Are You a Console or PC Gamer?  

2090 members have voted

  1. 1. Are You a Console or PC Gamer?

    • Console (Xbox, PS2, Gamecube, other, etc)
      336
    • Computer (PC/Mac/linux)
      1101
    • Both
      653


Recommended Posts

PC gamer here, has always been, and will probably always be. The PC is just an infinitely more flexible and powerful environment. I can use better controls, and the ones I prefer for each game; I can fire up fraps and record my games, I can install/create mods, I can install any game including old DOS games and emulators for old consoles, I can get better graphics if my hardware supports it or I can fine-tune them for optimal framerate.

The main reason is trying to play games on a PC is a fuss. I spent a few hundred building a good gaming computer, it had problems, and I'm always wondering "hmm I'll bump this setting up to high.... wait no that dropped the fps.... back to medium...." most of the time while playing, I'll just be focusing on how I can squeeze more performance out of it. None of those worries on my PS3 or 360. I can just get a game, know it'll work and be able to enjoy it.
I agree that having to optimize performance is a pain. I spent about 2 hours running Far Cry 2 benchmarks before finding a good compromise. And that's because Far Cry 2 has an awesome benchmark utility. With most games I don't even bother trying to find the perfect compromise because it would take way too long.

However, I've seen games run with a crappy framerate on consoles, and then you can't do anything about it but endure it. I'd rather keep the option of customizing performance.

The ideal would be if PC games shipped with an auto-tuning utility that iterate through all the settings, running benchmarks each time. You'd give it a target average framerate, a tolerance threshold, and a set amount of time to complete (at least 15 minutes, but the longer you leave it on, the finer-tuned it gets). This utility would be very similar from game to game so it could just be part of popular engines so it doesn't have to be custom-made all the time.

  • 2 weeks later...

To be frank I think console gaming sucks. The entire model is broken and forces you to sacrifice quality for what the new "in" thing is.

I mean for example I was surfing the net the other day looking for a game to quench my RTS thirst. I love RTS games but haven't played in a while. I had a poke around on gameranking websites and decided to opt for Starcraft a game that is 11 years old but an undisputed classic of the genre. I had the option of purchasing newer games like Red Alert 3 but I thought Starcraft was the superior game.

The problem with console gaming is the model relies on software being sold. For example when Microsoft and Sony make a console the consoles are sold at a loss in general. In other words if the PS3 sells for 500 dollars it may cost 600 to make. Sony recoup that cost with software taking a percentage from every game sold.

Because consoles rely on software sales they have to tailor a sales pattern that dictates new games are constantly being bought up so they create a marketplace where something is big for a few months and then gets replaced and what this does is breed games that generally suck and have a short life. After all if a game on the consoles was to last in the limelight for a longer period of time it would take away sales from other games.

The problem with this model is new games are constantly pushed on you and quality is sacrificed for the "in" thing to succeed. The ultimate cut off point is generally a new generation of consoles.

The problem with this philosophy is if you are a Square Enix fan and you own a current generation console instead of getting to pick between gems like Chrono Trigger and Final Fantasy 7 you are now stuck with crap like Infinite Undiscovery and The Last Remnant.

With PC gaming quality usually reigns supreme. I have to bring up Starcraft again for example. The game is over a decade old but due to its quality it is still the best selling RTS game. That is something you do not get with console gaming due to old games being relegated to the past generations in favour of shiny new games that are often inferior to the original product.

The model is very broken and consoles are paying for it. The 360 has yet to break a profit and Sony have conceded it is unlikely to ever turn a profit on the PS3. Not only do I think the model for consoles is broken I also don't think the Xbox franchise will become profitable in the 360's lifetime and I am convinced the PS3 won't be profitable either in its lifetime. Says a lot about winning when you look past irrelevant figures. The Wii on the other hand deserves a mention simply because it's the Jesus console.. after all what else aside from divine intervention can help that console conquer its opponents in such furious fashion?

  • 2 weeks later...
The problem with this philosophy is if you are a Square Enix fan and you own a current generation console instead of getting to pick between gems like Chrono Trigger and Final Fantasy 7 you are now stuck with crap like Infinite Undiscovery and The Last Remnant.

If you mean The Last Remnant is 'crap' on consoles (and not the PC version) I agree with you (due to it being badly optimized and lagging on console versions). Some people think it was a bad game but I actually enjoyed it. The battle system took awhile to get used to, but the overall game was enjoyable IMO.

With no hesitation I'd say I'm a PC Gamer.

