UFO over Indiana Pennsylvania (near pittsburgh)


Recommended Posts

I wish it wasnt so dark out... after it started acting wierd I grabed my sony dv cam and put it on the tripod to record the sky and i was just watching the tape and it appeared in about 40 of the frames... here is one of them... its a little hard to see being at night but the highest object in the picture is it.... this is looking out over our deck twards a few houses in a field (the lower lights) the higher light is up in the air...

:rolleyes: My NSA contacts enhanced the pic for you .... hehe

post-92-1084891756.jpg

Well, I've been wrong before but dang if that doesn't look like a pole to me...  If you increase the contrast of the original to where you see just black and white dots, you can see that there is a pattern in that area.

wow you guys go way to far on disproveing stuff :rolleyes:

I wasnt going to post more pics after half that stuff but since you guys are certain there is a telephone pole with a light on it in the pic here are light enhanced pictures... gawd.. and one from the deck the 1st one was taken on to prove there is no pole there

this is also a completely overcast night and no clouds (hence the bright red glow in the middle of the screen, that is a glow from the state juvi prision against the clouds)

Edited by neufuse
wow you guys go way to far on disproveing stuff?:rolleyes::

I wasnt going to post more pics after half that stuff but since you guys are certain there is a telephone pole with a light on it in the pic here are light enhanced pictures... gawd.. and one from the deck the 1st one was taken on to prove there is no pole there

this is also a completely overcast night and no clouds (hence the bright red glow in the middle of the screen, that is a glow from the state juvi prision against the clouds)

first off, only one person claimed that there was a pole there, and I for one know he's wrong. If there was a pole there, then that would mean you didn't copy and paste the streetlamp, and it's obvious you did.

Also, I'm assuming the "overcast night and no clouds" comment is a typo on your behalf, since the statement makes no sense.

and is this supposed to be another picture of your ufo? If so, then why on earth post a dark, ambiguous photo when you have such a 'better' example on hand?

I can't speak for the others, but as far as I'm concerned, nothing you show or say now can make me change my mind. You posted a photo whose chances of being genuine are slim to none. That ruins any credibility your story may have had.

Edited by Jack31081

Yeah, it looks to me like the post I was seeing was probably one of the posts of the deck. Big deal, you asked for people's interperetation and I gave mine (and it seems I was right about seeing some kind of post). That still doesn't explain why the "ufo" is the same exact size and shape (and rgb values) as the streetlights.

what i ment to say is there were clouds yes that was a typo.. why post a better pic now? because I just noticed that I had one that displayed this on it, I have about 3000 pictures on my camera, it's not the quickest looking through them to find pictures that look great... maybe there is a better way to do it faster but i dont know of one myself..

and as for me posting this, i only posted it to say what happened, when i posted it i was pretty frightened by what I saw, yes posting what I had at the time may of been stupid for me because of how people react but that was my outlet for it... i didn't post this to get attention i just needed something to let it out to and this being a nice community i did it here. sure it generated attention, but i was just posting as an informative type post about what i whitnessed. For the about 20 people around here that did see this, you could ask any of them what the saw, the will all say the same thing... also there are 5 police reportings of this to the PA state police too by seperate people so that is my other point of proof that something did happen... if you dont believe me about the reports request them through the police for that night in this area. then you can compare independent whitness reports to what i reported to you guys. im not trying to be mean or anything i just wanted to pass on some information about this occurance.

what i ment to say is there were clouds yes that was a typo.. why post a better pic now? because I just noticed that I had one that displayed this on it, I have about 3000 pictures on my camera, it's not the quickest looking through them to find pictures that look great... maybe there is a better way to do it faster but i dont know of one myself..

and as for me posting this, i only posted it to say what happened, when i posted it i was pretty frightened by what I saw, yes posting what I had at the time may of been stupid for me because of how people react but that was my outlet for it... i didn't post this to get attention i just needed something to let it out to and this being a nice community i did it here. sure it generated attention, but i was just posting as an informative type post about what i whitnessed. For the about 20 people around here that did see this, you could ask any of them what the saw, the will all say the same thing... also there are 5 police reportings of this to the PA state police too by seperate people so that is my other point of proof that something did happen... if you dont believe me about the reports request them through the police for that night in this area. then you can compare independent whitness reports to what i reported to you guys. im not trying to be mean or anything i just wanted to pass on some information about this occurance.

