Recommended Posts

Okay...1.0.28 works fine but i need to confirm one thing here....As soon as it detects the 266Mb Service Pack 2...it displays 5.1.2600.2180 (Pre-SP2). This is false syntax on the part of the application ??

Okay...1.0.28 works fine but i need to confirm one thing here....As soon as it detects the 266Mb Service Pack 2...it displays 5.1.2600.2180 (Pre-SP2). This is false syntax on the part of the application ??

Yes, this is an error in the application, a bug. It is fixed in version 1.0.29, but since it won't let you install SP2 because of the "Wrong OS" error, then you'll have to live with 1.0.28! At least until they fix this bug (which shouldn't be long).

ok, I'm sorry, I thought he was on vacation and wouldn't fix it for awhile. Thanks DJ Prem, I'll be patient. :cool:

Actually he IS on vacation. :laugh: He had just stopped in for a couple hours and left again. When he gets back he'll release a fix/new version. :yes:

Thanks for the update...where did he go/going for vaction?

Well, I live in Athens (where most of the events are held). As far as vacation is concerned, I rarely visit our islands (I did that some years ago). Instead, I stay in Dilesi/Oropos (I bet most of you will have a real hard time pronouncing this!!). It's a 30 minute drive from Athens (Average speed 150 km/h). Since I never take any PCs with me, the only way to do anything PC-related is to... well... take a vacation-break!

/Raptor

You can add scsi etc drivers easily.

In the step AFTER the SP2 is installed in your XPCD (as an example) directory but BEFORE you have nlite go to work on the reduction....simply do GreenMachines example of how to add drivers like Sil3112 sata/sataraid to the WinXP disk. Then run the next step on nlite, pulling out all the crap from the XPCD folder.

This seemed to work fine for me.

I figured out the "disk read error" issue:

With XP on fresh formated drives, you need to go into the bios and RE-DISCOVER the drive. Then install XP. otherwise on the first reboot there is some really funky NTFS conundrum that occurs. I tracked this down on the error, and lots of people re-installing XP on new upgrade drives, etc have this happen. Later after clearing CMOS or some other thing it suddenly works. Well, its because the bios reports disk info in correctly and snarfles the WinXP setup on the first reboot....something to do with boot sector switching from FAT32 to NTFS...all in WinXP's hands..the user is never aware of this activity.

Just thought I'd pass this along....it was using the VMware trial that sent me down this path.... the VM's all worked perfect, but the real HDisk screwed up.

Nice Proggy raptor!!!

Nice app...but I dont know howto burn this cd.

Which app? :s I have Nero and Pinacle...

And what options do I use...last time, Nero burned, and explorer said the disc had nothing on, but space had been taken up. It wouldn't boot either.

Any help for burning and hwat options and a howto?

Nice app...but I dont know howto burn this cd.

Which app? :s I have Nero and Pinacle...

And what options do I use...last time, Nero burned, and explorer said the disc had nothing on, but space had been taken up. It wouldn't boot either.

Any help for burning and hwat options and a howto?

open Nero and cancel out of the window that opens. Select recorder and burn image. Select the image that AutoStreamer made and click burn.

I have tried to research a fix for the Runtime error, but I haven't found anything yet. I get the following error when clicking on next from the initial screen. This is with the current download available from the link posted earlier. 1.0.29

AutoStreamer.jpg

The I looked at the threads talking about the DAO pieces, but they didn't help.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-...ntime+error+429

Anyone have any ideas what is causing this error?

My friend used this app to create his iso and his image fits to a cd. The one I created from nLite is 800MB and the one I created the old fashioned way was 900MB. Just a weee bit to large for a cdr.

Thanks!

Hmmm.... spoke too soon.

Seems Slip'd SP2 disks have potential issues when you go to actually USE them on a new or upgraded system.

I did a test.....fingers tired.

WinXP Home retail, WinXP pro OEM, WinXP pro Corp gold's to start with....all install perfectly.

Made a SP1 and SP2 version of each of the 3 OS's....did it 3 ways;

A) by-hand (folders/copy/update commandline)

B) Autostreamer

C) nLite

SP1 and SP2 versions all install perfectly under VMware....so we make CD's.

Thats right... 18 CD's, $.10ea so why not, I wanted to test this out, since I had trouble.

Gold's and slip'd SP1's all install correctly without incident...using a 80G/8 Seagate IDE as a mule. I've used this as my IDE backup with Win2Kpro installed for years....to cover/setup/maintain/resue my sata raid0 array.

Well, then comes SP2....all fail. That's right all 9 iterations of SP2 fail in the same manner.....

Setup installs correctly, copy's files, etc but when it reboots to actually then BOOT off the new SP2 based hard drive it generates "disk read error".

Now if I use any slip'd SP1, then use the 266MB SP2 Admin servicepack.... no problems, works like a charm.