Give me any FPS or RTS game and I'll take mouse and keyboard on my PC any day, however for stuff like GTA4 / Saint's Row / Fable 2 / Mass Effect I find they work better with a joypad... Doesn't necessarily mean I'll play on console given the choice, but I'll certainly prefer a joypad for them.

The beauty of PC gaming is you can easily buy a 360 controller off eBay for like $25 (like I did) and is compatible with almost all games out of the box. Especially when it comes to console ports.

See my sig, the only console missing here is the Wii. My consoles are connected (HDMI) to my 50" Sony FullHD with full surround sound.

Still, I find myself playing much more with my PC. I love to game, but I'm short on patience, so I like to run a trainer/cheat from time to time.... Something you can't do on a console.

PC Gamer hands down. Nothing is better than playing Fallout 3 or Mass Effect or Flight Simulator X at 1920x1200 with all settings set to very high. Throw in the PCSX2 emulator and I have an all around package with a Logitech Wireless Rumblepad 2, internet browsing, MS Office, AutoCAD, Firefox (with tens of addons), chat, MediaMonkey, and torrents and I think it trumps the consoles.

If I didn't depend on the software, I would have a PS3 and bought 10 games or so. :p

I own all platforms. I game 99.5% on my PC. Why, better controls, graphics, gaming experience. The only game I've been able to stomach on my consoles recently is Tigers Woods 2010 with the the new Wii motion plus. I think if more console gamers had the oppurtunity to try real PC gaming they'd become PC gamers. The current market promotes consoles in the retail stores and tv advertisements. Millions of gamers are being herded into the console arena and have no comprehension there is a platform that provides a better all round gaming experience. These gamers friends talk console, console, console so they have to assume they must be right? No those friends are clueless to. The PC has no promoter but it's fans.

With the cost of current PC gaming hardware the arguments off the console fanboy are becoming wiffs of air. I can also hook my PC to my big screen TV and sit on the couch while looking at better graphics.

While practically all games are going multiplatform the PC still gets a wealth of exclusives via mods for current games (for free may I remind you), European nations are still huge into PC gaming and we see some really decent games coming this way. Lets not forget the upcoming exclusives mainly Starcraft 2 and Diablo 3.

If your an exclusive console gamer get your head out of Gamestop and do a little research. The PC gaming library goes all the way back to the 80s. ;) There also seems to be a whole silent market for adventure games on the PC. I thought adventure gaming had died till I did some digging recently. There are a couple websites which specialize in them.

$500 gaming PC..April article so it should be cheaper now.

Edited by Samduhman
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

console

imo only genre pc is good for is rts... maybe mmo's but ive never played them so no comment

for fps's give me a analogue stick anyday... yes its harder but its harder for everyone so its all good. feels more natural.

using a mouse cursor across a screen to shoot a gun.. its like some kindergarten stuff to me

now if someone can build me and keep upgrading me a gaming pc for ?160 to last me next 4 years (including a xbox 360 controller) i will take the plunge... theres even drawbacks for that... getting games later than consoles, getting gimped versions of sports games, getting downloadable content after consoles get them, having to install games and mess about with settings and drivers etc, having to boot up the pc everytime i want to play a game, not getting games like forza, gran turismo, halo 3, uncharted, fable... i dont even think the whole online thing is as good as the 360's (or even ps3's), correct me if im wrong

consoles are just easy... nothing like coming home from being infront of a pc almost all day, sitting back on the sofa infront of your 42 inch hdtv, grabbing the controller and turning on the console... joining a party within seconds

If your an exclusive console gamer get your head out of Gamestop and do a little research. The PC gaming library goes all the way back to the 80s. ;) There also seems to be a whole silent market for adventure games on the PC. I thought adventure gaming had died till I did some digging recently. There are a couple websites which specialize in them.

[/url]

why would i want to play games from the 80's?

adventure games? u mean like uncharted and fable? if so, doubt they will be better than those 2

The playability just seem far more fluid in a PC (if you have the spec right) but more to the point there is so much more you can do with a keyboard and mouse. I used to play flight sims non stop and loved to take an F/A 18 off a carrier, fly to target, take it out, shoot down a couple of MiGs on the way and return to land on the carrier and having to press a seperate key for every single operationrequired to do the tasks required. I remember reading a post on another forum where a kid thought that the button on the underside of a 360 pad made CoD more realistic cause it is like a trigger, he has obviously never fired a rifle in his life. To me a console just doesnt add anything that a PC cant do.

