578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

Opera has that extra touch of professionalism that can only come when a group of programmers know they are getting paid for their work. They HAVE to do a good job, or lose their job you see.

In my opinion, the idea of fixing a problem should not have to be digging through INI files or registry hacks. In Opera, anything I really need to do is as simple as the F12 button.

im a firefox user ONLY because of the fact it renders a bit better than opera

but opera itself is much better

It has EVERYTHING you need in one package..there arent even extensions for all of opera's features yet

Saying opera sux is really quite retarded, saying IE sux is retarded

id give up fighting over this cause a fanboy will always be a fanboy, one day theyll realize theres more to life than what browser people use

im a firefox user ONLY because of the fact it renders a bit better than opera

but opera itself is much better

It has EVERYTHING you need in one package..there arent even extensions for all of opera's features yet

Saying opera sux is really quite retarded, saying IE sux is retarded

id give up fighting over this cause a fanboy will always be a fanboy, one day theyll realize theres more to life than what browser people use

584910722[/snapback]

hahaha, so true... damn fanboys...

i regard firefox and opera as quite equal actually, but IE is quite inferior to the two.

My points, from the view of a FX builder:

1) Firefox is open source and that's nice for thingsl ike the print patch which I include and the optimizations I get to apply.

2) Firefox renders pages a bit better than Opera

3) Opera is far more polished. It does exactly what you expect it to. Don't give me the extension bull****. It's an excuse for a feature that hasn't been included.

4) The opera devs just have a lot more common sense and a more open ear to their community than the FX devs do.

hahaha, so true... damn fanboys...

i regard firefox and opera as quite equal actually, but IE is quite inferior to the two.

584914151[/snapback]

hard to say

being #1, IE might just be the bigger target

i mean their finding FX vulnerabilities now here and there

the upside is FX and opera fix those right away, IE could take months

4) The opera devs just have a lot more common sense and a more open ear to their community than the FX devs do.

584914218[/snapback]

That is one thing that is true for Opera.. i'll give them that: If enough people show the desire to have a feature in the Opera community, it appears in the next release!

[Opera user since v5.10]

My points, from the view of a FX builder:

1) Firefox is open source and that's nice for thingsl ike the print patch which I include and the optimizations I get to apply.

...

3) Opera is far more polished. It does exactly what you expect it to. Don't give me the extension bull****. It's an excuse for a feature that hasn't been included.

584914218[/snapback]

Being open source, I can imagine Firefox is a dream come true if you're a programmer and find yourself dedicated enough towards it.

But personally, I do prefer to more polished look. Perhaps its Microsoft that have spoiled me, but I prefer my software to have that polished "Complete" look. The appearance of a markettable product.

I highly approve of Opera. I have tried to see if Firefox was right for me, but it simply didn't feel right, and I feel right at home with Opera. Like almost everyone else has said, just try both of the browsers and go from your own preference. It's completely your call.

I hope you make the right decision ;) (opera 7.6 preview 3)

I highly approve of Opera.  I have tried to see if Firefox was right for me, but it simply didn't feel right, and I feel right at home with Opera.  Like almost everyone else has said, just try both of the browsers and go from your own preference.  It's completely your call.

I hope you make the right decision ;) (opera 7.6 preview 3)

584952987[/snapback]

THat?s right;))

My points, from the view of a FX builder:

1) Firefox is open source and that's nice for thingsl ike the print patch which I include and the optimizations I get to apply.

2) Firefox renders pages a bit better than Opera

3) Opera is far more polished. It does exactly what you expect it to. Don't give me the extension bull****. It's an excuse for a feature that hasn't been included.

4) The opera devs just have a lot more common sense and a more open ear to their community than the FX devs do.

584914218[/snapback]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't this a design decission? The full Mozilla suite had become huge - "Oh.. feature. Include it, and a config pane". It got to the point that it was SO huge that they said "Let's make a stripped-down version, but offer extendability!" So it's not about polish, it's about not ****ing off the Open Source community, while making the browser more attractive.

Just out of curiousity, what do you mean by common sense?

Goals:

1) Standards compliant

2) Useable

That's common sense IMO.

Opera.

Opera is the most bloated software ever.  It's like they are trying to grab the coat tails of open source genre of users.  It's finicky at best and laggy, and buggy.  I used it for years and even was a tester for it at one point.  I love firefox.  GO FOX GO

584904462[/snapback]

No, that would be AOL for most bloated software ever. Opera is smaller than FireFox... how can you call it bloated? It has been very stable for me and no more bugs than FireFox or IE. FireFox is nice, Opera is great.

What Opera is trying to do is to take over the mobile browser market. Their web browser is small enough to fit on cell phones and PDAs. It also has technology to format web pages for the small screen. FireFox does not do this.