Just ignore them. :p

trolls.gif

due to your insistence on this story, I see a few possibilities:

1 - You really did see something, but decided to fabricate a photo to back up your story

2 - You're making this all up as part of some research you're doing (similar to Betelgeuse's doings)

3 - You really are an attention ###### and will go to any lengths to try and prove you're not bullsh*ting us

either way, no one with any type of experience in photo analysis would look at that first photo for more than 30 seconds before declaring it a fake. Your other 'light enhanced' pic ain't nothing special either. Had you grabbed a picture while it was 20x its original size and orange, well then you might have something.

well you can believe what you want, i did give you the means to prove what i said myself by stateing there are multiple police reports of this with the state police here in PA. I will not get them myself for the fact that everyone will scream fake, so I thought I would give you the information you needed to find it for yourself if you choose to. As for #2 and #3 of your list I don't even have the time for that kind of stuff, for the little time I do have free (I am rasing 3 babies (ages 2 months to 3 yrs old) which takes up most of my time, I am a software engineer by day (and most of night for the people that know what that is like) along with an admin, and ontop of that doing everything that needs done for the house.. I have absoutly no time on my hands to fake this, what little free time I do have I spend on here or with my wife. I don't need any attention I have all I need at home with 3 kids and a wife. and as for research, as i stated im a software engineer and admin, not sure what kind of research I could be doing with in that kind of field with this.

and as I stated, anyone that wants to get the police reports from the state police (which they do release reports for stuff like this and anything that isnt a juvi crime) go right ahead, the other peoples statements should back up excatly what I stated.

Well, I've been wrong before but dang if that doesn't look like a pole to me...  If you increase the contrast of the original to where you see just black and white dots, you can see that there is a pattern in that area.

:rolleyes: Since when do they put poles that high in the air ? All the other street lights are low to the ground. And 'street lights' don't move up and down, like he reported.

My dad, who lives in Maryland, told me that had heard about the sightings in that area. In fact he had heard about it within a day or two afterwards. So, clearly neufuse isn't the only one reporting this. Someone want to call the State Police Office in Indiana, Penn? I would but I really wouldn't know who to ask to talk to or what exactly to say, otherwise I would call them. The number is (724) 357-1948. Not that I don't believe neufuse but perhaps some of the doubters can be silenced :rolleyes:

Edit: One more number came up when I googled it: (724) 357-2888 But try the other one first.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 by Razvan Serea Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) is a utility for completely removing AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL graphics drivers and related packages from your system, attempting to eliminate all leftovers (including registry entries, folders and files, driver store). Though AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL drivers can usually be removed via the Windows Control Panel, this uninstaller tool was created for situations where standard uninstall fails, or when you need to fully remove NVIDIA or ATI graphics card drivers. After using this driver cleaner, your system will behave as though it’s the first time you’re installing a new driver—similar to a fresh Windows installation. As with all such tools, we recommend creating a restore point beforehand, allowing you to undo changes if issues arise. If you're having trouble installing an older or newer driver, try it—there are reports that it resolves such problems. Recommended usage: The tool can be used in Normal mode but for absolute stability when using DDU, Safemode is always the best. Make a backup or a system restore (but it should normally be pretty safe). It is best to exclude the DDU folder completely from any security software to avoid issues. You do NOT need to uninstall the driver prior using DDU. Requirements: .NET Framework 4.8 Compatible with Windows 7, 8, 8.1, 10, and 11 (32-bit or 64-bit) Note: Using on Insider Preview builds is at your own risk. Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 changelog: Added 'Reset to recommended' button for the Options. General fixes and improvements. Download: Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 | 1.7 MB (Freeware) Download: DDU Portable | 1.2 MB Links: Display Driver Uninstaller Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
    • Tor Browser 15.0.17 by Razvan Serea Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. The Tor software protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world: it prevents somebody from watching your Internet connection and learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access sites which are blocked. The Tor Browser Bundle lets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained. Tor Browser 15.0.17 changelog: All Platforms Updated Tor to 0.4.9.11 Updated NoScript to 13.6.25.1984 Build System / All Platforms Bug tor-browser-build#41821: Update gpg subkeys for boklm Bug tor-browser-build#41827: Update morgan's keychain with renewed key Download: Tor Browser (64-bit) | Tor Browser (32-bit) | 109.0 MB (Open Source) View: Tor Browser Website | Other Operating Systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      526
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      146
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!