Recommended Posts

I voted no, for other reasons, mainly being the 2 computers I had Windows 11 on weren't supported and after an update I was told that, so reinstalled my system images of Windows 10.

I did like Windows 11 for the 3-4 months it was installed though. Not going out of my way to do anything to try and upgrade computers though. I'll be running Linux on everything once Windows 10 dies.

  • Like 2

12 systems at work Win 11, all upgrades from 10. No issues. 3 on Win 10 because of incompatible CPU.

2 at home Win 11, 1 an upgrade from 10 1 came with 11. No issues.

On 15/01/2023 at 11:11, Nick H. said:

Voted that I'm sticking with Windows 10. Even if I met the requirements, I see no reason to move to Windows 11. Any troubleshooting that I have done for clients using Windows 11 has been a bit of a headache, I don't know why I would inflict that on my own system. :laugh:

This for sure.

  • Like 1

Hello,

I have some new computers running Windows 11, but most of my primary-use systems are running Windows 10.

Windows 11 does have some useful default security features, but some of them also happen to be present in Windows 10 as optional features to enable.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

Windows 11 is bloatware.  Ads, widgets, Edge integration; it repulses me.  I'll run 10 until my PC dies, and after that it's either Linux or start drinking Apple's Kool-Aid.

I have 4 working Windows machines at the moment, 3 on 11 and one on 10. I mostly hated 11 at first, but as things got sorted out (and I got used to it), eventually I became more comfortable using it. There are still some things that annoy me, but I can usually deal with them. I will use 10 though, on a big project I've been working on for a couple of years. I've thought about going with Linux (just to simplify my life), but the software I am used to working with is Windows only. I also tried Macs a few times, starting with the very first iMac (Bondi Blue), but the Macs all ended up going to friends (or in one case, a "frenemy")! 😉     

On 17/01/2023 at 10:29, cmcgregor80 said:

Are ads normal in your country for windows 11? I don't have a single one. Is it an american thing? Plus What linux distro will you use to avoid bloatware? Don't tell me Ubuntu or Mint or any of those bloated distros. Plus you shouldn't drink apples kool-aid they have a browser included in their OS too. Linux also usually comes with a browser. You could go mobile but iOS and Android have their browser integrated into the OS so not sure what you're gonna do, unless its not the browser integration you hate but edge. You could of course use a worse version of it by google or join the 20 people still using firefox.

I don't see any ads either, no clue what these complains are about.

On 17/01/2023 at 12:03, nekrosoft13 said:

I don't see any ads either, no clue what these complains are about.

They're talking about the nags for Microsoft hooks, i.e logging into one drive, using a microsoft account, subscribing to office. Telemetry, etc...

Basically, complaining about nothing.

On 16/01/2023 at 22:00, PluralGrey said:

Windows 11 is bloatware.  Ads, widgets, Edge integration; it repulses me.  I'll run 10 until my PC dies, and after that it's either Linux or start drinking Apple's Kool-Aid.

Dude, just turn all that crap off and stop whining. Yes, you might see an Edge icon appear on your desktop or be encouraged to subscribe to Microsoft 365, but I get this on Windows 10 as well. Life is to shots to have a cow about this crap.

Hate the 11 interface, and the fact everything seems to take more clicks\effort to do in 11 than previous versions, several PC's that support it, but only running it on a non-supported system for insider and testing.

On 15/01/2023 at 12:59, nerim said:

While I prefer 10, I'll likely have to go to 11 eventually anyway...some day.

Maybe not. Windows 12 might be out by the time Win10 'expires' in Oct 2025 and they will probably get that one right.

but that seems to be the norm since at least Win98 to date with Microsoft with good/bad/good/bad pattern and Win11 is on the 'bad' cycle currently and appears it will remain that way as it does not seem like Win11 will reach the wide adoption that Win10 has.

p.s. hell, there have really only been three dominate OS's from Microsoft over the last 20 years or so... WinXP/Win7/Win10.

On 18/01/2023 at 08:06, Dadwen said:

Hate the 11 interface, and the fact everything seems to take more clicks\effort to do in 11 than previous versions, several PC's that support it, but only running it on a non-supported system for insider and testing.

If that's true, all the more reason I am glad I don't use Win11.

which is why I am also of the mindset I don't like change for the sake of change as the more time proven core interface we have had for ages (pretty much since 1995 with Win95, although maybe a bit more recent on some level with addition of the basic search function of the general menu for programs which I want to say started on Vista off the top of my head) on Windows should not be screwed with as once something works well, you just don't screw with it. tweak it, maybe (like minor visual changes etc is okay but core function should remain basically the same). but definitely nothing that's going to make things more difficult to do.

I don't know about everyone else but when I load programs I either do it from a desktop icon or generally press the windows key and then start searching for the program (like usually the first two or three letters or so is enough to highlight the program) and then press enter to load it (or if more than one program comes up it's quick enough to press up or down arrows to highlight it) since it tends to be the quickest to load up this way. anything that fails that very basic standard would just be a disaster if you ask me. I don't know whether Win11 fails here, since I never used it, but given what you say, even if it's not as major as what I just mentioned, it appears things are a step backwards given what you said.

  • Like 2

To me, the answer to this is kinda similar to questions about what I want in a phone or a car - something simple that works.

For my OS, I don't want to spend time stuffing around with it. I don't want to install third party apps to get it to work how I want, I don't want something pretty that requires more steps to do basic functions. I just want something lean that does the basic tasks I need to do and for me, that is Win10 (I use the LTSC version). At some point if Microsoft adds specific functionality to Win11 that I can't live without, or shelves Win10, I will swap over. At the moment Windows 11 feels like a bunch of shiny stuff to attract the people who like the shiny stuff, and that is ok too.

  • Like 1

Tried Windows 11 21H2 and 22H2 for a short time but still feels like Windows 10 1507 and 1511 and 1607

Went back to Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019 and Windows 7

I'd go with Windows 8.x than use Windows 11 in its current state

  • Like 3

Microsoft seems to have forgotten that Windows is nothing more than a platform to do the stuff that I want with, it doesn't need all these extra features, what it needs is a powerful clean UI that lets me get on with the tasks I need to do

  • Like 3

I upgraded when it was released, no issues and using Windows 10 actually feels quite outdated to me now. Just started working on a Windows 11 deployment too so over the next year I'll be using Windows 10 less and less. Ultimately though the OS is the platform I use to run programs, I'm not going to be 'loyal' to any of them. I use Windows, Mac OS, Linux & iOS, they all have their pros and cons but ultimately it's the programs I want to run (or for Apple, the hardware).

  • Like 2
On 21/01/2023 at 02:14, NinjaGinger said:

I will never downgrade from Windows 10 to Windows 11, I like myself too much.

It's not a downgrade, it is the lack of accepting change. Accepting change is psychologically an important part of a healthy mind. Just because you can't move the taskbar to all four corners of the screen or the lack of available choices in the context menus doesn't mean that it is a downgrade. The context menus are like that because the apps you install don't like the thought of change either. Looks like you are partially fighting your own kind.

On 21/01/2023 at 19:38, jesseinsf said:

It's not a downgrade, it is the lack of accepting change. 

Sorry but when the changes make you less productive then it is not a user fault. Stop being an apologist for a megacorp that's out of touch and pushes bad ideas on end users that they ultimately are forced (at least in part) to backtrack on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!