Recommended Posts

Well, it's a complex statisical method. You've got to factor in trends, user demographics, and various other metrics into the equation. And this isn't just a simple binomial or gaussian distrobution, because of dealing with all these dimensions. Several regressions have to be performed to normalize the data set into something workable for a final true number.

585007297[/snapback]

Follow this logic. :wacko:

Riiiiight - looks a bit uneccesary to me :rolleyes:

585009895[/snapback]

yeah I don't think it 100% needed but it kind of neat

but if you keep it is there a way to put ratings in a email. So when you get a new topic notifcation you could see if it worth visiting

It encourages good posting habits and draws your attention to good content on the forums (and, conversely, away from bad content). Considering a small subset of users have bitched about how "downhill" the site is going, this is a way to counteract that by encouraging good posting habits.

Edit: It's also absolutely perfect for the reviews and visual styles forums. People can rate reviews and styles for content :)

I don't think this will make any difference as far as someone's posting habits are concerned. Why would a member care if a thread got a bad rating just because of his post? Are members really going to strive to get threads a good rating? I dont think so.

It encourages good posting habits and draws your attention to good content on the forums (and, conversely, away from bad content). Considering a small subset of users have bitched about how "downhill" the site is going, this is a way to counteract that by encouraging good posting habits.

Edit: It's also absolutely perfect for the reviews and visual styles forums. People can rate reviews and styles for content :)

585010363[/snapback]

Tim,

I think you should make a FORUM WIDE ANNOUCEMENT (IPB Announcement) that RATINGS EXIST. Just like the one you made when we were introduced to "Neowin 3.9".

I haven't seen 1 other thread with a viewable rating other than this one.

I lowered the threshold to 7 votes to counteract that. We've got 635 votes as of right now (about 15 hours after inception), so I think that's a good amount. I may lower it to 5 if we still haven't gotten a lot of rated topics by tommorrow. It's still a tweaking process, which is why I haven't made an annoucement yet.

I lowered the threshold to 7 votes to counteract that. We've got 635 votes as of right now (about 15 hours after inception), so I think that's a good amount. I may lower it to 5 if we still haven't gotten a lot of rated topics by tommorrow. It's still a tweaking process, which is why I haven't made an annoucement yet.

585010415[/snapback]

ok.. good news. I put a link in my sig.. that'll help get the word out ;)

Transfer Page issue again ;)

Find:

Thanks, Your vote has been added.
Topics need 10 votes before the total vote is shown publicly.

Change to

Thanks, Your vote has been added.
Topics need 7 votes before the total vote is shown publicly.

585006850[/snapback]

Keep abreast on that tim as you keep modifying the number required to see the rating.

I don't think this will make any difference as far as someone's posting habits are concerned. Why would a member care if a thread got a bad rating just because of his post? Are members really going to strive to get threads a good rating? I dont think so.

585010391[/snapback]

It may not change certain people's posting habits, but if a handful of people have read the thread and it's truly terrible, they can vote which will let others know not to bother.

That, and it will save people from having to scroll down through tons of posts like "This sux!" and " :x " and " (N) " for pages.

I hope people will get in the habit of rating every thread they read, be it good, bad or mediocre. :)

i dont like it :(

i think the yellow is kinda weak... i know its like a stop sign

red = 1-2? low

yellow = 3-4 middle..

green = 5 good?

but i dont like the yellow look :s sorry

and the mouse over on the rating is very nice... but you should use something other then thumbs?

I've just put in place the code for thread ratings. You can now rate topics to encourage good posting habits (or discourage bad ones). Any topic requires 10 votes before you can see it's rating, so that someone (or someones) can't take over the vote. You get one vote per thread, so make it count!

Let me know any bugs you find, but it should be secure against haX0ring and such ;)

585006745[/snapback]

Please think twice about your last line :unsure: If I find anything I'll contact you (same as last time :rofl: )

i dont like it :(

i think the yellow is kinda weak...  i know its like a stop sign

red = 1-2? low

yellow = 3-4 middle..

green = 5 good?

but i dont like the yellow look :s  sorry

and the mouse over on the rating is very nice...  but you should use something other then thumbs?

