578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

I use Firefox, but was an Opera user. The only reason I switched was because of the simplicity of Firefox over Opera.

If you don't really know what you want in a browser, but just something that's faster than IE, I'd suggest Opera, simply because it has EVERYTHING.

Firefox is mainly for users who know what they want in a browser, hence the reason for extensions.

Since when did i say extensions were a bad thing?.

I guess I took your sentence about Opera having everything that Firefox needs with extensions too literally, but that surely implies that you don't approve of extensions and rather have the features built into the browser, which is definitely just bloat for many users.

Most people dont use Email?

Most people don't use their web browser for e-mail. We've got Outlook and Thunderbird for that, buddy.

@Elliot, I guess you didn't get my point. Everyone's saying "Firefox can do everything Opera can". I was merely stating some features that Firefox doesn't have. And the build competition thing everyone is jabbing about.

@jagedEdge, oh just the fact that it's not ONLY a web browser.

@jagedEdge, oh just the fact that it's not ONLY a web browser.

584797974[/snapback]

Oh, I guess that's why it does a pretty poor job at being a web browser and only comes slightly above Internet Explorer in compatibility with standards then. Thank you for reinforcing my point that a web browser should be a web browser, and that if you want more features it should be up to the user to add them via extensions or plugins.

Edited by jagedEdge
Oh, I guess that's why it does a pretty poor job at being a web browser and only comes slightly above Internet Explorer in compatibility with standards then. Thank you for reinforcing my point that a web browser should be a web browser, and that if you want more features it should be up to the user to add them via extensions or plugins.

584798478[/snapback]

Or it would be a lot easier to have the features bundled with the browser, and have an option to enable/disable them. I cant see how this would be called 'bloatware' When opera is still smaller then firefox.

Or it would be a lot easier to have the features bundled with the browser, and have an option to enable/disable them. I cant see how this would be called 'bloatware' When opera is still smaller then firefox.

584798577[/snapback]

Bloat isn't how big the file is. It's how much crap that's packed into the software. Firefox just happens to have higher quality images and and less compressed stuff, so it's larger. Doesn't mean Opera has less bloat. Mac OS X is regarded by many to have less bloat than Windows, yet OS X is much larger than Windows in file size.

Oh, I guess that's why it does a pretty poor job at being a web browser and only comes slightly above Internet Explorer in compatibility with standards then. Thank you for reinforcing my point that a web browser should be a web browser, and that if you want more features it should be up to the user to add them via extensions or plugins.

584798478[/snapback]

Wow you must have used Opera a long time to make all these statements! Maybe you used it on version 6?

I agree, if you want more features it's up to the user, that's why Opera has a great support for Plugins. (Y)

I have both installed, but mainly use firefox. I like them both, I've managed to customize opera to get it to look pretty much the way I want it. The one thing opera is missing is the feature that turns all plain text links into clickable links, like the "linkification" extension. I use a messageboard (godlike productions) where you run into these type of links all the time, plain text links, and it's nice to be able to click on them.

On the other hand, I love how fast opera renders, especially when one presses the back button, it doesn't attempt to check for new content it just instantly loads what you were previously looking at. Perhaps I'll give it another hard look after the next preview release comes out.

I like Firefox more cuz Opera feels like bloatware to me. It takes long to load, the ad in the top corner is annoying, and last i tried it, it was a memory hog..

Plus I dont like how dense the program feels. Then again I havent tried it recently so I dont know about recent changes, if any.

Why should you have to choose 1 over the other? I use both of them, both great browsers, load up about the same time, opera renders pages/images slightly faster, and i love the built in IRC client. FIrefox has some killer plugins, id like to see plugin "bundles" with most commonly used plugins in the near future. IE simply cannot compare, those of you saying IE is faster, it takes relatively the same time to load, but renders pages much slower than its 2 competitors. When in doubt, use both, and see which one you like more.

Bloat isn't how big the file is. It's how much crap that's packed into the software. Firefox just happens to have higher quality images and and less compressed stuff, so it's larger. Doesn't mean Opera has less bloat. Mac OS X is regarded by many to have less bloat than Windows, yet OS X is much larger than Windows in file size.

584798629[/snapback]

How much crap does opera have bundled with it then?

Sure, irc wont come in handy for the average user, but it will come in handy for some.

Why is it so hard for people to learn a fact, that you can choose NOT to use the IRC and the built in mail features. Why is it so hard to do that and easier to call it a bloatware? when infact additionally it comes in even a smaller size. You people baffle me.

I have both of them installed on my computer, but I use Opera as my main browser. I like it better because it has all the features I want (tabs, mouse gestures, etc.) and they work perfectly. I found that downloading extensions for Firefox was just a hassle. It took a long time to find exactly what I want and there were incompatibilities between some of extensions. Also, Opera loads pages faster and uses less memory on my computer.

Anyway, I don't think there's a browser that is better than others. Some people in this thread should understand that different people have different needs. It's not because you like a browser better that it's the bestest and that everyone should use it.

You just have to try them both and use the one that fits your needs the best.

i used to be the opera guy but the 'clicking link resulting the loading page stoped ' bug is not good for me

584802397[/snapback]

For those on low bandwidth, this feature is great. 5K a second is a lot that can be wasted, and I find Opera the most bandwidth efficient (hence the fastest) browser that I have ever used.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
    • The first improvement they need to make to audio in W11 is to add an equalizer that actually works.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!