UFO over Indiana Pennsylvania (near pittsburgh)


Recommended Posts

I wish it wasnt so dark out... after it started acting wierd I grabed my sony dv cam and put it on the tripod to record the sky and i was just watching the tape and it appeared in about 40 of the frames... here is one of them... its a little hard to see being at night but the highest object in the picture is it.... this is looking out over our deck twards a few houses in a field (the lower lights) the higher light is up in the air...

:rolleyes: My NSA contacts enhanced the pic for you .... hehe

post-92-1084891756.jpg

Well, I've been wrong before but dang if that doesn't look like a pole to me...  If you increase the contrast of the original to where you see just black and white dots, you can see that there is a pattern in that area.

wow you guys go way to far on disproveing stuff :rolleyes:

I wasnt going to post more pics after half that stuff but since you guys are certain there is a telephone pole with a light on it in the pic here are light enhanced pictures... gawd.. and one from the deck the 1st one was taken on to prove there is no pole there

this is also a completely overcast night and no clouds (hence the bright red glow in the middle of the screen, that is a glow from the state juvi prision against the clouds)

Edited by neufuse
wow you guys go way to far on disproveing stuff?:rolleyes::

I wasnt going to post more pics after half that stuff but since you guys are certain there is a telephone pole with a light on it in the pic here are light enhanced pictures... gawd.. and one from the deck the 1st one was taken on to prove there is no pole there

this is also a completely overcast night and no clouds (hence the bright red glow in the middle of the screen, that is a glow from the state juvi prision against the clouds)

first off, only one person claimed that there was a pole there, and I for one know he's wrong. If there was a pole there, then that would mean you didn't copy and paste the streetlamp, and it's obvious you did.

Also, I'm assuming the "overcast night and no clouds" comment is a typo on your behalf, since the statement makes no sense.

and is this supposed to be another picture of your ufo? If so, then why on earth post a dark, ambiguous photo when you have such a 'better' example on hand?

I can't speak for the others, but as far as I'm concerned, nothing you show or say now can make me change my mind. You posted a photo whose chances of being genuine are slim to none. That ruins any credibility your story may have had.

Edited by Jack31081

Yeah, it looks to me like the post I was seeing was probably one of the posts of the deck. Big deal, you asked for people's interperetation and I gave mine (and it seems I was right about seeing some kind of post). That still doesn't explain why the "ufo" is the same exact size and shape (and rgb values) as the streetlights.

what i ment to say is there were clouds yes that was a typo.. why post a better pic now? because I just noticed that I had one that displayed this on it, I have about 3000 pictures on my camera, it's not the quickest looking through them to find pictures that look great... maybe there is a better way to do it faster but i dont know of one myself..

and as for me posting this, i only posted it to say what happened, when i posted it i was pretty frightened by what I saw, yes posting what I had at the time may of been stupid for me because of how people react but that was my outlet for it... i didn't post this to get attention i just needed something to let it out to and this being a nice community i did it here. sure it generated attention, but i was just posting as an informative type post about what i whitnessed. For the about 20 people around here that did see this, you could ask any of them what the saw, the will all say the same thing... also there are 5 police reportings of this to the PA state police too by seperate people so that is my other point of proof that something did happen... if you dont believe me about the reports request them through the police for that night in this area. then you can compare independent whitness reports to what i reported to you guys. im not trying to be mean or anything i just wanted to pass on some information about this occurance.

what i ment to say is there were clouds yes that was a typo.. why post a better pic now? because I just noticed that I had one that displayed this on it, I have about 3000 pictures on my camera, it's not the quickest looking through them to find pictures that look great... maybe there is a better way to do it faster but i dont know of one myself..

and as for me posting this, i only posted it to say what happened, when i posted it i was pretty frightened by what I saw, yes posting what I had at the time may of been stupid for me because of how people react but that was my outlet for it... i didn't post this to get attention i just needed something to let it out to and this being a nice community i did it here. sure it generated attention, but i was just posting as an informative type post about what i whitnessed. For the about 20 people around here that did see this, you could ask any of them what the saw, the will all say the same thing... also there are 5 police reportings of this to the PA state police too by seperate people so that is my other point of proof that something did happen... if you dont believe me about the reports request them through the police for that night in this area. then you can compare independent whitness reports to what i reported to you guys. im not trying to be mean or anything i just wanted to pass on some information about this occurance.

