P4 1.8GHz or AMD Athlon XP And Why?


Recommended Posts

When did that happen? You can't disprove something that AMD admits to themselves. The Athlon runs hotter. Thats why you have 50 fans on your case.

The Intel people seem to be posting the facts, and the amd people still post the benchmarks.

That image rendering post that Typh0n posted, the DUAL Athlon had a score of 18 seconds...the SINGLE P4 posted 40 seconds. Now either divide the P4 score by 2 to assume a dual P4, or multiply the amd score by two to assume a single amd. Its mere seconds people.

irdawood....quit stereo-typing people. Your experience from working at this company means nothing. For all we know, you could be a 14 year old kid sitting at home. I don't know...but I do know that there aren't many reputable companies out there that use athlon processors

Companies do not want something that is unreliable. They do not want something loud...they do not want something that runs up the elec bill. After you install proper cooling...and a somewhat-decent chipset (no such thing as a good chipset for amd....but the decent ones are pricey)... it adds up. Normal companies don't care what benchmarks say...they don't care if the nearest 14 year old says "BUY AMD! BUY AMD! BUY AMD!!" They buy from a proven leader who makes reliable products. amd certainly isn't a proven leader, and the chipsets/chips aren't good.

This topic could easily go on for weeks. Why don't we just call it a day and all tell the mods to close the topic.

Originally posted by irdawood  

on the other thread i even showed u a vid to proove Athlons dont have a prob with heat, we even carried out a test at work what more do u want???

YOU DO NOT NEED ANY SPECIAL HARDWARE!!!!!  

I DONT USE ANY!!!

and i dont get any probs

if u get probs then u guys dont know how to build Computers

first learn how computers work then come crying back

Yes and I showed you an article telling everyone that the video you posted was rigged by AMD with special hardware. Please follow the URL I posted above(actually read the artivle) and quit acting retarded. Toms Hardware knows alot more about building computers than you do man.

Originally posted by irdawood  

on the other thread i even showed u a vid to proove Athlons dont have a prob with heat, we even carried out a test at work what more do u want???

YOU DO NOT NEED ANY SPECIAL HARDWARE!!!!!  

I DONT USE ANY!!!

and i dont get any probs

if u get probs then u guys dont know how to build Computers

first learn how computers work then come crying back

YOU HAVE 50 FANS IN YOUR CASE!!! What do you mean you don't use special hardware?!?!

Originally posted by irdawood  

yeah but according to u intel peeps the intel p3 even lashes the Athlon XP according to an erlier post

The Xeon is not a PIII. An Xeon is kinda like a PIII because it has the P6 core *BUT* the old Xeon does not feature any instruction sets other than MMX(It does not have SSE). The Xeon is intended for computers that are left on 24/7 acting as a server, it is not intended for graphical work, games, etc.

there is no perfect chip.

i am an avid AMD fan, but like people have stated, they have heat issues. but, if you properly cool it (and i dont mean water cool) its fine. i torched one chip cuz i was testing something, and was stupid. i didnt put the heat sink on. hrm... why is it smoking. but is amd better than intel? KCUF YEA!!! the main reason is not price (even though it is way cheaper than a P4). its just plain faster... well... lemme clarify that. if you pit a p4 2200 vs. a axp 2000+(which i belive is 1.66 ghz), then yes... the p4 is faster. duh! the p4 is running 533MHz faster clock speed than the axp. it better kcufing run faster, otherwise intel would crumble under its own weight. but if you go clock speed vs. clock speed (1.6 vs. 1.6 for you illiterate folks), then amd mops the floor with a p4 chip. the only real way to kick amd's ass it to buy a p4 with rambus, but then if you can afford a p4 AND rambus, then you need to give me some money. so you have to decide for yourself.

Originally posted by Zombie9920  

I have this funny feeling that bormooski and irdawood is the same person posting with different names. Thier typing styles are identicle.

nope..two different people, i checked.

btw..welcome to Neowin bormooski :)

Originally posted by Typh0n  

Superfula, go back and read my post. Those figures are not in seconds, they are in MINUTES.

Means alot more, now doesn't it.

What's 4 minutes? If you are into graphics, 4 minutes isn't much of anything.

Heh...irdawood and bormooski the same person. I kinda like it...

Irdawood...you still said you didn't use any extra hardware to cool. Even overclocking the processor and video card doesn't require that many fans.

like i said

Rockin69-2.jpeg

Rockin69-3.jpeg

the front bottom 2 are for intake

the side 2 ones are grills top 1 is hot air exhaust

2 rear top ones are outline exhausts

2rear middle ones are for grills only at the mo this is for airflow for the heatsink

the 3 pci ones are for my pci slots gpu which anyone with a geforce knows gets hot

now before u say it a normal 2000XP DOES not need this many fans and grills but this is no ordinary PC

it has had it multiplyer unlocked and is a very good overclocker!!!!

and no..... i dont care about noise the pros of a CPU this fast will out weigh anything else

and no i dont care about power consumption i can afford electricity

DOE ANYONE really care, or do you all have nothing better to do than to argue and bash each other over whether intel or AMD hold the Holy Grail in CPU Speed and Architecture....?????

WHO THE HELL CARES??

Use whatever you want. If you like INtel, use INtel, if you liek AMD, use AMD...but stop arguing over an issue that has no ending....sheesh..what a bunch of children..

mine's biiger than yours nah nah...that's what it sounds like in here...Heck a real person can't even get any real help in here anymore because of all this debate crap...

LET IT GO!!