if your a fan of flight sims and playing on a qwerty keyboard then u should think about buying a dedicated flight joystick. a qwerty keyboard was invented for typing, people have just become acustomed to using it as a gaming device, its not ideal

as for call of duty... im not bashing but how do you differentiate run and walk on the arrow keys, just curious

98% of gaming I do on PC

simply there is no good games on consoles.

why would i want to play games from the 80's?

adventure games? u mean like uncharted and fable? if so, doubt they will be better than those 2

hey kiddo, uncharted and fable are not adventure games

World of Warcraft and all the newest high end games on the PC

Xbox 360 is just basically a Media Center Extender for my bedroom

Wii Mario Kart (need i say more here)

I have a Mame Arcade (in a Street Figher II Championship Edition Cabinet) all classic games like centipede and pacman

other than that all my other consoles are in my kids room

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Trailer park trash “sport “, fits the current White House
    • KataLib 5.3.0.0 by Razvan Serea KataLib is more than just a music player — it's a complete audio suite designed for music lovers and creators alike. It combines a powerful audio player, a flexible metadata editor, a capable audio converter, and a music library manager into one streamlined application. Core Features: Audio Player Enjoy seamless playback of virtually any audio format or even streaming video files. DJ Mode lets you mix tracks with manual or automatic crossfades. You can also load and save WinAmp-style playlists for quick access to your favorite sets. Audio Converter Convert between a wide range of audio formats effortlessly. Trim or normalize your output automatically, and even extract audio from streaming video sources. Ideal for preparing files for different devices or platforms. Metadata Editor View and edit ID3v2 tags and other metadata. Batch edit multiple files at once, and fetch missing information directly from the MusicBrainz database. You can also apply or update album art with ease. Music Library Manager Organize your entire audio collection, search across tracks instantly, and download cover images from the internet — or use your own custom artwork. KataLib makes it easy to keep your library tidy and enriched with useful info. Supported Formats: KataLib supports a wide range of both lossy and lossless audio formats: Input: OPUS, AAC, FLAC, M4A, MP3, MP4, MPC, APE, AIF, MKV, AVI, MOV, FLV, WEBM, Ogg Vorbis, WAV, WAVPack, WMA, AC3, OGA, MP2, MPGA, MPEG, DTS, M4B, DSD (DFS) Output: OPUS, FLAC, M4A, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, WAV Under the hood, KataLib uses the trusted FFmpeg engine for audio conversion and media playback, ensuring compatibility with virtually all mainstream media formats. KataLib 5.3.0.0 changelog: Added Option to select the Zoom level of the Oscilloscope visualizer. The taskbar button of the app now displays the progress of its processing tasks. The metadata text of the Visualization Video can now be aligned by the user. We can now reorder the order of the Visualizers and Metadata, in the Visualization Video Setup dialog, by removing any item and adding it again. It will be added at the end. Changed The font size of the Visualization Video can now be more than 30 points. Updated yt-dlp library to version 2026... Fixed Opening the Visualization Video Setup dialog could fail if the settings were wrong. Sometimes there were false duplicates in the Rename Tracks dialog. Tracks without metadata appeared without title in the Recent menu. Download: KataLib 5.3.0.0 | 90.0 MB (Open Source) Links: KataLib Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • EA Sports UFC 6 review: Brutal, satisfying, and surprisingly accessible to newcomers by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe EA’s UFC series of fighting games has been putting out games for over 10 years now, but it’s a series I have never spent any time with. As a PC guy, the series being console-exclusive is the primary reason for that. The latest entry to the series, EA Sports UFC 6, is still not coming to PC, but I have an Xbox now. When EA reached out to see if I could have a crack at the game and give my opinion about it, I finally got the chance to see what this franchise is about. I have spent about a week playing UFC 6 on the Xbox Series X. Despite my lackluster skill with fighting games, I still have fun with entries like Street Fighter and Tekken. I quickly came to realize this is a different kind of fighting game, not the arcade titles I am usually dabbling with. Most of the week that I spent playing UFC 6 was in the career mode, trying not to get knocked out while slowly improving my combos and reactions. The review below will be from the perspective of a newcomer to the series and an amateur fighting game fan, so please forgive any mistyped lingo or series-staple mechanics I am not comprehending. In the Ring Getting a solid hit in UFC 6 is satisfying. It’s probably the most satisfying impact reaction I have seen in a fighting game. The ripples in the muscles, the spray of sweat (and blood), the meaty sound, and the subsequent stumble all carry a lot of weight. If I miss a heavy swing like that, though, I already know that I'm in for a world of hurt from the incoming counters. The fighting is a real treat. The actions aren’t as snappy as arcade titles, so a miss feels like a much bigger mistake here. This slowness did take some getting used to, but I felt the improvement in my abilities