Cullpepper the best QB ?


Recommended Posts

well i read that a few starters on defense, either did not play the whole game or just did not play at all. so i can not say that is the reason for the texans to rally from behind. but also it is a new defensive system the vikings have, and i HOPE and i really HOPE they need time to gell. or it is going to be shoot out every game, which i dont like to happen!

you have to remember the pats have the best coach and defense in the league, its not like brady is doing it himself

584717083[/snapback]

Are you kidding me? both Manning and Cullpepper have the same tds and the same ints, the only difference is that culpepper have a better completion average, better rating and slighly more yards

He's not even close to the best.

Nowhere. Close.

He may have the stats, but they won't last for long. Plus watching him play, he's not as good as some of the others in the league. Stats aren't everything. He's a good QB, but not the best -- especially if you're talking about best in terms of talent.

I'd have to say that Daunte's stock is up and rising. Brady threw for 76 yards last week with a pick bringing his total to 4 interceptions and 9 TDs compared to Daunte's 1 pick and 13 touchdowns.

Brady is just one of the many reaons the Pats won the Super Bowl and have been on this streak. Don't give the guy too much credit.

Edit: Whatever do you mean L3thal? :D

Interesting note:

Daunte is on pace to throw for 5364 yards, 52 TDs and only 4 INT's.

584725978[/snapback]

Yeah, but he won't keep it up. It's like saying a baseball player is on pace to hit 100-something home runs after the first few games of the season with homeruns -- it won't happen.

Interesting note:

Daunte is on pace to throw for 5364 yards, 52 TDs and only 4 INT's.

584725978[/snapback]

Sorry, but the projections don't mean anything. The real numbers do. Any QB could get injured at any moment.

Let's go with the stats as they stand...

Daunte Culpepper's Stats

Peyton Manning's Stats

I still feel Peyton is the stronger player.

I would have to say that Culpepper, Manning, Favre are the best passing QBs, but the "complete package QB" would have to be McNabb with his ability to run, throw, and the fact that he is extremely tough to sack/tackle. He may not be the most accurate passer in the world like Culpepper or Manning, but he is a headache for defenses because they always have to leave one man to spy on him and make sure he does not run for big yards. Plus he has better endzone dances then all the QBs in the league.

I would have to say that Culpepper, Manning, Favre are the best passing QBs, but the "complete package QB" would have to be McNabb with his ability to run, throw, and the fact that he is extremely tough to sack/tackle.  He may not be the most accurate passer in the world like Culpepper or Manning, but he is a headache for defenses because they always have to leave one man to spy on him and make sure he does not run for big yards.  Plus he has better endzone dances then all the QBs in the league.

584733667[/snapback]

Can't beat the moonwalk.

I'd pick Manning any day over DC, DC's got a stretch put together this year.  But he's all over the place from year to year..

Brett needs to consider going away....

584734480[/snapback]

Favre scares me the most out of any QB in the NFL. I like watching Green Bay games because when it seems like Green Bay is really down and out, Favre seems to rally the entire team together on like one deep bomb pass. And when Favre has a good game, he has a VERY good game. I still cannot get over the Monday night football game of last year and I do not think I ever will. I really would like to see his career end with a Super Bowl win so that he can go out on top.

Manning's a much better QB. He's a better game manager and has a better vision of the field. He knows the game very well and can throw it to anyone, anywhere. I have no real bias cause I live in Canada (although I'm a football nut) but I feel that Manning (and Tom Brady for that matter) is a much better QB. Culpepper can be on and off... I dunno, he's skilled, but not as skilled as the other two QB's that I just stated.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
    • It's funny when thieves accuse other thieves of stealing. Ai companies just blatantly siphoned all the knowledge of the internet without consent and are now selling it with their service... so excuse me if I find this a bit ironic.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!