Mike

Originally posted by Zombie9920  

Xeon 733mhz x 4 processors = performance of an Xeon at 2932mhz

Dual Athlon MP 1800+ = Athlon MP 3600+

Of course it is going to beat the old Xeons. Why would a business use old Xeons for that type of work anyways? The old Xeons do not have SSE(I believe CAD uses SSE). Xeons are intended for servers(hence thier high price).

yeah but the AMD XP 1800+ is 1.53Ghz X 2 equals 3.06Ghz = big deal... it's only 128Mhz faster yet it does the same work of 4 processors in less than half the time... 128Mhz isn't that big of a deal to double the speed at which it works.

Originally posted by mike3169  

Heck a real person can't even get any real help in here anymore because of all this debate crap...

Mike

Hi Mike,

If you need help, please feel free to start a new thread and you`ll find that many of our Neowin members, mods and staff would be happy to offer assistance.

Zombie, the reason we purchased the Quad Xeon was because at the time, they were the most powerful Xeon available. This server is used for 3D project storage and doing renderings. With 4 processors, it can do all of that with processor power to spare. Whoever told you that Xeons are not for graphics, misinformed you. If you put a Xeon 733 against a PIII 733, the Xeon will blow the PIII away. The major difference is the error catching ability, fault tolerance, and the large cache sizes. Our 4 processors have 2 MB caches each compared to most computers only having 256kb or 512kb. We have used that server for way more than it was purchased for. When you can tell a client that you can have a rendered animation done in a week versuses other guys having it done in a few weeks, it pays for itself over and over again.

How does the Athlon MP's compare to the new Xeon P4? I don't know. From Intel's site their benchmarks say the Xeon beats the MP, yet on the Athlon site they say the MP beats the Xeon. I won't know until I get a Xeon P4. Until then the Athlon MP has already proved capable of beating our current abilities with a very small price tag. This means a better ROI, and that means more money for my company.

I know that the Xeon's typically have a larger cache(I think 512k is the smallest option), but doesn't CAD utilize SSE? If it does I would think the instruction set would make up for the PIII having only 256k cache. BTW, for your kind of work a Mac would probably be more efficient.

Originally posted by irdawood  

see you guys cant even take it that AMD is better and other people suppost AMD over crappy Intel

lol lol

i dont need to create a second ID i can take all you guys on single handed  

coz i have facts and you guys have opinions

suppost

LOL, nuff said

Superfula, again your incorrect. 4 minutes may not seem much for rendering an image, but when that image is 1 frame of a 2500 frame animation that equals 10,000 minutes. Do you know how much that costs at a rate of $85 per rendering hour? Only about $14,000. Makes a big difference, take it from someone that actually does graphics work. Seconds and Minutes do make a difference in this case several thousands difference.

Originally posted by Typh0n  

Superfula, again your incorrect. 4 minutes may not seem much for rendering an image, but when that image is 1 frame of a 2500 frame animation that equals 10,000 minutes. Do you know how much that costs at a rate of $85 per rendering hour? Only about $14,000. Makes a big difference, take it from someone that actually does graphics work. Seconds and Minutes do make a difference in this case several thousands difference.

If you care about money and time that much, why don't you buy a Mac. It would easily outpace the other 4 choices

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The concern of this article is not getting "hacked". No one is taking over my Google account and anyone that was is far away from self-hosting their passwords. It was about your big tech account of choice deciding to reduce features or getting out of the password manager business altogether. Bitwarden (or say Proton) is professional security company offering opensource solutions. They are going no where and one can easily download or export their passwords to another password manager service regardless. They again also offer self-hosted option. I doubt many people were sold on this solution based on the write up. The author had a number of warnings and caveats themselves. A local, self-managed solution is not for 99% of users.
    • I've owned nothing but ATi/AMD GPUs since 2002, after my last nVidia GPU in 2001 (3dfx before that), IIRC, and in all of that time I recall getting this error maybe once, certainly no more than twice. Despite all the scuttlebutt as to how poor AMD drivers are supposed to be that has certainly not been my experience at all... Usually it has been a configuration problem of some kind. Then again, since we're dealing with OS versions that are EOL, it could easily be an OS version discrepancy. It's still weird to think that Win11 has been officially out for more than five years!
    • AI will never be the jobs panacea some companies fantasize about today. Oracle is likely using it as an excuse, which we will see a lot of companies doing, I'm certain. They love their "plausible" excuses for their downturns. A couple of weeks ago my wife asked me to call Krogers about some discrepancy in a online grocery order, and it will be the last time either of us does that. I'll just do emails with humans from now on... The AI experience was horrible--the obviously recorded voice started asking a bunch of questions about our orders six months prior(!) and saying, "Is this in reference to your order on January 6, for $****?" You say "No!" and immediately the next question is "Is this in reference to your order on January 29th, for $****?" again, I answered "No!"--and it was incredible--on and on it went like that for fully 20 minutes until we finally got to the present, and only then was I put through to a human with authentic intelligence... I wondered why on Earth the idiot AI didn't start with the most recent orders and work back from there, as it was something anyone with a functioning brain would have done. And why didn't the AI have enough sense to ask me what the problem was in the first place? It didn't take too much deduction to understand that the goal of this "AI" was to cause the person on the phone to hang up in disgust, with no resolution of the problem. That begs another question: why pay for a tool-free problem line if the goal is to avoid solving your customer's problems?... Fortunately, Krogers does have real humans capable of reading an email and understanding it, and if she sees another situation in the future that's route she or I will take. The online grocery delivery service from Krogers has been great, over all, but their AI truly sucks.
    • AI is the justification that company administrators use to lay people off; it is not the end all, be all touted in the media (many of whom can't tell a microchip from a potato chip). Greed is main driving factor behind its adoption; the other is remaining relevant in the face of competition from other entities.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      480
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      103
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!