Recommended Posts

Well, it's a complex statisical method. You've got to factor in trends, user demographics, and various other metrics into the equation. And this isn't just a simple binomial or gaussian distrobution, because of dealing with all these dimensions. Several regressions have to be performed to normalize the data set into something workable for a final true number.

585007297[/snapback]

Follow this logic. :wacko:

Riiiiight - looks a bit uneccesary to me :rolleyes:

585009895[/snapback]

yeah I don't think it 100% needed but it kind of neat

but if you keep it is there a way to put ratings in a email. So when you get a new topic notifcation you could see if it worth visiting

It encourages good posting habits and draws your attention to good content on the forums (and, conversely, away from bad content). Considering a small subset of users have bitched about how "downhill" the site is going, this is a way to counteract that by encouraging good posting habits.

Edit: It's also absolutely perfect for the reviews and visual styles forums. People can rate reviews and styles for content :)

I don't think this will make any difference as far as someone's posting habits are concerned. Why would a member care if a thread got a bad rating just because of his post? Are members really going to strive to get threads a good rating? I dont think so.

It encourages good posting habits and draws your attention to good content on the forums (and, conversely, away from bad content). Considering a small subset of users have bitched about how "downhill" the site is going, this is a way to counteract that by encouraging good posting habits.

Edit: It's also absolutely perfect for the reviews and visual styles forums. People can rate reviews and styles for content :)

585010363[/snapback]

Tim,

I think you should make a FORUM WIDE ANNOUCEMENT (IPB Announcement) that RATINGS EXIST. Just like the one you made when we were introduced to "Neowin 3.9".

I haven't seen 1 other thread with a viewable rating other than this one.

I lowered the threshold to 7 votes to counteract that. We've got 635 votes as of right now (about 15 hours after inception), so I think that's a good amount. I may lower it to 5 if we still haven't gotten a lot of rated topics by tommorrow. It's still a tweaking process, which is why I haven't made an annoucement yet.

I lowered the threshold to 7 votes to counteract that. We've got 635 votes as of right now (about 15 hours after inception), so I think that's a good amount. I may lower it to 5 if we still haven't gotten a lot of rated topics by tommorrow. It's still a tweaking process, which is why I haven't made an annoucement yet.

585010415[/snapback]

ok.. good news. I put a link in my sig.. that'll help get the word out ;)

Transfer Page issue again ;)

Find:

Thanks, Your vote has been added.
Topics need 10 votes before the total vote is shown publicly.

Change to

Thanks, Your vote has been added.
Topics need 7 votes before the total vote is shown publicly.

585006850[/snapback]

Keep abreast on that tim as you keep modifying the number required to see the rating.

I don't think this will make any difference as far as someone's posting habits are concerned. Why would a member care if a thread got a bad rating just because of his post? Are members really going to strive to get threads a good rating? I dont think so.

585010391[/snapback]

It may not change certain people's posting habits, but if a handful of people have read the thread and it's truly terrible, they can vote which will let others know not to bother.

That, and it will save people from having to scroll down through tons of posts like "This sux!" and " :x " and " (N) " for pages.

I hope people will get in the habit of rating every thread they read, be it good, bad or mediocre. :)

i dont like it :(

i think the yellow is kinda weak... i know its like a stop sign

red = 1-2? low

yellow = 3-4 middle..

green = 5 good?

but i dont like the yellow look :s sorry

and the mouse over on the rating is very nice... but you should use something other then thumbs?

I've just put in place the code for thread ratings. You can now rate topics to encourage good posting habits (or discourage bad ones). Any topic requires 10 votes before you can see it's rating, so that someone (or someones) can't take over the vote. You get one vote per thread, so make it count!

Let me know any bugs you find, but it should be secure against haX0ring and such ;)

585006745[/snapback]

Please think twice about your last line :unsure: If I find anything I'll contact you (same as last time :rofl: )

i dont like it :(

i think the yellow is kinda weak...  i know its like a stop sign

red = 1-2? low

yellow = 3-4 middle..

green = 5 good?

but i dont like the yellow look :s  sorry

and the mouse over on the rating is very nice...  but you should use something other then thumbs?

585011109[/snapback]

Don't worry, those images are only temporary. I'm still waiting on some updated graphics from the gfx team :D

Please think twice about your last line  :unsure: If I find anything I'll contact you (same as last time  :rofl: )

585011208[/snapback]

Trust me, you can't hack it. There are no SQL injection tricks or overflows you can do with it. Every input is intval()'d and checked for validity first....

