• 0

Running Mac OS X on x86 PC!


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

OK, I'm getting hopeless now, I'll finish getting mad or something worse. I already reinstalled Windows today (mainly for some other reasons), but still, I don't get the network thing to work with PearPC. I've been trying it for the whole time that networking has been available for PearPC, but nothing worked.

Maybe, someone can figure out, where the problem lies, so, here's what I have:

This is what is displayed in my Network connections in the Windows XP Control Panel:

LAN section:

My real LAN adapter: LAN Connection IP: 192.168.0.1

Virtual LAN adapter (TAP device): LAN Connection 2 (not connected) IP: 192.168.0.2

LAN device (created by the USB DSL modem): LAN Connection 3 IP: 192.168.0.3

and a 1394 LAN device: 1394 Connection

The first three of the above mentioned play the important role in this tragic networking story.

Now come the other entries I have in my Network connections Control Panel:

Dialup section:

MicroLink ADSL Fun USB (obviously the USB DSL modem, my actual connection to the internet)

Broadband section:

Broadband Connection

I have created a broadband connection for my ISP, which I could easily use instead of the Dialup connection, which is described above.

I could also connect to the internet switching to the LAN device labeled LAN Connection 3 (again, see above), but everything I tried didn't succeed.

Additionally I don't know, on which device I have to enable ICS, because I tried it with all of the entries and it seems that none has been the right one.

So, the essential questions are:

a) Which device do I have to enable ICS on?

b) What are the correct IP addresses and settings?

c) If all of these settings fail, how could I get PearPC connected anyway (i.e. bridging devices or using proxy or something else)?

I beg anyone to help me solving these problems,

otherwise I can't even start PearPC anymore... and I can't live without PearPC without networking support!

THX in advance for any help,

Cyman

PS

If this description doesn't help at all, I'll post a screenshot of my network settings.

  • 0

You need to enable file sharing on the device that runs your main conection. IE if the usb modem is your connection set it up with ics, it'll then ask you what connection to let it use, choose the TAP driver connection. DOn't manualy set any ips. Let OSX use dhcp. Also make sure you have the right nic enabled with the right mac addy in your pearpc config.

  • 0

OK, so I reset all the IP's of all the adapters I have in my Windows XP Network connections Control Panel and set ICS to the dialup entry, right?

When I select ICS, I always have to choose the right LAN connection - there are two to choose from, the real onboard 1GBit adapter and the TAP device. Normally I connect my home LAN via the 1GBit LAN (of course), but I suppose I have to choose the TAP device for ICS to make it work with PearPC (which I have done). Anyway, there must be a way that I can use the home LAN at the same time (since I don't have a router). How about the FreeProxy solution?

  • 0

ok, i've tried placing the sdl version of the ppc.exe file into my directory along with the .dll. someone over at emaculation said it would work, it didn'. i've tried to compile the source with cygwin, that doesn't work. i'm not sure if this is related, but everytime i extract the source, i get an error saying that it couldn't extract certain files. PLEASE HELP!!!

  • 0

OK,

I tried starting the emulator the conservative way, via the command prompt and this is the error message I receive:

[CPU/MMU]new pagetable: sdr1 = 0x00300003

[CPU/MMU] new pagetable: sdr1 accepted

[CPU/MMU] number of pages: 2^15 pagetable_start: 0x00300000 size: 2^18

cannot find boot file.

It seems this has nothing to do with network...

  • 0
Almost there!

Using the nightly P4 custom build.

That is damn slow considering the whole install takes less then 20 minutes on my G3.

I am really worry bout my processor, everything I have PearPC running it sounds a little 'dead'? Is there any harmful effect that it's gonna do to my P4 2GHz? Is any of your PC blown using PearPC?

Using for CPU at 100% for long periods of time makes the CPU get a lot hotter then normal, it will probably crash or shut off it gets too hot. A better fan might be a good idea.

  • 0
I am really worry bout my processor, everything I have PearPC running it sounds a little 'dead'? Is there any harmful effect that it's gonna do to my P4 2GHz? Is any of your PC blown using PearPC?

PS I'm using stock fan too.

What do you mean when you say it sounds dead?

Is your computer bogged down, if so it is because PPC is going to pretty much use all your resources.

I can't imagine that it will do any damage to your processor, you might want to use some gel.

  • 0
That is damn slow considering the whole install takes less then 20 minutes on my G3.

Using for CPU at 100% for long periods of time makes the CPU get a lot hotter then normal, it will probably crash or shut off it gets too hot. A better fan might be a good idea.

Thanks for the very usefull comment :rolleyes:

  • 0
ok, i've tried placing the sdl version of the ppc.exe file into my directory along with the .dll. someone over at emaculation said it would work, it didn'. i've tried to compile the source with cygwin, that doesn't work. i'm not sure if this is related, but everytime i extract the source, i get an error saying that it couldn't extract certain files. PLEASE HELP!!!

You need to comment this out in your config file

#ppc_start_resolution = 5

and this

#fs_refresh_rate = 60

the "#" is commenting it out

Then fire it up and all will work fine.

  • 0
the file your're looking for is going be in between the ( )'s on the site... (SDL Library) its i think the on the 3rd news post

TS

Yeah, that makes sense now =>

Downloads:

PearPC sdl.0003 Source

PearPC sdl.0003 Windows binary (SDL library)

(SDL library) is actually a seperate download link to PearPC sdl.0003 Windows binary.

:happy:

  • 0

i replaced the old ppc file with the new sdl version and the sdl.dll file is IN my pearpc directory. when i go to run ppc in the command prompt, i get this:

d:\pearpc>ppc goodconfig.cfg

i press enter, and i get this...

d:\pearpc>

that's it, it doesn't run or anything. i renamed the ppc-sdl.0003 files to just ppc, could this be the problem. here is my config file

#ppc_start_resolution = 4

fs_refresh_rate = 60

redraw_interval_msec = 40

prom_bootmethod = "select"

prom_env_bootargs = ""

prom_env_machargs = ""

prom_driver_graphic = "video.x"

memory_size=0x10000000

pci_ide0_master_installed = 1

pci_ide0_master_image = "macosx_6gb_unjournaled.img"

pci_ide0_master_type = "hd"

pci_ide0_slave_installed = 1

pci_ide0_slave_image = "macosx.iso"

pci_ide0_slave_type = "cdrom"

pci_rtl8139_installed = 1

pci_rtl8139_mac = "de:ad:ca:fe:12:34"

pci_usb_installed = 1

nvram_file = "nvram"

please, someone help me out here, i'm desperate! :blush:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? You didn't really think this through did you? lol
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!