206 members have voted

  1. 1. Best Windows

    • Windows 95
      3
    • Windows 98
      0
    • Windows 98 SE
      7
    • Windows 2000
      18
    • Windows ME
      6
    • Windows XP
      172


Recommended Posts

I voted for XP because it finally bridges the gap between 9x and NT. Now there is a single codebase, so compatibility is no longer an issue. Not to mention all the new features in XP like System Restore, driver rollback, Remote Desktop and Remote Assistance, ClearType, Internet Connection Firewall (soon to be Windows Firewall), and a ton of other things.

I would say Win98SE & Win2k are pretty much the best. Does anyone care? I didn't think so.

What is the best OS? Whatever YOU think is the best. The way I use my computer is way different from the way you use it. My threshold for the amount of blue and random fields/highways on my desktop is also different.

Running it as a workstation and have to say, its faster then XP, on par with 2000 and contains so much more secuirty and useful features. Its an awesome upgrade from 2000...I was very impressed to say the least and was very reluctant to dump 2000, but with its end coming soon, it was time for an upgrade.

rofl. That was pretty funny! :D :rofl:

I voted for XP because it finally bridges the gap between 9x and NT. Now there is a single codebase, so compatibility is no longer an issue. Not to mention all the new features in XP like System Restore, driver rollback, Remote Desktop and Remote Assistance, ClearType, Internet Connection Firewall (soon to be Windows Firewall), and a ton of other things.

Exactly, Xp is an OS with the stability of NT and the fun of 9x all together, also has the visual styles, etc..

and for older computers i agree win2k is by far the best one

longhorn is like XP with extra features but it still has the same stability and all because its built on top of it so it has to be better.

Its nothing like XP. Longhorn is going to encorporate XML and become much more of an "efficient" OS. Its a radical new deisgn from the ground up on many accounts...

XML is easier to code and contains up to 60% less...resulting in a far better and more manageable piece of software...

EDIT: Ah, saint dark, you beat me to it...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!