Recommended Posts

Without buying anything extra? No.

What don't you like about the stand though?  It looks sharp, allows the display to swivel 90 degrees in either direction (providing easy access to the plugs), can tilt the monitor a few degrees horizontally, and can raise/lower the panel about 8 inches.

584969443[/snapback]

ehh i just dont like how it looks

but i guess its not that bad

well, dell screwed up my thing....they delayed my order already over a week...and i was extremely ****ed off all week...except now

because of you (ron) i am now receiving 120 or 160 dollars off my purchase

my total original price was 648 after tax...no shipping...so im going to get it for either

528 or 488.....either way, im completely happy now :)

:::ill find out tomorrow which price it will be

::::Steven, i am purchasing the Dell 2001, not the 2005 :)

584970260[/snapback]

well steven, so many things have happened....im now getting the 2005, instead of the 2001....lol, i couldnt make up my mind, but i finally did, and i believe i will be happy with this monitor...i cant believe it, scheduled shipping date is dec 2

i just wanted to thank Dazzla once again for this review, bang bang and Doug and someone else...i forgot his name....but thanks for helping me pick a monitor...ive been needing one for quite some time now

so thanks again, and i will be posting some pics asap...of course on the other thread...this is the last time i will hog it...thanks for all your help again

Like Mav Said you're wrong. Please click the link in my sig.

584995062[/snapback]

I'm dead positive that you are wrong. The monitor is manufactured by benq but the panel was made by lg-philips. You remember when all the 16ms 17" monitors appeared? They were all manufactured by different companies (NEC, Benq, Viewsonic, Hitachi, etc), but they all used the same AU Optronics panel. The dell 2001fp is made by benq, but the panel comes from LG-Phillips.

Quote from tomshardware: "The 200P4 was launched in December and logically, it's based on a LG-Philips panel, which is already very popular. It had barely become available when it could be found on a Sharp monitor (LLT2015), a Dell (the 2001FP) and probably on the NEC (the 2080UX+) too."

Tom's

Benq doesn't make their own panels, they just manufacture the monitor. If you look at their 16 and 12ms monitors you will find that they use the 16 and 12ms versions of the AU-Optronics panel and not a proprietary Benq panel.

Here's some solid proof: 2001fp panel.

Edited by SonComet
I'm dead positive that you are wrong.  The monitor is manufactured by benq but the panel was made by lg-philips.  You remember when all the 16ms 17" monitors appeared?  They were all manufactured by different companies (NEC, Benq, Viewsonic, Hitachi, etc), but they all used the same AU Optronics panel.  The dell 2001fp is made by benq, but the panel comes from LG-Phillips.

Quote from tomshardware: "The 200P4 was launched in December and logically, it's based on a LG-Philips panel, which is already very popular. It had barely become available when it could be found on a Sharp monitor (LLT2015), a Dell (the 2001FP) and probably on the NEC (the 2080UX+) too."

Tom's

Benq doesn't make their own panels, they just manufacture the monitor.  If you look at their 16 and 12ms monitors you will find that they use the 16 and 12ms versions of the AU-Optronics panel and not a proprietary Benq panel.

Here's some solid proof: 2001fp panel.

584995392[/snapback]

Let's see. Should we believe Dell or Anandtech? Gosh, that's a tough one. :rolleyes:

BenQ is not a maker of LCD panels.. LG and Samsung are. BenQ only makes the HOUSING! Same with Apple lcd's, Apple buy's the LCD panel from Samsung or LG (or other makers of lcd panels) then they build thier own housing. So if a LCD monitor is made by Apple does that mean that the LCD panel was build by them? No.

Let's see.  Should we believe Dell or Anandtech?  Gosh, that's a tough one.  :rolleyes:

584995690[/snapback]

BenQ does not make that panel let alone any. LG-Phillips does, whether you want to believe it or not. Gosh this is a tough problem, BenQ doesn't make their own panels and its a known fact that the dell among many others use the LG-philips panel (viewsonic, nec, and dell all use the panel and probably more).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!