585011109[/snapback]

Don't worry, those images are only temporary. I'm still waiting on some updated graphics from the gfx team :D

Please think twice about your last line  :unsure: If I find anything I'll contact you (same as last time  :rofl: )

585011208[/snapback]

Trust me, you can't hack it. There are no SQL injection tricks or overflows you can do with it. Every input is intval()'d and checked for validity first....

Would it be possible to use a post-by-post rating, and then have the average of the rating of all the user's post under their name in a  thread?

585012577[/snapback]

yeah, like a member rating. an average rating of a user's posts. i've seen a feature similar to this on other board systems.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Audacious 4.6.1 by Razvan Serea Audacious is a lightweight, open-source audio player that emphasizes simplicity, performance, and sound quality. Designed for Linux, Windows, and macOS, it supports a wide range of audio formats, internet radio streaming, and playlist management. Users can customize the interface with Winamp-style skins or modern themes, making it flexible for different preferences. Audacious also includes an equalizer, advanced audio effects, and a plugin system for extending functionality. Its low resource usage makes it especially suitable for older computers or users who value efficiency without sacrificing playback quality. Audacious key features: High audio quality – delivers clean, gapless playback with minimal distortion. Wide format support – plays MP3, FLAC, Ogg Vorbis, AAC, WAV, WMA, and more. Internet radio streaming – supports Shoutcast, Icecast, and other online streams. Winamp skin support – classic, nostalgic look for users who prefer the old-school style. Modern GTK-based interface – clean, simple UI with a more modern feel. Customizable themes – change appearance through skins and themes. Advanced playlist management – organize, save, and edit playlists with ease. Equalizer – fine-tune audio output with a built-in graphical equalizer. Audio effects – built-in DSP options like crossfade, replay gain, and more. Plugin system – extend functionality with additional components. File metadata support – displays and organizes music based on tags. Drag-and-drop support – quickly add songs or playlists. Global hotkey support – control playback without switching windows. Bit-perfect output modes – bypass system mixers for pure audio output. ReplayGain support – normalizes track loudness automatically. Cue sheet support – play entire albums from a single audio file with .cue. MPRIS2 integration – integrates with Linux desktop environments for media controls. Advanced resampling options – adjust playback quality with different resampler settings. Gapless playback – seamless transition between tracks encoded properly. Crossfade plugin – blend one song into the next smoothly. Last.fm scrobbling plugin – track listening history online. Remote control support – control Audacious via command-line or scripts. Lyrics plugin – display song lyrics if available. Alarm / timer plugin – start or stop playback at set times. SOX resampler plugin – high-quality resampling for audiophiles. Spectrum analyzer / visualization plugins – visual feedback while playing music. Headphone crossfeed effect – simulates speaker listening for headphones. Customizable buffer size – tweak latency and playback smoothness. Audacious 4.6.1 changelog: Use XDG cache dir to store temporary files (#1817) Accept embedded lyrics in more cases (#1818) Bump .so and plugin ABI versions retrospectively (#1819) Include Georgian translation (#1820) Fix build on systems using musl instead of glibc (#1823) Download: Audacious 4.6.1 | 48.2 MB (Open Source) Download: Portable Audacious 4.6.1 | 69.8 MB View: Audacious Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I really wonder if this has to do with the built in VPN or "private DNS" of browsers that trip up legal requirements like cookie consent and Cloudflare (to avoid all the botnet attacks we get). And BTW some botnets still manage to get past Cloudflare, we are constantly having to tweak it to block malicious traffic that ultimately cause a DDoS.
    • CPPC states can also be messed around with in most UEFI settings but aren't as robust as the ones that the Windows Scheduler can provide! Make sure you look into what your motherboard also has before customizing for the Windows Scheduler.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      197
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      142
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!