578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

Your're implying that the entire web is non-standards complient, only writen for IE6, therefore the Operas default useragent is fine. Maybe Opera should take leaf from firefox, and have a better quirks mode.

you don't know what you are talking about. quirks mode has got nothing to do with the useragent string. and yes, the entire web is non-standard, just about. pick a random site and run it through the html validator.

So how is Opera different to Firefox/Mozilla/Safari rendering non-standards compliant pages?

not very different, actually. the biggest problem is with scripts specifically detecting opera and then sending non-working code. if they just treated opera like any other browser, those pages would work just fine.

Your answer doesnt address the issue, other browsers will render non-complient/badly writen webpages with their native user agents without too many issues. Opera has to lie to view webpages, seems strange.

how difficult is it to get through to you? just about ALL browsers fake the useragent string.

MSIE IDENTIFIES AS MOZILLA

SAFARI IDENTIFIES AS MOZILLA (iirc)

FIREFOX IDENTIFIES AS MOZILLA/NETSCAPE

how bloody hard is it to actually READ before posting? the stuff you posted was answered by worbd, so why do you keep repeating the same crap over and over again?

I tried Opera the other day... and it sucked.

Very slow and 2 times the memory usage of Firefox.

thank you for proving our point about mindless firefox fanboy drones who spread fud and lies about opera, but don't really know what they are talking about.

Opera offers a huge collection of features that is bundled with the Opera download, which the user base seems to enjoy. Firefox comes in a simple clean package and the user base enjoys customizing their browser with ONLY the additional features they want. Some people think Opera is a victim of feature bloat and prefer Firefox.

'feature bloat', and still smaller, faster and more efficient than firefox.

THE IRONY!

Some people dont' like the task of customizing their browser so they prefer Opera.

opera is easier to customize than firefox for most people.

This is what will allow Firefox to run away with the small time browser race on a global level. The average user has not had to pay for a browser for many many years and they will not want to in the future.

you don't have to pay for opera either. you can download it and use it for free.

as for 'the average user', why wouldn't he pay if he wants to? am i suddenly a freak for having paid for something? you firefox zealots sure love to insult people.

If you choose Opera, good for you. I'm happy for you. You will be in the minority but your browser is still good.

at least opera users have made a conscious choice based on the quality of the program, and not just had it forced down their throats.

Whoa, whoa. Calm down. I fully admitted earlier that both browsers are excellent. I stated a fact that Firefox will run away with the small-time browser race. We all know this. This is not a slam on Opera. The reasoning for this was the average consumer will choose firefox over opera anyday simply because of no banners nor needing to pay to remove that banner. What you really need to understand is that the people from Neowin is not a fair representation of the average computer user. You all come here because you are computer savvy and like to talk anything computer related. However, you represent a spec of the overall population of computer users. You know EXACTLY what you want your browser to do. The average user just wants a browser. They see a banner and simply decide to try something different. THAT is what makes the average user choose Firefox. Remember, I'm not talking about the neowin people, I'm talking about the far majority of basic internet users that you do not take into consideration. They don't weigh in performance results, they don't study CSS standards and the support from that browser nor do they care.

That damn banner will prevent Opera from going big time. Firefox is steam rolling right now. Their marketing efforts are gearing towards the average internet user, and they are simply doing a damn good job at it. That is the only point I am making. They are both quality programs. You have no right to accuse me of forcing firefox down your throat because I've done no such thing, and you know it. You also have no right to say Firefox is not a quality program, just like I have no rights to bash Opera. I just don't like the banner. You have simply decided Opera is better for you. So calm down, take a deep breath. It will be ok. :)

i cant say im a super genius when it comes to internet browsing technologies. But i use Opera. Tried Firefox once when it was still in its infancy and i dont remember it being as versatile as opera, but that was a long time ago. One thing that really annoys me however is that for quite a few homepages i still have to use IE! :( i dont think we can ever get away from ie, for doing such simple things as google mail, a lot of other web mail places, places that use imbeded flash and finally internet banking- I cant do these things in opera, and although its not hard to open IE every now and then to do it, its annoying. Im gunna try firefox again- i find that opera really slows down after a ton of use, and im the guy who never closes opera, opens a new tab everytime i want to visit another webpage.

However, I disagree with Operas default user-agent is IE, infact Mozilla, Firefox, Konq, Lynx, Safari, Netscape have done well on there own user agents. Why is Opera any different?

