578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

i prefer firefox. not only does opera make me want to SCREAM CAUSE ITS SOOOOOO BAD, i cant understand why people use it. I used it for 5 minutes, it was slow and cr..p so i went back to firefox

584902575[/snapback]

Wow, how the hell is it slow? It loads in literally half the time that FF loads for me, and its faster at rendering webpages.

i like all browsers but i have this issue with ff ...

On my WindowsXP home + athlon 1800 + 256Mb box... I open firefox (with atleast 3-4 tabs open)and minimize it for a long time , try to click it... to max... it just freezes for huge time compared to IE... opera has no freeze time...

all FF lovers, dont u hate this bug.. also,FF has mem leak issue, which i thought will be solved in final release but it hasnt.

:D I've used Opera on Windows since v5.10, i's gonna take a revolution in the browser-wars for me to switch to Firefox. It's one piece of software I gladly paid for :p

Opera r0x0rz your s0x0rz :p

However, Firefox is good too, just not too my tastes!

Some random site says it's the best, it must be the best. In addition to "the best browser", they also said what was the best in about 400 different catagories. To be honest I can't imagine they went into great depth.

584794012[/snapback]

I didnt' realize PC World was some random site.

I just removed Opera and installed Firefox. I still can't get rid of IE--that makes me mad!

Why?

Why NOT IE (not that people need a reason anymore)

1. I use XP and with all the updates, IE blocks my test websites EVERYTIME I am trying to test in Dreamweaver. It makes no sense, but it blocks sites from my computer and not from the internet. I couldn't figure out how to turn that one off.

2. Won't do tabs.

3. There isn't a search bar on the top.

4. I don't like their linking/bookmarks settings on the browser window.

5. No wands/password memory

Why NOT Opera

1. It has a huge ad banner that only goes away when you purchase it.

2. It doesn't block things.

3. I like the sleeker icons.

4. It won't do auto complete like IE.

5. Can't check gmail from google.

6. 7.5 won't check hotmail

7. Starts slow on my machine.

Why Firefox,

1. Free

2. Does do autocomplete

3. Easy to do the password protection

4. Checks all my emails.

Why NOT Firefox,

1. Starte slow on my machine.

I added them up and Firefox won. And I work with a rabid Mac lover so I generally just do the opposite of whatever he does. Firefox just does the most of what I want out of a browser. That is why I switched.

I just removed Opera and installed Firefox.  I still can't get rid of IE--that makes me mad!

Why?

Why NOT IE (not that people need a reason anymore)

1.  I use XP and with all the updates, IE blocks my test websites EVERYTIME I am trying to test in Dreamweaver.  It makes no sense, but it blocks sites from my computer and not from the internet. I couldn't figure out how to turn that one off.

2.  Won't do tabs.

3.  There isn't a search bar on the top.

4.  I don't like their linking/bookmarks settings on the browser window.

5. No wands/password memory

Why NOT Opera

1.  It has a huge ad banner that only goes away when you purchase it.

2.  It doesn't block things.

3.  I like the sleeker icons.

4.  It won't do auto complete like IE.

5.  Can't check gmail from google.

6.  7.5 won't check hotmail

7.  Starts slow on my machine.

Why Firefox,

1.  Free

2.  Does do autocomplete

3.  Easy to do the password protection

4.  Checks all my emails.

Why NOT Firefox,

1.  Starte slow on my machine.

I added them up and Firefox won.  And I work with a rabid Mac lover so I generally just do the opposite of whatever he does.  Firefox just does the most of what I want out of a browser.  That is why I switched.

584904313[/snapback]

1.) All software is "free", were talkin about the quality of the product

2.) Does do autocomplete

3.) Are you a nub? It is easy

4.) Opera checks email, DUH

5.) Your comp must suck, Firefox takes me 1-2 seconds, opera instantly

6.) Opera uses LESS memory, far more stable, faster

7.) Hotmail client access is blocked now.., the website loads just fine

You should really learn how to use ur comp b4 doin reviews

Btw..it does check gmail, another DUH, maybe you forgot to actually try the browser before talkin

Why NOT Opera

1.? It has a huge ad banner that only goes away when you purchase it.

2.? It doesn't block things.

3.? I like the sleeker icons.

4.? It won't do auto complete like IE.

5.? Can't check gmail from google.

6.? 7.5 won't check hotmail

7.? Starts slow on my machine.

Why Firefox,

1.? Free

2.? Does do autocomplete

3.? Easy to do the password protection

4.? Checks all my emails.

584904313[/snapback]

1. Opera is quality! Opera doesnt pride itself as "The Fastest Browser on Earth" just for nothing...

2. doesn't block things? can moremore vague? if your talking about adblocker... works fine for me, I havent seen one popup in ages.

3. better icons is a reason to hate a browser? just get another skin... sheesh...

4. eh.. i dont know what auto-complete is... (i must not use it, so it doesnt matter to me)

5. Opera does check Gmail with 7.6 beta. (when identified as Opera)

6. Opera 7.5 wont check hotmail? what? im using 7.6 now... but before i used 7.5 fine and was checking hotmail all the time... where did you pull that from?

7. Takes maybe 5 seconds... alot shorter than firefox on my system (10-15 seconds)

Firefox is a good browser, its alot more equal with Opera as you may think, but i still think Opera is faster than Firefox, and I never liked how Firefox performed, it just seems slow to me, moreso than IE even. and it annoys the crap out of me when people say they dont like Opera because of a tiny ad banner and they didnt even take 5 minutes to see how the program actually performs.

I will tell ya the funny thing about this. What is the big freaking deal about the diffrent types of browsers? You people get all worked about a damned computer browser to look at websites. Give me a break... step into reality my friends... But that may be besides the point of this thread... One if not 100% better than the other . IE has its good points and so does Firefox.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!