ok too.

  • Like 1

Tried Windows 11 21H2 and 22H2 for a short time but still feels like Windows 10 1507 and 1511 and 1607

Went back to Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019 and Windows 7

I'd go with Windows 8.x than use Windows 11 in its current state

  • Like 3

Microsoft seems to have forgotten that Windows is nothing more than a platform to do the stuff that I want with, it doesn't need all these extra features, what it needs is a powerful clean UI that lets me get on with the tasks I need to do

  • Like 3

I upgraded when it was released, no issues and using Windows 10 actually feels quite outdated to me now. Just started working on a Windows 11 deployment too so over the next year I'll be using Windows 10 less and less. Ultimately though the OS is the platform I use to run programs, I'm not going to be 'loyal' to any of them. I use Windows, Mac OS, Linux & iOS, they all have their pros and cons but ultimately it's the programs I want to run (or for Apple, the hardware).

  • Like 2
On 21/01/2023 at 02:14, NinjaGinger said:

I will never downgrade from Windows 10 to Windows 11, I like myself too much.

It's not a downgrade, it is the lack of accepting change. Accepting change is psychologically an important part of a healthy mind. Just because you can't move the taskbar to all four corners of the screen or the lack of available choices in the context menus doesn't mean that it is a downgrade. The context menus are like that because the apps you install don't like the thought of change either. Looks like you are partially fighting your own kind.

On 21/01/2023 at 19:38, jesseinsf said:

It's not a downgrade, it is the lack of accepting change. 

Sorry but when the changes make you less productive then it is not a user fault. Stop being an apologist for a megacorp that's out of touch and pushes bad ideas on end users that they ultimately are forced (at least in part) to backtrack on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!