Uxtheme installation under Windows XP/2003


Recommended Posts

All the uxtheme.dll mirrors for build 2600.xpsp_sp2_rtm seem to have disappeared.

585525477[/snapback]

my website went down for good. working on a new site atm. i need to get all files from rafael/vortex again.

http://www.vortex-scratchpad.info/reposito...atches/Uxtheme/

still works for me.

Also, what is a shellstyle (I know nothing, me) is it the icons on the toolbar of a folder ? Thanks again.

585525550[/snapback]

the shellstyle is the "background" of the panel left hand side in yoru explorerwindow.

post-10955-1109233658.jpg

This has probably already been answered, but I can go to any theme site and download a new VS after replacing my uxtheme.dll right?  (I assume VS and theme are interchangeable).  Does it matter if the VS is a .msstyle or .theme file?

585515978[/snapback]

yes you can use ANY visual style you want after patching your uxtheme.dll

and no, it doesn't really matter if it's a .theme or .msstyles.

Thanks InsaneKiwi. But where do you put the new shellstyle.dll's you get with many visual styles? Some of the VS's seem to alter these taskbar buttons judging by the previews (eg Luxurious) but they don't change on my system. What am I doing wrong? Thanks.

c:\windows\resources\themes\THEMENAME\shell\ = where the shellstyle should be

c:\windows\resources\themes\THEMENAME = where your msstyle belongs

if you want to change your taskbar buttons you need to replace your shell32.dll. that's something different mate ;)

c:\windows\resources\themes\THEMENAME\shell\  = where the shellstyle should be

c:\windows\resources\themes\THEMENAME = where your msstyle belongs

if you want to change your taskbar buttons you need to replace your shell32.dll. that's something different mate ;)

585525825[/snapback]

Yeah thanks for that.. How come many VS's come with screenshots of these buttons changed (eg Roysal Inspirat SE, Luxurious) yet there's nothing in here on how to actually change them? How am I supposed to find out? Ok I need to replace the shell32.dll but with what? I'm not finding one included with the VS's & How do I know they're compatiable with SP1?

you need to find a shell32.dll matching your currentwindows built/version. i only replaced my shell32.dll once but all i can suggest is seach upon neowin forum and google. you'll find lots of results.

I'm still not understanding i'm afraid..

Do you mean I need a single hacked version of the shell32.dll for my version of XP and then all visual styles that contain a modfied toolbar will work

or..

I need to obtain the correct shell32.dll for each and every visual style that has a modified toolbar (Presumably made by the author of the VS?)

Thanks.

I'm still not understanding i'm afraid..

Do you mean I need a single hacked version of the shell32.dll for my version of XP and then all visual styles that contain a modfied toolbar will work

or..

I need to obtain the correct shell32.dll for each and every visual style that has a modified toolbar (Presumably made by the author of the VS?)

Thanks.

585538296[/snapback]

you need to find a shell32.dll matching your currentwindows built/version. i only replaced my shell32.dll once but all i can suggest is seach upon neowin forum and google. you'll find lots of results.

:whistle:

Yes but if he 'only replaced the shell32.dll once' it sort of implies he could change it again. Maybe if he changed to another VS? Didn't that remark seem a little ambiguous to anyone but myself? Or is it me?

Fair enough, i'll get my coat.

:D

Yes but if he 'only replaced the shell32.dll once' it sort of implies he could change it again. Maybe if he changed to another VS? Didn't that remark seem a little ambiguous to anyone but myself? Or is it me?

Fair enough, i'll get my coat.

:D

585539175[/snapback]

Nah, you can stay :)

I'm not an expert in that bit of the guide just read what I could from insanekiwi's reply. Insanekiwi...your assistance is needed :p

regarding the shell32.dll replacement..look around in the customization subforum. you#ll find topics about shell32.dll

you need one matching your OS's language and version/built.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD is supported out of the box in linux because of their open source driver. Nvidia does not. All my systems are amd and all of them work nicely on linux arch without doing anything.
    • Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.
    • I can answer about the Linux bit. I only used AMD GPUs. I currently have a 9060XT (8GB) that fits my needs, I'm not a gamer, so I don't need that much GDDR. But lately, NVIDIA has grown a lot in the recent years. Oh, the horrors of NVIDIA drivers not working. But they have been getting better. I know a lot of members onm here that are running cachyOS and other distros, and are fine with a 4090/5090 variants. Really, though, I would stick with AMD variants.
    • Everything they say you can already do yourself on the registry by changing some things.
    • Artist's renderings are so much nicer to view than the real thing, don't you think?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!