578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

I do not lie about anything, especially not Web browsers. Will you guys get the hell over yourselves? We're talking about a little piece of software, this isn't Yalta. If someone says something inaccurate or misleading, it's not a POLITICAL SMEAR CAMPAIGN, it's just inaccurate or misleading. So if you guys could all stop throwing words like 'lie' around like there's this big conspiracy movement to topple your stupid browser, that would be incredibly rad.

Please don't lie to make your browser seem better.

585512016[/snapback]

Right. In-line find was introduced in Opera 6.0 beta 1, which was released in November of 2001. Click those shiny little underlined words and you'll see the change log and the press release.

'Type-Ahead Find' (as it was originally called by Mozilla) was introduced in Mozilla 1.2 alpha, released September of 2002.

Call me a liar again!

This goes the same for pretty much all of Mozilla's 'killer' features. Most of them were invented (or, at the very least, developed into their modern forms) by Opera. The one semi-exception is tabbed browsing -- Opera had supported MDI for ages, but Galeon was the first browser to really use tabs the way we know them. Opera borrowed them from Galeon (and, i think, perfected them)... and then Mozilla borrowed them, in turn, from Opera. Opera was also one of the first browsers to include a built-in pop-up blocker. I don't think it was the first, but, again, they were the ones who perfected it. Opera also invented the search tool bar, if i'm not mistaken. And mouse gestures.

This doesn't make Opera better than Mozilla (or Firefox), of course, and i don't think there's anything wrong with Mozilla having borrowed their ideas. Mozilla sucks enough on its own without even having to worry about arguing over who made what first. Firefox is loads better than Mozilla but i still prefer Opera. (There are a few things i really like about Firetruck, like how its mouse-gestures extension makes that rad line following your cursor.) But... that's how it is. I'm not biassed about it: Most of them WERE invented or perfected by Opera.

As far as 'Firetruck', that was something i came up with on my own (i don't know if other people came up with it independently, but i didn't join some trend or anything) after they thought it would be great to change the name a thousand times (well, maybe just two or three, but it's close to a thousand). It is not meant as some kind of retarded insult like saying 'M$' or 'Winblows'. I think Firetruck is a really cute nickname and if i used Firefox as my browser i would get the extension (Firesomething) that a Firefox user developed to let people do the very same thing that i'm doing: Poking a little fun at Firefox's name changes.

At least, that's my reason. If other people are doing it because they think it's insulting, whatever.

but every fkin thread on every fkin forum has some clown with "SPREAD TEH FIREFOX!!!11one" type piece of cack in it :D

u got mozilla.org but when fools do getfirefox.com spreadfirefox.com isleepwithfirefox and omfgilovet3hfirefox sites on the same thing, it gets waring. personally FF is a distant 3rd place browser for me.

It's clever. Nokia, Google and other megacorporations are using Mozilla to rally the people to battle against Microsoft. People think mozilla.org is a grass roots organization, and that all the user did this, without any money what so ever, but Mozilla is thriving because huge corporations are pumping money into it :)

The open-source fans who think that they are fighting the good fight, David vs. Goliath, aren't realizing that it's really Goliath vs. Goliath.

The one semi-exception is tabbed browsing -- Opera had supported MDI for ages, but Galeon was the first browser to really use tabs the way we know them. Opera borrowed them from Galeon

Actually, Opera had tabs before Galeon:

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?cid=11681555&sid=139557

NetCaptor introduced tabs to browsing, but Opera already had MDI of course.

(That fellow is going to try to use Lynx against my in-line-find arguement, isn't he? I guess if i have to make disclaimers for idiots who rely on literal string comparison instead of this crazy human thing called common sense, i can do that. I MEANT THEY INVENTED IT IN GRAPHICAL WEB BROWSERS.)

Actually, Opera had tabs before Galeon:

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?cid=11681555&sid=139557

NetCaptor introduced tabs to browsing, but Opera already had MDI of course.

585514656[/snapback]

I've learnt something new today then! Golly!

It's a small company, and it does not try to hide the fact that it relies on money to keep going.