Just ignore them. :p

trolls.gif

due to your insistence on this story, I see a few possibilities:

1 - You really did see something, but decided to fabricate a photo to back up your story

2 - You're making this all up as part of some research you're doing (similar to Betelgeuse's doings)

3 - You really are an attention ###### and will go to any lengths to try and prove you're not bullsh*ting us

either way, no one with any type of experience in photo analysis would look at that first photo for more than 30 seconds before declaring it a fake. Your other 'light enhanced' pic ain't nothing special either. Had you grabbed a picture while it was 20x its original size and orange, well then you might have something.

well you can believe what you want, i did give you the means to prove what i said myself by stateing there are multiple police reports of this with the state police here in PA. I will not get them myself for the fact that everyone will scream fake, so I thought I would give you the information you needed to find it for yourself if you choose to. As for #2 and #3 of your list I don't even have the time for that kind of stuff, for the little time I do have free (I am rasing 3 babies (ages 2 months to 3 yrs old) which takes up most of my time, I am a software engineer by day (and most of night for the people that know what that is like) along with an admin, and ontop of that doing everything that needs done for the house.. I have absoutly no time on my hands to fake this, what little free time I do have I spend on here or with my wife. I don't need any attention I have all I need at home with 3 kids and a wife. and as for research, as i stated im a software engineer and admin, not sure what kind of research I could be doing with in that kind of field with this.

and as I stated, anyone that wants to get the police reports from the state police (which they do release reports for stuff like this and anything that isnt a juvi crime) go right ahead, the other peoples statements should back up excatly what I stated.

Well, I've been wrong before but dang if that doesn't look like a pole to me...  If you increase the contrast of the original to where you see just black and white dots, you can see that there is a pattern in that area.

:rolleyes: Since when do they put poles that high in the air ? All the other street lights are low to the ground. And 'street lights' don't move up and down, like he reported.

My dad, who lives in Maryland, told me that had heard about the sightings in that area. In fact he had heard about it within a day or two afterwards. So, clearly neufuse isn't the only one reporting this. Someone want to call the State Police Office in Indiana, Penn? I would but I really wouldn't know who to ask to talk to or what exactly to say, otherwise I would call them. The number is (724) 357-1948. Not that I don't believe neufuse but perhaps some of the doubters can be silenced :rolleyes:

Edit: One more number came up when I googled it: (724) 357-2888 But try the other one first.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
    • Shutter Encoder 20.2 by Razvan Serea Shutter Encoder is one of the best video converter software and image, audio available today. It has been designed by video editors in order to be as accessible and efficient as possible. It is one of the few free professional tools. Based on FFmpeg, it has the largest codec library available. You can thus convert your files into many different formats. Complete settings for the most advanced Shutter Encoder has a panel containing a large number of settings, in order to define your own choices based on your files and perfect your video or audio output. Well-thought-out settings, with parameters predefined to create files quickly and easily. List of functions Without conversion: Cut without re-encoding, Replace audio, Rewrap, Conform, Merge, Extract, Subtitling, Video inserts Sound conversions: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, AAC, AC3, OPUS, OGG Editing codecs: DNxHD, DNxHR, Apple ProRes, QT Animation, GoPro CineForm, Uncompressed YUV Output codecs: H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1, OGV Broadcast codecs XDCAM HD422, AVC-Intra 100, XAVC, HAP....and much more. Shutter Encoder 20.2 changelog: Added "Intel Quick Sync" hardware acceleration for Linux Added 'Identify speakers' option for "Audio transcription" function Improved installer package Improved video player performance Improved timecode display with drop-frame videos Improved naming convention for surround audio files Fixed splash screen freeze Fixed bug with file hanging Fixed bugs with presets loading Fixed bugs with video player's buffer Fixed bug with 'Total length of file' option Fixed bugs with 'Record screen/device' option Fixed bug with "XAVC" & "XAVC Long GOP" functions Rollback to XPDF tool for PDF conversion Removed unused binary architecture for Mac Various corrections Various improvements Download: Shutter Encoder 20.2 | 166.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Shutter Encoder Portable | 185.0 MB Links: Shutter Encoder Home Page | FAQ / Tips | macOS | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • did you give it permission to do so? its probably on the ToS. After that South Park episode I'm paying attention to them lol
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!