578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

I do not lie about anything, especially not Web browsers. Will you guys get the hell over yourselves? We're talking about a little piece of software, this isn't Yalta. If someone says something inaccurate or misleading, it's not a POLITICAL SMEAR CAMPAIGN, it's just inaccurate or misleading. So if you guys could all stop throwing words like 'lie' around like there's this big conspiracy movement to topple your stupid browser, that would be incredibly rad.

Please don't lie to make your browser seem better.

585512016[/snapback]

Right. In-line find was introduced in Opera 6.0 beta 1, which was released in November of 2001. Click those shiny little underlined words and you'll see the change log and the press release.

'Type-Ahead Find' (as it was originally called by Mozilla) was introduced in Mozilla 1.2 alpha, released September of 2002.

Call me a liar again!

This goes the same for pretty much all of Mozilla's 'killer' features. Most of them were invented (or, at the very least, developed into their modern forms) by Opera. The one semi-exception is tabbed browsing -- Opera had supported MDI for ages, but Galeon was the first browser to really use tabs the way we know them. Opera borrowed them from Galeon (and, i think, perfected them)... and then Mozilla borrowed them, in turn, from Opera. Opera was also one of the first browsers to include a built-in pop-up blocker. I don't think it was the first, but, again, they were the ones who perfected it. Opera also invented the search tool bar, if i'm not mistaken. And mouse gestures.

This doesn't make Opera better than Mozilla (or Firefox), of course, and i don't think there's anything wrong with Mozilla having borrowed their ideas. Mozilla sucks enough on its own without even having to worry about arguing over who made what first. Firefox is loads better than Mozilla but i still prefer Opera. (There are a few things i really like about Firetruck, like how its mouse-gestures extension makes that rad line following your cursor.) But... that's how it is. I'm not biassed about it: Most of them WERE invented or perfected by Opera.

As far as 'Firetruck', that was something i came up with on my own (i don't know if other people came up with it independently, but i didn't join some trend or anything) after they thought it would be great to change the name a thousand times (well, maybe just two or three, but it's close to a thousand). It is not meant as some kind of retarded insult like saying 'M$' or 'Winblows'. I think Firetruck is a really cute nickname and if i used Firefox as my browser i would get the extension (Firesomething) that a Firefox user developed to let people do the very same thing that i'm doing: Poking a little fun at Firefox's name changes.

At least, that's my reason. If other people are doing it because they think it's insulting, whatever.

but every fkin thread on every fkin forum has some clown with "SPREAD TEH FIREFOX!!!11one" type piece of cack in it :D

u got mozilla.org but when fools do getfirefox.com spreadfirefox.com isleepwithfirefox and omfgilovet3hfirefox sites on the same thing, it gets waring. personally FF is a distant 3rd place browser for me.

It's clever. Nokia, Google and other megacorporations are using Mozilla to rally the people to battle against Microsoft. People think mozilla.org is a grass roots organization, and that all the user did this, without any money what so ever, but Mozilla is thriving because huge corporations are pumping money into it :)

The open-source fans who think that they are fighting the good fight, David vs. Goliath, aren't realizing that it's really Goliath vs. Goliath.

The one semi-exception is tabbed browsing -- Opera had supported MDI for ages, but Galeon was the first browser to really use tabs the way we know them. Opera borrowed them from Galeon

Actually, Opera had tabs before Galeon:

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?cid=11681555&sid=139557

NetCaptor introduced tabs to browsing, but Opera already had MDI of course.

(That fellow is going to try to use Lynx against my in-line-find arguement, isn't he? I guess if i have to make disclaimers for idiots who rely on literal string comparison instead of this crazy human thing called common sense, i can do that. I MEANT THEY INVENTED IT IN GRAPHICAL WEB BROWSERS.)

Actually, Opera had tabs before Galeon:

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?cid=11681555&sid=139557

NetCaptor introduced tabs to browsing, but Opera already had MDI of course.

585514656[/snapback]

I've learnt something new today then! Golly!

It's a small company, and it does not try to hide the fact that it relies on money to keep going.