IE identifies as itself and mozilla. Mozilla identifies as itself but allows people to create their own UA strings. Firefox does the same and even identifies small parts as Netscape. I don't know what Lynx identifies as, but it's irrelevant because webmasters really have no reason to target Lynx. Netscape, if I recall correctly, used to identify as Internet Explorer and is currently identifying as Mozilla. I imagine that Konquerer identifies itself as Mozilla (it uses a rendering engine similar to Gecko so it would likely want to receive code for that engine), just a guess though. Opera identifies as itself and Internet Explorer at the same time. All browsers have had their individual "reasons" to be blocked. The little guys are always put at a disadvantage when it comes to ignorance, and that includes Opera.

iconboy, the important thing is that you are not using Internet Explorer as your primary browser. :) If you do try Firefox, try using the "Open in IE" extension. Makes it really easy to right click in a page and select that to auto open IE to that same page. I end up using it a few times a month. Who knows.. opera may already have this.

All browsers have had their individual "reasons" to be blocked. The little guys are always put at a disadvantage when it comes to ignorance, and that includes Opera.

I always email every site the does not work with Opera or Firefox and point out that they are both more standard complaint and that IE has a shrinking market share. Usually, I get back something saying that the issue will be addressed. I have seen two sites begin to support both browers within a month of my emails.

One thing that really annoys me however is that for quite a few homepages i still have to use IE! :( i dont think we can ever get away from ie, for doing such simple things as google mail, a lot of other web mail places, places that use imbeded flash and finally internet banking- I cant do these things in opera

opera 8 works with gmail.

flash works fine in opera.

internet banking works fine too, but some banks are known to block opera.

if you are having problems, go to the opera forum and list the sites.

thank you for proving our point about mindless firefox fanboy drones who spread fud and lies about opera, but don't really know what they are talking about.

Wow... just perfect example of fanboys who never used Opera.

:rolleyes:

Uhm... let me put it this way: Screw you, Opera fanboys. I'm not a Firefox fanboy, since I use Internet Explorer, Konqueror, Firefox and Galeon daily, If you want to bash somebody, you better do it with somebody else. Your arrogance is quite irritating.

I used Opera, Firefox and Internet Explorer with National [Portuguese] and International contents. And even tried the ****ing FTP functions (not with Firefox).

My test machine? See my signature.

My connection? 640 Kbps [d] / 128 Kbps.

Plain simple: was slower in both national and international contents.

In a Opera/Firefox dispute, Firefox won.

I don't even want to talk about IE.

Thanks for your productive comments about a "fanboysism" that doesn't exist, you have been reported.

at least opera users have made a conscious choice based on the quality of the program, and not just had it forced down their throats.

585362196[/snapback]

"forced down their throats." ??? WTF?? so you're saying that Mozilla had some how controlled us into clicking that "download firefox now!" link??

It's funny that you say that Firefox fanboys spread lies (in your sig) but it is very apparent to me that the person who is spreading lies in here is you.

Uhm... let me put it this way: Screw you, Opera fanboys. I'm not a Firefox fanboy, since I use Internet Explorer, Konqueror, Firefox and Galeon daily, If you want to bash somebody, you better do it with somebody else. Your arrogance is quite irritating.

I used Opera, Firefox and Internet Explorer with National [Portuguese] and International contents. And even tried the ****ing FTP functions (not with Firefox).

My test machine? See my signature.

My connection? 640 Kbps [d] / 128 Kbps.

Plain simple: was slower in both national and international contents.

In a Opera/Firefox dispute, Firefox won.

I don't even want to talk about IE.

Thanks for your productive comments about a "fanboysism" that doesn't exist, you have been reported.

585363850[/snapback]

Hmm... I use IE too, I just found it ridiculous that you said Opera's memory usage is twice as much as Firefox.

In fact, Opera uses LESS memory than Firefox, and that's one of points people in this thread have been trying to make, to convince FX users that Opera is not bloated.

Sorry if you're offended by the word 'fanboy', but your invalid statement just makes it looks like you never tried Opera before.

Hmm... I use IE too, I just found it ridiculous that you said Opera's memory usage is twice as much as Firefox.

In fact, Opera uses LESS memory than Firefox, and that's one of points people in this thread have been trying to make, to convince FX users that Opera is not bloated.

Sorry if you're offended by the word 'fanboy', but your invalid statement just makes it looks like you never tried Opera before.

Invalid?

My statement is quite valid. Opera uses more memory than Firefox in my computer.

Do you want me to install Opera again and take screenshots of the memory usage?

Please, don't make me lose my patience. Questioning my ability to read numbers and my temporal perception is just not good.

Invalid?

My statement is quite valid. Opera uses more memory than Firefox in my computer.

Do you want me to install Opera again and take screenshots of the memory usage?

Please, don't make me lose my patience. Questioning my ability to read numbers and my temporal perception is just not good.

585364082[/snapback]

Try changing how much memory opera can use for cache in preferences.

Honestly, I'm shocked that Firefox would run faster on your machine, as old as it is, than Opera. Opera has always been known and is known for running very well on older machines. A little tinkering and I'm sure you'll find Opera to be fine.

