578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

I use Firefox, but was an Opera user. The only reason I switched was because of the simplicity of Firefox over Opera.

If you don't really know what you want in a browser, but just something that's faster than IE, I'd suggest Opera, simply because it has EVERYTHING.

Firefox is mainly for users who know what they want in a browser, hence the reason for extensions.

Since when did i say extensions were a bad thing?.

I guess I took your sentence about Opera having everything that Firefox needs with extensions too literally, but that surely implies that you don't approve of extensions and rather have the features built into the browser, which is definitely just bloat for many users.

Most people dont use Email?

Most people don't use their web browser for e-mail. We've got Outlook and Thunderbird for that, buddy.

@Elliot, I guess you didn't get my point. Everyone's saying "Firefox can do everything Opera can". I was merely stating some features that Firefox doesn't have. And the build competition thing everyone is jabbing about.

@jagedEdge, oh just the fact that it's not ONLY a web browser.

@jagedEdge, oh just the fact that it's not ONLY a web browser.

584797974[/snapback]

Oh, I guess that's why it does a pretty poor job at being a web browser and only comes slightly above Internet Explorer in compatibility with standards then. Thank you for reinforcing my point that a web browser should be a web browser, and that if you want more features it should be up to the user to add them via extensions or plugins.

Edited by jagedEdge
Oh, I guess that's why it does a pretty poor job at being a web browser and only comes slightly above Internet Explorer in compatibility with standards then. Thank you for reinforcing my point that a web browser should be a web browser, and that if you want more features it should be up to the user to add them via extensions or plugins.

584798478[/snapback]

Or it would be a lot easier to have the features bundled with the browser, and have an option to enable/disable them. I cant see how this would be called 'bloatware' When opera is still smaller then firefox.

Or it would be a lot easier to have the features bundled with the browser, and have an option to enable/disable them. I cant see how this would be called 'bloatware' When opera is still smaller then firefox.

584798577[/snapback]

Bloat isn't how big the file is. It's how much crap that's packed into the software. Firefox just happens to have higher quality images and and less compressed stuff, so it's larger. Doesn't mean Opera has less bloat. Mac OS X is regarded by many to have less bloat than Windows, yet OS X is much larger than Windows in file size.

Oh, I guess that's why it does a pretty poor job at being a web browser and only comes slightly above Internet Explorer in compatibility with standards then. Thank you for reinforcing my point that a web browser should be a web browser, and that if you want more features it should be up to the user to add them via extensions or plugins.

584798478[/snapback]

Wow you must have used Opera a long time to make all these statements! Maybe you used it on version 6?

I agree, if you want more features it's up to the user, that's why Opera has a great support for Plugins. (Y)

I have both installed, but mainly use firefox. I like them both, I've managed to customize opera to get it to look pretty much the way I want it. The one thing opera is missing is the feature that turns all plain text links into clickable links, like the "linkification" extension. I use a messageboard (godlike productions) where you run into these type of links all the time, plain text links, and it's nice to be able to click on them.

On the other hand, I love how fast opera renders, especially when one presses the back button, it doesn't attempt to check for new content it just instantly loads what you were previously looking at. Perhaps I'll give it another hard look after the next preview release comes out.

I like Firefox more cuz Opera feels like bloatware to me. It takes long to load, the ad in the top corner is annoying, and last i tried it, it was a memory hog..

Plus I dont like how dense the program feels. Then again I havent tried it recently so I dont know about recent changes, if any.

Why should you have to choose 1 over the other? I use both of them, both great browsers, load up about the same time, opera renders pages/images slightly faster, and i love the built in IRC client. FIrefox has some killer plugins, id like to see plugin "bundles" with most commonly used plugins in the near future. IE simply cannot compare, those of you saying IE is faster, it takes relatively the same time to load, but renders pages much slower than its 2 competitors. When in doubt, use both, and see which one you like more.

Bloat isn't how big the file is. It's how much crap that's packed into the software. Firefox just happens to have higher quality images and and less compressed stuff, so it's larger. Doesn't mean Opera has less bloat. Mac OS X is regarded by many to have less bloat than Windows, yet OS X is much larger than Windows in file size.

584798629[/snapback]

How much crap does opera have bundled with it then?

Sure, irc wont come in handy for the average user, but it will come in handy for some.

Why is it so hard for people to learn a fact, that you can choose NOT to use the IRC and the built in mail features. Why is it so hard to do that and easier to call it a bloatware? when infact additionally it comes in even a smaller size. You people baffle me.

I have both of them installed on my computer, but I use Opera as my main browser. I like it better because it has all the features I want (tabs, mouse gestures, etc.) and they work perfectly. I found that downloading extensions for Firefox was just a hassle. It took a long time to find exactly what I want and there were incompatibilities between some of extensions. Also, Opera loads pages faster and uses less memory on my computer.

Anyway, I don't think there's a browser that is better than others. Some people in this thread should understand that different people have different needs. It's not because you like a browser better that it's the bestest and that everyone should use it.

You just have to try them both and use the one that fits your needs the best.

i used to be the opera guy but the 'clicking link resulting the loading page stoped ' bug is not good for me

584802397[/snapback]

For those on low bandwidth, this feature is great. 5K a second is a lot that can be wasted, and I find Opera the most bandwidth efficient (hence the fastest) browser that I have ever used.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!