585514659[/snapback]

Neither does Mozilla. They list on their Web site many of their partners, and they were ridiculously open about the fact that they were funded by AOL before that. Just because they don't list the details of every single partnership they have like Opera does doesn't necessarily mean they're 'hiding' anything.

I'm not saying that Mozilla is necessarily hiding things, although that page doesn't explain how they are funded, or that they receive massive support from huge corporations (other than IBM). And people still seem to have the impression that Mozilla is David fighting Goliath, which isn't quite true.

I've seen someone describing what's going on is Mozilla acting as a cover operation for aspiring monopolists (other than Microsoft), and although I'm not sure that is a fair description, one can get suspicious when "everyone" seems to think of Mozilla as this cute little organization that does all these good things with help from the grass roots, when it is clearly an organization which is relies heavily on money from megacorporations, and they aren't quite as open about everything they do.

But never mind, I'm sure the Mozilla fans won't get hurt by seeing this as participating in a "revolution" where the "little guy" fights the "big guy" (as opposed to everyone trying to take down Microsoft, including other huge corporeations ;))...

By the way, who said that Mozilla uses XSLT for the UI? I thought they were using XUL?!

I have a question. In Opera 8 beta, when posting on some message boards, I press add reply, and it goes and says "completed" but it doesnt refresh to show my post. Sometimes it does, most of the time it doesnt. So I have to refresh it manually, and my post is there. Any idea how to fix that?

I used to have this prob in Opera 7 but not in 8 beta any more. Try posting in Opera's forums.

I have a question. In Opera 8 beta, when posting on some message boards, I press add reply, and it goes and says "completed" but it doesnt refresh to show my post. Sometimes it does, most of the time it doesnt. So I have to refresh it manually, and my post is there. Any idea how to fix that?

585519098[/snapback]

I have a question. In Opera 8 beta, when posting on some message boards, I press add reply, and it goes and says "completed" but it doesnt refresh to show my post. Sometimes it does, most of the time it doesnt. So I have to refresh it manually, and my post is there. Any idea how to fix that?

585519098[/snapback]

ctrl+f12->history and cache->check documents->always

Is there any extension to save an MHT file (Web archive, single file) within Opera or FireFox? If so, provide the link please... i would really like to left IE forever :D

Opera is great. FireFox is great (and Open Source). IE is... well, let's just leave it that way. :laugh:

ctrl+f12->history and cache->check documents->always

585520514[/snapback]

That helps having the "recent posts" always updated, but it doesnt help the problem with the browser not refreshing the page after sending a post. I mean it doesnt even do anything other than send the data. It sends the data and then it sits there saying its completed sending of data (in the status bar). So it not a cache problem.

edit: I also want to point out that Blogger does not work at all in Opera.

Edited by Xtreme $niper

Alright so heres my final impressions on Firefox 1.0 vs Opera 8 Beta.

Firefox -

PROS:

Runs on Gecko engine

Built-in popup blocker

Ability to add hundreds of extensions

Ability to use themes

Add unlimited search engines on the drop down menu next to the address bar

Nice and compact download manager

A lot of features are already implemented into it, instead of having to mess around with config files.

Built-in RSS support

CONS:

Usage of RAM is very high often times, especially after long periods of use. (not a issue to me because I have 1gig of ram)

Overall appearance not too customizable without hunting down extensions.

Opera -

PROS:

Built-in popup blocker

Ability to use themes

Search engines are customizable* (see CONS)

Download manager that allows for resuming

Not too RAM heavy

Customizable toolbars

Double, triple clicking on words and sentances comes up with cool options

CONS:

Some sites do not load properly, and some not at all (Making a new post in Blogger is not possible)

Some sites take longer to load because gzip not enabled on some sites

*Each search engine takes up a large portion of the bar, making it look cluttered.

Download manager takes up whole tab (annoying for me personally)

Download manager gave me troubles, was not able to keep a solid connection often

Ad-supported if you do not pay

To customize some things, you need to edit config files (aka, not noob friendly)

Conclusion -

All in all, its up to you and what you are willing to give up to get. Personally, I have tried numerous times to give Opera the chance to stay on my computer, but frankly I just cant do it. Most of the sites I go to are giving Opera problems, I feel that Firefox loads up faster and loads pages faster, and I like having my Yahoo Toolbar. I also dont like how Opera doesnt change the mouse pointer to a text pointer when selecting text. And when I middle click, it doesnt make it look like I clicked it like it does in Firefox.