Would it be possible to use a post-by-post rating, and then have the average of the rating of all the user's post under their name in a  thread?

585012577[/snapback]

yeah, like a member rating. an average rating of a user's posts. i've seen a feature similar to this on other board systems.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think every American should have a course in a 'dry sense of humour' at school; and perhaps 'using sarcasm in jest' oh, and also 'the use or irony in humour'.
    • What they really need to do is automatically spell "loses" and "lose" correctly since nobody seems to know how to anymore. Then they blame spellcheck/autocomplete and don't realize autocomplete is just filling in the word for them automatically so it was misspelled in the first place.
    • If someone chooses to continue using SB and therefore goes through the manual intervention in the thread, afterwards the BSOD problem is gone. Whether they then re-enable the task doesn't matter, they're done, though on such machines it might pay to keep it disabled in case the next update (if there is a next) causes the same problem. OTOH, if someone disables SB in the BIOS, the problem is also gone. Incidentally, I noticed that this task exists even on machines that don't support SB. It's just installed across the board...and runs. Doing what on such machines is a little hazy.
    • qBittorrent 5.2.2 by Razvan Serea The qBittorrent project aims to provide a Free Software alternative to µtorrent. qBittorrent is an advanced and multi-platform BitTorrent client with a nice user interface as well as a Web UI for remote control and an integrated search engine. qBittorrent aims to meet the needs of most users while using as little CPU and memory as possible. qBittorrent is a truly Open Source project, and as such, anyone can and should contribute to it. qBittorrent features: Polished µTorrent-like User Interface Well-integrated and extensible Search Engine Simultaneous search in most famous BitTorrent search sites Per-category-specific search requests (e.g. Books, Music, Movies) All Bittorrent extensions DHT, Peer Exchange, Full encryption, Magnet/BitComet URIs, ... Remote control through a Web user interface Nearly identical to the regular UI, all in Ajax Advanced control over trackers, peers and torrents Torrents queueing and prioritizing Torrent content selection and prioritizing UPnP / NAT-PMP port forwarding support Available in ~25 languages (Unicode support) Torrent creation tool Advanced RSS support with download filters (inc. regex) Bandwidth scheduler IP Filtering (eMule and PeerGuardian compatible) IPv6 compliant Available on most platforms: Linux, Mac OS X, Windows, OS/2, FreeBSD qBittorrent 5.2.2 changelog: FEATURE: Use D-Bus to show file in file managers (Chocobo1) #24340 BUGFIX: Fix friendlyUnitCompact precision calculation (vafada) #24323 BUGFIX: Remove all top-level folders (glassez) #24333 BUGFIX: Use proper API for checking exit status (Chocobo1) #24349 BUGFIX: Delete stale lockfile when hostname mismatch (TurboTheTurtle, glassez) #24363 BUGFIX: Fix wrong removal procedure of watched folder paths (Chocobo1) #24413 BUGFIX: Don't reannounce before interface changes are applied (glassez) #24447 BUGFIX: Use Latin script for Bosnian locale name (Andy Ye) #24342 WEBUI: Fix performance of global checkbox toggling (tehcneko) #24316 WEBUI: Fix Safari transfer list header misalignment (Piccirello) #24377 WEBUI: Fix error when submitting magnet before metadata loads (Piccirello) #24378 WEBUI: Use correct row id when updating Rss Downloader feed selection (Chocobo1) #24402 WEBUI: Use SameSite=Lax for session cookie to fix cross-site login (Piccirello) #24422 WEBUI: Bring back properties panel expand/collapse button (vafada) #24430 WEBAPI: Only use X-Forwarded-Host header when reverse proxy support is enabled (Chocobo1) #24457 RSSS: Fix "RSS Smart Episode Filter" RegEx (nathanon-akk, glassez) #24398 RSS: Fix previously matched episode format (glassez) #24452 WINDOWS: Fix Python fallback search path (TurboTheTurtle) #24325 WINDOWS: NSIS: Allow to install x64 binary on ARM64 (Chocobo1) #24358 Download: qBittorrent 5.2.2 | 41.1 MB (Open Source) Download: qBittorrent 64-bit installer (qt6) | 43.6 MB Links: qBittorrent Home page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Veteran
      branfont went up a rank
      Veteran
    • Reacting Well
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Cosminus earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      126
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      87
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!