585514659[/snapback]

Neither does Mozilla. They list on their Web site many of their partners, and they were ridiculously open about the fact that they were funded by AOL before that. Just because they don't list the details of every single partnership they have like Opera does doesn't necessarily mean they're 'hiding' anything.

I'm not saying that Mozilla is necessarily hiding things, although that page doesn't explain how they are funded, or that they receive massive support from huge corporations (other than IBM). And people still seem to have the impression that Mozilla is David fighting Goliath, which isn't quite true.

I've seen someone describing what's going on is Mozilla acting as a cover operation for aspiring monopolists (other than Microsoft), and although I'm not sure that is a fair description, one can get suspicious when "everyone" seems to think of Mozilla as this cute little organization that does all these good things with help from the grass roots, when it is clearly an organization which is relies heavily on money from megacorporations, and they aren't quite as open about everything they do.

But never mind, I'm sure the Mozilla fans won't get hurt by seeing this as participating in a "revolution" where the "little guy" fights the "big guy" (as opposed to everyone trying to take down Microsoft, including other huge corporeations ;))...

By the way, who said that Mozilla uses XSLT for the UI? I thought they were using XUL?!

I have a question. In Opera 8 beta, when posting on some message boards, I press add reply, and it goes and says "completed" but it doesnt refresh to show my post. Sometimes it does, most of the time it doesnt. So I have to refresh it manually, and my post is there. Any idea how to fix that?

I used to have this prob in Opera 7 but not in 8 beta any more. Try posting in Opera's forums.

I have a question. In Opera 8 beta, when posting on some message boards, I press add reply, and it goes and says "completed" but it doesnt refresh to show my post. Sometimes it does, most of the time it doesnt. So I have to refresh it manually, and my post is there. Any idea how to fix that?

585519098[/snapback]

I have a question. In Opera 8 beta, when posting on some message boards, I press add reply, and it goes and says "completed" but it doesnt refresh to show my post. Sometimes it does, most of the time it doesnt. So I have to refresh it manually, and my post is there. Any idea how to fix that?

585519098[/snapback]

ctrl+f12->history and cache->check documents->always

Is there any extension to save an MHT file (Web archive, single file) within Opera or FireFox? If so, provide the link please... i would really like to left IE forever :D

Opera is great. FireFox is great (and Open Source). IE is... well, let's just leave it that way. :laugh:

ctrl+f12->history and cache->check documents->always

585520514[/snapback]

That helps having the "recent posts" always updated, but it doesnt help the problem with the browser not refreshing the page after sending a post. I mean it doesnt even do anything other than send the data. It sends the data and then it sits there saying its completed sending of data (in the status bar). So it not a cache problem.

edit: I also want to point out that Blogger does not work at all in Opera.

Edited by Xtreme $niper

Alright so heres my final impressions on Firefox 1.0 vs Opera 8 Beta.

Firefox -

PROS:

Runs on Gecko engine

Built-in popup blocker

Ability to add hundreds of extensions

Ability to use themes

Add unlimited search engines on the drop down menu next to the address bar

Nice and compact download manager

A lot of features are already implemented into it, instead of having to mess around with config files.

Built-in RSS support

CONS:

Usage of RAM is very high often times, especially after long periods of use. (not a issue to me because I have 1gig of ram)

Overall appearance not too customizable without hunting down extensions.

Opera -

PROS:

Built-in popup blocker

Ability to use themes

Search engines are customizable* (see CONS)

Download manager that allows for resuming

Not too RAM heavy

Customizable toolbars

Double, triple clicking on words and sentances comes up with cool options

CONS:

Some sites do not load properly, and some not at all (Making a new post in Blogger is not possible)

Some sites take longer to load because gzip not enabled on some sites

*Each search engine takes up a large portion of the bar, making it look cluttered.

Download manager takes up whole tab (annoying for me personally)

Download manager gave me troubles, was not able to keep a solid connection often

Ad-supported if you do not pay

To customize some things, you need to edit config files (aka, not noob friendly)

Conclusion -

All in all, its up to you and what you are willing to give up to get. Personally, I have tried numerous times to give Opera the chance to stay on my computer, but frankly I just cant do it. Most of the sites I go to are giving Opera problems, I feel that Firefox loads up faster and loads pages faster, and I like having my Yahoo Toolbar. I also dont like how Opera doesnt change the mouse pointer to a text pointer when selecting text. And when I middle click, it doesnt make it look like I clicked it like it does in Firefox.