Edited by KayMan2K
No, that would be AOL for most bloated software ever.  Opera is smaller than FireFox... how can you call it bloated?  It has been very stable for me and no more bugs than FireFox or IE.  FireFox is nice, Opera is great.

584974734[/snapback]

Perhaps he's talking about the features? I know that's what puts me off it. Too much stuff I don't want and not enough of what I do.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • They aren't going to want to. Most would just go with the 17 Pro and save money. Why would they want to spend $300 for basically the same thing? It's not worth it if there are hardly any changes from year to year.
    • 24H2 rolled out to the Release Preview Channel in early June 2024, so this coming a bit later in the Experimental Channel (formerly Dev) doesn't really say much more than earlier H2 releases that came out in October. I am not sure what the thinking is here by putting it in Experimental, one would think that the 26H2 stamp means features are locked down and it's now bug tested until October? I don't even pretend to understand Microsoft's strategy for Windows Insider Program though
    • Nothing Ear (a) and CMF Buds Pro 2 with active noise cancellation drop to lowest price ever by Fiza Ali With Prime Day 2026 scheduled to run from Tuesday 23 to Friday 26 June, Amazon has already begun rolling out early access offers ahead of the main event. Particularly, Nothing Ear (a) and CMF Buds Pro 2 wireless earbuds have dropped to their lowest price ever with limited Prime deal offering 33% and 24% discounts, respectively. Nothing Ear (a) are equipped with 11mm dynamic drivers featuring a PM1 + TPU diaphragm. For noise control, the earbuds offer active noise cancellation (ANC) of up to 45dB across frequencies reaching 5,000Hz. The smart ANC algorithm adapts to surrounding noise levels, while a Transparency Mode allows users to remain aware of their environment when needed. Connectivity is handled via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for AAC, SBC, and LDAC audio codecs. Additional features include IP54-rated earbuds for dust and splash resistance, paired with an IPX2-rated charging case. Furthermore, users also benefit from pinch controls, in-ear detection, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, dual-device connectivity, and a low-latency mode designed for gaming and video playback. The Nothing X app unlocks a range of customisation options, including a personalised equaliser, bass enhancement, control remapping, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, dual-device management, a Find My Earbuds feature, and low-latency mode settings. When it comes to the battery, the earbuds house a 46mAh lithium-ion battery, while the charging case contains a 500mAh cell. With ANC disabled, users can expect up to 9.5 hours of playback from the earbuds and up to 42.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, battery life is rated at up to 5.5 hours per charge and up to 24.5 hours combined with the case. Finally, fast charging is also supported that should provide up to 10 hours of playback from a 10-minute charge with ANC turned off. Nothing Ear (a) Wireless Earbuds (Black): $53.20 (Amazon US) - 33% The CMF Buds Pro 2 feature a dual-driver audio system consisting of an 11mm bass driver and a 6mm micro-planar tweeter. The earbuds use PU (polyurethane) and PET (polyethylene terephthalate) titanium-coated diaphragms and are tuned by Nothing to deliver balanced audio performance. They further support active noise cancellation of up to 50dB across a frequency range of up to 5,000Hz, and noise control features include a Smart ANC algorithm, Adaptive ANC, Transparency Mode, and Clear Voice Technology 2.0. For calls, the CMF Buds Pro 2 use a total of six microphones and feature an environmental noise-cancelling algorithm, Clear Voice Technology 3.0, and Wind Noise Reduction 3.0 that should improve voice clarity during conversations. Furthermore, when it comes to the connectivity, it is provided through Bluetooth 5.4. Additional features include an IP55 rating for dust and water resistance, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, in-ear detection, a low-latency mode, and a Find My Earbuds function. Moreover, through the Nothing X app for Android and iOS, users can access custom EQ settings, a bass enhancement algorithm, customisable controls, Find My Earbuds, low-latency mode, dual-device connectivity, an ear tip fit test, and firmware updates. The earbuds contain a 60mAh rechargeable lithium-ion battery, while the charging case houses a 460mAh battery. A full charge of the earbuds and case via USB-C should take approximately 85 minutes, while the earbuds alone should be fully recharged in the case in around 60 minutes. Battery life is rated at up to 11 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 43 hours with the charging case when ANC is turned off. With ANC enabled, playback time is reduced to up to 6.5 hours on the earbuds and up to 26 hours with the charging case. Talk time is rated at up to 6 hours on the earbuds and 25 hours with the case with ANC disabled, or up to 4.8 hours and 18.6 hours, respectively, with ANC enabled. CMF Buds Pro 2 Wireless Earbuds (Dark Grey): $37.05 (Amazon US) - 24% Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • The entire world moved to the vastly superior and now universally supported Dolby Atmos technology a very long time ago, mate.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      544
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      187
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!