578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

Firefox - because with the number of extensions out there it is incredibly customisable with as many or as few features as you want.

For example the gmail notifier and the sage rss reader from www.extensionsmirror.nl

584793309[/snapback]

:blink: What, you mean opera cant get RSS news without ANY extensions? - heh, Talking about standard installations here, Opera is less in filesize (yeah sure its been compressed..whatever..). Opera includes Mail And IRC (Useless..yadayada, still smaller then firefox, and thats just a browser). You need to download extensions to make firefox be able to do what opera can do without any extensions.

Opera is faster then firefox, and IE, for me.

Erm, yeah you have to pay to remove the ads, but even if you dont, the ads only tiny.

'Opera --> 7.54

Firefox --> 1.0 Preview Release'

Erm, ok then, if Opera is so many builds ahead, why compare them?.

I love Opera for most of my browsing.. I have an "open in Firefox" button in Opera for the few sites that dont load with opera.. mostly Gmail ( which is gonna work with the next release of opera ) and a few others...

I like both... but once opera works with 95% of webpages I will stick with it all the time...

just my 2c :)

I love Opera for most of my browsing.. I have an "open in Firefox" button in Opera for the few sites that dont load with opera.. mostly Gmail ( which is gonna work with the next release of opera ) and a few other...

I like both... but once opera works with 90% of webpages I will stick with it all the time...

just my 2c :)

584793655[/snapback]

7.6 Preview, works with Gmail already :) (you can get it from the Forums.)

7.6 Preview, works with Gmail already :) (you can get it from the Forums.)

584793659[/snapback]

cool was wondering about that!

thanks

here is a few new things that are coming out with Opera7.6

Works with Gmail, loads even faster!!!

Latest Changes:

One of the first things you will notice when you start Opera is the ability to select whether to use Opera as an Internet suite or as a browser only

This release comes with a set of voice libraries that enable the user to control Opera by speaking commands to it

Opera 7.60 features in-line error pages, allowing you to continue to work if a page loading in the background gives an HTTP error

Created Medium-Screen Rendering (MSR), available by selecting "Fit to width" from the "View" menu

Edited by Gulfisland
'Opera --> 7.54

Firefox --> 1.0 Preview Release'

Erm, ok then, if Opera is so many builds ahead, why compare them?.

584793633[/snapback]

Because Firefox can do everything that Opera does, and Firefox isn't really even at 1.0 yet.

Face it, Firefox has the ability to customize that Opera can't even come close to. Since when were Extensions a bad thing? Makes it a lot easier for a beginning user to get around if he/she can navigate just the browser, then worry about adding whatever features they want. Makes a lot more sense than packing the thing with features that most people don't even use. Also, Opera's rendering engine doesn't come close to Firefox's. You'll find Firefox is able to display more sites correctly than Opera.

Because Firefox can do everything that Opera does, and Firefox isn't really even at 1.0 yet.

Face it, Firefox has the ability to customize that Opera can't even come close to. Since when were Extensions a bad thing? Makes it a lot easier for a beginning user to get around if he/she can navigate just the browser, then worry about adding whatever features they want. Makes a lot more sense than packing the thing with features that most people don't even use. Also, Opera's rendering engine doesn't come close to Firefox's. You'll find Firefox is able to display more sites correctly than Opera.

584793677[/snapback]

Since when did i say extensions were a bad thing?.

Makes a lot more sense than packing the thing with features that most people don't even use.

Most people dont use Email? Ok, Irc, i can understand. Erm, may i ask, how long has mozilla been in development, you think there COMPLETLEY different rendering engines? Sure...

Maybe it dose display pages better, but not any pages that i visit, unless there completley IE Only.

I've been using Opera mostly, but tried Firefox a few times (different versions), and each time I've been switching back to Opera pretty fast.

Sure Firefox displays some pages better but there's no problem with the sites i visit most.

For me Opera is faster than Firefox plus imo it really SUX that you have to download plugins for tabbed browsing and mouse gestures, those really should be included in the installer.