Also, in some message boards I was having troubles posting. It's just these little things that end up making me go right back to Firefox. I mean especially since Blogger is something I use a lot, I need to have a browser that can actually let me use Blogger. I feel like by using Opera I am putting an extra effort into actually liking the browser. I'm just far too spoiled by Firefox.

But thats just my opinion. Hopefully this helped some people who were sort of clueless on the subject. I am positive I missed a lot of PROS and CONS but I listed the important ones and the ones that actually came to mind.

Runs on Gecko engine
That's not a PRO. You'll have to get specific if you think Gecko is an advantage.
Add unlimited search engines on the drop down menu next to the address bar
You can do this with Opera as well.
Nice and compact download manager
Very arguable. Opera's is very compact, and it even resumes where FF does not.
Some sites take longer to load because gzip not enabled on some sites
That's pretty much Google, and is not Opera's fault or problem.
*Each search engine takes up a large portion of the bar, making it look cluttered.
No, actually it works pretty much the same as Opera. You CAN add multiple search fields however (Can't in FF)
Download manager takes up whole tab (annoying for me personally)
You can make it stay in a panel.
I want to buy Opera 8 beta but my freind gave me a Reg crack for it..
Are you asking to be reported?

1. I stated further down that opera does infact support resuming downloads, maybe if you read that you should have taken your comment off your post.

2. I dont care if its google's fault or operas, the fact of the matter is, the Opera browser has this problem and if neither party will fix it, then why should I be the one to suffer?

1. I stated further down that opera does infact support resuming downloads, maybe if you read that you should have taken your comment off your post.
You are right. My sincere apologies.
2. I dont care if its google's fault or operas, the fact of the matter is, the Opera browser has this problem and if neither party will fix it, then why should I be the one to suffer?

585523235[/snapback]

But there is a "fix" for Opera. Identify as IE or Mozilla on those pages and it works fine. I don't see how Opera can be expected to do anything more than that. It's not possible, save hard coding it to identify as IE or mozilla on certain google sites (can't on Gmail though, as it requires identifying as Opera for it to send the right code).
  • 1 month later...
Alright so heres my final impressions on Firefox 1.0 vs Opera 8 Beta.

...

Opera -

PROS:

Built-in popup blocker

Ability to use themes

Search engines are customizable* (see CONS)

Download manager that allows for resuming

Not too RAM heavy

Customizable toolbars

Double, triple clicking on words and sentances comes up with cool options

CONS:

Some sites do not load properly, and some not at all (Making a new post in Blogger is not possible)

Some sites take longer to load because gzip not enabled on some sites

*Each search engine takes up a large portion of the bar, making it look cluttered.

Download manager takes up whole tab (annoying for me personally)

Download manager gave me troubles, was not able to keep a solid connection often

Ad-supported if you do not pay

To customize some things, you need to edit config files (aka, not noob friendly)

...

585522861[/snapback]

Blogger input has worked for me since the first preview release of Opera 8. Weird that it doesn't work on you. Maybe you should try installing the final version, now that it is out.

As for the customization, yes, it is indeed kind of annoying there's no GUI to make things easier, but if you take a look at the Opera forums, it is not that hard. I've modded my search.ini in no time.

The other points are discussed in the attached image

post-53841-1114190139_thumb.jpg

I have not used Opera for myself yet so I have no rights to compare between the 2 current leading browser. My knowledge of browsers only brings me to the fact that Firefox is better that IE. But instead of straying off point and start discussing who invented what first, I believe the community can be more constructive by pinpointing what the exact advantages and disvantages of both are.

From what I have gathered after reading the last few pages of this thread, Opera is less of a resource hog than Firefox, is that true? If the statement has the backing of solid evidence and the difference is significant, I am more than willing to switch over to join the Opera brigade since my computer has only a 1.8GHz processor and 256M RAM. :pinch: So does anyone has an answer to my doubt?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!