• 0

Running Mac OS X on x86 PC!


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

wow, networking in panther just wouldn't work with the old sdl builds, now it does, just by using .03 pre. one thing tho, i still am not able to change my resolution! i'm stuck in 800x600, someone please gimme a couple of suggestions! here's my config:

#ppc_start_resolution = 5

#fs_refresh_rate = 60

redraw_interval_msec = 40

prom_bootmethod = "select"

prom_env_bootargs = ""

prom_env_machargs = ""

#prom_driver_graphic = "video.x"

memory_size=0x10000000

pci_ide0_master_installed = 1

pci_ide0_master_image = "macosx_6gb_unjournaled.img"

pci_ide0_master_type = "hd"

pci_ide0_slave_installed = 1

pci_ide0_slave_image = "macosx.iso"

pci_ide0_slave_type = "cdrom"

pci_rtl8139_installed = 1

pci_rtl8139_mac = "de:ad:ca:fe:12:83"

pci_usb_installed = 1

nvram_file = "nvram"

  • 0
wow, networking in panther just wouldn't work with the old sdl builds, now it does, just by using .03 pre. one thing tho, i still am not able to change my resolution! i'm stuck in 800x600, someone please gimme a couple of suggestions! here's my config:

#ppc_start_resolution = 5

#fs_refresh_rate = 60

redraw_interval_msec = 40

prom_bootmethod = "select"

prom_env_bootargs = ""

prom_env_machargs = ""

#prom_driver_graphic = "video.x"

memory_size=0x10000000

pci_ide0_master_installed = 1

pci_ide0_master_image = "macosx_6gb_unjournaled.img"

pci_ide0_master_type = "hd"

pci_ide0_slave_installed = 1

pci_ide0_slave_image = "macosx.iso"

pci_ide0_slave_type = "cdrom"

pci_rtl8139_installed = 1

pci_rtl8139_mac = "de:ad:ca:fe:12:83"

pci_usb_installed = 1

nvram_file = "nvram"

try removing the # from in front of #ppc_start_resolution = 5

  • 0

Is it normal to have to reinstall OSX after overwriting the old ppc executable with this new SDL build? (no configs touched here)

I'm asking because that's what I've had to do. I copied over sdl.dll and the new ppc 0.3pre SDL newclock blah blah blah, launched it, but it didn't see my already existing OSX installation from my PantherImage.img. So now I'm reinstalling it.

Is this normal? I'm not THAT upset since it's only taking 30-60 minutes (so far) on a new installation rather than 2-3 hours as before, but it sucks that I have to redownload and reinstall everything I had prior.

  • 0

I save the build EXE's with their original filenames. For example, my PearPC shortcut on the desktop refers to "d:\PearPC\ppc.pre03.sdl.win32clock.exe osxconfig.txt" and I have had zero problems trying newer builds.

wow, networking in panther just wouldn't work with the old sdl builds, now it does, just by using .03 pre.

Phalanx, how is your Windows network setup? Bridge or just Internet Connection Sharing?

Also, for anyone else who knows this: what is the latest version of Azureus that works on OSX? 2.1 and 2.084 both failed. I downloaded the Mac OS X .DMG files from Sourceforge. Should I get the generic java versions instead?

  • 0

Oh check this out! File Sharing between the PearPC and the host works again!! Just remove the Bridge and go back to using Internet Connection Sharing (ICS).

You'll want to setup a new password-protected user called "filesharing" in Windows. Make this user an administrator. You can substitute "filesharing" with whatever you like, as long as the user is assigned a password.

Now, share your folders from Windows, then in PearPC go to smb://192.168.0.101 (substitute your computer's local IP address). Authenticate with your "filesharing" username and password. Mount the desired shared folder, and Presto! You're set to go. Move files in and out of the Mac with ease.

  • 0
I can't wait to get hold of a copy of Panther so I can try this out.

Do the clock speeds that are reported relate to anything - is an OSX that reports, say 800mhz rather than 500mhz, faster?

You find several Mac OS X 10.3 (Panther) for sale on eBay! ;)

I guess you dont want to buy it brand new from Apple...

  • 0
Sooo...does anyone know how slow is it when run under a decent pc... too slow to do anything?

I had an old PPC9500 withj a G3-250 upgrade in it, that I loaded 10.0 on when it first came out. I would say that it is at least as fast as that: Useabel, still slow BY TODAY'S G5 STANARDS! That said, it is useable the same way a 2-300MHz pc running Win95-98 is useable.

I have a 2.5GHz PC with 512MB RAM and WinXP Pro

  • 0
Is it normal to have to reinstall OSX after overwriting the old ppc executable with this new SDL build? (no configs touched here)

I'm asking because that's what I've had to do. I copied over sdl.dll and the new ppc 0.3pre SDL newclock blah blah blah, launched it, but it didn't see my already existing OSX installation from my PantherImage.img. So now I'm reinstalling it.

Is this normal? I'm not THAT upset since it's only taking 30-60 minutes (so far) on a new installation rather than 2-3 hours as before, but it sucks that I have to redownload and reinstall everything I had prior.

I finally got it to work with my original img. I just used Emon's fixboot tutorial and it's running with 0.3 now :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The current Statcoungter desktop numbers has Google Chrome increasing it's market share this past year and currently commanding 75% share. Everybody else is just making up the numbers with even MS Edge losing 3% this past year and has dipped just below 10% share which is staggering considering it's default on every Windows deviced purchased. If these numbers are correct that terrible Edge number is both devastating and embarrassing for MS especially when you add in the terribly low Bing market share. This leads me to ask a couple of questions as the default browser holding just less than 10% market share seems really weird. It used to be that all Chromium browsers were being counted as Google Chrome in some cases.  Is this still happening? Do these high Google Chrome numbers contains some Edge user numbers?
    • Yeah, all web browsers seem to have some junk in them these days. The regular Brave browser has a lot of unnecessary stuff in it, similar to Microsoft Edge, so I don't see any benefits of using Brave over Microsoft Edge if you already have Microsoft Edge fully set up with adblockers and that. The cleanest or best free browser outside of 'Microsoft Edge' I’ve tried so far is 'Opera Air'. It still has some bloat, but nowhere near as much as Brave browser, for example. I also really like the web browser called 'Floorp' that is based on Firefox. I have a system wide Adblocking program for Windows 11 that doesn't just blocks ads in the the web browser, but over the whole thing. I don't really need a web browser with an inbuilt adblocker because of that.
    • I have been using Firefox for years.
    • I'd trust open source stuff on github more then closed source binaries from Microsoft.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      moog19 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Mentor
      grik went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Dedicated
      JKR earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      491
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!