The mail client in Opera is pretty neat, the IRC client I honestly don't know why it's there, rather useless (well you don't need to use it ;p).

For the sites Opera can't handle I use IE.

And for those comparing the version numbers.. geeeeez, how long haven't they been developing Mozilla?

Because Firefox can do everything that Opera does, and Firefox isn't really even at 1.0 yet.

Does FF have speech-enabled browsing?

Does FF work with the very popular Gmail?

What you gotta understand is that Opera isn't only a web browser. It's a web browser and a e-mail client a IRC client etc. etc. (Features)

Face it, Firefox has the ability to customize that Opera can't even come close to.

What do you base that on? You can customize your Opera to almost anything you want..

Since when were Extensions a bad thing? Makes it a lot easier for a beginning user to get around if he/she can navigate just the browser, then worry about adding whatever features they want. Makes a lot more sense than packing the thing with features that most people don't even use.

How about packing everything in one, and you can use the features you want!? :o

You think Opera got the "Best Browser of 2004" because Firefox is better? Doesn't make any sense to me :rolleyes:

To the threadstarter, my advice is to test them both for about two weeks each.. test all your regular websites.. and surf around a lot. Choose the one that deserves it.

I'm sure you'll make the "right" choice ;)

Does FF have speech-enabled browsing?

Nice example of opera bloat. That's why a lot of people don't like it, nobody needs speech-enabled anything, other than in extreme cases.

But hey, I'm sure it's a nice novelty for, oh, at least 15 minutes!

Does FF work with the very popular Gmail?

Has done since I got gmail, can't be sure if it worked before then.

What you gotta understand is that Opera isn't only a web browser. It's a web browser and a e-mail client a IRC client etc. etc.

It's never going to be as good as three programs specialising though. Ever heard the saying, jack of all trades, master of none?

What do you base that on? You can customize your Opera to almost anything you want..

Open source. 'Nuff said.

How about packing everything in one, and you can use the features you want!? :o

How about having a basic browser that most people use, and let the minority download the extra stuff? I have zero extensions, it's still great.

You think Opera got the "Best Browser of 2004" because Firefox is better? Doesn't make any sense to me  :rolleyes:

Some random site says it's the best, it must be the best. In addition to "the best browser", they also said what was the best in about 400 different catagories. To be honest I can't imagine they went into great depth.

:p

I have both of them on my comp, i primarily use Firefox tho.

I'm not saying Opera is bad, its rendering speed is impressive. it's the UI i don't really like, Firefox's UI is cleaner.

You can't really say Opera's UI is cluttered or "not clean" when you can pretty much customize it how you want.. that is remove practically everything

Opera. Why? I guess it's just personal preference. I've used it for the past couple of years and have grown accustomed to it. It renders pretty fast, has tabs (firefox has as well) and has the middle clicky thingy (I'me sure FF has this too). It's standard's support is very good, much better than IE. The only problem I have with it is the load time. It take a couple of seconds to load, a tad bit slower than FF.

Another thing I like is it's customizability. Maybe it's not as good as FF, but I've got it the way I want. I've got 5 buttons on my bar, 3 of them are useless (back, fwd, new) which I can remove, but don't feel like it.

Oh, and I've used FF before and think it's a very good browser. It's open source, free, pretty quick, free, and did I mention open source? It's cross platform (as is opera). It's standards compliant (except for CSS2, but no browser is compliant, not even amaya). It's customizable and support extensions. There are lots of reasons to use FF. In then end, I guess it comes down to whatever floats your boat.

P.S. I've also use konqueror (KHTML) and it's pretty good as well. Not as good as FF and Opera.

firefox. why? because you can add wahtever you like. do i reallyneed a piece of bloatware taht can read email, do irc, take notes, etc etc? no i have mirc and outlook for that. ( which function better than their opera counterparts) i find its very fast although opera DOES have some nice featres

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!