even after a few drills with basic punch and kick combos. If I’m not deliberate with my actions in the ring, whether it be a hasty retreat or a flying punch, the possibility of getting instantly knocked out is always there. The head, chest, and legs all come with their own health bars, so guarding just one area is just asking for trouble. A few hits to the head, and it's game over. Meanwhile, you won’t even be able to stay on your feet if they get damaged enough, drastically lowering the total amount of stamina available for the rest of the match. I was also encountering a large range of fighting styles to customize my own fighter with. There are a huge number of real-life superstars here from multiple eras. It’s not as exaggerated as Street Fighter or Tekken, but the way they move, evade, throw punches, or even take steps is based on their real-life counterparts. I can see this being a big draw for any mixed martial arts fan. One feature I was surprised to see here was the 'Flow State' ability. As rounds progress, a power-up meter can give a temporary boost to the unique fighting style of the selected fighter, essentially boosting what they are good at. There is an entire visual effect that kicks in when activating this, too. The surprising part was seeing something like this in a game that feels like it’s aiming to be more of a simulator than an arcade fighter. My skill level is too low to use this exactly how the game wants me to, so I ended up triggering it whenever the opponent did it as well. Streamlined vs Authentic When I first started it up, UFC 6 asked me about my experience with the series. Being genuinely new, I took its advice and opted for a lowered difficulty level and 'Streamlined' controls. Quickly, I realized that this wasn’t for me. My chosen fighters were throwing random attacks, no matter what combination the game was trying to teach me. Win streaks were happening, and I was already getting bored out of my mind just a few matches in. Turning off this mode and switching to 'Authentic' controls fixed everything right up. I was now able to control my fighter with more precision than I expected. I could control each arm and leg, which body part my attacks would aim at, and the fully customizable controls for setting up unorthodox moves were a cherry on top. None of these made me an expert at the game, but at least I was being beaten up fairly. This is not a point against UFC 6, though. Giving the option for anyone to enjoy the game is always a good thing in my eyes. There is a lot of customizability in the difficulty, with everything from slow-motion reactions to specific assists being offered as toggles. If I had a friend coming over and wanted to try a quick 1v1, the streamlined controls option is one I’d consider to make it a light and fun fight. The one part of the fighting that did not click with me was the grappling. Being taken to the ground brings in an entirely new control mechanism involving mounts and submissions that feel more like quick-time events than the heavy, tactical fighting I had seen so far while standing. The game wants me to hold sticks in certain directions to change the position or pull off submissions, trying to do the opposite actions of the opponent. Even though I tried to get used to this gameplay, it just felt like a momentum killer, and I eventually just wanted to get back on my feet to get back into the action. Legacy and Career It was UFC 6’s career mode that I wanted to play the most when I started it up. I grew up with EA Sports games, and taking my team from the ground to the top has always been my favorite task. UFC 6 has that same option but also offers a more cinematic entrance to the career experience than I expected with ‘The Legacy’ mode. This mini-campaign follows an up-and-coming fighter, Chris Carter, who is attempting to reach the heights his father had reached in the sport. Starting with a small-time gym and coach, the story follows both his growth in the space as well as the growing rivalry with a friend and fighter, Danny Lopez. The fights in this mode are very good at introducing a newcomer like me to the sport and its varying techniques. Cinematics land between the major fights, showing the growing tension between the two fighters as the years go by, feeling the pressure to not miss out on the hard-earned chances. The dialogue can be a little corny at times, especially when the bar fights kick off, but I largely enjoyed the storyline. At the end of it, I was pretty much familiar with all the mechanics of the career mode, unlocking new skills and moves, and how I needed to approach fights, both outside and inside the ring. This story mode isn’t a very lengthy one, so don’t expect an hour-long campaign. Once the conclusion is reached, Carter’s journey continues as if it’s a normal career playthrough, though I decided to start over from scratch now that I have some know-how about the basics. The career mode is very streamlined, which is to be expected considering there isn’t a team to manage like in other EA Sports games. It’s the journey of one fighter. When a fight comes up in the calendar, I could choose how many weeks I dedicate to preparing for it at the gym. A longer prep time gives the opportunity to get my fighter’s fitness up (giving a bonus during fights), earn more money and points for unlocking new skills, and gain more fans to fast-track the rise to stardom. While that sounds like a lot of things to manage, it’s more like a few clicks. There is a social media menu that sometimes pops up with canned replies I can send to