578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

From what I have gathered after reading the last few pages of this thread, Opera is less of a resource hog than Firefox, is that true? If the statement has the backing of solid evidence and the difference is significant, I am more than willing to switch over to join the Opera brigade since my computer has only a 1.8GHz processor and 256M RAM. :pinch: So does anyone has an answer to my doubt?

585813550[/snapback]

Just as a reassurance, yes, opera runs definitely lighter than Firefox.

Im not a super technical person, but heres my experience... I am a long time opera lover and have only recently (2 months) started using Firefox. Ive gotta tell you Opera was GREAT, it loaded faster and did a hell of a lot more than IE ever could. It was also secure- so why did i switch? i could not access my banking, hotmail, msn email, google email, my rogers email and a ton of sites that had embedded flash didnt work properly. Hell a few sites with no flash didnt display properly- but you know what i got over this for a while because i told myself "Ive still got the fastest browser out there" -yeah true if i did all my stuff in opera, problem with some sites not working and others working is that you have to stop what your doing, open up IE and copy and paste the URL or goto the site with bookmarks to get what you need done. And all this because Opera is much faster than IE.

Firefox does everything Opera does, you can customize it- I find that with a ton of tabs open it reacts (opens, closes and switches between windows) faster than opera. What does Opera have over Firefox, it is slightly faster...

SLIGHTLY

so is that slight speed worth it? To me, no. I could have continued to stumble along with a combination of Opera and IE, but i switched to Firefox (which opens everything from my banking to various email accounts and pages that just looked weird in Opera) and i havent looked back.

Im not going to promote using cracks to make opera free, but im sure everyone here doesnt use 100% legit stuff on their computers, so the price isnt a huge excuse. (if u have ONE mp3 on your comp you dont have a legal CD copy of your guilty of this). I guess if your not willing to go 100% firefox yet (oh and you will., trust me you willl :))- why not do a combination of Opera / Firefox?

Im not anti Microsoft but until ver 7 comes out with some MASSIVE changes I would advise everyone to stay away from IE ;)

Blogger input has worked for me since the first preview release of Opera 8. Weird that it doesn't work on you. Maybe you should try installing the final version, now that it is out.

As for the customization, yes, it is indeed kind of annoying there's no GUI to make things easier, but if you take a look at the Opera forums, it is not that hard. I've modded my search.ini in no time.

The other points are discussed in the attached image

585813343[/snapback]

Why did you have to be a necrophile and go back TWO MONTHS to ressurect this thread :rolleyes:

I have finally tested out opera for myself after assurances that it takes up less resources. I gave it more than a few hours of run out, including time to customize it to my needs and preference.

Here's what I came up with

fen9ij.th.jpg

And to speak from a neutral angle, I think opera really rules when it comes to customizing, although I think the process would have been more enjoyable if i could actually shift the all-in-one search bar(bottom right, besides the glasses image) up to the top where I want it to be. I only succeeded in creating a search engine specifically for eg. google, but I never managed to duplicate the all-in-one seach bar. Maybe I am dumb and there's actually a way to do it, but the fact that I could not manoeuvr the buttons with ease demonstrates Opera's need to lower the difficulty of customizing one's browsing experience. I would also love to be able choose what which are engines I would like to have in my all-in-1 search engine. Not all is gloom though, I love Opera's optional ability to delete cookies and history each time I shut it down. I don't remember have such a feature in firefox, but oh well, my memory could be failing me. Still, I love this feature nonetheless.

There were claims that Opera loads pages much faster than Firefox. I was excited then, but now that I have used Opera for myself, I realized the statement does not stand true on all occasions. In fact, some pages loaded much slower than Firefox. That judgement of course, is based only on my naked eye, it could be wrong, but I can't help but feel Firefox could have performed much better for certain webpages. In terms of webpage compatibility, one is right to say that Firefox is definitely a winner in this area. Hell, Opera doesn't even load my online school account correctly. In fact, it always hanged in the process of accessing my own school account. But of course, Opera cannot take the entire blame for this, since its also webmaster's responsibility to ensure his/her webpage is compatible with all browsers.