Tested on a different system, got the error once, but cleared it up with a visit to the bios and a "re-discover" of the hard disk by the bios. But on the main system...DFI Infinity, 6/19 bios, it was a no go regardless of anything I could do. All the usual suspects were covered....this is NOT a hardware problem, as SP1 is flawless, as is SP2 as a servicepack, on the same hardware.

Something about SP2 as an actual completed CD is not interacting with the bios correctly, in getting the info about the disk to the OS.

Ill move to SATA and try using sata instead of IDE as the disk channel and see if SP2 does better.

It's something that looks like a BIOS-vs-SP2 issue, and so some systems will have issues and some wont. The PoS Intel fake PC that VMware pretends to be has no issue :D And my NF7-S system has only a slight issue but it was able to get over it.

Since noone is selling SP2 WinXP's yet, and only the few/brave do the whole slipstream thing, its not a big deal yet. But I predict it may be a real issue down the road. WHAT did they change that is causing this? Hmmm :angry:

Thought I give a heads up.... nice proggy Raptor!

Hi, I have a CD with czech version of Windows XP Corp. I tried to open CD and ADD SP1 update, which I have downloaded. When I try to open CD, I obtain following message:

Error.jpg

Then the AutoStreamer is closed and in its directory there is generated a new "temp.bat" file, which contains:

@echo off

expand "F:\I386\NTOSKRNL.EX_" -F:ntoskrnl.exe "D:\INSTALACE\WINDOWS XP UPDATE\JIN?\AutoStreamer\AutoStreamer 1.0.29\NTOSKRNL.EXE"

I know there is probably problem with supporting my language version, but is it possible to do something with that? :rolleyes:: I would like this utility very much :)) . If there is problem with that "NTOSKRNL.EX_" file on my CD, I can send it by email to creator of AutoStreamer. Thanks for reply and help here or on my email: [email protected] :yes:: :yes::

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google's next-gen Tensor AI chips might be produced by Samsung, report says by Hamid Ganji Image via Google Google’s Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) is produced in collaboration with companies such as Broadcom and TSMC, but a recent report suggests that the search giant is in talks with Samsung to hand over part of the production to the Korean tech company. According to a report by The Information, citing people familiar with the matter, Google has begun talks with Samsung about using its chip manufacturing capacity for the next generation of Tensor AI chips. Google’s upcoming TPUs are reportedly codenamed “Icefish” and will be produced using Samsung's 2-nanometer process technology. Meanwhile, Samsung is expected to produce only a portion of the next-generation Tensor chips, with most of the production remaining at TSMC. The Information says the new Tensor chips are currently in the design stage and are scheduled to enter mass production in 2028. TSMC is generally considered one of the most reliable chip manufacturing partners and is trusted by tech giants such as Apple and Google. However, the growing demand for TSMC’s AI chips, combined with the company’s focus on meeting demand from AI data centers, has reportedly prompted Google to seek additional manufacturing partners for its next-generation TPUs. Besides Samsung and TSMC, Intel could also be assigned part of the production. The Information reported this week is that Google has begun talks with Intel to produce up to three million TPUs in 2028. However, this is not the first time Google has partnered with Samsung on chip production, as Samsung has previously manufactured Tensor chips for Pixel smartphones. Google’s Tensor Processing Unit is used in cloud data centers and competes with NVIDIA’s chips, which currently dominate the market. By relying on in-house chips, Google can not only reduce its dependence on third-party providers but also create new revenue opportunities. The company has already supplied its TPUs to the AI firm Anthropic.
    • Reminder that the Premium and Ultimate plans already come with a 100 hour per month limit, which you then have to pay more to increase in 15 hour blocks.
    • It does invite Linux because MS should have been improving their products all along these years instead chose to ignore the users now this year they’re making all of these improvements to their products where as Linux doesn’t have this kind of problems in fact it has gotten so good I can even play Windows games in Steam that I no longer ever needed Windows to carry on with my life, unlike you still use Windows and chose to try beat down down those who don't use Windows because they love their LG TV. (Surprisingly I actually own a 55” LED LG TV and it has been going strong for almost 14 years, longer than any Sony TV”)
    • As much as I love owning my own hardware, it's hard to argue with the value. I'm not a huge gamer, I'd actually be interested in a cheaper plan with limited monthly hours, or even a pay-by-the-hour plan.
    • Well, they (LibreOffice/The Document Foundation) are bitchy and whiny, yes, but they're right, at least this time. It doesn't make sense to market something as "free and open source to thwart dependency on foreign companies' software" but at the same time, using the formats of said companies (Microsoft) by default. That way, you are changing nothing, essentially, you're just using another UI. We all know that users just use the defaults and almost never change them. I'm not saying they should drop other formats altogether, but they shouldn't default to the thing they're trying to run away from in the first place. If you're gonna do something, just go all the way in, don't stop in the middle, IMO. Otherwise, shut up and move along.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      487
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      196
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!