fans, and the sponsors are once again a single click away from being assigned as finished. It’s the training aspect that adds a gameplay angle. Using the money from winnings and sponsorships, I was hiring different types of trainers and learning fancier moves to use in the ring. One small thing I appreciated was that it was possible to injure each other during these training sessions. If a trainer goes down in a bad way while sparring, they won’t be available for the remainder of training. If my fighter is injured, it takes valuable time and resources to heal and recuperate. Just like in real life, it makes sense not to go so hard during training sessions and save that energy for the main event. Every training or sponsorship activity I took part in used up the days and weeks I had before the next fight, bringing a balancing element to the whole ordeal. There were times I simulated most of these to just get to the next fight, but the grind for gaining even the slightest bit of advantage while trying not to overdo it is an enjoyable one. Outside of quick fights and career modes, UFC 6 also introduces an almost museum-like mode to explore a trio of fighters considered to be legends of the sport: Max Holloway, Alex Pereira, and Zhang Weili. The aptly named Hall of Legends mode is unlike everything else seen in the game. Each of these fighters has entire levels dedicated to them that I could walk around in and explore their journey into the UFC. This includes footage from real-life fights and interviews about their original inspirations and training methods. Each of these spaces is almost like an interactive documentary. Once the highlights are done, the mode offers the opportunity to take over a deciding fight from the superstars. It’s an impressive transition. Going from the real-life televised event with crowds and commentary to immediately taking over in the game has some real hype behind it. Performance and visuals It’s clear to see that UFC 6 is going for a photo-realism look with its visuals compared to any other fighting game. The fighters don’t look great in selection screens. But inside the arenas, under the flood lights, surrounded by crowds, and facing an opponent, the visuals are more than impressive. As ghastly as it is to witness, things like blood spraying into the mat and muscles reddening as they get pummeled keep improving the immersion. The fluid animations help sell the illusion even further. A missed kick carries the momentum to require a corrective step. Hard punches that glance off blocks give off the air of a hit that still took some wind off the opponent’s guard. The special moves with flips and spins look mega awkward when missing, just as they do in real life. Suffice to say, the Frostbite Engine powering this game is one of the biggest strengths of EA development studios. Playing on the Xbox Series X, the 60 FPS gameplay did not miss the mark or cause any slowdowns that I could detect. I still wish this series were on PC to see just how far the developer can push the engine. One area I continue to have issues with, surprisingly enough, is the menus. The game has fast loading screens, but almost every menu I click through has a large amount of noticeable lag before it registers. This is immensely painful in the career mode, since I have to go through multiple menus between fights to train and do sponsorships, and having a 3-second pause when selecting a simple move between pages is the only time that made me quit the game. Thanks to Xbox’s quick resume, though, I was able to instantly jump back in the next day to the same point (and wade through more laggy menus). Conclusion My primary mission going into this EA Sports UFC 6 review as a newcomer to the series was to find out if this is a good jumping-in point for someone like me. Suffice it to say, the game passed that test with flying colors. Despite the high skill ceiling, the legacy mode introduction campaign, multiple types of accessible controls, and streamlined career had me picking up the basics and fighting styles much faster than I expected. I wish I had gotten to try out competitive multiplayer during my time with the game, too, but the lack of players in the pre-release version prevented this. The impressive visuals and animations, coupled with the impact physics that let me feel every punch and kick easily, made this the most immersive fighting game I have played. The only part that gave me pause was the grappling gameplay, which killed the momentum in most fights. The Flow State amplifying system didn’t hamper the experience, but I also felt like it made more sense for an arcade fighter, not this. Easily the most annoying thing about UFC 6 was its laggy menus, which I hope get some sort of fix later. Returning series veterans might have a completely different experience from me. But for a new fan like me looking to climb ranks and see fighters get floored in spectacular ways, UFC 6 doesn’t miss a step. EA Sports UFC 6 is releasing on June 19 across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. Ultimate Edition owners can already jump in via advanced access. This review was conducted on the Xbox Series X version of the game provided by EA.
    • No, Microsoft is obviously just spending money on maintaining a product with 0 users.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      MarkHughes4096 went up a rank
      Contributor
    • Dedicated
      jordanspringer earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rookie
      Rimplesnort went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!