206 members have voted

  1. 1. Best Windows

    • Windows 95
      3
    • Windows 98
      0
    • Windows 98 SE
      7
    • Windows 2000
      18
    • Windows ME
      6
    • Windows XP
      172


Recommended Posts

Ummm I wonder just WHO the heck actually voted for WINDOWS ME!&nbsp:pinch:h:

umm I said I did before. You see it is part of my infernal scheme to convert windows users to linux. By making windows users think that ME is a good windows they will believe that the other windows are about the same standard. However once they use Windows Me they will be apalled and then not want to use any Windows software because they believe that ME is just as good as the other Windows...and that isn't good. So they turn to the free alternative (they already have a PC so they don't want OSX) called linux. Wait I shouldn't of told you this...

umm I said I did before. You see it is part of my infernal scheme to convert windows users to linux. By making windows users think that ME is a good windows they will believe that the other windows are about the same standard. However once they use Windows Me they will be apalled and then not want to use any Windows software because they believe that ME is just as good as the other Windows...and that isn't good. So they turn to the free alternative (they already have a PC so they don't want OSX) called linux. Wait I shouldn't of told you this...

kongit you meanie :devil:

and WS togermano I agree, ME was the fastest booting of all of them

win2003 for both server and also workstation

I got an increase speed with 2k3 compared to xp (Y)

What did you use for your comparission test between 2003 server and XP and how long was the tests running for ?

We need details don't just say faster show your results based on your tests and please don't show 3dmark that crap is not worthy of benchmarking a server.

Was a clean install of both OS's performed with the same programs running on each ?

xp/2000 have so many benefits over older windows versions. i use xp pro at home and (did) use 2000 at work, and i have never had one problem with either of them. rock stable, great compatibility with everything i used, and so many free programs and things to make them look better. i voted xp since thats what i use most.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But building your own.. what? You can't build anything like the Steam Machine yourself. Even trying to get close costs a good deal more. Even just the CPU cooler in their price comparison is as big as the entire Steam Machine. If you want a regular gaming PC, then by all means, build that. If you want a a small console-like PC for the living room that is good for gaming, I'm not sure what else is a better deal. In the GN review, they only mentioned a small form factor Dell, which is like twice the size and hundreds of dollars more expensive.
    • Those are some popular multiplayer games. But hardly "all". Just those that don't work on Linux currently due to specific anti-cheat implementations. I think it's also fair to point out the literally thousands of games that don't work on the PS5. And it's not locked at 1080p. That's the default, which you can change.
    • Ubuntu Livepatch arrives on Arm64 to eliminate system reboots for kernel updates by Paul Hill Canonical has just announced that its Livepatch service now supports computers with Arm64 processors. For those who are not familiar, Livepatch allows users to apply important kernel updates without any service interruption or rebooting. While home users will benefit from this, it’s even more important for critical machines that absolutely should not be going offline at all. The feature is available as part of Ubuntu Core 26 for Arm64 and Ubuntu Core 20 and onwards for AMD64. According to Canonical, this will improve the security of systems that aren’t security-maintained daily or weekly, and it helps organizations work towards Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) compliance. If you are familiar with Ubuntu, you probably know that most packages can be updated without having to restart the system. There is one big exception to this, and that’s the kernel; it typically requires you to reload the system to boot into the new kernel. With Livepatch, Canonical has done something so that you don’t need to restart to begin using the new kernel. Aside from Ubuntu Core 26, users with Arm64 chips running Ubuntu 26.04 LTS can also use Livepatch. If you want to learn more about Livepatch, check out its product page. There, you can also find a button to join Ubuntu Pro (it’s free for several home devices) so that you can enable Livepatch. By linking your computer to Ubuntu Pro, you will also extend the life of your Ubuntu install from five years to ten years. If you are running Ubuntu, let us know in the comments if you have been looking forward to this feature on your ARM-based computer. If you’ve had a compatible AMD64 machine for a while and never used this feature, let us know why in the comments!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      206
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!