Also, in some message boards I was having troubles posting. It's just these little things that end up making me go right back to Firefox. I mean especially since Blogger is something I use a lot, I need to have a browser that can actually let me use Blogger. I feel like by using Opera I am putting an extra effort into actually liking the browser. I'm just far too spoiled by Firefox.

But thats just my opinion. Hopefully this helped some people who were sort of clueless on the subject. I am positive I missed a lot of PROS and CONS but I listed the important ones and the ones that actually came to mind.

Runs on Gecko engine
That's not a PRO. You'll have to get specific if you think Gecko is an advantage.
Add unlimited search engines on the drop down menu next to the address bar
You can do this with Opera as well.
Nice and compact download manager
Very arguable. Opera's is very compact, and it even resumes where FF does not.
Some sites take longer to load because gzip not enabled on some sites
That's pretty much Google, and is not Opera's fault or problem.
*Each search engine takes up a large portion of the bar, making it look cluttered.
No, actually it works pretty much the same as Opera. You CAN add multiple search fields however (Can't in FF)
Download manager takes up whole tab (annoying for me personally)
You can make it stay in a panel.
I want to buy Opera 8 beta but my freind gave me a Reg crack for it..
Are you asking to be reported?

1. I stated further down that opera does infact support resuming downloads, maybe if you read that you should have taken your comment off your post.

2. I dont care if its google's fault or operas, the fact of the matter is, the Opera browser has this problem and if neither party will fix it, then why should I be the one to suffer?

1. I stated further down that opera does infact support resuming downloads, maybe if you read that you should have taken your comment off your post.
You are right. My sincere apologies.
2. I dont care if its google's fault or operas, the fact of the matter is, the Opera browser has this problem and if neither party will fix it, then why should I be the one to suffer?

585523235[/snapback]

But there is a "fix" for Opera. Identify as IE or Mozilla on those pages and it works fine. I don't see how Opera can be expected to do anything more than that. It's not possible, save hard coding it to identify as IE or mozilla on certain google sites (can't on Gmail though, as it requires identifying as Opera for it to send the right code).
  • 1 month later...
Alright so heres my final impressions on Firefox 1.0 vs Opera 8 Beta.

...

Opera -

PROS:

Built-in popup blocker

Ability to use themes

Search engines are customizable* (see CONS)

Download manager that allows for resuming

Not too RAM heavy

Customizable toolbars

Double, triple clicking on words and sentances comes up with cool options

CONS:

Some sites do not load properly, and some not at all (Making a new post in Blogger is not possible)

Some sites take longer to load because gzip not enabled on some sites

*Each search engine takes up a large portion of the bar, making it look cluttered.

Download manager takes up whole tab (annoying for me personally)

Download manager gave me troubles, was not able to keep a solid connection often

Ad-supported if you do not pay

To customize some things, you need to edit config files (aka, not noob friendly)

...

585522861[/snapback]

Blogger input has worked for me since the first preview release of Opera 8. Weird that it doesn't work on you. Maybe you should try installing the final version, now that it is out.

As for the customization, yes, it is indeed kind of annoying there's no GUI to make things easier, but if you take a look at the Opera forums, it is not that hard. I've modded my search.ini in no time.

The other points are discussed in the attached image

post-53841-1114190139_thumb.jpg

I have not used Opera for myself yet so I have no rights to compare between the 2 current leading browser. My knowledge of browsers only brings me to the fact that Firefox is better that IE. But instead of straying off point and start discussing who invented what first, I believe the community can be more constructive by pinpointing what the exact advantages and disvantages of both are.

From what I have gathered after reading the last few pages of this thread, Opera is less of a resource hog than Firefox, is that true? If the statement has the backing of solid evidence and the difference is significant, I am more than willing to switch over to join the Opera brigade since my computer has only a 1.8GHz processor and 256M RAM. :pinch: So does anyone has an answer to my doubt?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!