I read somewhere that one of Opera's main advantages over Firefox is its focus on mails. So happily, I gave all my mail account details to Opera, hoping to able to read all of my mails in 1 centralized locations, but I was left disappointed. For, it never got beyond this:

fen15au.th.jpg

I don't know, maybe I am just a cursed noob who can never get anything done right, but still, maybe someone but help me out here.

Overall, my impression so far is that Firefox is still a better browser for its simplicity. I will still continue to use Opera though, so I can be more familiar with it and see if there will be any changes in my conclusion.

EDIT: I forgot to mentioned how much I loved the mouse gestures of Opera. I was able to hold down the click and move it down to open a new document. Fantastic feature.

Edited by howb21
I have finally tested out opera for myself after assurances that it takes up less resources. I gave it more than a few hours of run out, including time to customize it to my needs and preference.

I think the process would have been more enjoyable if i could actually shift the all-in-one search bar(bottom right, besides the glasses image) up to the top where I want it to be.

Yeah you probly should've just stuck with it a bit longer, you would've got that bar up there where it belongs.

The new and the unfamiliar seem strange.

I'm enjoying FF a lot more now, but can anyone tell me is there a way to save your open pages on shutdown like you can in Opera, and then re-open where you were before?

I'm enjoying FF a lot more now, but can anyone tell me is there a way to save your open pages on shutdown like you can in Opera, and then re-open where you were before?

You can use Session Saver extension or TBE extension for firefox. BUT... Opera save your opened pages(session) after shutdown MORE BETTER than any firefox extension. Because Opera saving settings for each(!) page individual: current position of page, image show setting in page, selected encoding, selected CSS mode, selected search engine, handheld mode, FULL(!) HISTORY of navigation for each page.... and many other settings (Y).

Also Opera after it shutdown save all pages in cache, so if you launch Opera again you get all pages quickly loaded from cache... You can browse visited pages in offline mode without internet connection (Y). If you want to reload(refresh) all pages from Web just switch to Online mode and press Ctrl+F5.

Session saving problems with FireFox:

- TBE extension for FF is really sucks because it bloated and it can slow down FireFox. (N)

- Session Saver is very primitive extension. Absolutely not usable. (N)

- FireFox kill cache every time when it shutdown. If you launch FF again, all you saved tabs will load again from Web not from cache, because it ignore cache. It's really sucks. (N)

Edited by STNG
I prefer Firefox and am shocked to find out that my family excluding my sister and dad prefer Explorer!!! :no:  :no:  :no:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :no:  :angry:  :no:  :angry:  :no:  :angry:  :no:

585850437[/snapback]

Maybe cause FF is slow? =P. FF is horrible when I have more than 3 or 4 tabs open, it drags. Opera on the other hand deals with multiple tabs pretty well. IE doesn't do "tabs", but opening multiple windows doesn't slow my computer down like multiple tabs in FF do. Plus, FF's memory leak is extremely annoying.

I prefer Firefox and am shocked to find out that my family excluding my sister and dad prefer Explorer!!! :no:  :no:  :no:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :no:  :angry:  :no:  :angry:  :no:  :angry:  :no:

585850437[/snapback]

Probably because IE suits their needs just fine..

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This is what I want. Hey Gemini, how do I remove you from all my google products permanently?
    • I would never install install this build before rtm process. only 3 months to go. never install on your daily devices. just wait 3 months.
    • Motrix Next 3.9.6 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.6 changelog: New Features Clipboard management — App-owned copy actions no longer trigger the Add Task auto-detect popup. aria2 input compatibility — Multi-line aria2-style task input is supported for URLs with per-task options such as out=. BitTorrent IPv6 DHT — Added IPv6 DHT support and related configuration. File category URL patterns — File category rules can match URL patterns with validation and localized hints. Task status tags — Added clearer waiting and sharing states for task cards. Download event bridge — Added an aria2 WebSocket event bridge for faster download notifications. Improvements Improved task list transitions and preserved task state during tab switches. Kept RPC origin access enabled for local integrations. Restored AppImage stripping in release builds after beta validation. Added localized preference guidance across supported languages. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!