578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

Opera has that extra touch of professionalism that can only come when a group of programmers know they are getting paid for their work. They HAVE to do a good job, or lose their job you see.

In my opinion, the idea of fixing a problem should not have to be digging through INI files or registry hacks. In Opera, anything I really need to do is as simple as the F12 button.

im a firefox user ONLY because of the fact it renders a bit better than opera

but opera itself is much better

It has EVERYTHING you need in one package..there arent even extensions for all of opera's features yet

Saying opera sux is really quite retarded, saying IE sux is retarded

id give up fighting over this cause a fanboy will always be a fanboy, one day theyll realize theres more to life than what browser people use

im a firefox user ONLY because of the fact it renders a bit better than opera

but opera itself is much better

It has EVERYTHING you need in one package..there arent even extensions for all of opera's features yet

Saying opera sux is really quite retarded, saying IE sux is retarded

id give up fighting over this cause a fanboy will always be a fanboy, one day theyll realize theres more to life than what browser people use

584910722[/snapback]

hahaha, so true... damn fanboys...

i regard firefox and opera as quite equal actually, but IE is quite inferior to the two.

My points, from the view of a FX builder:

1) Firefox is open source and that's nice for thingsl ike the print patch which I include and the optimizations I get to apply.

2) Firefox renders pages a bit better than Opera

3) Opera is far more polished. It does exactly what you expect it to. Don't give me the extension bull****. It's an excuse for a feature that hasn't been included.

4) The opera devs just have a lot more common sense and a more open ear to their community than the FX devs do.

hahaha, so true... damn fanboys...

i regard firefox and opera as quite equal actually, but IE is quite inferior to the two.

584914151[/snapback]

hard to say

being #1, IE might just be the bigger target

i mean their finding FX vulnerabilities now here and there

the upside is FX and opera fix those right away, IE could take months

4) The opera devs just have a lot more common sense and a more open ear to their community than the FX devs do.

584914218[/snapback]

That is one thing that is true for Opera.. i'll give them that: If enough people show the desire to have a feature in the Opera community, it appears in the next release!

[Opera user since v5.10]

My points, from the view of a FX builder:

1) Firefox is open source and that's nice for thingsl ike the print patch which I include and the optimizations I get to apply.

...

3) Opera is far more polished. It does exactly what you expect it to. Don't give me the extension bull****. It's an excuse for a feature that hasn't been included.

584914218[/snapback]

Being open source, I can imagine Firefox is a dream come true if you're a programmer and find yourself dedicated enough towards it.

But personally, I do prefer to more polished look. Perhaps its Microsoft that have spoiled me, but I prefer my software to have that polished "Complete" look. The appearance of a markettable product.

I highly approve of Opera. I have tried to see if Firefox was right for me, but it simply didn't feel right, and I feel right at home with Opera. Like almost everyone else has said, just try both of the browsers and go from your own preference. It's completely your call.

I hope you make the right decision ;) (opera 7.6 preview 3)

I highly approve of Opera.  I have tried to see if Firefox was right for me, but it simply didn't feel right, and I feel right at home with Opera.  Like almost everyone else has said, just try both of the browsers and go from your own preference.  It's completely your call.

I hope you make the right decision ;) (opera 7.6 preview 3)

584952987[/snapback]

THat?s right;))

My points, from the view of a FX builder:

1) Firefox is open source and that's nice for thingsl ike the print patch which I include and the optimizations I get to apply.

2) Firefox renders pages a bit better than Opera

3) Opera is far more polished. It does exactly what you expect it to. Don't give me the extension bull****. It's an excuse for a feature that hasn't been included.

4) The opera devs just have a lot more common sense and a more open ear to their community than the FX devs do.

584914218[/snapback]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't this a design decission? The full Mozilla suite had become huge - "Oh.. feature. Include it, and a config pane". It got to the point that it was SO huge that they said "Let's make a stripped-down version, but offer extendability!" So it's not about polish, it's about not ****ing off the Open Source community, while making the browser more attractive.

Just out of curiousity, what do you mean by common sense?

Goals:

1) Standards compliant

2) Useable

That's common sense IMO.

Opera.

Opera is the most bloated software ever.  It's like they are trying to grab the coat tails of open source genre of users.  It's finicky at best and laggy, and buggy.  I used it for years and even was a tester for it at one point.  I love firefox.  GO FOX GO

584904462[/snapback]

No, that would be AOL for most bloated software ever. Opera is smaller than FireFox... how can you call it bloated? It has been very stable for me and no more bugs than FireFox or IE. FireFox is nice, Opera is great.

What Opera is trying to do is to take over the mobile browser market. Their web browser is small enough to fit on cell phones and PDAs. It also has technology to format web pages for the small screen. FireFox does not do this.

Edited by KayMan2K
No, that would be AOL for most bloated software ever.  Opera is smaller than FireFox... how can you call it bloated?  It has been very stable for me and no more bugs than FireFox or IE.  FireFox is nice, Opera is great.

584974734[/snapback]

Perhaps he's talking about the features? I know that's what puts me off it. Too much stuff I don't want and not enough of what I do.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
    • The first improvement they need to make to audio in W11 is to add an equalizer that actually works.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!