For the love of God, can you people not act like normal human beings for more than 5 minutes? Talk about thism aturely or shut up, simple as that. I'm tired of getting non stop report after report because someone posted something that someone else doesn't agree with. Get over it. Different people have different needs. Each browser meets a different user's needs. Who cares which browser the next person uses?

^ agreed

^^double agreed.

This thread is just going round and round in the same circles over and over, and getting more and more aggressive as time goes on.

I think every aspect of both browsers has been discussed in large detail several times over and over, there really isn't anything left for this thread but the non-stop flaming.

I've used Opera since 2002 and I've seldom visited pages that doesn't render properly. I use Opera as identifier. Wonder how wrong the browser statistics is about IE's marked share because of Opera identify as IE by default.

585360931[/snapback]

When Opera is set to identify as IE it still has Opera in the user-agent string:

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; en) Opera 7.60

And as Opera:

Opera/7.60 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en)

FF 1.0:

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041109 Firefox/1.0
Plain simple: was slower in both national and international contents.

In a Opera/Firefox dispute, Firefox won.

If Opera is "much slower", then something is wrong. We've already established the fact that some sites discriminate against Opera and send content uncompressed, while Firefox gets the content gzip compressed. But that shouldn't be too noticeable to most people.

Thanks for your productive comments about a "fanboysism" that doesn't exist, you have been reported.

I am sure they will look kindly at your comments too. Things like "X sucks" really make for a calm and sensible debate.

"forced down their throats." ??? WTF?? so you're saying that Mozilla had some how controlled us into clicking that "download firefox now!" link??

This has been explained. I believe it refers to the way Firefox fans constantly make derogatory remarks about other browsers, spread FUD and lies and so on, just to get people to use Firefox instead of whatever they are comfortable with.

I've found Firefox fans to be quite bad in a few forums I frequent. They always go on about Firefox, even when it's absolutely not appropriate, such as threads discussing Opera. Why do they feel the need to ruin people's threads by interrupting people and telling them what idiots they are for not running Firefox?

That's what people mean by "forced down their throats".

It's funny that you say that Firefox fanboys spread lies (in your sig) but it is very apparent to me that the person who is spreading lies in here is you.

If you had taken the time to read the thread, we've already explained that these things are a reaction to the constant attack by Firefox users against Opera users. It seems that a lot of Opera users are simply fed up, and not getting anywhere with arguing rationally, they instead behave the same way as many Firefox fanboys. An unfortunate development, but I guess people can only take FUD, lies and attacks for so long.

I'm tired of getting non stop report after report because someone posted something that someone else doesn't agree with. Get over it. Different people have different needs. Each browser meets a different user's needs. Who cares which browser the next person uses?

This is very true, but I think a lot of Opera users are getting fed up with the misinformation and FUD spread about Opera by certain Firefox fans.

When Opera is set to identify as IE it still has Opera in the user-agent string

Nevertheless, some/most of the major stats packages apparently fail to recognize Opera. This has been discussed in the Opera forums, and people actually tested this. The results were everything but encouraging.

Ok i dont know if i should even bother saying this, as it appears fanboys cant be convinced (and yea call me a fanboy cuz of my sig if u want i really dont care)

Heres how i see the situation. Both are Excellent browsers. Both offer different choices for customization etc. They both kick IE's ass. Some say one is faster than the other, but these days those differences are probably so small that the majority of users wont even notice. Essencially, the two browsers are equal.

Now the only downside to Opera is the Banner Ad. You can all scream and rant that its just a banner, but to me it makes opera feels like trial software. It doesnt feel right. And if you want to complain that nobody really cares about a banner, look at all the fuss about Exeem and the Ads it has (yes more people complain about the banner than about the adware included :wacko: ) Go look up how many patchers there are to take the banner of MSN Messenger. Most people hate banner Ads, and if you can stand them, thats great, but realize that this is the reason FireFox will rise to the top in the small browser race.

And also, to comment on those who say FireFox fanboys attack everything, ive had just as much trouble with opera fanboys attacking FF IE and everything else. Fanboys are Fanboys, no matter who they represent.

However, I disagree with Operas default user-agent is IE, infact Mozilla, Firefox, Konq, Lynx, Safari, Netscape have done well on there own user agents. Why is Opera any different? I dont mind people changing there useragents, but the Default? No other browser I know uses another browsers useragent by default, Shows a lack of support in there own product.

585360789[/snapback]

I forgive you for missing this because this thread is like 900 pages long, but i explained that already. It's because stupid people use copy-and-paste browser detection scripts that either are out-dated or operate on the mistaken assumption that Opera 7 is as crappy of a browser as Opera 6 (and earlier) was.

Opera doesn't give the users the interface (Firefox has them way beat with making the default interface look familiar to former IE users), but at least they do their best with the user-agent string, i guess. :/

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!