UFO over Indiana Pennsylvania (near pittsburgh)


Recommended Posts

I wish it wasnt so dark out... after it started acting wierd I grabed my sony dv cam and put it on the tripod to record the sky and i was just watching the tape and it appeared in about 40 of the frames... here is one of them... its a little hard to see being at night but the highest object in the picture is it.... this is looking out over our deck twards a few houses in a field (the lower lights) the higher light is up in the air...

:rolleyes: My NSA contacts enhanced the pic for you .... hehe

post-92-1084891756.jpg

Well, I've been wrong before but dang if that doesn't look like a pole to me...  If you increase the contrast of the original to where you see just black and white dots, you can see that there is a pattern in that area.

wow you guys go way to far on disproveing stuff :rolleyes:

I wasnt going to post more pics after half that stuff but since you guys are certain there is a telephone pole with a light on it in the pic here are light enhanced pictures... gawd.. and one from the deck the 1st one was taken on to prove there is no pole there

this is also a completely overcast night and no clouds (hence the bright red glow in the middle of the screen, that is a glow from the state juvi prision against the clouds)

Edited by neufuse
wow you guys go way to far on disproveing stuff?:rolleyes::

I wasnt going to post more pics after half that stuff but since you guys are certain there is a telephone pole with a light on it in the pic here are light enhanced pictures... gawd.. and one from the deck the 1st one was taken on to prove there is no pole there

this is also a completely overcast night and no clouds (hence the bright red glow in the middle of the screen, that is a glow from the state juvi prision against the clouds)

first off, only one person claimed that there was a pole there, and I for one know he's wrong. If there was a pole there, then that would mean you didn't copy and paste the streetlamp, and it's obvious you did.

Also, I'm assuming the "overcast night and no clouds" comment is a typo on your behalf, since the statement makes no sense.

and is this supposed to be another picture of your ufo? If so, then why on earth post a dark, ambiguous photo when you have such a 'better' example on hand?

I can't speak for the others, but as far as I'm concerned, nothing you show or say now can make me change my mind. You posted a photo whose chances of being genuine are slim to none. That ruins any credibility your story may have had.

Edited by Jack31081

Yeah, it looks to me like the post I was seeing was probably one of the posts of the deck. Big deal, you asked for people's interperetation and I gave mine (and it seems I was right about seeing some kind of post). That still doesn't explain why the "ufo" is the same exact size and shape (and rgb values) as the streetlights.

what i ment to say is there were clouds yes that was a typo.. why post a better pic now? because I just noticed that I had one that displayed this on it, I have about 3000 pictures on my camera, it's not the quickest looking through them to find pictures that look great... maybe there is a better way to do it faster but i dont know of one myself..

and as for me posting this, i only posted it to say what happened, when i posted it i was pretty frightened by what I saw, yes posting what I had at the time may of been stupid for me because of how people react but that was my outlet for it... i didn't post this to get attention i just needed something to let it out to and this being a nice community i did it here. sure it generated attention, but i was just posting as an informative type post about what i whitnessed. For the about 20 people around here that did see this, you could ask any of them what the saw, the will all say the same thing... also there are 5 police reportings of this to the PA state police too by seperate people so that is my other point of proof that something did happen... if you dont believe me about the reports request them through the police for that night in this area. then you can compare independent whitness reports to what i reported to you guys. im not trying to be mean or anything i just wanted to pass on some information about this occurance.

what i ment to say is there were clouds yes that was a typo.. why post a better pic now? because I just noticed that I had one that displayed this on it, I have about 3000 pictures on my camera, it's not the quickest looking through them to find pictures that look great... maybe there is a better way to do it faster but i dont know of one myself..

and as for me posting this, i only posted it to say what happened, when i posted it i was pretty frightened by what I saw, yes posting what I had at the time may of been stupid for me because of how people react but that was my outlet for it... i didn't post this to get attention i just needed something to let it out to and this being a nice community i did it here. sure it generated attention, but i was just posting as an informative type post about what i whitnessed. For the about 20 people around here that did see this, you could ask any of them what the saw, the will all say the same thing... also there are 5 police reportings of this to the PA state police too by seperate people so that is my other point of proof that something did happen... if you dont believe me about the reports request them through the police for that night in this area. then you can compare independent whitness reports to what i reported to you guys. im not trying to be mean or anything i just wanted to pass on some information about this occurance.

Just ignore them. :p

trolls.gif

due to your insistence on this story, I see a few possibilities:

1 - You really did see something, but decided to fabricate a photo to back up your story

2 - You're making this all up as part of some research you're doing (similar to Betelgeuse's doings)

3 - You really are an attention ###### and will go to any lengths to try and prove you're not bullsh*ting us

either way, no one with any type of experience in photo analysis would look at that first photo for more than 30 seconds before declaring it a fake. Your other 'light enhanced' pic ain't nothing special either. Had you grabbed a picture while it was 20x its original size and orange, well then you might have something.

well you can believe what you want, i did give you the means to prove what i said myself by stateing there are multiple police reports of this with the state police here in PA. I will not get them myself for the fact that everyone will scream fake, so I thought I would give you the information you needed to find it for yourself if you choose to. As for #2 and #3 of your list I don't even have the time for that kind of stuff, for the little time I do have free (I am rasing 3 babies (ages 2 months to 3 yrs old) which takes up most of my time, I am a software engineer by day (and most of night for the people that know what that is like) along with an admin, and ontop of that doing everything that needs done for the house.. I have absoutly no time on my hands to fake this, what little free time I do have I spend on here or with my wife. I don't need any attention I have all I need at home with 3 kids and a wife. and as for research, as i stated im a software engineer and admin, not sure what kind of research I could be doing with in that kind of field with this.

and as I stated, anyone that wants to get the police reports from the state police (which they do release reports for stuff like this and anything that isnt a juvi crime) go right ahead, the other peoples statements should back up excatly what I stated.

Well, I've been wrong before but dang if that doesn't look like a pole to me...  If you increase the contrast of the original to where you see just black and white dots, you can see that there is a pattern in that area.

:rolleyes: Since when do they put poles that high in the air ? All the other street lights are low to the ground. And 'street lights' don't move up and down, like he reported.

My dad, who lives in Maryland, told me that had heard about the sightings in that area. In fact he had heard about it within a day or two afterwards. So, clearly neufuse isn't the only one reporting this. Someone want to call the State Police Office in Indiana, Penn? I would but I really wouldn't know who to ask to talk to or what exactly to say, otherwise I would call them. The number is (724) 357-1948. Not that I don't believe neufuse but perhaps some of the doubters can be silenced :rolleyes:

Edit: One more number came up when I googled it: (724) 357-2888 But try the other one first.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My experience in the past with older Windows 11 builds was not great on unsupported machines but I recently used Rufus to put the latest build on a older 5th Gen Core Thinkpad T that we upgraded with a SATA SSD and 8GB of RAM four years ago when hardware was reasonable and it seemed pretty fast and solid. Customer is very happy with the performance and will probably get four more years out of that venerable laptop that he loves so much. Another customer just retired his Dell Studio laptop from 2009 running Windows 10. It got an SSD over 10 years ago and did everything he needed it to for 17 years but he also retired last year and is happy doing everything on his iPad now.
    • Apple's newest AirTag 2 gets first big discount by Taras Buria In late January 2026, Apple introduced its second-generation AirTag trackers, bringing a refresh to the old model that has been on the market for half a decade. Now, you can get these new trackers at an all-time low price, thanks to the first big discount that brought the price down by 17% on Amazon. While the second-generation AirTag looks identical to its predecessor, it packs meaningful upgrades inside. The second-gen ultrawideband chip works 50% farther than the original AirTag, allowing you to detect lost items in a wider range. In addition, the second-generation AirTag features an upgraded Bluetooth chip for extended range and a significantly louder speaker (up to 50%) so that you can hear it better when locating a lost item. Note that the second-gen AirTag only works with iPhones and iPads that run iOS/iPadOS 26 and newer, so you need a compatible device to use the tracker. Like the original AirTag, the AirTag 2 is available in two packs: one and four pieces. Both are now available at a notable discount on Amazon, and you can purchase them using the links below. Apple AirTag 2 tracker - $24 | 17% off on Amazon Apple AirTag 2 tracker (four-pack) - $89 | 10% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S.- specific and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!